Slashdot Mirror


Liquid Mercury Found Under Mexican Pyramid

An anonymous reader writes: An archaeologist has discovered liquid mercury at the end of a tunnel beneath a Mexican pyramid, a finding that could suggest the existence of a king's tomb or a ritual chamber far below one of the most ancient cities of the Americas. Mexican researcher Sergio Gómez ... has spent six years slowly excavating the tunnel, which was unsealed in 2003 after 1,800 years. Last November, Gómez and a team announced they had found three chambers at the tunnel’s 300ft end, almost 60ft below the the temple. Near the entrance of the chambers, they a found trove of strange artifacts: jade statues, jaguar remains, a box filled with carved shells and rubber balls.

133 comments

  1. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And I thought a real king should have had solid mercury in his tomb!

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      A real king has Freddy Mercury in his tomb. (Or preferably all of Queen.)

    2. Re:Wow by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Originally he did, but because of Man's imperialist and engineeringist hubris the climate warmed so much that the mercury is liquid today.

    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Originally he did, but because of Man's imperialist and engineeringist hubris the climate warmed so much that the mercury is liquid today.

      Premises:

      1. The freezing/melting point for mercury is approximately -39 C,
      2. part of Mexico (south of the Tropic of Cancer) is considered tropical.

      Conclusion:

      I'm glad the climate has warmed since then.

    4. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      DENIER!

    5. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DENIER!

      The 1984 center fielder for the Cubs?

    6. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol , I mean really lol
      I was think the same thing.ha

    7. Re: Wow by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      No, the measure of sheerness of stockings. Mmmmm nylon.

  2. Solids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Meanwhile, liquid pyramids have been spotted on Mercury.

  3. Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do not activate the gate.
    Do not activate the gate.
    DO NOT ACTIVATE THE GATE!

    1. Re: Do not by ledow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, fuck off.

      They heated cinnabar ore. You get mercury when you do that. These people had metal, mined, and could build vast structures that weigh more than any skyscraper did for millennia after them.

      You don't need a supernatural explanation that they found a liquid metal (a liquid mirror, in effect) fucking intriguing and so prized it as some kind of treasure to bury with their kings.

      That people in these ancient eras had brains seemed to be frowned upon, as if we're the only humans who could be allowed to do that. Ancient Greek, ancient Egyptian, etc. civilisations all had astounding knowledge and abilities. Just because they were never able to fully capitalise on them and then we suffered a few thousand years of poxy ignorance doesn't mean they weren't geniuses. (Just so happens that several of those millennia were dominated by religious shit, Crusades, etc.).

      Antikythera (extremes of "clockwork", gearing and mathematical technology), pyramids, battery technology, steam-powered engines, railways, they had a shit-ton of expertise, but the problem was that the insights were few and far between and hard to do, and secondary to surviving for the most part, so unfortunately they never were able to be joined together in the way we could do now.

      Fuck your aliens. Pay your respects to thousands of years of education, science, inquisitiveness, some of the greatest minds who ever lived, single individuals who knew all of established science for their time, amazing insights, and artisans capable of creating their off-the-wall ideas using some of the most difficult craftsmanships in existence.

    2. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not saying it was aliens - but it was aliens....

    3. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've harnessed the power of red mercury . What's under the pyramid is most likely a precursor, held for when they return

    4. Re: Do not by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      Lots of theories about the demise of these civilizations. I don't recall mercury poisoning being discussed as a contributor, but it seems plausible.

    5. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That people in these ancient eras had brains seemed to be frowned upon, as if we're the only humans who could be allowed to do that.

      Considering what can be seen of what we now do with our brains, I would say people in these ancient eras were way brainier than we.

    6. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They heated Cinnabon rolls. You get fat when you do that.

      FTFY.

    7. Re: Do not by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Informative

      In addition to being cool stuff, mercury also has a very long history of use in gold extraction. I don't know about the people who built this particular structure; but mercury-amalgamation gold extraction is known to have been in use in South America well before the Spanish showed up. Given the human enthusiasm for gold, that's another point in mercury's favor as a funerary good, along with being weird and cool looking.

      (Large scale extraction is now usually done by cyanide leaching, since that's somewhat less nasty than mercury amalgamation; but small scale miners often still use mercury. As one might imagine, the 'now heat the amalgam with a blowtorch to drive off the mercury and recover the gold' step is about as good for you as it sounds, possibly worse.)

    8. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's come up, with it being used as a medicinal aid and possible playtoy.

