Slashdot Mirror


The Challenge of Web Hosting Once You're Dead

reifman writes: Hosting a website (even WordPress) after your death has a variety of unexpected complexities, from renewing your domain name, to hosting, security, monitoring, troubleshooting and more. It's a gaping hole that we as technologists should start thinking more about — especially because all of us are going to die, some of us unexpectedly sooner than we'd like or planned for. The only real solution I found was to share credentials and designate funds to descendants — you've done this, right?

182 comments

  1. The next identity theft... by Hanzie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It used to be you look for dead people to steal identities from by pretending they're still alive.

    After the 'dead hosting' problem is taken care of, it will be 'pretend the owner is dead and take control'

    --
    ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
  2. I'll be dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'll be dead, so it won't matter to me.

    1. Re:I'll be dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.

      I die, the bills stop getting paid and the account goes away, what's the problem?

    2. Re:I'll be dead by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Right, and if someone does want to reach me after coming to my website, how am I supposed to get back to him?

    3. Re:I'll be dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You offer a ride on the euthanasia coaster so they can contact you in $religious_afterlife_place.

      --sf

    4. Re:I'll be dead by beamdriver · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ouija.com?

    5. Re: I'll be dead by Radres · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe you're hosting your family's photo albums, or perhaps some writing you'd like to someday share with your grandkids? The web is so ephermal. It would be great if I had a more reliable means of leaving something to future generations of my family. Even printing stuff out doesn't always work either.

    6. Re:I'll be dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a very real problem. I had to take over administration of a bunch of sites that a guy was running before he died unexpectedly. The biggest issue was he had developed most of his sites by himself with no comments on what he'd done. It took me months to work out what he had done, especially in how he'd made changes to one of the sites' code to reflect a discount and it wasn't triggered by a flag in the database or the like so it was always present until I found every last call.

    7. Re:I'll be dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be dead, so it won't matter to me.

      Why is this not scored +5, Insightful yet?

    8. Re:I'll be dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this not scored +5, Insightful yet?

      Because it's stupid? Yes, it won't matter to the you of the future. But that doesn't mean it shouldn't matter to the you of the now.

      By that logic, why should you care if I kill you? After all, once I've killed you, there won't be a you to care, so why care about it now?

    9. Re:I'll be dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I'm not sure you're skillful enough to kill me painlessly.

    10. Re:I'll be dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I value my life just a little bit more than a fucking web site.

  3. Forget about being dead... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What do you do with an old website that you're not adding new content and tired of keeping up with the endless WordPress updates, spam comments and nonexistent traffic?

    1. Re:Forget about being dead... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I turned comments off, myself. Wordpress will update itself nowadays, at least for minor updates.

    2. Re:Forget about being dead... by lucm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Easy: a Buffer.com account using a prepaid credit card.

      Don't let death stop the conversation! Prepare right now years of meaningless babbling that people will Like, Share and Retweet.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    3. Re:Forget about being dead... by solios · · Score: 1

      Depending on the design and just how serious you are about keeping it around you could convert it to a static site. You don't have to worry about wordpress or plugin updates if there's no CMS on the server.

      That said, I have a number of sites that get next to no traffic and probably the biggest issue with maintaining a WP install these days is theme and plugin updates. Trim those down, strip out comments (or move the "responsibility" for them to something like Disqus), fiddle .htaccess* if you're feeling paranoid, make a backup and let 'er rip. Or rot, as the case may be.

      * It's possible to allow only a specific IP to see wp-admin, or no IP at all. The biggest problem with this approach in my experience is forgetting that you've set the condition.

    4. Re:Forget about being dead... by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Informative

      Modify your robots.txt and allow the Wayback Machine to archive it. Once it's there, feel free to shut it down. People who need it, will find it in the archive.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    5. Re:Forget about being dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can actually submit your own crawls to the wayback machine, rather than wait for them to get to your website. See http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Wayback_Machine#Uploading_to_archive.org or http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Working_with_ARCHIVE.ORG

    6. Re:Forget about being dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on the design and just how serious you are about keeping it around you could convert it to a static site. You don't have to worry about wordpress or plugin updates if there's no CMS on the server.

      This. Static site generation isn't actually stuck in the '90s - far from it. You can do absurdly complex things, quickly and easily. Full-text search, tagging, taxonomy, pagination, comments (in some systems)... Pretty much everything the average person is mismanaging a PHP and MySQL stack for, for no reason at all.

      Imma pimp DocPad, because it's awesome and allows you to go as far as combining dynamic crap into a static site, but there's no shortage of static site generators out there.

    7. Re:Forget about being dead... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Informative

      Perhaps there are millions of reasons why you are receiving spam and weird things?

      Arstechnica above has a half dozen security issues related to it. It is so bad at this stage I would not recommend anyone use it as the plugins are not updated even if the core is which means full security exploit season. Especially if your programmer wrote them in 2011 and is no longer around and you have +40 security exploits and sql injections. Like IE 6 it needs to be avoided at all costs.

    8. Re:Forget about being dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most tech platforms are going to have the exact problem you are referencing. I"m actually all for smaller shops having purely static sites or using a generator... but most peoples needs won't be met with that either.

    9. Re:Forget about being dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wget --mirror that bitch and host it as static content with an nginx instance with a very limited user that only has read access to the files.

    10. Re:Forget about being dead... by jpkunst · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Save Wordpress site as static HTML:

      wget -k -K -E -r -l 10 -p -N -F -nH http://www.oldwebsite.tld/

      Remove Wordpress site and upload static HTML in its place.

    11. Re:Forget about being dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've actually become a fan of using USB keys that generate an admin cookie. No passwords, just something you can physically keep on your keychain and use on any computer. Just remember to clear cookies after you're done.

    12. Re:Forget about being dead... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      How, exactly, do you prepare for Ghostbusters?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    13. Re:Forget about being dead... by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 3, Funny

      I turned comments off, myself. Wordpress will update itself nowadays, at least for minor updates.

      Are you dead? If so I'm impressed.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    14. Re:Forget about being dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless a future owner of your domain puts up a robots.txt.

