Slashdot Mirror


Dawn Spacecraft Gets a Better Look At Ceres' Bizarre 'White Spots'

StartsWithABang writes: Since its discovery as the first asteroid more than 200 years ago, Ceres has been one of the most poorly understood objects in the Solar System as even imagery from the Hubble Space Telescope is unable to resolve very much. But NASA's Dawn mission, since moving on from Vesta, has begun to map Ceres, constructing the highest resolution global map ever, with better data to come. The greatest mystery so far are two bright white spots at the bottom of a deep crater, brighter and more reflective than anything else on the planet's surface. Right now, three leading possibilities for the origin of these features exist, with Dawn possessing the capabilities to teach us which one (if any) is correct, hopefully by the end of the year!

78 comments

  1. Abandoned alien solar panels? by hawkfish · · Score: 1

    I suppose that counts as option 3...

    --
    You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
    1. Re:Abandoned alien solar panels? by slashmydots · · Score: 2

      Don't solar panels specifically not reflect light? It's obviously an alien hotspring spa destination.

    2. Re:Abandoned alien solar panels? by khr · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't solar panels specifically not reflect light?

      That could be why they're abandoned...

    3. Re:Abandoned alien solar panels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I vote for gigantic abandoned construct (ship, habitat, etc) that has been covered by millions of years of debris from the asteroid belt and an impact blasted away the rubble making part of it visible. Ah, at least one can hope.

    4. Re:Abandoned alien solar panels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, China started selling them cheaper and priced the innovators out of the market.

    5. Re:Abandoned alien solar panels? by Nyder · · Score: 1

      I suppose that counts as option 3...

      It's a dwarf planet, everyone knows that rubbing a dwarf's head bring luck. Well, sucking a dwarf's cock brings even better luck, and well, that is what you get after a planet spits it back on the dwarf.

      Just sayin....

      --
      Be seeing you...
    6. Re:Abandoned alien solar panels? by cytg.net · · Score: 1

      Its a texture glitch, i am sure it will be patched in due time.

    7. Re:Abandoned alien solar panels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was the sole escape pod from Mars.

      A few of the inhabitants left in case their geoengineering project to undo damage to the Mars environment failed.

  2. they left out #4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right now, three leading possibilities for the origin of these features exist

    I favor number 4: domed alien cities.

    Seriously, though: Ceres is probably a better destination for settlement than Mars.

    1. Re:they left out #4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about bioluminescent life? It wouldn't require intelligence, so it looks more likely.

    2. Re:they left out #4 by Fortran+IV · · Score: 1

      It doesn't seem to shine in the dark, so probably not. Kinda rules out lights from an active alien base, as well. Bummer.

      --
      I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
    3. Re:they left out #4 by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1

      I favor number 4: domed alien cities.

      Ceres is dust-covered planetoid whose core is made entirely of cocaine.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
  3. Huh by koan · · Score: 1

    They all seem to appear right where you would expect stress fractures to be on a body shaped like this.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Huh by kolbe · · Score: 1

      In several spots along the equatorial region it looks to have some open lava tubes that reinforce the idea of a molten core and active volcanos.

    2. Re:Huh by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      LOL ... you mean 'round'?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Huh by koan · · Score: 1

      Appears as more of a flattened ball, disk shaped or is that photo distortion? I guess that's still "round".

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  4. Ceres is a planet now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    more reflective than anything else on the planet's surface.

    Pluto is not, but Ceres is? Has the definition changed again?

    1. Re:Ceres is a planet now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the definition changed since 2006. There are 8 classical planets + 5 dwarf planets = 13 planets in total.

    2. Re:Ceres is a planet now? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Funny
    3. Re:Ceres is a planet now? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      So in OOP terms, "Dwarf" is a sub-class (sub-type) of "Planet". Thus, Ceres still "is-a" Planet per base type membership.

  5. It's a beacon by mveloso · · Score: 1

    Nothing natural can do that on that scale. Wonder what it's trying to tell us?

    1. Re:It's a beacon by Maritz · · Score: 1

      It's saying "Brian, get the fuck out of the bathroom what in fucks name are you at in there anyway."

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    2. Re:It's a beacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing natural can do that on that scale. Wonder what it's trying to tell us?

      ALL THESE PLANETS ARE YOURS EXCEPT CERES, ATTEMPT NO LANDING HERE.