    9. Re: Do not by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fuck your aliens.

      I know, right? It wasn't aliens that built the pyramids, or anything supernatural. It's stupid to think that.

      Everybody knows it was Anunnaki, our ancestors, the Shining Ones, who gave this technology to humans over 250,000 years ago.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re: Do not by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Pay your respects to thousands of years of education, science, inquisitiveness, some of the greatest minds who ever lived, single individuals who knew all of established science for their time, amazing insights, and artisans capable of creating their off-the-wall ideas using some of the most difficult craftsmanships in existence.

      THIS!

      Ah yes, the" Ancient Aliens" mindset of some folks. It's so damn amazing how some people assume that humans are all too stupid to have ever done anything worthwhile or clever, and needed "aliens" to come teach us.

      People have their problems. We like to kill each other for fun, and we can be really nasty to each other at other times. But we're actually pretty damned smart when you think about it. Our ancestors were capable of a lot of amazing things, and there really isn't the need to invoke beings that had to come help us because humans are soooo stoopid. An intelligent person from say Pharonic times, would be able to understand modern technology after some exposure to it. They weren't stupid, not even close.

      Having watched that AA show a few times, it is just one long argument from personal incredulity. And the problem with accepting arguments from personal incredulity is that the biggest idiot in the room always wins.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re: Do not by JimSadler · · Score: 2

      Even in more modern times we see unusual abilities in those on the edges of society. One famous Hatfield from the famous Hatfield and McCoy feud era complained that people who could read had awful memories as they tended to always look things up.

    12. Re: Do not by penguinoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not jumping to conclusions, but the people who have been making the case for historical alien visitors

      Although I acknowledge that they're good workers, you should know that Mexicans aren't considered aliens in Mexico.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    13. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In roman times you got called an "ink-drinker" for reading/writing too much.

    14. Re: Do not by peragrin · · Score: 2

      Exactly. The big trick way back when was a limited written history. When craving into stone tablets you only hit the highlights and none of the gritty details. So people ended up duplicating each other's work hundreds if not thousands of times before paper copies started getting created. And even once we had paper the data was so far separate from each other that compiling and knowing what was in the complications took another couple of thousand years.

      Even today you can't get all of human knowledge easily. you have to duplicate someone else's work a lot of the time. Just look at Operating Systems and the not invented here ideology in software. And that is with easily transmitted data.

      Useful things like making weapons, and making beer got passed down verbally, as those would save lives. but spoken and memory communication is at best a hit or miss affair. It is why I wonder why we want to talk to computers as it is a horrible method of data transmittal.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    15. Re: Do not by CanEHdian · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The big trick way back when was a limited written history. When craving into stone tablets you only hit the highlights and none of the gritty details. So people ended up duplicating each other's work hundreds if not thousands of times before paper copies started getting created.

      Savages! Wonder why it took that long for Copyright to be invented.

      --
      When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
    16. Re:Do not by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      This is not gate, this is fifth element.

      This is supreme being.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    17. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That "religious shit" is what made modern science possible. The monks preserved the ancient knowledge that would have otherwise been lost and they developed the universities and the science, too. Bone up on your Western Civ, buddy..

    18. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That people in these ancient eras had brains seemed to be frowned upon, as if we're the only humans who could be allowed to do that. Ancient Greek, ancient Egyptian, etc. civilisations all had astounding knowledge and abilities. Just because they were never able to fully capitalise on them and then we suffered a few thousand years of poxy ignorance doesn't mean they weren't geniuses. (Just so happens that several of those millennia were dominated by religious shit, Crusades, etc.).

      Funny that you're the one underestimating the people of the past now. You know how we developed science in the first place? It started with the philosophical notion that a rational God would make a rational universe that could be understood by humans. And the idea that the world obeyed immutable rules was the missing piece that kept the geniuses of the past from figuring out how to acquire scientific knowledge systematically.

    19. Re: Do not by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      lead poisoning is, though.

    20. Re: Do not by dbIII · · Score: 2

      lead poisoning is, though.

      Only if you do something as insane in hindsight as put lead acetate in the wine as a cheap sweetener. Lead pipes give you tiny trace amounts. Guzzling down cheap vino with a lead based sweetener like the Romans did is a few orders of magnitude more.
      The lead pipes myth came from someone who knew about the poisoning but not about the wine so made a bit of a guess - lucky for us a wrong one since there's still some lead plumbing around.

    21. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dang, now I'm hungry for a Cinnabon roll.

      Curse you.