    15. Re:Forget about being dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which basically all the squatters and registrar-run "parking services" do.

      archive.org is far less useful than it could be by not detecting ownership changes and allowing new parties to retroactively hide old content.

    16. Re:Forget about being dead... by Quirkz · · Score: 2

      I believe the process is supposed to begin with a telephone call.

  4. Renewing the domain name? No by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    How would the domain be renewed if the estate cancels the credit cards?

    1. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by BlackPignouf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That, and many more problems. A good friend and our main developer committed suicide 5 years ago.
      With the ceremony, the emotional shock and many organizational problems, 1 month got by, the bank account got closed, the provider didn't get paid and deleted the whole VM on which our website was running.
      During this period, 2 disks died at his place on the Raid 5 NAS backup, and nobody noticed.

      When people tell me I'm being overzealous with backups now, I tell them that worst-worst-case scenarios do happen sometimes.

    2. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by slazzy · · Score: 1

      You can renew for 10 years, and some registers will allow you to leave a credit in the account and set auto-renew. That should last until the register business goes tits-up at least.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    3. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dead people can't be parties to contracts.

      Establish a succession plan.

      What is the point of this submission?

    4. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by viperidaenz · · Score: 2, Informative

      .... RAID is not a backup.

    5. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's close enough. Besides, if the data you have is not accessible within say, 10,000ms you are not relevant in todays world. Data needs to live, needs to be utilized, manipulated, spied upon, stolen and hacked. Keep your data in ram, better yet keep it in the cpu cache, get yourself some 18 core xeons and keep those registers full.
      Anyway thanks for reminding us that raid is not backup do you have any other irrelevant drone like comments to make? Maybe you can share your thought about how well systemd kicks off your carefully written backup scripts and locks log entries away in a binary log that is innaccessable to anyone after it takes to long to respond while compressing the file and dumps your perfectly good drive out of the array so you can look forward to another 23 hour rebuild process. Aaaaahhhhhggggggggh!

    6. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not being an asshole here, but "worst case" literally means "it could actually happen".

      If you explain it that way, it might help educate a few more people.

      "Worst case, I lose a few quid down the loo." Well, do you have anything else in your pocket like a phone or I.D. or more quid? Because worst case could be really devastating.

      Worst case is literally the worst thing that could happen within the realm of possibility. Meaning it is possible. Meaning you should try not to get to that point.

    7. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      Would have to set up an LLC or a Trust or something?

    8. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nor are tapes.

      The copy of production data you put on a RAID or tapes are the backup. The key here is the backup system was starting to fail without oversight.

    9. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Interesting

      .... RAID is not a backup.

      What a clueless thing to say. His setup was fine. You've misused the meme.

      At a minimum, a proper backup strategy provides some level of protection against hardware failure and error propagation. RAID—by itself—provides no protection against error propagation, which is why we all chant that "RAID is not a backup", but it absolutely can be used as a part of a comprehensive backup strategy. Super trivial example: if you're even doing something simple like bringing a copy of the production data home periodically and loading it into a RAID you keep there (i.e. kinda like what it sounds like was going on here), that's sufficient to provide you with a degree of protection from error propagation (albeit, a thin one). A better solution might involve regular (e.g. every hour for the last day, every day for the last week, etc.) backups to an off-site RAID, since it would provide you with better protection against error propagation, as well as all of the protection against typical hardware failure that RAID provides, not to mention protection against at least some forms of disasters.

      All of which is to say, "RAID is not a backup" is a shorthand way of telling people to not put their production data in a RAID and assume it's "backed up" when it's not. RAID may not not a backup, but it's an essential part of many organizational backup strategies, and if you're a small company, putting your production data in one place and using RAID for storing a backup at the home of your lead developer is a perfectly valid strategy.

    10. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      You're right. All I'm saying is that you actually need some imagination to find out what the worst-case scenario could be.
      As in, not just "getting hit by a bus", "fire at work" and "being robbed at home", but all three at the same time.

    11. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Death is just one possibility. What's the impact of a missing person, that's the clue. The many diverse ways to die or missing is not interesting here.
      If worst case is very cheap or unavoidable, maybe it's not worth protecting against?
      Or maybe protection makes sense anyways and is relatively cheap?

      These are business decisions. Anybody in business not doing these assessments are incompetent and should not run a business.
      Anything is possible? What's the chance of it and what's the impact?
      If protection is too costly, you cannot / will not protect against that..

      The real flaw in his story is not losing the only backup, but failing to manage risk (technological and human) and failing to manage around key personell.
      Somebody can be as much rockstar they want in in their own free time.

    12. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like you would have had the same problems if they guy had just decided to quit. seems he was a key man and you didn't have adequate precautions in place.

    13. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by allo · · Score: 1

      And if the admin-c is dead, the domain holder is no valid person, so everybody can take it down.

    14. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      How would the domain be renewed if the estate cancels the credit cards?

      Why renew? Just prepay for 100 years: http://www.networksolutions.co...

    15. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      You can renew for 10 years, and some registers will allow you to leave a credit in the account and set auto-renew. That should last until the register business goes tits-up at least.

      10 years? Bah... Network solutions offers 100 years: http://www.networksolutions.co...

      Now whether they'll be around that long is a completely different question.

    16. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by TheTrueScotsman · · Score: 1

      During this period, 2 disks died at his place on the Raid 5 NAS backup, and nobody noticed.

      In all this "RAID is not a backup" back-and-forth, has nobody noticed that the NAS was the backup? Multiple disks failing on the backup is not a problem. since you've still got the main copy (i.e. the main respository if you're a company with things like websites). You just laugh and renew the backup.

      Now, reading between the lines, it may be that this deployed (production?) VM with the website may have been the 'main' repository. In which case, the failure of this company is only a question of a (rather short-term) when. Suicides of lead developers notwithstanding.

    17. Re:Renewing the domain name? No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there are just so many cases possible, that I bet worst case is not gonna happen.

      P.S worst case is probably worse than my raid drives rising up in revolt together and ending the world.

  5. OMG - How will I update twitter when I'm dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How can I post inane details of my (after) life on twitter when I'm dead?

