Results Are In From Psychology's Largest Reproducibility Test: 39/100 Reproduced
An anonymous reader writes: A crowd-sourced effort to replicate 100 psychology studies has successfully reproduced findings from 39 of them. Some psychologists say this shows the field has a replicability problem. Others say the results are "not bad at all". The results are nuanced: 24 non-replications had findings at least "moderately similar" to the original paper but which didn't quite reach statistical significance. From the article: "The results should convince everyone that psychology has a replicability problem, says Hal Pashler, a cognitive psychologist at the University of California, San Diego, and an author of one of the papers whose findings were successfully repeated. 'A lot of working scientists assume that if it’s published, it’s right,' he says. 'This makes it hard to dismiss that there are still a lot of false positives in the literature.'”
What they don't tell you is that of the 39 reproducible results:
9 were telepathic,
3 were remote viewing,
15 were astral projection,
11 were telekinetic,
and 1 was precognitive (we knew the results of this study before it was published).
Well, this is interesting news, to be sure. Gives us plenty to think about. I can't help but wonder if anyone has been able to reproduce their results.
Should have had the teachers in Atlanta grade the results... http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05...
And those that are labeling a score of 39/100 "not bad at all" should have their head checked.
They did, but only 39/100 of them found anything out of whack.