    22. Re: Do not by Mashiki · · Score: 0

      I dunno about that, all I have to do is look at southern califorina then remember that many homes have high to very high levels of lead in the drinking water.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    23. Re: Do not by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I read that the silverware was made of silver for royalty, but commoner's flatware was lead, and lead pots, lead utensils lead to lead poisoning. IT wasn't just the pipes, but that almost everything metal was made from lead (aside from things like armor and things for royalty).

    24. Re: Do not by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      They don't just do that for ancient peoples. I've heard theories about modern technology coming from aliens. The great minds from 70 years ago to today that developed the computer technology that almost everyone on Slashdot benefits from? Ada Lovelace? Alan Turing? The geniuses at Bell Labs? Fairchild?

      Nope. Aliens.

      If one of us make something amazing, you can count on some group saying aliens did it, and it'll only take a generation or two.

    25. Re: Do not by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      In modern history, we're known to do things with uranium and lead that we shouldn't have. Today we continue to muck about with chemicals in things with unpredictable results on our fertility and fetal development. So I say that sort of thing should not only be possible, but remains a contributing factor to our potential decline.

    26. Re: Do not by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 0

      Lots of theories about the demise of these civilizations.

      As Jared Diamond said, all you need are: Guns, Germans and Steel. If you buy a Heckler & Koch MP7, you get three in one, and are ready to conquer South America.

      Hey, you da big Inca? You think you bad, mutha fucka . . . ? Meet Heckler & Koch!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    27. Re: Do not by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think you're thinking of pewter; tin, often (in the past) alloyed with lead.

      Of course, for decades we burned leaded gasoline in our engines since it reduced knock so wonderfully, so there are several hundred ppm of lead in the atmosphere that didn't used to be there. It's still there, even though tetraethyl lead has been phased out of use.

      Read up on Thomas Midgley Jr . He was a chemist and a prolific inventor, but sadly he set loose some of the nastier industrial chemicals into the world in the last century, somewhat unwittingly.

      --

      Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

      Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    28. Re: Do not by Zordak · · Score: 1

      Also, liposuction and velcro.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    29. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i looked and thought "fuck likelyhood... artificial electromagnetic mercury generator"

    30. Re: Do not by tmosley · · Score: 1

      But...we've only had science for the last few hundred years. Most of the more advanced technology was used by priests back then to fool rubes into thinking they were the messengers of the Gods, gibs mony plox.

    31. Re: Do not by kanweg · · Score: 1

      "It started with the philosophical notion that a rational God would make a rational universe that could be understood by humans."

      And the evidence that it started with that is...?

      Bert

      “Tell people there's an invisible man in the sky who created the universe, and the vast majority will believe you. Tell them the paint is wet, and they have to touch it to be sure.” George Carlin

    32. Re: Do not by loufoque · · Score: 1

      That's not how things work.

      The Mayans were a civilization based on water control. Water is necessary to survive and was only available seasonally in the region the Mayans originate from. The Mayan kings developed ways to control water, which in turn got them the following of their subjects, which allowed them to have a massive workforce available to build more sophisticated ways to control water, as well as the incentive to develop the technology further to stay in power.

      Something similar happened to all ancient civilizations; they get developed out of need, dependence on a ruling class is built to address that need, and massive constructions are the result of large populations being controlled and conditioned.

      Why is there no such thing during the middle ages? Because to a degree, people were generally happy, had what they needed and were left to their own devices instead of being at the mercy of a control freak.

    33. Re: Do not by NigelTheFrog · · Score: 1

      In modern history, we're known to do things with uranium and lead that we shouldn't have.

      And radium!

    34. Re: Do not by pwizard2 · · Score: 2

      Actually, no. The Arabs preserved most of the learning from the Greco-Roman era, and added some of their own. Moorish Spain was more technologically advanced than the rest of Europe at the time.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    35. Re: Do not by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      Why is there no such thing during the middle ages? Because to a degree, people were generally happy, had what they needed and were left to their own devices instead of being at the mercy of a control freak.

      Citation needed. Big time.

      Sure, people must have been happy under the whole feudal serfdom/slavery system. I mean, it was great if you were a noble or king but it sucked big time for everyone else. Existing (you could hardly call it living) in squalor, ignorance, and poor health in a vermin-infested hovel with no opportunity for a better life is what we should all strive for.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    36. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isnt that what we do with outsourcing? Soon we will be back to that lifestyle

    37. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Just so happens that several of those millennia were dominated by religious shit, Crusades, etc.).
      And the shit still goes on today.