    1. Re:OMG - How will I update twitter when I'm dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_in_Hell

    2. Re:OMG - How will I update twitter when I'm dead? by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought I could connect with the world of living over the Ethernet but it appeared not to be what I hoped.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    3. Re:OMG - How will I update twitter when I'm dead? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Webcam in the coffin that auto uploads every now and then. Just make sure you've dressed to your expectations. What else?

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    4. Re:OMG - How will I update twitter when I'm dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IoT for the dead: now your relatives can observe the rate of decay of your corpse! The unique way of increasing the excitement of the children of your relatives for STEM careers!

    5. Re:OMG - How will I update twitter when I'm dead? by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

      Just create a script on a computer somewhere that has it every so often send an update consisting of '[date] Still dead.'

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  6. Condemned to Wordpress for eternity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    A fate worse than death.

  7. if I am dead by ganjadude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would I care what happens??

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    1. Re:if I am dead by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Two types of websites would be good after you die:

      The first is obvious-Your website makes a profit, and you want your family members to continue to profit in your absence. This is kinda like how life insurance works.

      The second type is for spiritual types like me- I believe in an after life, and I want people to have faith in Jesus. I might not meet you personally in this life, but if I helped your faith, it'd be cool to know you later. I'm not one who gets in arguments about what is the minimum for salvation, or what the minimum you need to do to get to Heaven. But I know it stokes God when we follow him, do good, be loving, and help people in their faith. So helping people to find Jesus even when I'm not around will be beneficial.

      In either regard, if it matters to you for your website to be up after you die, you should probably be sharing the credentials with at least one other trustable person now.

    2. Re:if I am dead by Known+Nutter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I just threw up in my mouth a little.

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    3. Re:if I am dead by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Third type of website is a public service. Maybe you're not making money off it, but people like it. An example of this would be: Capgeek. Its owner got sick and passed away. No one runs it anymore because he put a lot of work into it, and no one could maintain it.

      If the Internet is full of public service websites, maybe we should try and see them go forward even if we die. This like a mutual favor that people could do.

    4. Re:if I am dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      See, you can login here every day and learn about problems you never knew you had.

    5. Re:if I am dead by Twinbee · · Score: 2

      Perhaps from an unselfish perspective, assuming you had something to offer humanity...

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    6. Re:if I am dead by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 0

      Two types of websites would be good after you die: The first is obvious-Your website makes a profit, and you want your family members to continue to profit in your absence. This is kinda like how life insurance works. The second type is for spiritual types like me- I believe in an after life, and I want people to have faith in Jesus. I might not meet you personally in this life, but if I helped your faith, it'd be cool to know you later. I'm not one who gets in arguments about what is the minimum for salvation, or what the minimum you need to do to get to Heaven. But I know it stokes God when we follow him, do good, be loving, and help people in their faith. So helping people to find Jesus even when I'm not around will be beneficial. In either regard, if it matters to you for your website to be up after you die, you should probably be sharing the credentials with at least one other trustable person now. [Third type of website is a public service. Maybe you're not making money off it, but people like it. An example of this would be: Capgeek. Its owner got sick and passed away. No one runs it anymore because he put a lot of work into it, and no one could maintain it. If the Internet is full of public service websites, maybe we should try and see them go forward even if we die. This like a mutual favor that people could do.]-[i added your other, seperated, comment to this one]

      You answered (very good in my opinion) the question "if i am dead why would I care what happens?", but instead of mentioning in your second type of websites something about wanting to spread Atheism you choose to mention God and the Good News, so... you are currently modded as a "Troll" (what a surprise for "/."... and i am just a couple of weeks old member!).

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    7. Re:if I am dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bile comes from you in all ways that it flows up into your mouth?

    8. Re:if I am dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot, the place where barf is (4; Insightful).

    9. Re:if I am dead by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I just threw up in my mouth a little.

      It happens to me often when i read "("/.") religious Atheistic propaganda", but i don't usualy write about it. Thank you for your "Score:4 insightful" (!) comment, an answer to this (currently modded as "Troll") comment (which was an answer to the GP question "if i am dead why would I care what happens?"):

      "Two types of websites would be good after you die: The first is obvious-Your website makes a profit, and you want your family members to continue to profit in your absence. This is kinda like how life insurance works. The second type is for spiritual types like me- I believe in an after life, and I want people to have faith in Jesus. I might not meet you personally in this life, but if I helped your faith, it'd be cool to know you later. I'm not one who gets in arguments about what is the minimum for salvation, or what the minimum you need to do to get to Heaven. But I know it stokes God when we follow him, do good, be loving, and help people in their faith. So helping people to find Jesus even when I'm not around will be beneficial. In either regard, if it matters to you for your website to be up after you die, you should probably be sharing the credentials with at least one other trustable person now. [Third type of website is a public service. Maybe you're not making money off it, but people like it. An example of this would be: Capgeek. Its owner got sick and passed away. No one runs it anymore because he put a lot of work into it, and no one could maintain it. If the Internet is full of public service websites, maybe we should try and see them go forward even if we die. This like a mutual favor that people could do.]"

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    10. Re:if I am dead by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      That's a very selfish approach.

      What about giving of yourself freely to the world? Contributing - and making sure your contributions stay around, available to these, who need them?

      Maybe they aren't significant enough for someone to establish some estate that would perpetuate publishing them; that doesn't mean they are useless - and sure once I'm dead I won't care what happens to them and the rest of the world, but currently I am alive and I do care.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    11. Re:if I am dead by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Third type of website is a public service. Maybe you're not making money off it, but people like it. An example of this would be: Capgeek. Its owner got sick and passed away. No one runs it anymore because he put a lot of work into it, and no one could maintain it.

      But this is exactly why a zombie site doesn't do any good. You need somebody to be your heir, which goes beyond simply the funds to keep the lights on. If you don't have any line of succession set up, make arrangements in your will to add a message to the site saying I've passed, here's a zip of the entire site, if you want to carry the torch feel free for your own name under your own domain. You can't just offer free money and a domain name, somebody will just take the money and use the domain for squatting for ad revenue. Or you could go the formal route and establish a trust, but I imagine that's overkill and the trust manager will take a fair chunk of cash for that.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    12. Re:if I am dead by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Slashdot, the place where barf is (4; Insightful).

