Export Ban Drives Cuba To Non-US Analytics Software To Boost Tourism
dkatana writes with some crucial lines from an article at InformationWeek: Currently Cuba receives around 2.8 million visitors every year, half of them from Canada. Mintur, the Cuban Tourist Ministry, estimates that if Americans were free to travel to Cuba today, the number of visitors would increase by two million the first year. Last year the Cuban government was interested in getting its hands on analytics software to process the data generated by visitors on social networks. ... Because of the existing ban on American companies supplying technology to Cuba, Havana had to look somewhere else and found SocialVane, a small Spanish company on the island of Menorca, which has been working with the local tourist sector to analyze issues, trends, and potentials of the tourism industry.
There's more to it than that. Far more.
Starting in 1901 when the US jammed the Platt Amendment into the Cuiban Constitution which America said entitles them to keep a naval base in Cuba (that's what Guantanamo is).
Carrying forward, the US was a backer of Batista, who was a petty little thug who did things like:
But, as always happens, he was a thug and a dictator but friendly to US business interests. So America liked him.
Basically the Cubans were poor and starving under a terrible government who cared more about US interests than its own citizens.
The American Mafia is largely whose stuff was nationalized:
So, let's not pretend that Cuba wasn't already under a corrupt dictatorship under which the citizens suffered hugely.
I'm not defending everything Castro did, but everyone likes to conveniently the history of American supported dictators allowing American organized crime to treat the nation as their own private playground.
Batista and the crooks really needed to go. And I'm afraid I have little sympathy for them.
Americans like to act like Castro overthrew a benign government, when nothing could be further from the truth.
Don't just look at the last 50 years, look at the last 100.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
Leasing? America is NOT "leasing" Guantanamo in any legitimate use of that word.
America jammed the Platt Amendment into Cuba's Constitution at the end of a war, which unilaterally said "we get to keep a navy base here" ... in effect "we own joo, bitches".
Cuba has never cashed the checks, has repeatedly said they don't consent to Guantanamo, and don't want the Americans there.
Guantanamo is basically a forcible military presence in a foreign country.
It sure as fuck isn't 'leased' in any honest meaning of 'lease'.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.