Slashdot Mirror


Ancient Megadrought Entombed Dodos In Poisonous Fecal Cocktail

sciencehabit writes: Nine hundred kilometers off the east coast of Madagascar lies the tiny island paradise of Mauritius. The waters are pristine, the beaches bright white, and the average temperature hovers between 22C and 28C (72F to 82F) year-round. But conditions there may not have always been so idyllic. A new study suggests that about 4000 years ago, a prolonged drought on the island left many of the native species, such as dodo birds and giant tortoises, dead in a soup of poisonous algae and their own feces.

2 of 55 comments (clear)

  1. "The xxxx in yyyy years" by Troed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Humans remember about thirty years back. Anything that's different today from thirty years ago we feel to be "unnatural". Most processes on earth work over much longer time scales than that - while still being completely natural.

    The holocene, our current interglacial, is ~12000 years old. During that time the climate has both been a lot warmer (the Holocene optimum) as well as a lot colder (the Little Ice Age) than now. What we don't really know is how the climate has changed regionally during these thousands of years. We have some insight (the Sahara desert was a lush savannah around 8000 years ago) and there's a lot of research into how the rise and fall of civilizations might be correlated with natural regional climate changes much more than the popular image portrayed by, for example, Jared Diamond.

    We do have written records from the last 2000 years (se the linked PDF). It's fascinating read into how heat waves, droughts, extremely cold winters and hot summers etc have affected our forefathers in a way I think we have problems grasping today. If anything, it seems the climate has been unnaturally stable over the last century - even including the famous dustbowl in the US.

    http://www.breadandbutterscien...

    1. Re:"The xxxx in yyyy years" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Denialist propaganda funded by Big Oil.

      [citation needed]

      overwhelming consensus

      Ah, I see. No sense arguing with consensus reality. Remember that the overwhelming consensus was once that the earth was flat, and anything that went against that consensus was "denialist propaganda".

      I don't consider myself to be a "denier" per se, but I can't stand uncited allegations from either side of the debate, especially since one side seems to think they have some kind of moral authority. There is no such thing in science.