      Can you really say we are more "enlightened" today??

      Sure we have more gadgets today but gadgets really gauge our intelligence?

    38. Re: Do not by Megol · · Score: 1

      Neither Ada Lovelace nor Alan Turing have directly contributed to computer technology, both were brilliant mathematicians and Alan Turing made important contributions to the theory of computability but that is at most indirect involvement of actual computer development.

    39. Re: Do not by dargaud · · Score: 1

      An intelligent person from say Pharonic times, would be able to understand modern technology after some exposure to it.

      It's something that somewhat pissed me off in the movie The Mummy: they used Imhotep as the bad mummy came back to life. It's an insult to that guy who was a true genius of Galileo/Newton/Einstein caliber. 5 millennia ago he wrote medical texts, built the very first pyramid (still standing), invented collumns, performed surgery, astronomy, poetry, philosophy, was a prime minister, was born a commoner but was accorded divine status after his death... One of his diagnostics is still used in current medical textbooks. Come one Hollywood, have some respect ! OK, besides that, the film was halfway decent.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    40. Re: Do not by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

      > I know, right? It wasn't aliens that built the pyramids, or anything supernatural. It's stupid to think that.

      Exactly. A civil engineer wanted to figure out how the pyramids were built, so he went around asking the experts - Egyptian stonemasons (modern ones). The most plausible answer they came up with is the "shadouf" - the lever and water bag device for raising water from the Nile to irrigate fields. Pretty much everyone at the time would have been familiar with it. To raise stones for the pyramids, just build a bigger, sturdier version. A 5:1 leverage ratio makes a 2 ton block an 800 lb lift. A bunch of workers hanging their body weight on the lever end would raise the stone a foot or two. You prop the stone with some timbers, shorten the lifting rope, and repeat. When the stone gets to the next level of the pyramid, you rotate the lever arm horizontally and pivot the stone to the next step. A series of shadoufs like this could raise a stream of stones step by step up the pyramid.

      In comparison to dragging the stones up a giant dirt ramp (which there is no evidence for), levering the stones up is immensely easier. You merely climb up one step, put your foot in a rope loop, and let gravity do the rest.

    41. Re: Do not by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      A bunch of workers hanging their body weight on the lever end would raise the stone a foot or two. You prop the stone with some timbers, shorten the lifting rope, and repeat. When the stone gets to the next level of the pyramid, you rotate the lever arm horizontally and pivot the stone to the next step.

      Sounds plausible, except how does that lever get the stones to the top of a 455' structure? The widest "step" doesn't seem like it would allow room for enough guys to exert 800 lbs on a lever, much less for the lever itself. And we're talking a pretty long lever by the time you get halfway up. Then, you've got all the limestone sheathing to put up and you have to make sure the inside chambers are there, and accessible..

      However they did it, it's pretty remarkable. I got to see it once up close and it's amazing.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    42. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If humans aren't sooooo stupid why do shows like Ancient Aliens exist?

    43. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dammn rigth .its reconfortating some people here are well versed on the theme. alien actually its a movie. hehehe

    44. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      totally wrong just at the begining of christianism they destroyed alexandria library, in the colony times the destroyed everything scintific classified it on the index killed the scintists then called spellers ans witches and confiscated thier properties. if there were any preservation was keeped secret not for saving ghe science .if you got sick it was bwcause you have sinned not other coherent explanation was accepted

    45. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was a paved way to human freedom eg . who invented bitcoin? .... aliens! of course

    46. Re: Do not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      happy people at middle age .are you nuts! was the worst timelapse of humanity ever

    47. Re: Do not by muecksteiner · · Score: 1

      Out of genuine curiosity: which of his diagnostics is still being used today?

    48. Re: Do not by dargaud · · Score: 1

      The one for 'blue baby', cyanosis due to missing heart/pulmonary valve.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    49. Re: Do not by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Wow, that guy just kept causing problems. That he eventually strangled himself on a bed pulley system of his own design seems like a pretty fitting (and ironic) end to his life.

    50. Re: Do not by Xest · · Score: 1

      Honestly, the explanation may be even simpler again.

      This pyramid dates back 1800 years, but 2200 years ago China's first emperor had his own tomb built, and whilst it has not been excavated it is long rumoured to have been filled with rivers of mercury, and of course, jade, which is common in China.

      So as much as we like to pretend otherwise in many Western history books it's feasible that there was, in the intervening 400 years, some knowledge transfer and trade from China to Mexico, and that this Mexican pyramid was simply built to mirror this one in China that is similarly pyramid shaped, filled with mercury, and full of jade.

