Slashdot Mirror


YouTube Going Dark On Older Devices

PC Mag reports on changes to the YouTube API, which have rendered YouTube apps inoperable on older consoles, smart TVs, and other video streaming devices. They're doing this because the old version of the API doesn't support some of YouTube's newer features. Newer devices might be able to upgrade — Apple handhelds that can run iOS 7 or later will have no problem, nor will 3rd-gen Apple TVs and devices running Google TV 3 or 4. But earlier Apple TVs and Google TVs running version 2 or earlier will be out of luck.

6 of 129 comments (clear)

  1. It's not surprising by msobkow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's what happens when you rely on a vendor instead of a ratified standard. Can you imagine the uproar if older HDTV tuners suddenly stopped working with new broadcasts? People were upset enough that the old analogue signals were obsolesced!

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:It's not surprising by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When YouTube started there was no standard for streaming video. The only working options were things like Flash and RealPlayer, so they went with Flash. Now they are moving to HTML5 and that's the problem - older devices don't support it.

      The real issue is that tech companies are not used to providing software for consumer products. In the UK smart television are covered by the Sale of Goods Act. The Act says that they must last a "reasonable length of time". For a moderately priced television you would expect at least 5 years out of it, more for an expensive one. If it fails before that time you can take the vendor (not the manufacturer, the shop where you bought it) to court and argue your case, and will be entitled to compensation for lost functionality. Say the TV dies after three years, you might get 50% of the purchase price back because it only lasted half as long as you would reasonably expect it to.

      Loss of functionality due to discontinuation of service is new but seems to be covered by existing conventions. If part of a product breaks and the vendor can't fix it you can get compensation. That was the basis for the £85 refund on a Playstation 3 some guy got from Amazon when Sony removed the Other OS feature.

      I own a high end Panasonic plasma TV. It is the year after the ones that are being cut off, but I was worried for a while. I use YouTube every day on it. If it were to break down and stop showing YouTube, a feature I specifically wanted when I bought it, I'd go back to the shop and ask for compensation, say 30% of the purchase price. Alternatively they could offer me an alternative, like a new TV or perhaps a smart BluRay player, assuming I could add it to my system without breaking my existing set-up. I'd also settle for say £80 to cover the cost of an Amazon FireTV stick.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:It's not surprising by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When YouTube started there was no standard for streaming video. The only working options were things like Flash and RealPlayer, so they went with Flash. Now they are moving to HTML5 and that's the problem - older devices don't support it.

      No, the problem is not Flash or HTML5.

      The problem is that the old YouTube players were much better than the current one, because well, they didn't support ads.

      The new YouTube apps support the Google APIs and they return ads, both the pop up and interstitials, while the old APIs didn't support it.

      Back when YouTube was in the old days of getting marketshare, and API use is low, it made sense. These days, with Google monetizing stuff, well, they need all youtube players to support ads.

  2. Re:Stripped down version by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So offer people with older devices a version without those features.

    Do you recall the last time you saw a "dumb" DVD or Blu-Ray player for sale that did not have "those" features?

    Yeah, me neither. Seems they outlawed them.

    TVs aren't far behind either, and soon neither will cars. What was a $20,000 base model that had these things called "options" has now become the $30,000 "base" model with all this in-dash/online crap standard.

    After all, shouldn't everyone need to upgrade their new car/TV/appliance as often as your smartphone due to obsolescence?

    Vendors think so.

  3. Re:Expected lifetime 3 years. by a.koepke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And this is why I never bothered with a SmartTV. Aside from the HD TV tuner, I prefer my TV to be just a monitor. Give me ports and let me plug in other devices which provide smart functionality like a Raspberry Pi or Chromecast or console, etc.

    I watch YouTube on my TV. Find the video via the Android App, share it with the Kodi remote app and it starts playing on my TV. Easy.

    --


    (\(\
    (^.^)
    (")")
    *This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread
  4. Atari by Wild_dog! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Still mad I could never get Youtube working on my Atari 800.
    Now this!!!!