Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Invests In Undersea Cable Projects
An anonymous reader writes: Microsoft announced today that it will partner with a group of telecom companies in order to build new undersea cables. A new cable will connect data centers in China, South Korea, and Japan to the West Coast. Microsoft hopes the New Cross Pacific (NCP) Cable Network will improve connection speeds and boost its competitiveness in cloud computing. They also made deals with Hibernia and Aqua Comms, to invest in a cable with each company connecting Microsoft's datacenter infrastructure from North America to Ireland and the United Kingdom. A company announcement reads in part: "Additionally, we joined a consortium comprised of China Mobile, China Telecom, China Unicom, Chunghwa Telecom, KT Corporation with TE SubCom as the cable supplier. As part of our participation in the consortium, Microsoft will invest in its first physical landing station in the US connecting North America to Asia. The New Cross Pacific (NCP) Cable Network will provide faster data connections for customers, aid Microsoft in competing on cloud costs, all while creating jobs and spurring local economies. The goal of our expansions and investments in subsea cables is so our customers have the greatest access to scale and highly available data, anywhere."
Software companies (Microsoft, Google, Facebook) are investing in internet infrastructure because they are out of ideas.
Who exactly wants to move their private personal and business data to this 'cloud' you speak of?
Because we know that cloud is based in Utah and run by military men who even spy on their own government.
all while creating jobs and spurring local economies.
Local to whom? Asia, who is on one side of the connection? Or North America, who is on the other side of the connection?
Or, more uselessly (and, therefore, probable), do they mean the local economies in the middle of the Pacific Ocean?
Captcha: rigging
Latency, moron.
"the New Cross Pacific (NCP)" - anyone who deploys infrastructure or creates a product with "New" in the name, even creating a new acronym out of it, is clueless! In 5-10 years time the thing is no longer new! What do they build next, "the New New Cross Pacific (NNCP)" cable?
Message to Microsoft: when your HQ employees only have access to Comcast (Pray you don't have a problem) and CenturyLink (Pray you don't need bandwidth), you'd be really well served to increase local capacity (a-la Google Fiber) to your local markets.
Good job sending more fiber to Asia, though.
Windows 10 will be so great every story related to Microsoft should be about it. Not about some useless trivia.
Pretty soon Microsoft is going to be underwater.
Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
Microsoft invests in undersea cables becomes news?
What year is this? 1985??
C'mon, man! There are so many undersea cables crisscrossing all the major oceans and new cables are being pulled every single day
Even if it is a slow-news-day this piece of non-news should not have appear in /.
Spotify can't seem to find a way to make money -- http://news.slashdot.org/story/15/05/11/2158218/how-spotify-can-become-profitable
Online news outlets are not making money either
Any exciting new video games lately? Same old shoot-em-up?
Even those suppose to deliver contents ( infotainments / edumercials, etc ) are regurgitating the same old stuff
The Net boomed during the 1990's, settled down near the end of the previous decades and now it's in decline, and unless someone figure out a way to inject brand new contents I do not foresee any meaningful 'growth' (in terms of substance) for the Net
Well, I can't help but wonder if Nsa is a customer to Microsoft.
Btw, i feel weird about getting a free upgrade from Win7 to Win 10, why is this free?
A new cable will connect data centers in China, South Korea, and Japan to the West Coast
The west coast of...?
Microsoft continues to have vast amounts of cash; that some of it is going to be used to build some useful infrastructure is a good thing. However the idea that this is best value for shareholders, who surely invested in a software company, is less obvious.
This isn't infrastructure, it's saving their non-US business.
Microsoft continues to have vast amounts of cash; that some of it is going to be used to build some useful infrastructure is a good thing. However the idea that this is best value for shareholders, who surely invested in a software company, is less obvious.
Fundamentally, a large part of what MS is selling today is its cloud services. Software subscriptions, OneDrive, MS hosted Exchange, Cloud computing, etc...
Better data links can be helpful with that. Think load-balancing or parallel processing or insurance against depletion of resources. If someone makes a bad call or an unexpected load comes up rapidly beyond their planned needs, low-latency connections let them offshore the needed resources for a day or two while they work to bring in a few thousand new machines locally, for example.
Data links they control also improve security. MS actually has pretty good privacy policies, people, and security compared to other providers; the more third-party companies involved in that, the less secure it is.
Microsoft is investing in tasty network capacity for its cloud computing so the NSA et al will be able to demand access.
I sincerely hope everybody tells MS to go piss up a rope because they can't be trusted.
Because, as long as the Patriot Act is in effect, Microsoft can't be trusted. Nor can any US cloud provider.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
...as every past partner to a project with M$ has not been very happy (except Darryl from SCO).
I expect that IBM will be taking bets.
of US IT jobs going overseas again.....
n/t