  6. ice by itzly · · Score: 1

    I'm not an expert, but if it were ice, wouldn't you expect to see it in a crater on the pole where it is permanently in the shadow, rather than on the equator ?

  7. Aliens!!!! by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For the love of all science fiction be aliens!!! How many Sci-fi stories have we all read where an asteroid/comet/artefact is floating around our Solar system and it turns out to be some uber cool alien thing that has warp drive or a stargate or whatever and off we go adventuring around the galaxy?

    In fact I could even narrow the question down to how many sci-fi stories have we all read where the artefact involved Ceres?

    So while if I had to bet I would go with ice, soil disturbance, tectonic, or maybe even something a little cool like magnetic. But I want aliens!

    1. Re:Aliens!!!! by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Clearly what happened was that Ceres is in fact an alien covert research facility diquised as an asteroid. The facility had some kind of accident (hopefully it was just wiped out by an engineered, weaponized diesease and not full of zombified aliens) centuries ago and sometime between then and now a large impact damaged the coating all the way down to the metal wall of the facility itself. And of course, due to the inhabitiants at this point being nothing but dessicated (or animated!) corpses the damage to the camouflage was never repaired.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Aliens!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's down in that crater."

      "Chlorophyll!!"

    3. Re:Aliens!!!! by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      This. I fully agree, it would be a welcome twist in our history. I initially thought it was ice, but according to the information so far is something that is in the same place for too long to be ice (sublimation, sun hitting, etc). Then it is more likely to be another highly reflective material (and note that he appears to created the crater) , so I thought what kind of natural materials would be so reflective that way. It seems to me almost pure or polished metal, would be one of NASA discarded rocket stages that ended up hitting Ceres? Or ... is some kind of rocket, but not from us? :-)

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    4. Re:Aliens!!!! by CaptainLard · · Score: 2

      If it is aliens would they tell us? Or like most stories would there be a coverup?

    5. Re:Aliens!!!! by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      I am going with coverup. Information is power and they would feel so special being in the know of something so momentous when everyone else is in the dark. Even if a few came out and leaked it unless they had a massive massive data dump they would just end up a crank on the History channel. Look at that former Minster of Defence we have in Canada. He is all "blah blah ALIENS blah blah ALIENS!!!" yet outside of crank TV he is ignored.

      But for many they would suppress it for all kinds of paternalistic/religious/nationalistic reasons. Then after they suppressed it for a while they would just keep suppressing it so they didn't get the blame for being the one to suppress it.

    6. Re:Aliens!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't find a measured albedo of the bright spots, but in general Ceres is about the color of charcoal so these spots don't have to be "bright as freshly fallen snow" to stand out like this. They may just be relatively young impact features - perhaps the impactor was a rubble-pile asteroid or comet that broke up into many pieces due to tidal forces before it impacted, resulting in a number of freshly excavated craters arranged in a roughly east-west line due to the rotation of Ceres.

    7. Re:Aliens!!!! by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Richard Hoagland, is that you? heheh... I'm afraid to even look up what he thinks (well I know what he thinks, it's another NASA cover up :)

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  8. Ceres it's cold out there by Yergle143 · · Score: 1

    The solar irradiance at Ceres is about 150 W/m2...1/9th that of earth. It is cold out there in the asteroid belt in comparison to the moon or Mercury where surface ice is exposed only in polar permanent shadow. As reference the moons of Jupiter have no trouble maintaining a coat of ice.
    My guess is that the surface of Ceres is like a charred marshmallow; organic long chain hydrocarbon on top forming a dark crust that protects a frozen interior of H20/CO2/Methane and ammonia. The white spot is a rupture out of which has gurgled up some salty water that is sublimating to space.
    The question is can we skate on it?

    1. Re:Ceres it's cold out there by Fortran+IV · · Score: 2

      Interesting question. The explanation for ice skates I was taught as a kid (weight of skater forces surface of ice to melt, making it slippery) appears to be discredited. Still, I'd expect any loosely-bonded water molecules between skates and the ice would boil away instantly in near vacuum. Has anybody ever tried skating at very high altitude?

      --
      I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
    2. Re:Ceres it's cold out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would a vacuum matter? When you're a water molecule trapped between skates and the ice, the atmospheric pressure 5 mm away is the least of your worries.

  9. Remnants of a forgotten planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has been theorized before that the asteroid belt could have been formed when a larger planet was destroyed in a collision. It has also been theorized that the center of Jupiter is a giant diamond. What if Ceres is the leftover diamond from the center of a large gas giant that got destroyed? Having a diamond the size of Texas would certainly create a new space race and would help to change some of the existing laws on space exploration and ownership.