      Great spirits meet one another... as we did!

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    13. Re:if I am dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      You are posting on a site (primarily) about tech / science news, with some political stuff thrown in usually because it affects tech or science. Please don't be surprised if you find intelligent people not cheering for beliefs including invisible sky wizards, talking burning shrubbery, slavery(Ephesians 6:5, Exodus 21:2-11), rape(Deuteronomy 22:28-29, Numbers 31:18) or child murder (Judges 11:30, Leviticus 26:30). Spreading a belief that condones such actions ranging from silliness to the basest barbarity could very well merit a "troll" mod by a rational person.

    14. Re:if I am dead by Whiteox · · Score: 0

      But I know it stokes God when we follow him, do good, be loving, and help people in their faith. So helping people to find Jesus even when I'm not around will be beneficial.

      You should know that the concept you are proselytizing is an ancient Greek one, where worship of their gods keep them in existence. The corollary is that if you forget your gods, they disappear.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    15. Re:if I am dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >So helping people to find Jesus even when I'm not around will be beneficial.

      Religion is the best wetware computer virus around. It propagates even after the host dies. It infects at childhood, and replicates when it can using communication protocols.

      Have you heard the message of Blaster.exe yet? Spread the bits!

    16. Re:if I am dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since I have been promised Life everlasting, why in hell should I worry about how to deal with my websites and such after I'm Dead? Seeing as How I wont be dead after all?

      If the website is making money, I'll continue raking in the cash and if it aint, I wont bother continuing to support it and eventually will kill the site because it's no longer profitable and no, I don't do public service type sites unless I'm paid to build them. Then they aint my headache once they're live.

      Captcha=passage

    17. Re:if I am dead by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      im in dead, i have nothing left to offer.... im dead....

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    18. Re:if I am dead by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      is it? the internet archive will cache the page and it will still be visible to people going forward.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    19. Re:if I am dead by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      Good, so you have not hosted someone's website, designed nor developed, nor in a any fashion done anything for anyone on the internet?

      Then you are irrelevant to this conversation.

      If you are the sole proprietor of a password, or an account, or the only developer of some uniquely functional site, then your knowledge dies when you do.

      It sounds like you are completely useless to humanity, and you might as well jump off something really high while you have the option, lest you burden the rest of us with your care.

      Or, if you have something to contribute, then by all means contribute. But you're 0 for 2, and by your own description better off dead. Sounds like this isn't the conversation for you.

    20. Re:if I am dead by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      telling me to kill myself because I cant see the value in caring about things *after* I am dead..... yeah... real classy there.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    21. Re:if I am dead by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Well, at that point your organs, etc.

      Oh hey, if things went all biometric whoever gets your (kidney|eyeballs|lungs|heart) could use your DNA to authenticate...

      Yeah buddy, got a good liver for you, but it comes at a cost...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    22. Re: if I am dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't even need to login

    23. Re:if I am dead by Threni · · Score: 1

      If they want to make a profit they need to roll their sleeves up and get to work. How do other people make money from my site after my death? I'll give 'em my credentials and they can do what I've been doing. Next.

    24. Re:if I am dead by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      No I meant the stuff you had produced while you were alive. Keeping it online after you were gone may be beneficial.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    25. Re:if I am dead by sjames · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you didn't put food up your butt?

    26. Re:if I am dead by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      Two types of websites would be good after you die: The first is obvious-Your website makes a profit, and you want your family members to continue to profit in your absence. This is kinda like how life insurance works.

      Put ownership in your will and credentials in a safe deposit box! If you make a substantial profit, you should probably register as a business and put a succession plan in place.

      The second type is for spiritual types like me- I believe in an after life, and I want people to have faith in Jesus. I might not meet you personally in this life, but if I helped your faith, it'd be cool to know you later. I'm not one who gets in arguments about what is the minimum for salvation, or what the minimum you need to do to get to Heaven. But I know it stokes God when we follow him, do good, be loving, and help people in their faith. So helping people to find Jesus even when I'm not around will be beneficial.

      I, too, believe in the afterlife, but I'm not sure I'd want an eternal website trying to convert people to my chosen faith. Most sects and denominations already have websites; maybe you could share your testimony on one of them (providing them permission to host your comments even after you die).

      I run a website which I think should be perpetuated long after I leave this mortal existence, but it doesn't match either of your two categories. I host the largest genealogical sites for my surname. Indeed, I am contacted daily to verify information on other sites. I want those photos from the 1800s to be available a hundred years from now. I want my descendants to know why I believe a certain family story is false. I want to preserve family stories I have verified as true (including teaching a French princess English).

    27. Re:if I am dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The second type is for spiritual types like me- I believe in an after life, and I want people to have faith in Jesus. I might not meet you personally in this life, but if I helped your faith, it'd be cool to know you later. I'm not one who gets in arguments about what is the minimum for salvation, or what the minimum you need to do to get to Heaven. But I know it stokes God when we follow him, do good, be loving, and help people in their faith. So helping people to find Jesus even when I'm not around will be beneficial.

      OK, I'm going to inject a little reality into your analysis here. About 70-90% say that their conversion was the result of the witness from a family member, friend, or work associate. Your little website may not be as wonderful an evangelism dynamo as you think it is and keeping it up and running after you die may be more about your personal ego than about reaching the world for Christ.

      TL;DR: you apparently have delusions of adequacy.

    28. Re:if I am dead by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      The first is obvious-Your website makes a profit, and you want your family members to continue to profit in your absence. This is kinda like how life insurance works.
       

      This is not obvious, it's stupid. If your website is making money then leave it and it's password in your will to your next of kin.
      Why would you go thru the trouble of prepaying for a website, figuring out a way to mail a check to the next of kin's current address,
      and a whole host of other things when you can just as easily just give the whole thing to them.

      This is like trying to figure out how to keep putting gas in your wife's car after your dead. Just give her the keys to the
      car and the money and let her do it.

    29. Re:if I am dead by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Third type of website is a public service. Maybe you're not making money off it, but people like it. An example of this would be: Capgeek. Its owner got sick and passed away. No one runs it anymore because he put a lot of work into it, and no one could maintain it.

