How Google Searches Are Promoting Genocide Denial

merbs writes: If you use Google Turkey to search for "Ermeni Krm", which means "Armenian genocide" in Turkish, the first thing you'll see is a sponsored link to a website whose purpose is to deny there was any genocide at all. If you Google "Armenia genocide" in the U.S., you'll see the same thing. FactCheckArmenia.com may reflect Turkey's longstanding position that the Ottoman Empire's systematic effort to "relocate" and exterminate its Armenian population does not qualify as a genocide, but it certainly does not reflect the facts. The sponsored link to a credible-looking website risks confusing searchers about the true nature of the event. Worse, it threatens to poison a nascent willingness among Turkish citizens to recognize and discuss the horrors of its past.

Comments

It is an ad.

[houghi]

When I see ads, I ALWAYS assume they are false. Also: ads are influenced about your browsing history. I did not see it and I tried google on several countries. No ad.

Next on /. I googled iPhone and saw an ad for Samsung. OMG,: google is evil.

I am not a fan of Google, as they have way too much power, but I think this is just stoopid.

Re:It is an ad.

[Cafe Alpha]

Ever watch political ads sway an election or referendum? People are really stupid.

Re:It is an ad.

[Anonymous Coward]

The ads aren't just false, they're often dangerous. Search for a piece of software, such as VLC and the top results are poorly differentiated ads pointing to somewhere other than the official download site. From that alternate site will be a repackaged version that, at best will have an installer bundled with crapware. Quite probably loaded down with some sort of virus or backdoor for viruses. Next theing you know supermegawindowsantivirussepreme2015 is explaining to you that 32,485 threats have been detected and that the full version for $49.99 will be able to clean them. When you get the full version, it will explain how you can get all your now-encrypted files back for the low, low price of $2,000.

Re:It is an ad.

[rmdingler]

So Turkish nationalists are buying Google adwords. What's the problem with that? It's an exercise of free speech (for a position that I disagree with).

I have Armenian (and Greek) friends, so I know the basics. Armenians tell me about losing grandparents, aunts and uncles in 1915. This is of course the 100th anniversary. The personal tragedies are overwhelming, and if that wasn't enough, there is the further tragedy of destroying the Armenian and Greek communities and culture in Turkey, and the end of Ottoman tolerance.

I realize there's a debate over the word "genocide." The official Turkish position is, "Let the historians decide." I'm not sure what good that does them. The New York Times leans towards "genocide." http://www.nytimes.com/ref/tim... There is some symbolism here that I can't follow too well.

There is also a small, slowly growing movement among Turks to acknowledge the Armenian position. I don't know how long it will take. I'm not as optimistic as I used to be about world peace and reconciliation.

But Google isn't doing anything wrong.

Two takes from this:

Free speech, first and foremost, especially to the folks who disagree with me.

Eyes wide open, a very close second, get your important information from as many sources as possible.

Re:It is an ad.

[CastrTroy]

This is what is wrong with advertising on the internet. It's become too automated. All that's required to get your ad up on the internet is for you to put down the money. Nobody reviews the ad to see if it's for a legitimate product. Nobody checks that false claims aren't being made. And the websites wonder why people resort to using things like Adblock Plus. If they held ads to a higher standard, then they could demand more money for ads, and they would have a much smaller likelihood of people blocking them. With the current state of ads on the internet, I avoid them as much as possible. If they were high quality, less intrusive ads, I might start paying attention more.

Re:The alternative is... What, exactly?

[ultranova]

Ban people with an opposing point of view? Google deciding intentionally what's "true" and "not true"? Only people with approved viewpoints get a chance to place ideas out there?

"I hate Jews" is a point of view. "There was no Holocaust" is a flat-out lie. You are entitled to your own opinions and interpretations, but not your own facts. The latter makes you wilfully insane.

And frankly, Turkey is being a moron here. They could simply ignore all this, it happened 100 years ago after all. Or they could issue an official apology. They could even frame the Armenians as nasty people who had it coming, evil as such approach might be. But instead they pick the one strategy that has no chance of success whatsoever: pretending nothing ever happened. It's enough to make one question whether someone in Turkey wishes to ride a national persecution complex to power.

Re:The alternative is... What, exactly?

[Shadow of Eternity]

It's enough to make one question whether someone in Turkey wishes to ride a national persecution complex to power.

Why not it's working fuckin great for Hamas...

The problem is the ads don't show the sponsor

[hhammermill]

The problem is not the ads themselves. Advertising is free speech. The problem is that the ads don't show the purchaser (the sponsor) so the reader has no context on potential bias.

Basically Google is enabling astroturf campaigns.

No matter how misleading a political ad is, there is always a "paid for by X" at the end of it. We should require the same of all advertising.

Re:The alternative is... What, exactly?

[dave420]

They learned from the best - Israel.