Slashdot Mirror


The Solution To Argentina's Banking Problems Is To Go Cashless

dkatana writes: There is no way back for Argentinian people to trust their own currency. Several governments have used the "Peso/Dollar" exchange to dig into people's savings, reward their friends and limit the freedom of citizens to use other currencies.

Short of Dollarizing the economy again, the only solution for the country is going cashless. People are desperate, and they're looking for alternatives such as mobile payments, Amazon gift cards and Bitcoin to store their savings away from government control. A digital currency could help curb black market exchanges, fight corruption and restore the country's image.

10 of 294 comments (clear)

  1. "Cashless" is meaningless by jodido · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cashless is a convenience. You need a currency. And once there is one, you're in the dollar world again.

    1. Re:"Cashless" is meaningless by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not meaningless if your goal is to steal and that's what that 'article' proposes - theft.

      1. Government steals by forcing people to declare all of their cash savings and to justify them to transfer them into the electronic form.

      2. Government steals by creating inflation electronically, so it's cheaper and faster for the government to create vast amounts of virtual money and dilute existing savings, thus stealing (creating inflation).

      3. Government can steal everything at any time by simply emptying your bank account and leaving you with nothing.

      4. Government will steal by setting stupid exchange rates that are absolutely fake, like pegging the exchange say 1USD to 10Pesos while on the 'black market' you would get many times more pesos, for example 100 for 1.

      5. Government can control you if you do not have access to your own money, and it can prevent you from doing anything they don't like and punish you for doing anything they don't approve of.

      It's a gigantic con, don't fall for it, it doesn't matter what the name of the currency is if you are not even able to have it in your own hands.

      Basically if you cannot hold your own money in your own hands but government holds it for you (directly or through proxy banks) you are fucked, you have nothing.

      If you try to switch to gold and other currencies of your choice, you will be labeled a 'speculator' and 'enemy of the working class' etc., and you can be dealt with criminally.

    2. Re:"Cashless" is meaningless by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Informative

      You need a currency.

      "1000 Quatloos for the newcomers!"

      It will be interesting to see how Greece gets out of their mess, when they run out of Euros. Pundits are guessing that Greece will issue "scrips", which are a kind of government IOU, and pay government salaries and pensions with them.

      The only problem with that is . . . who will want these scrips? Certainly not even the Greeks themselves. They want Euros. And they will try to get rid of their scrips as soon as they can, in exchange for something of value.

      Car sales are up now in Greece by something like 40%, as people worry about if their bank accounts will get raided by the government. An automobile is considered as something "valuable". The cruel irony here, is that Greeks prefer to buy German cars . . . exactly the folks who Greeks blame for all their problems. So the Germans are actually benefiting the most from this.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:"Cashless" is meaningless by rahvin112 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not a sideline, it's entirely the point. The German citizenry isn't willing to see their taxes go up again to pay Greek debt that was incurred buying votes. The again in that sentence is the important bit. Germany has already raised the taxes on their people to pay the original Greek bailout. They will NOT allow their government to do it again. And it infuriates them to no end that this happened because the Greek government lied about their spending and borrowing and used much of the proceeds to "buy votes" by raising minimum wages, increases pension plans and other electorate appeasing measures that require cash.

      For example, the current Greek government refuses to lower the minimum wage. Most people don't even realize that the minimum wage in Greece is almost 50% higher than in Germany! This goes for almost all the items of the bailout under attack. The most galling thing to most Europeans is that the troika didn't even require the Greeks to cut their higher wage rates, higher pension payments and such to match their European neighbors, they only required that they reduce them partially and this is how the Greeks react?

      Coming down to reality is hard, they built up a system with purchased votes that wasn't sustainable and it's a big impact to lower down to reasonable values. I personally don't agree with the austerity push, I think it's catastrophic policy with no historical backing and heavy counter demonstrations that it doesn't even work. But, I do agree with the rest of the Europeans that the EU and IMF have been extremely lenient with Greece and to have it thrown back in their face as asking too much is frankly stupid.

      But that's the problem with Greece's current government. They should have attacked austerity, not the measures they are expected to undertake to re-balance their economy with the rest of Europe. Many of the Torika's requirements were real improvements that would have been long term very positive for the Greeks economy and some of those are the ones the Greeks are attacking the hardest, rather than attacking the real problem, which is this Austerity idea that you can succeed by cutting spending during a recession. The Greek economy was heavily damaged by the Austerity drive where the measures should have been more targeted towards competition and divestiture of state assets because it was those very state assets and the salaries they included that bankrupted the Greek government to begin with. And this dragging of the feet on everything and inexperience has just created an environment where everyone in the economy is running for cover. The cuts to the pensions and minimum wage levels should have been done with a permanent freeze to increases until inflation balanced them with the rest of Europe because of the direct and immediate damage a large cut would do. The biggest problem the greeks face is a general disrespect for tax collection, that's what government should be spending their time fixing.