      Then what's the point of keeping the lights on? Within a few weeks, a few months at best... the content is stale. Within a year, it's of historical value at best. Within two, it gets maybe ten hits a day.

      Best to let the wayback machine handle it, and have the site itself go dark.

    30. Re:if I am dead by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The first is obvious-Your website makes a profit, and you want your family members to continue to profit in your absence.

      If the profit comes from the content you created, it's going to fall off almost exponentially with each week that passes with you no longer at the controls. The problem with websites that make a profit isn't keeping the lights on, that's trivial. The problem is keeping the cash flowing, and that's much much harder than just making sure there's a trusted person who pays the domain registrar and occasionally updates the software.

  8. Same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Same as with real property (house, boat, business office complex, etc.). A trust account, a trustee, and the keys in escrow (envelope in a box at the bank or the lawyers office).

    1. Re:Same way by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Same as with real property (house, boat, business office complex, etc.). A trust account, a trustee, and the keys in escrow (envelope in a box at the bank or the lawyers office).

      But .. but .. but .. this is with a computer!

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Same way by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      So I'll file a patent on it and make squillions!

    3. Re:Same way by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Not quite the point you're trying to make here, but why not just print out the website and patent it?
      Doesn't need to be an invention or novel or anything; modern patent offices will rubberstamp anything, and it'll be available for atleast several decades after you die or until Disney goes bankrupt and can't bribe politicians for extensions any more.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  9. corporations exist in perpetuity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    And nobody cares about their websites either. Why is narcissim on a grand scale a virtue, while the practice of pedophilia in the privacy of your own home frowned on? I ask you, isn't nature ready to admit that propogation of DNA via random collapsing of probabilty functions a quaint but failed experiment?

  10. You really have two problems... by tweir · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The legal entity side where you the person who paid for the service is now deceased is a small part of the problem. Once the credit card company knows you're dead, so are your cards. Then you need to figure out how to get the service provider to change payment method without them realizing that the person who's name is on the account is deceased. If you care so much about this scenario, your best bet is to form some form of LLC that itself owns the domain, service contracts, etc. Make your executor/spouse/meaningful person a signing officer. This has the added benefit of skipping over probate issues as well.

    The bigger issue is the content/tech side. All sites need maintenance. All service providers eventually go out of business or get acquired. Bit rot is a thing. Your best bet for future-proofing is to either publish static HTML, or have a backup that can be published as static html after the fact. Either way, you really need to have a designated geek to help finish your affairs.

    And, after all that, you still need to figure out how to pay for the hosting perpetually. Maybe directing an annuity to be established is the right thing? No idea.

    With all that said, sometimes its nice to leave a legacy. E.g. http://www.penmachine.com/

    1. Re:You really have two problems... by gsslay · · Score: 1

      So what you're really saying is that if you are running a website that is more than a personal website (i.e. others rely on it), then don't run it as a personal website.

  11. A challenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The first thing to consider is the web itself is less than 100 years old, and unlikely to still be there in 100 years. If you are willing to postulate the web, there are a number of strategies to be considered, and a good approach would be to use as many of them as possible.

    1. Host on a free service, like blogger. You don't have DNS, you are costing them almost nothing, your blog will remain as long as their company/business model survives. Find as many of these services as you can, and replicate content. This is probably the best case scenario.

    2. Host a website on Amazon's S3, and prepay. Cost of s3 is very low, one hundred dollars would keep a low traffic site running for a long time. And you should use their default URL. Again, no DNS issues.

    3. Write malware that distributes your content to existing websites. You'd need some automated method of acquiring exploits though. That would be difficult.

    4. Make sure you have a payment system that will keep running. This has been shown to work before: http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/07/us/michigan-mummified-body-found/ Use this as a backup to keep any paid websites, DNS, etc. Still running.

    5. Create a trust. Hire a law firm to administer the trust. Put enough money in it, and it can hire people that will keep the site running.

    1. Re:A challenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6. Have offspring. Teach them your system for backing up content including offsite back up. If you're lucky they'll be smart enough and interested enough to maintain your legacy. Failing that enter into a mutual arrangement with another geek you trust.

  12. I upload my legacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I upload my legacy and let the world mirror it.

  13. Better Testers? by jt-socal · · Score: 1

    Anybody want to beta the solutions?

  14. Try to be sufficiently interesting . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    . . . and the world will keep your content available. The works of Shakespeare are still around, and lots of lesser writers as well.

    Not all are so interesting. So there is a market for companies that keep content available forever, for a suitable one-time fee. Similar to those frozen brains . . .

  15. Mother of all assumptions by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    "especially because all of us are going to die"

    Bit of a large assumption there...

    There are likely some people already born who will never die. Their form might change.

    1. Re:Mother of all assumptions by kesuki · · Score: 1

      eventually the thermal death of the universe will come.

      there is no way to tell when (i bet next Wednesday at 3.05pm, small wager of one point only)

      that was a joke, not funny but i giggled.

    2. Re:Mother of all assumptions by pubwvj · · Score: 1

      You definitely worry too much. :)

      Be the Chaos.

    3. Re:Mother of all assumptions by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Thermal death of the universe will happen long after we develop cross-multiverse travel.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    4. Re:Mother of all assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if we fix old age and brain diseases and cancer and heart disease... a big if... we'll still get all the other diseases, get hit by buses, get poisoned, and so on. It's hard to come up with a good estimate but the educated guesses I've seen range between 500 and 5000 years.
      500 is a more conservative guess, taking into account bigger probabilities for accidents and such, but wagering we fix more and more diseases.
      5000 assumes lower accident probabilities mean we can fix almost any disease and radically re-engineer society or otherwise increase longevity in some way.

    5. Re:Mother of all assumptions by pubwvj · · Score: 1

      Poison, Busses, etc: Reboot.

      5,000 years: And you're still worrying. :)

    6. Re:Mother of all assumptions by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Well, it certainly won't happen in the reverse order.

    7. Re:Mother of all assumptions by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      There's always an option of energy hoarding. I saw that sci-fi once; the whole universe is long dead but the civilization thrives on a single isle of enormous hoard of energy picked before that. Yes, that means the universe isn't -entirely- dead, but its final thermal death is prolonged far past its natural date through artificial means buying the civilization extra time to either migrate to a different universe or trigger a new big bang.

