Ask Slashdot: Security Certification For an Old Grad?

An anonymous reader writes: I graduated in late 2003 during the tech bubble burst with a below 2.5 GPA. I am 35 with an interest in getting a security job. What are the chances that I would be just wasting my time and money? I am pursuing business interests with a patent used in a service that will be a prime target for hackers. I have been writing client/server software in an OpenBSD virtual machine for the security and the kqueue functionality; not to mention the rest of the virtual clients crash that I have tried. I figure that trying to sell the service idea, even if I can't get a job, when they ask what qualifies me to have such ideas, I can say I have the credentials. I just got issued the patent this year. What would you do in this situation to be a viable candidate for employment? Have a question for Slashdot's readers? Take a look at other recent questions first to see if someone else has had a similar question. And if not, ask away! The more details and context you include, the more likely your question will be selected.

Comments

Certification for programmers

[phantomfive]

If you're going to be a sysadmin, getting a certification can be well worth it (depending on the company, the certification, your position, etc).
If you're a programmer, getting a certification is a waste of time unless you learn something in the process. In that case, the certification will still be worthless but the knowledge you gained will be worth something.

Forget the GPA

[Sowelu]

All it says is how hard you leaned on the grindstone fifteen years ago. Totally useless as a predictor by the time you're four years out of university (some would say much earlier). You got the degree, you've been exposing yourself to technologies, you're staying more current than some (not very good) currently-employed programmers and security guys. Put that GPA out of your mind entirely.

Here's been my experience.

[Anonymous Coward]

If you do not have on the job experience, training means nothing. Unless the school you go to has an AWESOME placement program (yeah, right), it is a waste of time and money to go for classes or certs.

See, in this job market, you are your last job. You could have 10 years of experience and you take a job flipping burgers because your company laid off everyone in '09 - including the entire development department and offshored it - you will find that you no longer have "the skills" to do the job you did for 10 years prior (this happened to me). I went to classes for other technologies - .NET is big here - and NOTHING. No interviews. Not even a 'not interested' email.

So, I'd say take the money for certs and go into business and to hell with a technology career.

Why employment if you own a patent?

[Holladon]

I don't understand why the question is framed as one of employment. If the patent is valuable, the submitter should be hiring security specialists, not trying to become one from scratch. If the patent isn't valuable, then it has zero relevance to the job search unless the only reason it lacks value is because the submitter is crap at business. And if that's the case, why isn't the submitter trying to sell the patent for quick buck and use that to fund this interest in security credentials? I'm just having trouble reconciling the whole "I'm pursuing business interests with a security-related patent I own" with "I want to be someone else's hired gun for security work." Perhaps the problem is that the submitter is being disingenuous about the level of involvement in business discussions related to this patent - regardless, the first thing I would work on is creating a narrative that will make an ounce of sense to employers, because this one doesn't.

Also, I'm around the same age as submitter and haven't talked about my GPA in forever. Why are we talking about GPAs at all?? No one cares about your GPA 12 years ago. Seriously, no one. Far more worrying is the implication that a 12-year-old GPA is the most relevant thing you can talk to a potential employer about.

Re:Too old

[dgatwood]

That said, if you have a below 2.5 GPA...good lord, go get a new diploma and with a higher GPA. Only your most recent GPA counts. Getting a good GPA isn't hard, it just requires you to actually give a shit. Employers tend to not care so much for people who don't give a shit.

Do any employers actually care what someone's GPA was in college? I don't think I've ever put that information on my resumé, and I've never had any prospective employer ask. Never. Yes, for a new college grad, it might be relevant, but for everybody else, going back to college would probably be a waste of your time.

IMO, you'd be much better off taking classes in a particular specialization that will be relevant to your future career as the original poster suggested, rather than wasting four years just to prove that you are capable of getting higher grades in a pile of non-major classes whose subjects mostly won't provide any real benefit in your future career.