Slashdot Mirror
FCC Tosses Petition Challenging Its New Internet Regulations
A petition submitted to the FCC by several of the players (including AT&T, CenturyLink, and USTelecom) who would be most affected by the agency's recently asserted Internet regulatory powers has been rejected by the agency's leadership. The Internet providers, along with the CTIA trade association, asserted that the FCC's Open Internet order is aganst the public interest. Per The Verge, the Commission last Friday "denied the petition, issuing an order that states its classification of broadband internet as a telecommunications service "falls well within the Commission's statutory authority, is consistent with Supreme Court precedent, and fully complies with the Administrative Procedure Act."
Right. The top 0.1% of the wealth people should owns 99.9% of the world wealth. Net neutrality will prevent that. Think of the poor rich kids!
Wait, so it wasn`t the deregulation of corporations, with their unrestaint greed, caused a bubple and crash? t was the gov with all their rules and restictions on the freedom of individuals and companies!
No "priority" internally hosted services, no "doesn't count towards your cap" services
Ehhh. While a noble goal, I'm guessing you don't work in networking at a design level. If you have to leave your own network, you have to pay for the traffic you pull; that's even true for the largest ISPs. So there really is a good argument to be made for giving priority to (and ignoring data caps for) services on the provider network. If you disallow that sort of thing, then you'll be stepping on all the easiest ways to, for example, peer out big files during peak times. You'd also put a dent in network caching, which is actually pretty nice for end users.
Network neutrality isn't network communism. Not all data can be - not all data SHOULD be - treated equally. And it's important to make allowances for that sort of thing.
The right wing "news sources" and blogs have been saying that Obama is trying to take away our freedom through net neutrality all along.
Seriously.
And in the disqus comments and the like you can read thousands and thousands of hysterical old people screaming and crying about it ...
It's like that on everything. The hysteria of confused old people is a commodity bought and sold by corporations.
But who is really capable of thinking long term?
Everyone except rich people and wannabes, apparently. It's the MAKE MONEY FAST mentality that has mortally wounded our economy over the past 35 years.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
Is this FCC a USA government institution?
I thought the US government was since Ronnie wholly owned by the corporations...
Let us (normal internet users) hope the FCC can get away with this pro net-neutrality policy, level playing field and all that!
There's something in the air. Lately even Joe Scarborough and some of the FOX News regulars have occasionally balked at the bullshit.
Probably the solar system is passing through a cloud of hippie gas or something.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
This is regulation in favor of the people. We don't see a lot of that and so it's a bit of a surprise.
Naturally the right wing opposes it. It hurts the 1 percent AND demonstrates proper use of government regulation. Those are two things they can't stand the very thought of.
Considering the unlimited copyright extensions and money-based politics, corporations can never die. That is why they will never reach any afterlife.
QoS is an incredibly hard problem. Even professionals who are very good at their craft get it wrong on their own networks. What makes you think an ISP can properly QoS other people's traffic? ISP should be limited to purchasing more bandwidth and using anti-bufferbloat AQMs, but no throttling or QoS.
Not all Republicans. This one has been sick at the corporate welfare pushed by my own party. I've been cheering the FCC director and marveling at his backbone to push this non-partisan for the people measure through. I starting to think he'd be a good candidate for president someone that would serve the people.
I wish that the American people would wake up and stop treating politics as a sporting event and villianize everything from the other party. I wish we would start to seek and promote those that actually seek a better USA and that understand the principles that founded this country in the first place. These kind of individual are members of both the major parties and many of the minor parties. As the american people participate early we can avoid having to vote for the lessor evil and instead start voting for the greater good. If you only start to think about who to vote for in the general election it is too late.