      Plus it's not entirely sure if space expansion can't be harnessed as an energy source; that effect seems to increase potential energy between distant objects at no cost at all - a mysterious source of negative entropy.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  16. Simple approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Get a domain name for the family. Every member can have a subdomain under that domain name. Hand off care and feeding of the domain and the hosting to your successor well before you die, with instructions they do the same when the time comes.

    It does mean you have to say good-bye to myfancyvanitydomainname.com, instead you get to use you.family.org. At the same time, this is exactly how DNS was designed to work.

  17. Why? by pushing-robot · · Score: 2

    Do you really need to bequeath your blog to your next of kin? If you're talking to your family about funds and credentials, you're telling them 'here, I expect you to keep spending money forever on pointless sentimentality'. Keep a backup of the content, that's all.

    But don't get me wrong; we should all be ready for our inevitable demise. I can't overestimate how important it is to prepare a will, insurance, a small untraceable account and a few years of queued posts offering a food tour of the afterlife.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:Why? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Because not all websites are personal blogs. The modern web is a dynamic and interactive thing.
      Imagine how badly even something as trivial as a webbased game could be backed up as a static backup.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  18. If I'm dead by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Why the hell should I care?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:If I'm dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the NSA is trying to kill you before you can blow the whistle.

    2. Re:If I'm dead by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      In this case the last thing I want is them knowing where I hid the stash.

      In the purely hypothetical event of having something worth blowing the whistle over, I would certainly implement some kind of dead-man switch. Like, say, depositing a copy of the material with a person that I trust who has the instruction to immediately publish it should there ever happen something unhealthy to me.

      And of course I'd make sure that whoever I would like to blow the whistle on at the very least suspects that I do so. The only thing I'd then have to take care of is ensuring that there is no connection between me and that hypothetical person. At least after they have reason to suspect me and trace my steps.

      But that's all of course just the rambling of someone who plays way too much PnP RPGs.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. If you want something to happen after you die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Get a lawyer.

    Get him/her to setup a trust for that. Problem solves.

  20. Trust company? by slazzy · · Score: 1

    Seems like the sort of thing a trust/lawyer company would be good at. They can keep the bills paid, and hiring an IT person to fix anything that breaks. Probably cost a fortune though.

    --
    Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    1. Re:Trust company? by jopsen · · Score: 1

      Seems like the sort of thing a trust/lawyer company would be good at. They can keep the bills paid, and hiring an IT person to fix anything that breaks. Probably cost a fortune though.

      I see a business opportunity here... You leave your domain with the hosting company, the company does a scan (convert site to static site) and hosts it on say S3 once you're dead... You pay them upfront for say 1000 years of hosting and domain management. Why not, 1k years keeping the lights on a static site is only going to get cheaper, so how expensive do we really think that is...

      We could call the business "dead simple hosting" :)

      For all the people who ask why, I ask why not keep my personal blog around 1k years after I'm dead. Sure it might be worthless, but some of it might have interest to my grand children.. After all my blog is my legacy, however, uninteresting it may be.
      Yeah, I know there is the wayback machine, but it's also not the same...

  21. That's nothing by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've been dead since 2009 and I'm still posting Slashdot comments.

    It's all about good planning.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, it's a good thing the pope is infallible.

    2. Re:That's nothing by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 2

      I've been dead since 2009 and I'm still posting Slashdot comments.

      I hope you get better soon!

      --

      Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

      Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    3. Re:That's nothing by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Slashdot itself died in 2010. You only think you are posting beyond your grave!

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    4. Re:That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, the old neckbeards need some place to bake and let entropy strip them of their faculties amirite?

    5. Re:That's nothing by stooo · · Score: 1

      Salshdot had a beta version of death. It didn't work well...

      --
      aaaaaaa
    6. Re:That's nothing by Skapare · · Score: 1

      can you prove it ... with a selfie?

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    7. Re:That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can you prove it ... with a selfie?

      you mean a smellfie?

  22. Named by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Set up your family name as a corporation and ensure it's controlled by a trust of members in your immediate family that you can you know, trust.

    Use the corporation to control all aspects of accounts and websites for individual members of the family. Then multiple people know account log in's. The corporation cannot die, but will live on and controlled by your family, thus all accounts are immortal and controlled easily.

    Problem Fscking Solved.

    1. Re:Named by ledow · · Score: 2

      And thus my problem with this entire concept:

      That's a lot of pissing about just to hold some old family photos and some broken HTML code on the Internet for a while.

      Stop pissing about. The desire for you to be remembered for ever only resides with you, maybe your children, and - possibly - your grandchildren. Past that, nobody gives a shit at all. You could be the biggest celebrity in the world and nobody would care by the time it's your grandchild's time.

      Name a grandchild of a famous dead person. Pretty much they have their own lives and don't want to live in their shadow all the time, or they go bankrupt trying.

      Give it up. Print stuff off into a book or archive. Self-publish it and put a few copies around the family. Then forget about it and move on with your lives.

    2. Re:Named by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      The best thing anyone can do to be remembered is simply to have your DNA done. This gets placed into a world database and is searchable. The DB will last as long as DNA studies exist, which is presently pretty much forever in human terms.
      Spend as much as you can - for around $350 you can get a lot of DNA markers analyzed and stored. Anyone doing your genealogy would be very grateful and you will be remembered.
      www.enaos.net (French site) is also an option.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  23. Vote early, vote often by tomhath · · Score: 1

    This problem was solved a long time ago in Chicago. Just leave the password for the domain and your bank account with someone. Doesn't matter who you leave it with, you're dead.

  24. Obvious solution. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're dead? Host it on a zombie server.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:Obvious solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now there's a story for a sci-fi/horror novel. Dead people fragments haunting the living within constantly mutating, network persisting zombie ad-networks and botnets which their controllers have long since lost to the murky protocol layers of the Internet of everything.

  25. _even_ WordPress? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm shocked. I'm sure there's SOMETHING in the GPL about not discriminating against fields of endeavour or something. Surely that means it must not be right that they can discriminate against the endeavours of the dead.

