Slashdot Mirror


Social Science Journal 'Bans' Use of p-values

sandbagger writes: Editors of Basic and Applied Social Psychology announced in a February editorial that researchers who submit studies for publication would not be allowed to use common statistical methods, including p-values. While p-values are routinely misused in scientific literature, many researchers who understand its proper role are upset about the ban. Biostatistician Steven Goodman said, "This might be a case in which the cure is worse than the disease. The goal should be the intelligent use of statistics. If the journal is going to take away a tool, however misused, they need to substitute it with something more meaningful."

4 of 208 comments (clear)

  1. A Bayesian Conspiracy by PvtVoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a war, I tell you, a war on frequentists! I'm 95% certain!

  2. Re:What's the problem? by monkeyzoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is social science. Mathematics and statistics aren't even relevant.

    Correlation between low intelligence and uninformed statements of this nature is p<0.01.

  3. p-values are routinely misused ... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is why we can't have nice things.

  4. Re:What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not a big fan of college, eh?