Superfish Injects Ads In 1 In 25 Google Page Views

An anonymous reader writes: A new report from Google has found that more than 5% of unique daily IP addresses accessing Google — tens of millions — are interrupted by ad-injection techniques, and that Superfish, responsible for a major controversy with Lenovo in February is the leading adware behind what is clearly now an industry. Amongst the report's recommendations to address the problem is the suggestion that browser makers "harden their environments against side-loading extensions or modifying the browser environment without user consent." Some of the most popular extensions for Chrome and Firefox, including ad-blockers, depend on this functionality.

Comments

To save the internet from fake ads

[the_skywise]

Google sez we must remove ad blocker functionality!

I smell an ulterior motive..

No control is the real issue

[cstec]

As a serious coffee consumer, their main problem is you can't customize the cup of coffee. I drink so much coffee that I started making it weaker, and weaker, and then half strength. The last time I stayed in an office with a Keurig setup, I think I nearly killed myself before I realized what was happening.

I'd love to have one, but the 'my way or the highway' reality of those little cups doesn't work. And don't even start on the cost.

Re:No control is the real issue

[Anonymous Coward]

So even the Keurig 2.0 is infected by Superfish? This is worse than I thought!

Or disable javascript

[Spy Handler]

whoever thought running scripts from random sites and ads was a good idea?

Just don't allow all JavaScripts.

[Futurepower(R)]

Just allow JavaScript on the main URL.

Re:Math check

[dotancohen]

5% are affected, Superfish is responsible for 80% of those affected, i.e. 4% total. Here is a restatement of the fine summary, with some noncritical interjections removed (and TFS was missing a comma anyway):

5% of IP addresses accessing Google are interrupted by ad-injection techniques, and Superfish is the leading adware