    I'm going to have to stop developing in WordPress and switch to something less damn discriminatory.

  26. one possibility by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Use a webhost that lets you pre-pay for service, and prepay for a bunch of it. Register the domains through that host too, and set them to autorenewal. This won't get you indefinite service, but it can get you quite some years, if the host remains in business. Also you might want a static HTML website rather than something that might need upgrades.

    Nearlyfreespeech.net is an example of a host you can do that with. If you deposit, say, $500, they will keep hosting your website until you use up $500 worth of service, which for a modest static-HTML site with one domain should be many years.

    1. Re:one possibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A client of ours had a website that gave comfort and advice to people who were considering suicide, or had lost a loved one to suicide. When he died of old age, his family wanted to ensure his site continued on for a pretedetermined time. They paid us up front for several years of hosting, and since we had a static HTML version of the site, and controlled the server and domain name registration, we were able to honour his legacy and follow their wishes. I have no idea if he helped comfort or save anyone after his death, but I like to think he did.

  27. A lot of other things are challenging too... by BitterOak · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of other things that are challenging once you're dead too, like brushing your teeth, combing your hair (and it's a real pain when it starts to fall out), and even scratching an itch. Being dead sucks, actually, and you'll have a lot more on your mind than keeping your WordPress site up to date!

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    1. Re:A lot of other things are challenging too... by Skapare · · Score: 1

      or tweeting about your sudden demise .... with a selfie of course

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  28. If you think Web hosting is hard ... by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

    ... try editing your page after you're dead.

    I assume that decomposition has a negative effect on your typing skills.

    1. Re:If you think Web hosting is hard ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

      it all depends on remembering your password

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  29. Solved problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If it's that important and you have a partner in the endeavor, you make sure they have access.
    If it's that important and you don't have a partner in the endeavor, you hire a lawyer.
    QED

  30. Next of Kin by Mafiasecurity · · Score: 1

    You all are making this more complex than it needs. Simply implement a "Next of Kin" system which requires public records of death along with death certificate to have the account released. Too easy. The real challenge will be introducing some sort of inheritance tax on digital assets.

  31. Physical access by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    If I'm self-hosting, then the server is in my house and belongs to me. As long as whoever is supposed to manage it after I'm gone is capable of using the operating system on said system, they should be able to reset my passwords after I'm gone and manage it by starting there.

    Although really, if I'm dead, why would I care if anyone saw my web page? I've never had anything on my web server that was that important.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  32. Information is Only Available When Someone Cares by brian.stinar · · Score: 2

    In his book, The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology Ray Kurzweil talks about the difficulties moving information from media to media as technology changes. He comes to the conclusion that information is only readily available when someone cares about it.

    If you have enough money, [like other posters mentioned] you could setup a trust and have the executors required/compensated for taking an actions (such as keeping your online presence going after you die.)

  33. all of us are going to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speak for your self.
    More than 6 billion people have never died.
    Personally I'll take my chances at living for ever.

    1. Re:all of us are going to die by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wrong.

      7 billion people are alive. 108 billion people have existed. That means 101 billion have died.

      That gives you a 94% chance of death and a 6% chance of immortality.

    2. Re:all of us are going to die by Skapare · · Score: 1

      oooh, 108 possible identities to grab!

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    3. Re:all of us are going to die by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

      You completely and utterly fail at both logic and reading comprehension.

      Let me spell it out for you, because you are stupid:

      No one who is currently alive has ever died. There are over 6 billion people living today, hence there are over 6 billion people who have never died.

    4. Re:all of us are going to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be fun at parties.

    5. Re:all of us are going to die by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      My post is currently +4 Funny.

      There's also 7 billion people alive, not 6.

  34. rofl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    please someone maintain my Myspace profile after I die. Thank you.

  35. If your data on the web mattered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it would already be on a non-personal site (Wikipedia, liveleaks, arxiv, etc.)

    Otherwise it's best not to clutter the already cluttered net with more useless stuff. Let it 'age' out like any other good cache of once useful things that are no longer needed.

  36. Not possible. by bdubSOv1iKIJ403M · · Score: 2

    As a believer in presentism, I believe that your problem is unsolvable -- after you're dead, no matter how many preparations are made, there's no guarantee that your descendents will respect your wishes.

    But, that said, best of luck trying. The pursuit of the unachievable, often leads to useful side effects.

    1. Re:Not possible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you give the AI the ability to purchase its own hosting.

  37. In the LORDS NAME HIMSELF by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Stop using that security nightmare.

    PLEASE!

    IE 6 and XP with pre service pack 2 had less security exploits for crying out loud. No IT professional should trust it as arstechnica and others have a 0 day posted every other month.

  38. I am ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Anomymous Coward. I shall never die.

  39. I'm not convinced ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... this Internet thing is really going to catch on anyway.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  40. Here's a "real" example by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    I can't be the only one who thought of this precise example of a situation like this
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    1. Re:Here's a "real" example by Whiteox · · Score: 2

      Next door neighbor has kept his deceased daughter's website an facebook pages alive. I reckon facebook will last a long long time.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  41. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once I'm dead, what fucks do I give if my website or anything else is still around?

  42. Preservation of digital objects by pcjunky · · Score: 1

    My wife did this as her thesis.

    http://explorer.cyberstreet.co...

  43. Re:Information is Only Available When Someone Care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an alternative to a trust incorporate the blog and leave a big enough balance in the corporation accounts to pay someone to maintain the site for a good while. If you have a board of directors for the corp, it is likley there will still be one director around who can restart the corp. (Perhaps as an LLC etc). This is the big advantage of a corporation in that it will survive the death of the main person if set up properly. corps are immortal.

  44. R. I. P. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry, the living will maintain it if it's worth the effort.

  45. Dying is all about letting go by rainer_d · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you're famous enough, you'll have a wikipedia entry.
    If not, well, that's it.
    If you have relatives, they will remember you. If you have kids early enough and they also have kids early enough, your grandkids will remember you, too.
    If not, maybe you should stop worrying about a f*cking website, for god's sake!

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  46. Who cares? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    It's rather unlikely that I'll care what happens to my domain after I'm dead.