    1. Re:Remnants of a forgotten planet by Jack9 · · Score: 2

      > Having a diamond the size of Texas would certainly create a new space race

      Diamonds are not a compelling reason to go to other planets. The difference in economic scale is staggering. Diamonds are an artificially constrained resource. De beers and friends have conspired to keep cheap artificial diamonds (not fake zirconium) out of the luxury market, somewhat successfully. This doesn't mean it's work spending billions of dollars to get more. We can manufacture them here, cheaper than going out into orbit, much less another planet.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    2. Re:Remnants of a forgotten planet by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Funny

      This doesn't mean it's work spending billions of dollars to get more. We can manufacture them here, cheaper than going out into orbit, much less another planet.

      But these are SPACE DIAMONDS, and clearly far more likely to get you laid than those silly artificial diamonds.

    3. Re:Remnants of a forgotten planet by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      > Having a diamond the size of Texas would certainly create a new space race

      Diamonds are not a compelling reason to go to other planets. The difference in economic scale is staggering. Diamonds are an artificially constrained resource. De beers and friends have conspired to keep cheap artificial diamonds (not fake zirconium) out of the luxury market, somewhat successfully. This doesn't mean it's work spending billions of dollars to get more. We can manufacture them here, cheaper than going out into orbit, much less another planet.

      Just buy white sapphire. Looks just like a diamond unless you compare them side by side (and then only by color of the light or by hardness) and about a third of the price.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:Remnants of a forgotten planet by cusco · · Score: 1

      It has been theorized, but entirely discredited. Another planet breaking up would have left a lot more debris behind than exists in the asteroid belt. There's not even enough there to make Mercury or the Moon, much less a gas giant. Even if there were some unknown cosmic vacuum cleaner that sucked up the majority of mass the missing planet would have left its signature on the orbital dynamics of the rest of the planets, and there's nothing.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  10. Like that spot on a coconut... by See+Attached · · Score: 2

    There is always a soft spot under one of the black round circles on a coconut.. its where the straw goes! Perhaps this is where we are supposed tap into the interstellar fuel source!

    --
    Time for a new Political party in the US (or two!) One is off the rails Other cant pony up a leader.
  11. Obvious... by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Large, shiny reflective surfaces... it's a pair of Monoliths.

                            mark "would like to go there to investigate them...."

  12. "Three Leading Possibilities" by sexconker · · Score: 5, Informative

    No need to click - the "three leading possibilities" are exactly what you guessed:
      - Ice
      - Dry Ice
      - Different rocks that have a different albedo

    If you only guessed "ice" and "different rocks" you still get full credit.

    1. Re:"Three Leading Possibilities" by wasteoid · · Score: 1

      - Different rocks that have a different albedo

      Some rocks want to get their rocks off more than others.

  13. It's water ice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's water ice. Possibly ammonia hydrate. It is also not very surprising that it occurs on the floor of the crater. Many craters on terrestrial and icy worlds have structures (peaks, depressions, melt deposits) on their floors. The puzzle here is that the large crater appears to be old. Melt at its center should have been obscured by ejecta of subsequent smaller impacts. Perhaps Ceres low gravity and isolation prevents this.

  14. Earthlings? by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1

    I've often wondered if we are the first species to achieve intelligence on Earth.

    Bonobos are pretty smart, and a rough estimate might put them about 5 million years behind us on the evolutionary scale.

    Taking that as a rough guide (no more rough than the Drake equation), suppose humans decided to leave the planet, and suppose Bonobos evolved to our level of technology. Would they find evidence of us?

    Five million years is a pretty long time: everything on the surface would be eroded away, the seafloor would get covered in quite a bit of muck, any underground bunker would collapse. Overall I don't think there's be any reason for them to suspect that we were once here.

    Then reverse that and suppose that some *other* species evolved into intelligence more than 5 million years ago and left. Would we see any evidence?

    The results of non-natural nuclear reactors might indicate something was happening, but note that we haven't examined all the radioactive ore deposits on the planet yet - maybe we haven't found their "Yucca Mountain" installation yet. (Or then again, maybe we did.)

    If we wanted to leave a message for the next round of intelligent life, the best bet would be somewhere in space. The Lagrange points perhaps, or maybe the moon. Or maybe on a large asteroid - something that's big enough to be seen by early astronomers, and small enough to land and take off from without much difficulty.

