Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Have Paper On Gender Bias Rejected Because They're Both Women

ferrisoxide.com writes: A paper co-authored by researcher fellow Dr. Fiona Ingleby and evolutionary biologist Dr. Megan Head — on how gender differences affect the experiences that PhD students have when moving into post-doctoral work — was rejected by peer-reviewed PLoS Onebecause they didn't ask a man for help.

A (male) peer reviewer for the journal suggested that the scientists find male co-authors, to prevent "ideologically biased assumptions." The same reviewer also provided his own ironically biased advice, when explaining that women may have fewer articles published because men's papers "are indeed of a better quality, on average," "just as, on average, male doctoral students can probably run a mile race a bit faster."
PLoS One has apologized, saying, "We have formally removed the review from the record, and have sent the manuscript out to a new editor for re-review. We have also asked the Academic Editor who handled the manuscript to step down from the Editorial Board and we have removed the referee from our reviewer database."

5 of 301 comments (clear)

  1. acceptance is the only fair outcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Plos One needs to accept all papers from women that describe unfair treatment without reading them. Anything else would be unfair because men are privileged.

    1. Re:acceptance is the only fair outcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Perhaps you should return to Tumblr, where reality and grammar align with your perspectives.

  2. Re:Flip it around and... by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Funny

    That was a four line run-on sentence with two parenthetical sets and four commas.

    Maybe you should have had a woman read it before you hit post.

  3. Re:Just out of curiosity ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Males wouldn't be researching such a retarded subject in the first place. Unless they were faggots.

  4. PLoS by Snufu · · Score: 4, Funny

    First mistake was submitting to the Playboy Lounge of Scientists.