      Of course, I believe the oldest pyramids we know are perhaps the most famous ones in Egypt dating back even further, so this may all simply represent an eastwards spreading of that kind of style of tomb over a few centuries of human civilisation. I can quite imagine travellers being so mesmerised by these massive constructions full of jade, liquid mercury and other such things that they may want to replicate them upon returning home or reaching new lands.

    51. Re: Do not by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      I've also been to the pyramids. Stunning works.

      The thing that's struck me about the mystery of ancient construction methods is...just that they chose to make things with such large stones. If you can cut stones precisely as they could, why not cut them again? It must be simpler to cut a two-ton stone into four 500lb blocks and move those. The fact that they chose to use such large stones implies they had a simple method of moving them.

      Particularly when you look at some place like Pumapunku where they've got stones in the 80 metric ton range lifted on top of cliffs, after moving them from quarries miles away (and in some cases across lakes). What the hell? Why did all of the ancient world decide to use massive stones, and only later civilizations realized "oh wait this is way easier with smaller bricks." Odd.

      Not saying it was aliens...but it is weird.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    52. Re: Do not by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      ... Why did all of the ancient world decide to use massive stones, and only later civilizations realized "oh wait this is way easier with smaller bricks." Odd. ...

      Probably because big stones are way more impressive. And last longer. But it still leaves the question of how.

      Keep in mind, though, that most Archeologists have never built with things bigger than a matchstick. They need to consult more Engineers. 8-)

      By the way, there is evidence of a ramp built into the great pyrimid, turning at the corners, that was coverd up by the "sheathing" stones. You can even see a hollow at the edge where the stones are missing.

    53. Re: Do not by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Lots of theories about the demise of these civilizations. I don't recall mercury poisoning being discussed as a contributor, but it seems plausible.

      If Lead and Mercury were as dangerous as the State of California thinks, most of us would either be long dead or "not exist" because their parents died!
      The compounds are not a good idea to eat, but thats different.

  4. crap by edittard · · Score: 0

    they a found trove of strange artifacts

    An English primer was not among them, it would seem.

    --
    At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    1. Re:crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not mentioned:
      A prediction of global warming, if industrialization picked up, but it would take many years.

    2. Re:crap by formfeed · · Score: 1

      they a found trove of strange artifacts

      An English primer was not among them, it would seem.

      The English Prime Minister never made it to Montecello's Pyramids, it was the Spanish under Francesco Bizarro that discovered them.

    3. Re:crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the site's tagline is "news for nerds" not "news for douchebags who have nothing better to do with their doctorate in English"

    4. Re:crap by edittard · · Score: 0

      If you think a doctorate is required for getting words in the right order then that says more about you than it does about me.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    5. Re:crap by kanweg · · Score: 1

      Not a native speaker here. What is wrong with that sentence?

      Ber

    6. Re:crap by kanweg · · Score: 2

      OK, I now see it. Amazing how the brain fixes things for you. It is like reading msaehd up wrdos and still being able to make sense of that.

      Bert

    7. Re:crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not saying it takes a doctorate to get them in the right order. He's saying those who do have a doctorate are more likely to whine about it. Perhaps you might pursue a doctorate in Reading for Comprehension?

    8. Re:crap by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      OK, I'm going to call bullshit here.

      they a found trove of strange artifacts

      Is a perfectly well constructed bit of English.

      So what the hell are you bitching about? If you think that's needing an English primer, maybe it's you who needs one?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:crap by Xest · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's not a perfectly well constructed bit of English.

      But honestly, I don't blame you for claiming it's not, I read it correctly 3 times before I realised it's actually incredibly broken.

      It seems I have the capacity to automatically filter out terrible English unless I'm really trying hard to look for it. I'd wager you do too :)

    10. Re:crap by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      As quoted, "they found a trove of strange artifacts" seems perfectly good to me.

      I'm simply not seeing where it's not valid English.

      So, tell me oh wise one, what's wrong with it? It's no different than "they found a pile of stuff" in terms of syntax.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    11. Re:crap by Xest · · Score: 1

      Here is what they said, followed by what you just said they said.

      they a found trove of strange artifacts
      they found a trove of strange artifacts

      Hopefully side by side you can more easily spot the blatant illiteracy :)

    12. Re:crap by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Wow ... human monkey brain stupid ... I looked at it again and again and my brain apparently fixed it each time.