    Note in the image of Ceres from the link there's a crater that comes up before the white spot that's distinctly hexagonal in nature. In fact, it 'kinda looks like a regular hexagon. It's visible at the 10:00 position starting in the 3rd frame, and sweeps by before the bright spots come into view.

    Just sayin'.

    1. Re:Earthlings? by itzly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bonobos are pretty smart, and a rough estimate might put them about 5 million years behind us on the evolutionary scale.

      They are not behind, they are right next to us on another path, and we have no way of telling where they'll go.

    2. Re:Earthlings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The continuous layer of metal and lead projectiles that dispersed around the Earth within the last 500 years would be a pretty telling indication. Dig into 5 million year old sediment and find these hunks of metal with nothing similar in previous eras, and in well preserved cases some markings. Then run some tests on them and see that it's not naturally occurring metals, etc. It would be pretty damn telling. Not to mention the hundreds of thousands of perfectly straight oil, natural gas and water holes that we've bored down much further than 5 million year old rock, and that would be pretty hard to not notice also, particularly with our penchant for getting our tools stuck in them.

    3. Re:Earthlings? by itzly · · Score: 1

      Five million years is a pretty long time: everything on the surface would be eroded away, the seafloor would get covered in quite a bit of muck, any underground bunker would collapse. Overall I don't think there's be any reason for them to suspect that we were once here.

      We have fossils from hundreds of millions years old, and they were made from fragile, organic, materials. If we leave enough stuff around, some of it will survive at least equally long.

    4. Re:Earthlings? by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      suppose humans decided to leave the planet

      Some humans, sure. But as long as the planet remains habitable, ALL humans leaving seems rather improbable. Human populations tend to expand to cover all available ground, not move as a single herd from A to B.

    5. Re:Earthlings? by swb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bonobos just figured out that civilization is a lot of extra work to go through for fucking and eating. Especially when you can just fuck and eat without it.

    6. Re:Earthlings? by CaptainLard · · Score: 2

      Overall I don't think there's be any reason for them to suspect that we were once here.

      True but possibly because they may never make the leap now that all the easy fuel is used up. Wasn't there a story on here a few days ago about how difficult it would be to restart industry after a civilization collapse because there would be no infrastructure that can drill 10000ft underwater, etc? It took a lot more than 5M years under very different surface conditions for all that oil and coal to collect. The fact that we've burned as much fossil fuel as we did makes me think that there hasn't been a prior intelligent species (or at all?).

    7. Re:Earthlings? by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      One pet theory that I always loved (and finally found in a sci-fi book) is to wonder how far dinosaur civilization would have to have gotten before we would have already found incontrovertible evidence?

      I suspect that Neanderthal level would simply have left little trace with any findings being self-supressed by the palaeontologist.

      Even North American Indian culture of 500 years ago would still be largely invisible after 65 million years again with the aid of people dismissing the few oddities they found.

      But the aliens that I have long thought we would encounter would be some sort of machines sent out to just explore. Not even terribly advanced machines. Think about the warp drive or emdrive that NASA is tinkering with. If we barely got those to work I could see us firing out zillions of little probes to explore and eventually report back. Not all would make it back.

    8. Re:Earthlings? by meglon · · Score: 1

      Would they find evidence of us?

      Five million years is a pretty long time: everything on the surface would be eroded away, the seafloor would get covered in quite a bit of muck, any underground bunker would collapse. Overall I don't think there's be any reason for them to suspect that we were once here.

      Have you never heard of Twinkies?

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    9. Re:Earthlings? by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      "...suppose that some *other* species evolved into intelligence more than 5 million years ago and left. Would we see any evidence?"

      Yes. Assuming they didn't try to hide their traces. If I remember right, full surface recycling takes more than 200M years.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    10. Re:Earthlings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think any of those things will be there in 5 million years? The reason that refined metals have to be refined is because they don't last long in that state. The holes you talk about will mostly erode away and/or be filled in with sediment. True that will still leave a fossil hole that some future geologist might find, but how likely are they to find them?

    11. Re:Earthlings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bonobos are pretty smart, and a rough estimate might put them about 5 million years behind us on the evolutionary scale.

      They are not behind, they are right next to us on another path, and we have no way of telling where they'll go.

      Given that they're bonobos, probably into the bushes over there for a quick shag.

    12. Re:Earthlings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've often wondered if we are the first species to achieve intelligence on Earth.

