Slashdot Mirror


How and Why the U-Pick Game Marathon Raises Money With Non-Stop Gaming (Video)

On June 12 through 14th of this year, the fourth (not "fourth annual," but close) iteration of the U-Pick Video Game Marathon for Charity --“UPickVG IV” for short --will be streaming on an Internet connection near you. The U-Pick crew's volunteers will be playing and broadcasting video games, non-stop, as a fundraiser for Charity Water, a cause they've supported since the beginning. I talked with organizers Stephanie and Grant Kibler from their video-game lounge of a living room about what it takes to broadcast an online gathering like this, and why they've adopted this as an annual event. Hint: some esoteric video-capture hardware helps, and so does a beefy network connection, for high-quality streaming of games that pre-date today's multiplayer, network-oriented options. That's significant, because U-Pick's stable of titles isn't limited to modern ones, and observers are encouraged to suggest appropriate games (hence "U-Pick").The remote viewers' choices and donations influence the event by deciding which games are represented on the Wheel of Destiny that the team spins to decide which games get played.The play itself, though,*is* limited to the players who'll be on hand at a Northern Virginia co-working space that will serve as this year's venue. It turns out to be easier to stream the output of old consoles than it is to control them from remote (never mind the latency that would mean), but maybe one day participants will be able to play as well as shoulder-surf and laugh at the players' running commentary. You can check out the Upick page on Facebook, too, and watch one of their practice runs each Sunday. (Note: Video #1 talks mostly about the game play and how you can join. Video #2 - below - talks more about hardware and behind-the-scenes work.)

34 comments

  1. Re:quick, someone pick E.T. on the 2600. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    @rr-n41 $3x tæ$Ts g0DO. mUHc gOd0. yOu w4N/T$ i4?

  2. Games Done Quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wow, this is just like Awesome Games Done Quick (AGDQ) and Summer Games Done Quick (SGDQ)
    https://gamesdonequick.com/

    1. Re:Games Done Quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Desert Bus for Hope is another streaming charity that does stuff like this as well. Of course they only play Desert Bus so while it might be fun to pay money to subject someone else to the game, it isn't the most fun to watch, but the group can make it entertaining.

    2. Re:Games Done Quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This. Fuck you timothy for choosing to promote some group nobody has ever heard of. AGDQ/SGDQ have been going for years, raising funds for Doctor's Without Borders and the Prevent Cancer Foundation. They run for 24 hours for an entire week, twice a year.

    3. Re:Games Done Quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also they are speedrunners, not letsplayers, which means they are actually good at playing games.

    4. Re:Games Done Quick by Nehmo · · Score: 1

      Every "charity" that I've looked into was actually a money-making enterprise disguised as a benevolent one. Some of them have exposed publically, like Easter Seals, Boy's Home, and the Clinton Foundation. In these organizations, a small proportion of the collected money actually goes to the advertised cause, but that's just for show.

      To add to the list, a guy was staying at my house for a while who previously worked for Make A Wish Foundation. He talked like almost 100% of the money went to those who collect it. In fact, while he was at the house, he was collecting for the Fire Department's book on fire safety for children. In reality, there was no such book.

      Thus, anytime I hear the word "charity", I think "rip-off".

      If you want to give money, find the recipient yourself and give directly. If you must use a big organization to move your funds, make sure it's ran by someone you trust.

      Regarding the charity the article is about, I don't know anything. But, to me, it smells funny.

      --
      (||) Nehmo (||)
  3. And no one cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not that I can blame anyone.

    First off, not watching video, Slashdot. Not now, not ever. Stop doing video content. You're a news aggregator. You aren't a content creator. Accept it. Live with it.

    Secondly, who wants to watch people play video games over the Internet, even if it is "for charity"? I can think of better things to do than watch a bunch of neckbeards slowly sit themselves to death in front of a flickering screen. Like watch golf, or paint dry. I will never understand why "streaming people playing video games" is a thing. Why does anyone watch?! Do you want to watch me playing Solitaire by myself? What the hell is WRONG with people?!

    1. Re:And no one cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Secondly, who wants to watch people play video games over the Internet

      Millions of people that aren't you.

    2. Re:And no one cares by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      First off, not watching video, Slashdot. Not now, not ever. Stop doing video content. You're a news aggregator. You aren't a content creator. Accept it. Live with it.