      Thanks, because I simply wasn't seeing it. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    13. Re:crap by Xest · · Score: 1

      Yeah tell me about it, as I say I was struggling at first and figured maybe it was a snobbish reference to the use of artifact rather than the British English but basically never used artefact.

      It wasn't until I literally parsed it word by word taking a pause in between that I caught it. It's a rather fantastic example of inbuilt human brain automatic error detection and correction though :) Judging by the replies it caught quite a few people - I think there's a psychological study in there somewhere!

    14. Re:crap by edittard · · Score: 1

      Why did you retype it rather than copy-pasting?

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    15. Re:crap by edittard · · Score: 1

      You didn't use any word implying likelihood or probability. You're making stuff up.

      P.S. Reading comprehension. No "for".

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  5. Hmmm by koan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Near the entrance of the chambers, they a found trove of strange artifacts: jade statues, jaguar remains, a box filled with carved shells and rubber balls.

    What's strange about any of that?

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Hmmm by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Funny

      Near the entrance of the chambers, they a found trove of strange artifacts: jade statues, jaguar remains, a box filled with carved shells and rubber balls.

      What's strange about any of that?

      After 1800 years of solitude, the rubber balls were still bouncing!

    2. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      was Jack O'neil practicing his putting through the stargate again?

    3. Re:Hmmm by ChrisMaple · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jaguar branded cars didn't appear until about 1948. This is proof of time travel.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    4. Re:Hmmm by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      What's strange about any of that?

      The carved shells? They were from a Mossberg 500 Tactical Persuader pump action shotgun.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Hmmm by Livius · · Score: 2

      Frankly a rubber ball bouncing on its own for even a full minute would have me nervous.

    6. Re:Hmmm by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      The ancients invented Flubber.

  6. Posted by Soulskill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? Really???

    1. Re: Posted by Soulskill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read that too! You are right, it has been POSTED BY SOULSKILL.

  7. Cool info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the info. I've filed it for later viewing.

  8. Giant Aliens. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was put there by the giant aliens.

    1. Re:Giant Aliens. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was Mexico, not Belize. And there was no mention of a crystal skull. Phale.

  9. I think I remember this module... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the Hidden Shrine of Tamoachan.

  10. Sounds like the beginning of a *bad* scifi movie. by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    The preserved ship was found underneath the tombs, hidden safely in a pool of mercury from those who sought its destruction millennia ago. But now the pool has been emptied, and the ship's beacon detected, awakening the ancient enemy, who even now races to their final destination, readying massive engines of destruction, pointing them at a small, insignificant planet, called... Earth (zoom out to stock photo of Earth in space - Cue "threatening alien" theme).

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  11. Burial site of the first emperor of China by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 2

    You'd know him from the Terracotta warriors uncovered. The Burial site is close to being a wonder of the world and it's known where it's at. They won't dig there due to the high levels of Mercury measured at the site, a vast simulated area of water was created using Mercury in the tomb (as claimed by legends). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q...

    All of the early civilizations of pre-Columbian America used Cinnabar (a source of Mercury) in their rituals and almost always at burial sites due to it's red color.

    1. Re:Burial site of the first emperor of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      While there are high levels of mercury there, it isn't at a level that is particular unsafe and not the reason they've yet to open it. Various other tombs had been devastated by half-ass archeology attempts several decades ago, and the Chinese don't want to mess up something so important. They've been working on some more minor tombs in the area and want to make sure that one is done right.

    2. Re:Burial site of the first emperor of China by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      While there are high levels of mercury there, it isn't at a level that is particular unsafe and not the reason they've yet to open it. Various other tombs had been devastated by half-ass archeology attempts several decades ago, and the Chinese don't want to mess up something so important. They've been working on some more minor tombs in the area and want to make sure that one is done right.

      I agree. While the levels of Mercury are very high, they do want to do this one right and in no hurry.

  12. Re:Sounds like the beginning of a *bad* scifi movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you left out the kidney shaking BRRRAAAAWWHHHH sound at the Earth reveal indicating grave significance. it's all the rage...

  13. I hate these archaeology posts lately by __aasehi2499 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They don't show any photos of the items the headline brought you in with. How hard is it to take a photo?!?

    1. Re:I hate these archaeology posts lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want to look at photos of rubber balls?

    2. Re:I hate these archaeology posts lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's election season in Mexico, mid term congressional election and some states governatorial. The Mexican media is pushing all kinds of sensationalistic stories while trying to eclipse news about rampant corruption and police violence.

