Export Ban Drives Cuba To Non-US Analytics Software To Boost Tourism
dkatana writes with some crucial lines from an article at InformationWeek: Currently Cuba receives around 2.8 million visitors every year, half of them from Canada. Mintur, the Cuban Tourist Ministry, estimates that if Americans were free to travel to Cuba today, the number of visitors would increase by two million the first year. Last year the Cuban government was interested in getting its hands on analytics software to process the data generated by visitors on social networks. ... Because of the existing ban on American companies supplying technology to Cuba, Havana had to look somewhere else and found SocialVane, a small Spanish company on the island of Menorca, which has been working with the local tourist sector to analyze issues, trends, and potentials of the tourism industry.
Time to end that ridiculous embargo.
The US isn't the centre* of the universe!?!
*Yes, I spelled it Canadian.
STUFF THAT MATTERS!
I've been to Cuba 5 times in the last 8 years or so, and while I really like Cuba and the Cubans, I've also seen a considerable decline over that time.
The quality of the service has gone down. The resort staff are much less interested in good service and are now expecting tips. They doubled the size of the airport, but their internal stuff couldn't scale, so there can be days where it takes hours to check in for your flight.
Cuba has a lot of older resorts. It's still a really poor country with some shady infrastructure.
If you start throwing millions of Americans into that mix, I firmly believe the systems won't be able to handle it.
The last two times I was there the airport devolved into madness and chaos, because they had more passengers and aircraft than they could handle.
And there's going to be a lot of disappointed Americans as they discover that the effects of the embargo is a country which is impoverished and can't give them the kind of experience they want.
Honestly, for me, Florida is becoming more attractive than Cuba. The same weather, all the first world amenities, and none of the tourist stomach ailments.
I just don't think Cuba will weather a sudden influx of more tourists who are expecting first world luxuries. Cuba is beautiful and charming, but it's also small and poor.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
There's more to it than that. Far more.
Starting in 1901 when the US jammed the Platt Amendment into the Cuiban Constitution which America said entitles them to keep a naval base in Cuba (that's what Guantanamo is).
Carrying forward, the US was a backer of Batista, who was a petty little thug who did things like:
But, as always happens, he was a thug and a dictator but friendly to US business interests. So America liked him.
Basically the Cubans were poor and starving under a terrible government who cared more about US interests than its own citizens.
The American Mafia is largely whose stuff was nationalized:
So, let's not pretend that Cuba wasn't already under a corrupt dictatorship under which the citizens suffered hugely.
I'm not defending everything Castro did, but everyone likes to conveniently the history of American supported dictators allowing American organized crime to treat the nation as their own private playground.
Batista and the crooks really needed to go. And I'm afraid I have little sympathy for them.
Americans like to act like Castro overthrew a benign government, when nothing could be further from the truth.
Don't just look at the last 50 years, look at the last 100.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
Leasing? America is NOT "leasing" Guantanamo in any legitimate use of that word.
America jammed the Platt Amendment into Cuba's Constitution at the end of a war, which unilaterally said "we get to keep a navy base here" ... in effect "we own joo, bitches".
Cuba has never cashed the checks, has repeatedly said they don't consent to Guantanamo, and don't want the Americans there.
Guantanamo is basically a forcible military presence in a foreign country.
It sure as fuck isn't 'leased' in any honest meaning of 'lease'.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.