      I couldn't agree more.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    3. Re:And no one cares by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Secondly, who wants to watch people play video games over the Internet, even if it is "for charity"?

      Other people who are not you. Take a look around you some time - there are a lot of them in the world.

      I can think of better things to do than watch a bunch of neckbeards slowly sit themselves to death in front of a flickering screen.

      But you can't think of something better to do than complain about what other people like to do?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:And no one cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I DON'T UNDERSTAND SOMETHING SO I AM GOING TO ASSUME EVERYONE ELSE IS WRONG.

      How could anyone want to watch football. It is just other people playing a silly game. I can think of better things to do than watch doped up jocks tackle each other. Like do my taxes, or call Comcast customer support. I will never understand why "running a ball on flat land" ever became a thing. What the hell is WRONG with people?

    5. Re:And no one cares by neminem · · Score: 1

      Now I'm imagining "competitive Comcast customer support calling", where teams compete to see who can get Comcast to actually fix their problem fastest.

      I would totally watch that over football.

    6. Re: And no one cares by Roblimo · · Score: 1

      If you don't want to watch Slashdot videos, don't. If you want the *information* in them, read the verbatim transcripts we include with almost every one. And if you don't like the info in our videos, Don't click on them.

        Believe it or not, many different people look at Slashdot every day. Some want to read about *BSD, some want science news. Some -- usually many thousands -- watch the videos, while 10 (on average) complain about them. I learned long ago that not every story on Slashdot is going to please everyone. Such is life.

      AND if you think you can do better or more informative videos than we do, XLNT! Submit a video -- or maybe an idea for one, along with links to videos you've done elsewhere. We stay simple on purpose, because our job in these videos is to introduce you to the people in them, often with a "you are there" feel at conferences and shows where background noise is part of the environment. Remember that we are not looking for star wipes and such. We can do them as well as anyone else, but we know that just because you *can* do something doesn't mean you *should*.

      Something that happened all the way back in 2000: We did a reader-generated questions interview with Metallica drummer Lars Ulrich. He'd been complaining that nobody was ever fair to him; that they edited his words to twist their meanings. So, being us, Timothy talked to Lars for hours because Lars said it would have to be verbal, that he wasn't going to do all that typing. So Timothy transcribed every word of that interview verbatim, including every "uh" and mumble and obscenity.

      Lars was not thrilled to be quoted verbatim even though that's what he said he wanted. But that interview gave Slashdot people a better sense of who Lars was as a person than all the laundered interviews in the world.

      So we do video interviews with people a Slashdot editor considers interesting, often after a reader suggests interviewing that person (and includes contact information). Or they're people Timothy meets at conferences and trade shows. Some interviewees are making major contributions in one field or another. Some think they are, but aren't. Some are well-known. Some aren't - - but should be. And some live in obscurity and should stay there.

      It's a mixed bag. I say again: if you want to suggest video interview subjects *or* want to be interviewed yourself *or* do an interview, let's go!

      - Rob

      PS - Slashdot has always done a little original content, and for many years was associated with original content sites NewsForge and Linux.com. If you dip into the pool of internet content every day, shouldn't you be obliged to add to it? :)

    7. Re:And no one cares by Roblimo · · Score: 1

      This is a "don't give me any ideas" idea. I don't live in Comcast territory myself, but could moderate/narrate. Get some people who have webcams and speaker phones *and* have Comcast, and.... email robin at roblimodotcom and we'll see if we can make it happen

    8. Re: And no one cares by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Our problem is those of us who have set our preferences to now show images or video links still get this.

      Which means the editors are by-passing our selected preferences to hawk their own crap.

      We don't care if you post videos. But having them forcibly show up in our news feed against the settings we've selected?

      That's just plain annoying.

      In no other story this week do I see images or embedded video. And yet when timothy posts something, there it is.

      So how about you guys stop making your own posts extra special and obey the rules of the user settings instead of just bypassing them and deciding to show it to us anyway?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re: And no one cares by Roblimo · · Score: 1

      If you submit a video and we run it, it would show up in the feed, too. I haven't seen this behavior myself, but I'll try to replicate it. Thanks for the heads-up.

    10. Re: And no one cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an AC and a nigger I approve of this comment, coming from the black maker community.

    11. Re:And no one cares by linkdude64 · · Score: 1

      STOP LIKING WHAT I DON'T LIKE

      "Get off my lawn you selfless charitable bastards!", "Misogyny!" , etc., etc.

