Magician Turned Professor Talks About the Math Behind Shuffling Cards
An anonymous reader writes with this story about magician and professor of mathematics and statistics at Stanford University Persi Diaconis. "Now a professor of mathematics and statistics at Stanford University, Diaconis has employed his intuition about cards, which he calls 'the poetry of magic,' in a wide range of settings. Once, for example, he helped decode messages passed between inmates at a California state prison by using small random 'shuffles' to gradually improve a decryption key. He has also analyzed Bose-Einstein condensation — in which a collection of ultra-cold atoms coalesces into a single 'superatom' — by envisioning the atoms as rows of cards moving around. This makes them 'friendly,' said Diaconis, whose speech still carries the inflections of his native New York City. 'We all have our own basic images that we translate things into, and for me cards were where I started.' In 1992, Diaconis famously proved — along with the mathematician Dave Bayer of Columbia University — that it takes about seven ordinary riffle shuffles to randomize a deck. Over the years, Diaconis and his students and colleagues have successfully analyzed the effectiveness of almost every type of shuffle people use in ordinary life."
to complete randomness, is to leave an open pack sitting on the floor and let loose the kittens.
I'm a very special type of magician, I'm a MATH-emagician
Brady Haran on Numberphile has a series of interviews with Persi Diaconis: https://www.youtube.com/playli...
Elen sìla lùmenn' omentielvo
This topic might have warranted a video, considering it's a demo. It would sure beat all the "some dude talks about something for flipping forever" videos Slashdice keeps trying to dump on us instead.
And it varies with each individual shuffler, deck of cards, etc.
To call such a thing a "proof" is an insult to actual mathematical proofs. To use such a definition of "random" is outright blasphemy.
It can be proved empirically that this is a correct theory - the longer you shuffle cards, the more random sequence you have.
Not true. There is a limit to entropy of a collection of objects, and once you reach this limit, any change to the system can only to be a reduction in the degree of entropy in the system. Also, it is entirely possible, (if unlikely) that you can shuffle a randomized deck of cards into sequential order.
HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...