Slashdot Mirror


Once a Forgotten Child, OpenSSL's Future Now Looks Bright

Trailrunner7 writes: Rarely does anything have a defined turning point in its history, a single day where people can point and say that was the day everything changed. For OpenSSL, that day was April 7, 2014, the day that Heartbleed became part of the security lexicon. Heartbleed was a critical vulnerability in the venerable crypto library. OpenSSL is everywhere, in tens of thousands of commercial and homespun software projects. And so too, as of last April, was Heartbleed, an Internet-wide bug that leaked enough memory that a determined hacker could piece together anything from credentials to encryption keys.

"Two years ago, it was a night-and-day difference. Two years ago, aside from our loyal user community, we were invisible. No one knew we existed," says Steve Marquess, cofounder, president and business manager of the OpenSSL Foundation, the corporate entity that handles commercial contracting for OpenSSL. "OpenSSL is used everywhere: hundreds, thousands of vendors use it; every smartphone uses it. Everyone took that for granted; most companies have no clue they even used it." To say OpenSSL has been flipped on its head—in a good way—is an understatement.

Heartbleed made the tech world realize that the status quo wasn't healthy to the security and privacy of ecommerce transactions and communication worldwide. Shortly after Heartbleed, the Core Infrastructure Initiative was created, uniting The Linux Foundation, Microsoft, Facebook, Amazon, Dell, Google and other large technology companies in funding various open source projects. OpenSSL was the first beneficiary, getting enough money to hire Dr. Steve Henson and Andy Polyakov as its first full-timers. Henson, who did not return a request to be interviewed for this article, is universally known as the one steady hand that kept OpenSSL together, an unsung hero of the project who along with other volunteers handled bug reports, code reviews and changes.

3 of 76 comments (clear)

  1. Paid Advertisement by Elgonn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Someone has to be shilling to post a summary like that one. The only future for OpenSSL is to be replaced over time by LibreSSL or another competitor.

  2. Re: Huh? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Also: "...every smartphone uses it."
    Do any smartphones use openssl? Android uses BouncyCastle and Apple uses their own crypto libraries (they provide openssl for compatibility purposes on OSX, but not iOS). Microsoft has their own crypto libraries, too, so I doubt Windows Phones use openssl...

  3. LibreSSL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    OpenSSL.... yeah, right, whatever.
    LibreSSL is the one that deserves all the credit and support.
    With a smaller team and zero experience working with the codebase, LibreSSL has consistantly beat OpenSSL to the punch regarding ripping out trash, rendering and refactoring garbage into sanity, and fixing bugs.
    OpenSSL should have been doing this all along but were just lazy, not competent, poorly organized, etc.
    And now they just go all "we're a foundation now" and reap kudos from the world?
    BAH, totally undeserving.
    And all you're going to get is the same crap in the tarball instead of new original thoughts.