      Nope, but the good news is the Bonobos still have a good chance of being first.
      At least until we kill them all off, then it'll be a jellyfish or something as the best hope for first intelligent life on Earth.

    13. Re:Earthlings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One pet theory that I always loved (and finally found in a sci-fi book) is to wonder how far dinosaur civilization would have to have gotten before we would have already found incontrovertible evidence?
       

      T-Rex hip implants, especially with all that weight they were lugging around and poor posture.

    14. Re:Earthlings? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      On the surface of the planet, you would be very hard-pressed to find evidence of a civilization like ours that existed five million years ago. But start digging and you would find plenty of evidence. Things would get covered with sediment, and you would find things like roads, bricks, and other trash when you start digging. Some stuff we make would last a very long time, especially in the right environments. Glass, aluminum wheels and engine blocks, gold coins and jewelry, concrete, silicon chips, some plastics would be stable for a very long time. If the civilization made it to the space age, we'd also find stuff that they left in sufficiently high orbits. Now, a pre-industrial civilization that only made simple tools may slip through the cracks, but I'm pretty sure we are the first civilization to make it this far on Earth.

  15. Re:Other BBS doors and development is taking place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who the hell modded up this off-topic spam post?

  16. What it really is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either some lazy alien left the lights on, or...

    giant radioactive space seagulls...

  17. The real question is - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it shine on the dark side?

    1. Re:The real question is - by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      No, they checked. In the video you can see it goes dim then black when it gets out of sunlight.

      It was worth checking though.....

  18. Need a rover by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    If this is water ice, we need to send a rover to Ceres. This may end up being a better place to land astronauts than Mars.

    1. Re:Need a rover by itzly · · Score: 1

      Why would it be a better place ? It's further away, colder, and there's less gravity.

    2. Re:Need a rover by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Because it's further away, colder and there's less gravity. Ceres formed past the solar system's frost line. More volatile gases are frozen there than Mars. Things like water, methane, ammonia. We can use methane as fuel, drink water, and brake down water and ammonia to make air from the Nitrogen and Oxygen. That way, we also make Hydrogen for fuel. We may even find carbon dioxide to make hydrocarbons. Much easier to extract than they would be on Mars.

    3. Re:Need a rover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Better" probably isn't quite the right word but I think "easier" fits quite well. I believe some of the Mars exploration plans have suggesting going for the Martian moons rather than the planet due the the relative easy nature of landing on a body with no atmosphere and limited gravity (moons, small planetoids, etc). From a purely technical standpoint the Martian surface offers few advantages (standard day/night cycle, some atmosphere) and a lot of drawbacks (full spacesuits required, still very cold, parachutes don't really work but spacecraft still have to have aerodynamic characteristics (added weight/fuel requirements), 1/3 gravity probably doesn't prevent significant boneloss).

    4. Re:Need a rover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it's apparently the size of Texas, so it's probably full of Oil and Southerners.

  19. HELIUM 3 by mrego · · Score: 1

    Enough Helium 3 to make me very very very rich... and yeah power the entire earth for a million years.

  20. I know what they are... by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Spaceballs spitballs.

    Barf and Lonestar where messing around doing some target practice with the Spitball cannon... Don't worry, Mega-Maid will clean it up eventually.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  21. Spectrograph? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Don't they have something similar to a spectrograph to determine chemical signature of selected targets? I thought such was standard equipment on such probes. Perhaps they are not yet close enough to Ceres to get useful data from it.

    spectrograph overview: http://spiff.rit.edu/classes/p...

    1. Re:Spectrograph? by cusco · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, they do, and no, they're not.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  22. not an asteroid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ceres wasn't discovered as the first asteroid, for decades it was a planet. A retrospective recategorisation took place when discoveries of smaller bodies revealed the existence of the asteroid belt. The planet Ceres became a victim by association.

    I'm a member of the first wave of haters about planetary reclassification. Unlike the emotional and sometimes histrionic Second Wave, a.k.a Pluto Planet People, we Ceres Reinstaters like to put our case without exclamation marks but trust me, we feel just as deeply about Ceres as the PPP feel about Pluto.

  23. Option 4 : DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bright spots are a watermark to help catch outsiders taking pictures without a license.

    All ur base...

  24. Spaceships by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the Animated GIF, There are Black Oval Spots that appear in some frames. they are not part of the landscape. More like objects in low orbit. they dont look like digital artifacts. check it out.