  47. I have this plan... by swell · · Score: 1

    So, yeah, I have this plan to not die.
    So far it's working!

    Now really folks, aren't we taking ourselves too seriously here? Is there something you have to say that is so important you want it available for future generations? Think about the 101 billion who have already died- did lots of them have important things to say that we should be reading about now? Should they have left us a legacy web site?

    If you have important wisdom to share, or even some really important facts and figures to impart; put them in a book. Publishers love to publish important stuff and most of them can distinguish 'important' from 'self-important'. Your legacy may last longer than the internet, maybe longer than humanity.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  48. Re:Oh dear. by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

    The Challenge of Web Hosting Once You're Dead

    I clearly see it now, The Challenge of Web Hosting Once You're Dead, the occult aspect of it is clearly off topic. Thanks for clearing that up...

  49. When I'm dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I propably no longer care about what happens to my website(s).

  50. immortal web by CmdrTamale · · Score: 1

    github?

  51. Dead is dead by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    I don't want to see dead people, all the time, not in real life nor in the digital one.

  52. Twitter by Skapare · · Score: 1

    Can someone tell me how to keep my twitter account active after I die?

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  53. Oh my God ... by krygny · · Score: 1

    ... who the hell ceahs?!!

    --
    Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
  54. it happened to my employer, a nonprofit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My employer delegated everything to a contractor, a company of one. He hosted the webmail on a commercial server. All the contacts for the domain name were him and one email address, as was the hosting account. Not a single Board Member was on any account.

    One day he suffered an incapacitating stroke. He was an only child with an elderly mother who could not help us at all, not even with credit card or checking account numbers. No passwords were cached on his laptop. The guy was a hermit with no friends. We were locked out of everything, just waiting for accounts to expire.

    I managed to get into the accounts with social engineering. I read everything about Captain Crunch, Cliff Stoll, Catch Me If You Can. It took about 5 months, but I saved everything, domain names, email, registry services.

    Yes, it was a shitty Governing Board.

    1. Re: it happened to my employer, a nonprofit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serves you right for entrusting that much to a shit nerd instead of contracting real professionals. Too bad you haven't gone under.

  55. History by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    You know how we have found records from ancient Egypt and China and South America that are thousands of years old, enabling us to learn about those cultures? That won't happen with us. We store our records on fragile magnetic disks that require electricity and an extremely complex machine to read. No one wants to think that our civilization could end, but odds are it will at some point. I often wonder what future archaeologists will think about our civilization. What trace will we leave behind now that everything has gone digital?

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    1. Re:History by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      What trace will we leave behind now that everything has gone digital?

      What makes you think that everything has gone digital? We still make machines, build buildings, carve up the landscape. Those are going to last. The "plastic layer" in the rocks is metaphorical, but we as sure as hell are going to leave a major geochemical mark. And a shorter-live radiological trace. We've started a major climate change which shows every sign of being as significant as the Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, which we've understood for a bit more than a decade now, but we've recognised for more like one and a half centuries.

      Our civilisation will remain in the archaeological record, don't you worry. Your twitter feed may be gone, but that is unlikely to make it to the next decade, even without the untimely death of yourself or the civilisation that we live in.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  56. sheldonbrown.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A good example of this is www.sheldonbrown.com

    Sheldon Brown who died in 2008 was a very well know bicycle mechanic, writer, and collector. He had a lot of information about various interesting bicycle topics on hos web site. I believe he did not pass away suddenly and planned for his available web material to continue to be hosted on his domain.

  57. Wayne? by allo · · Score: 1

    If you're dead, you just do not care anymore.

  58. While you're at it... by gregor-e · · Score: 1

    While you're considering post-mortem hosting, you should also get your shit together.

  59. It really is something to think about by Spugglefink · · Score: 1

    Mom had a blog and a collection of around 80,000 digital photographs. After she died, I didn't have any good options for keeping any of it up. I mean yeah, she was my mother, but $120 a year in perpetuity to preserve her life's work? Not to mention various tech support providers were entirely unhelpful when I contacted them about transferring all her data to accounts I controlled.

    I tried ripping a mirror of all that stuff to a local archive, but it proved to be a major challenge to grab full sized copies of all the images, and every single interconnected thing, without sucking in half the damn internet. My script blew out a 500 GB hard disk, and got my bandwidth throttled for a month, and still missed most of what I was trying to capture.

    I had her original hard disk with the raw image files, and decided to settle for that. I had no record of which ones she hand picked, and no rhyme or reason to tens of thousands of files with random date-based names. I wanted to do a coffee table book or something--anything, really--but I never figured out what to do with any of that, and never got around to doing anything with it at all.

    When the rent came due on the online stuff, I threw up my hands and pulled the plug on everything. I set the hard drive aside to do something with one of these days, but I lost track of which identical old drive was which, and accidentally formatted that one.

    My mother was a very depressed, unhappy woman who drank herself to an early death. In the end, one of the things she lamented about most loudly was the fact that her life's work was nothing more than pixels. In a tragic turn of irony, she was exactly right about that. It fell on me to preserve her legacy, and I totally fucked it all up, and it's all gone. Poof. Literally the only thing I have to remind me that my mother used to exist is a print-out of one of her last emails, where she was telling some guy she knew what an asshole I am.

    I guess she was right about that too. I fucked it all up, and what can I do about it now? Nothing.

  60. psAfterlife service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a service called "psAfterlife" (spanish: https://www.fayerwayer.com/2011/07/psafterlife-un-servicio-para-comunicarse-despues-de-muerto-fw-startups/ and https://www.psafterlife.com/es/) which you subscribed so they managed your "digital heritage" after your death, forever. Ironically, I guess this service is no longer available so maybe it wasn't that good to profit from.

  61. Who is going to do the Startup? by bezenek · · Score: 1

    The problem of disappearing personal Web sites has been in the news a couple of times this week.

    It seems like an obvious startup to guarantee viability of Web content after death for a fee. It seems pretty straightforward, except...

    I assume there will be some law to define. For instance, does the company have the same rights as the deceased when it comes to asking/forcing Facebook to not delete their page/wall.

    This sounds like a great business project, and a great career-maker for at least one lawyer.

    -Todd

    --
    Omne ignotum pro magnifico.