    3. Re:I hate these archaeology posts lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't show any photos of the items the headline brought you in with. How hard is it to take a photo?!?

      It's because of the cuurse! Photos would spread the effects of the curse to millions of peoples!!

    4. Re:I hate these archaeology posts lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want to look at photos of rubber balls?

      Yes please. Any kind will do actually.

    5. Re:I hate these archaeology posts lately by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1
    6. Re:I hate these archaeology posts lately by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      It may be easier to take a photo than it is to get permission to publish it. If nothing else, many academic journals take a dim view of researchers publishing the gist of a paper before the paper itself is published. Prior publication may get your "original" paper dropped.

      I've probably done more photography underground than you have, by several hundreds of photos. It's not actually an easy task, particularly if you're needing photos up to research standards let alone publication standard.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    7. Re:I hate these archaeology posts lately by __aasehi2499 · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the classic obstacle to progress, copyright.

  14. Emergency by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

    Call the E.P.A. to deal with mercury pollution. This must become a cleanup supersite, and the polluters brought to court and sued out of existence.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  15. It's not Mercury; It's Naquada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Molten metal beneath a pyramind. 'Nuff said. Notify SG1 and prepare for the onslaught by the goa'uld.

  16. sub tall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fail to see how swearing made your case more convincing.

    1. Re:sub tall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The swearing was probably intended more as an expression of how the poster felt about the topic, and the GP's opinion thereof.

      Sometimes swearing is used just to communicate intensity of feeling, not necessarily to be more convincing.

      You probably already know that though, and are just whining because your puritan sensibilities were offended.

    2. Re:sub tall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TL;DR

      Muh feelings

    3. Re:sub tall by Megol · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he just _really_ like aliens?

  17. Re:Not nerdy enough by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This shouldn't have been let out of the firehose. WTF is nerdy about this?

    You're joking. Liquid mercury? Come on, show of hands: Who among us has not at some point in our lives broken open a thermometer in order to play with the mercury inside? That's a nerd rite of passage.

    Hell, I'm old enough to remember when they made little maze puzzles with a blob of mercury inside that you'd try to get from one corner to the other. Those were the days before parents raised kids like veal. We had pocket knives, for chrissake. Can you imagine millennial parents giving their precious offspring pocket knives? I had my own .22 rifle by the time I was 10. All the liquid mercury I handled in my life, it's no wonder I'm half an imbecile.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  18. Re:Not nerdy enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Those were the days before parents raised kids like veal."

    The above is THE most awesome ( and true ) phrase I have ever seen on Slashdot.

    I doff my hat to you, sir !

  19. What did they expect? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of course it would be liquid mercury. Now I'd be surprised if they found solid mercury down there!

  20. lasers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better start the coverup so they don't have to explain that it's a tomb for Montezuma's cat.

  21. But you didn't eat it by dbIII · · Score: 2

    From mucking about with it professionally (foundry sand packing test - pump mercury under a little bit of pressure through a sand sample) and reading a lot about mercury safety at the time it's the fumes that are the problem. Don't breath in mercury fumes and you'll be as fine as the gold miners working outdoors that used to stick their hands in the stuff and far better off than the hatters indoors that were poisoned by the fumes from heating the stuff up.
    Washing it down the drain to where it can end up in small organisms then concentrated into top level predators that people eat is also very bad news.

    1. Re:But you didn't eat it by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      But you didn't eat it

      Well...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  22. Re:Not nerdy enough by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine millennial parents giving their precious offspring pocket knives?

    I was about to reply that I've seen a few young kids with pocket knives but their parents grew up in places like China and have associated more with older generations in the west than people of their own age.

    I had my own .22 rifle by the time I was 10.

    Maybe if we had more of that now people would see the things properly as tools instead of the NRA insanity of it being an external sign of manhood, patriotism and being ready to overthrow the USA in a minute.

  23. Re:Not nerdy enough by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    OK maybe it is nerdy for some of us. Posting my original comment was totally worth the rebuttals. Well played.

  24. Re:Not nerdy enough by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

    Dude your an idiot. A pocket knife is not a firearm. Most kids get pocket knives these days, boys, around 8-10. Its really not that different.

    I would not let my children handle mercury, or lead, or really any heavy metals. This is because I am not a negligent parent, and have taught them that things can be toxic, carcinogenic etc because hopefully you can teach them some basic science and aren't just focusing on arming them for the apocalypse that probably isn't coming.

    "it's no wonder I'm half an imbecile."