  2. cashless = no privacy and lots of govt control by ciaran2014 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We've made very little progress in anonymising cashless transactions (and this proposal might rely on transactions never being anonymous).

    This not only reduces people's privacy but also gives government officials a way to remotely block you from making any payments. That's severe.

    --
    Help build the anti-software-patent wiki
  3. Re:socialism's benefits by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given that we just had this discussion within the last few weeks and most of the armchair solutions completely ignored Argentina's history with its currency, hyperinflation, being artificially pegged to the US Dollar, and then the problems that had to be addressed when they chose to top artificially pairing with the Dollar, I don't think it'll help at all.

    Currencies only work when everyone trusts them. People trust them when their governments and banks engage in responsible monetary policy. If monetary policy gets so out-of-whack that the people don't trust the currency then the government itself is in jeopardy the state-issued fiat currency is how it conducts business.

    I expect that most Argentines don't want violent or protracted revolution, they want the system to be repaired. Most solutions that were offered last time were based on circumventing the government, which would bring about the downfall of anything resembling the status quo, rather than correcting minor to moderate problems.

    This isn't Greece or Venezuela or Somalia, there's the ability to fix it if people are willing to commit themselves to it and to not syphon-off all of the gains for themselves.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  4. Greetings from Argentina by ericlondaits · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1 - We're nowhere near desperate. We've been desperate-ish in the past... not lately.

    2 - We have a high but predictable inflation... it's impossible to save in Pesos, so it stimulates spending and the economy survives.

    3 - Purchase of dollars is restricted but there's a "healthy" black market that sells at a higher but well know rate (it's published in the newspapers and there are websites that inform the black market rate as well). The government counts on the existance of this black market to keep peace.

    4 - Going cashless solves nothing..!!! Your cashless bank account still lists an amount of pesos and if you want to convert them to dollars the normal restrictions apply. People taking advantage of bitcoin and other schemes are simply operating in the black market... it could be bitcoin, it could be bonds or stock.

    --
    As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
  5. Re:Democracy by bobbied · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When 51% figure out that they can keep voting themselves resources by electing the right people, the end is near. Venezuela is an example of how this works. Once it was a thriving economic power house in south America, resource rich and hard working. Now, though the "reforms" of Chavez and his successor the country's economic engine has been running on sugared gasoline while the politicians poured fine sand in the crankcase and tried to floor the accelerator. Democracy voted itself out of existence as the popular "Let me make sure you get your share!" refrain echoed through the ever swelling ranks of the poor and dependent.

    Revolution is at the door, because eventually the government and the politicians that run it won't be able to cash the checks they've written. And the people who voted out of greed, to get something now and a promise of more to come, and those who objected to the perversion of their government, will ALL pay along with their children, grand children and great grand children, many with their lives.

    The sad part is that history clearly shows how this will progress, and even so, there are many countries on the same path...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  6. Bitcoin? Nonsense by cachimaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hi from Buenos Aires.

    No, the solution is not going cashless. We don't have a banking problem. We have a currency problem, because the government steals from us in the form of inflation. Going cashless is giving the government more power to screw us.

    Also we know very well how to play this game. If you can save, you buy other currencies like dollars. Or houses, if you are rich.
    If you need the money, you convert and spend as fast as possible. Inefficient and somewhat expensive, but possible.

    Bitcoin is easier to transfer, but too volatile. You might as well save in pesos.

  7. Maybe people are not desperate by gwolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My wife is Argentinan, as well as all of her family, and a great deal of our friends. We live in Mexico, and travel to Argentina at least once a year.

    The Argentinian exchange rate has dropped in the last year, although not as much as it happened 15 years ago — nor, by far, how it happened 30 years ago. And the local economy is far, far from hopeless— The standards of living in Argentina are quite high, most middle-class people travel outside the country regularly. As a Mexican travelling regularly to Argentina for the last five years, I have seen their life costs go from slightly cheaper to slightly more expensive — and today again slightly cheaper than ours.

    My family has their savings partly in pesos, in local banks, and partly in US dollars, in the safe deposits in the bank — AFAICT, they don't have a dollarised bank account. And they have a very decent level of life. My in-laws, as an example, travelled last year one month in Europe, and came to visit for a month in Mexico, without compromising their finances.

    This is the second post badmouthing Argentina in Slashdot in the past few weeks. I know I am answering with some (few) personal data points, but that's in the end how reality is: A huge collection of individual stories. And they are far from as dire as you portrait them.