    12. Re:And no one cares by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      Speedruns. That is the keyword.
      That said, lets plays are generally awful.

    13. Re:And no one cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does anyone pay to see someone stand on stage and tell jokes when they could tell jokes themselves? Because the people you are watching are (presumably) more entertaining than you.

  4. It's good to be the charity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    in 2013, the selected charity siphoned (heh) off about $10M from a $35M cash flow for "operations", of which 70% went for the salaries of 67 people. That's about $100K per person...not bad for a...er..."nonprofit."

    Annual report: http://www.charitywater.org/about/cw_13_annual_report.pdf

    1. Re:It's good to be the charity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only $100k / person in San Fran? I'm surprised they can afford to live somewhere nicer than in a carboard box on the curb.

    2. Re:It's good to be the charity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... except not. In that very annual report you linked, on the very page you reference (page 31), it explains how none of charity: water's operational costs come out of public donations: "Our operational costs are covered entirely by the generous private donors of our membership program, The Well, as well as a handful of corporate partners. Our largest operational investment is our talented team. In 2013, we brought on 24 new staff members, ending the year with 67 employees. But even while we grow, we continue to keep our 100% promise, and we never use public donations to cover operational expenses."

    3. Re:It's good to be the charity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      charity: water is actually headquartered in New York City... but yeah, same deal.

    4. Re:It's good to be the charity by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      in 2013, the selected charity siphoned (heh) off about $10M from a $35M cash flow for "operations", of which 70% went for the salaries of 67 people. That's about $100K per person...not bad for a...er..."nonprofit."

      Where did you get the idea that "nonprofit" means, "we don't pay our employees"? Or, "we pay our employees shit"?

      It's as dumb as thinking "for-profit" means, "we pay all of our employees well".

      Harvard University is a non-profit, and last I checked, they're paying their professors pretty well. Rush Presbyterian hospital is a non-profit, but the head of surgery probably makes more than minimum wage.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  5. You Would Think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...that San Fran, the fucking center of the Liberal Universe, would spend its own fucking money to clean up its own fucking bay.

  6. Desert Bus for Hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://desertbus.org/

    They've been doing something like this for the last 6 years in Victoria BC, except instead of the public picking the game the organizers deliberately chose the worst game ever created. So if you're a true sadist, ask them to play Desert Bus.

    Also, is it just me or does the Slashdot login and posting system now suck massive balls? I've logged in 3 times and it either forces me to post as an AC or it refuses to believe I'm a human. Well done /., well done.

    1. Re:Desert Bus for Hope by Roblimo · · Score: 2

      I've had problems logging in and sometimes can't post as other than AC even when logged it, too. Try emailing feedback@slashdot.org. That should bring your comment to the attention of people who can help. (I'm can't help because I'm an old retired guy now, and do a little work on Slashdot videos as a contractor.)

  7. playing video games... by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 0

    I know that a stupid Greek like me should not talk about productivity, but: some people play video games for some charity, and some other people watch the people that play video games for charity, and donate to that charity because they watched some people playing video games for some charity...

    --
    Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
  8. Psh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems like a sketchy cash-grab on the part of some gamers and a charity that, to me, barely qualifies as such.

    And there are much better-run and more-worthy charity gaming marathons to give your money to. Twice a year, there's a Games Done Quick (GDQ) marathon (Awesome GDQ in winter, Summer GDQ in summer) put on by the speed-run communities around the web. AGDQ raises funds for the Prevent Cancer Foundation, and SGDQ raises funds for Doctors Without Borders.

    So why would I watch a bunch of twits do random unskilled (because they can't pick their own, they can't be truly prepared to play well) playthroughs for a charity that cleans up a mess that should be a local area's tax/bond issue, when I can watch the infinitely more interesting skilled playthroughs and races that the GDQ's put on, and for charities that try to overcome external (not self-inflicted like pollution) healthcare and societal issues common to all humankind?

  9. Desert Bus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No disrespect for any of the others doing this kind of thing, and especially not that one -- Desert Bus for Hope is another one we'd love to highlight. Desert Bus has been one of my favorite things since the first time I heard of it, and anything involving Penn & Teller is generally improved by that involvement.

  10. Re:quick, someone pick E.T. on the 2600. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This actually happened U-Pick's first year. There were 3 straight hours of Atari 2600 games, including ET.

  11. Everyone should be requesting Desert Bus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... make them work for it.