    --
    -
  25. Re:Not nerdy enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dude your an idiot.

    Beautiful!

  26. Obvious reason for Hg by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    They were a civilisation of dentists, and they kept their trove of Mercury around 'cause it's used in fabbing the amalgalm for fillings.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  27. Whose an idiot? by pigwiggle · · Score: 1

    Whose an idiot?

    --
    46 & 2
  28. Re:Not nerdy enough by sudon't · · Score: 1

    If you accept the notion that science is "nerdy", and accept that archaeology is science, it follows that archaeological discoveries are of interest to nerds, with, or without, any mercury nearby. Not that one must be a nerd to enjoy Slashdot. I got laid in high school, yet I'm interested in many of the topics presented here.

    --
    -- sudon't

    Air-ride Equipped

  29. Re:Not nerdy enough by sudon't · · Score: 2

    I would not let my children handle mercury, or lead, or really any heavy metals.

    Glad you weren't my parent, (although, I'm sure you're a fine parent)! I would never have had a lead melting kit, (with cowboy molds!), a wood burning kit, (I forget what you were supposed to do with that, but it was great for melting army men, and burning my name into anything wooden), nor likely a dissecting kit, (and all the formaldehyde-soaked creatures I carved up), all while my age was in the single digits. And then, my dentist once gave me a nice blob of mercury to take home and play with - a little reward for being a brave patient. You would've taken that away from me? Yet, somehow, I turned out ok, and suffered no ill effects to my health.
    Having grown up in the sixties, (high school in the early seventies), I find it really shocking what a short leash kids are kept on nowadays. I spent my Summer days in complete, day-long freedom, and explored everything, via my Schwinn Stingray, within a ten-mile radius of home before I was nine. I lived in the city, not a remote rural area.
    My little sister's kids, OTOH, never went anywhere on their own, their activities all being planned, monitored, and scheduled - even play. Apparently, this is not merely common, but enshrined in law, as children left to simply walk themselves places have been picked up by police, the parents threatened with the taking of their children by Social Services. I wonder what the result of this type of child-raising will be, (for myself), when these children are themselves old enough to make laws.

    --
    -- sudon't

    Air-ride Equipped

  30. Tomb? really? by Guildor · · Score: 0

    I find it very odd that we take it at face value that pyramids were tombs for kings. I find it even more puzzling that we'd thing different cultures in different parts of the world would do the same thing! I don't see why mercury would be considered to lead to treasure of a king. All assumptions with no proof of anything. Just like the kings of Egypt. No body or any real writings about it being used as a tomb. So I can't buy into the mainstream thinking. Not going down the "Aliens built it" route - but I do think there's evidence that civilizations were once perhaps as great as our own, and probably blown back to the stone age by a nuclear war or some other Atlantis level mass extinction event. What#s left behind is a mystery to us, as their technologies and techniques are very different from ours. So in effect, we can't fathom how they achieved what they did, and perhaps, our computers would seem as magic to them. So what exactly we're looking at, I've no more idea than anyone else - but a king's tomb just doesn't cut the mustard for me.

  31. Re:Not nerdy enough by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    Your yelling at clouds.

    Burning stuff with various implements and unguided play are still common for many parents. There were always overprotective parents who force their children into rigid molds. Some would have us think that's the best way to treat children, but most of us know better.

    In any case, melting lead is not a good unsupervised activity for kids and probably something I would keep them away from. A high level of lead in your blood may explain why you are so aggressive about your way being best. Maybe you should have it checked.

  32. Too cool! by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    I'd love to don an airtight suit and try to walk/crawl on that river.

    According to these documents, I'd displace .0092 m^3 (9195 cm^3) of mercury (yes, I weigh in at nearly 125 kg).

    By using the largest values for foot, calf, and thigh volumes, the second document tells me that I could stand up in the mercury, and that it would come up 15% of the length of my thighs or so.

    Assuming I'm vaguely rectangular when I'm supine (41 cm wide by 183 cm tall), I'd float in 1.2 cm of mercury.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  33. Re:Tomb? really? by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    ... - but a king's tomb just doesn't cut the mustard for me.

    Probably just a high-security warehouse, for the Mercury that they used to extract gold from ore.

  34. Re:Not nerdy enough by sudon't · · Score: 1

    That you read my post as aggressive and yelling might indicate that you were excessively coddled as a child. Take two paint chips, twice a day, sublingually, for thirty days. Then re-read my post in a soothing, avuncular voice.

    --
    -- sudon't

    Air-ride Equipped