Slashdot Mirror


GCHQ Officials Given Immunity From Hacking Charges

An anonymous reader writes with news that members of British intelligence agency GCHQ have been granted immunity from prosecution for any laws they might have violated while hacking into citizens' computers or cellphones. The immunity was granted by changes to the Computer Misuse Act that weren't noticed until now, and not discussed or debated when implemented. While different legislation has long been thought to grant permission for illegal activities abroad, civil rights groups were unaware that domestic hacking activities were covered now as well. The legislative changes were passed on March 3rd, 2015, long after domestic spying became a hot-button issue, and almost a year after Privacy International and several ISPs filed complaints challenging it.

10 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. They can do ANYTHING anyway...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ......this just formalizes it for the plebs .

  2. They made a good argument, though. by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "James Bond has a license to kill, does he not?"

    "That's right."

    "Shoot someone, get off scot-free?"

    "Yes, why?"

    "So then, why do computer crimes carry a worse sentence than murder?"

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  3. good thing that's common. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good thing Aaron Swartz got similar immunity from any laws broken.

    Oh, wait, my bad. That's not what happened. Instead they tried to destroy his life. For fuck-all social harm, and arguable social good, compared to the NSA and GCHQ who have caused incalculable harm to our society.

  4. Why Do We Carry On Pretending? by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We all know Western Civilization has fallen to Fascism, so why not just come out and announce it? Why bother with these pieces of meaningless paper such as "Laws" and "Constitutions"? It's clear the rule of Law only applies to the Subjects, not the Wealthy or the Government. How about Marshall law? How about jackboots and arm bands and "show me your papers" and "up against the wall"? We're pretty much there anyway, but we all seem so intent on playing this bullshit game and pretending we still live in a free society.

    When will someone just fucking go ahead and blink already????

    1. Re:Why Do We Carry On Pretending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It really does seem to be the case. Every day on we see example after example of entirely different rules for (dare I say) about 1% of the population-- from Clapper just plain not being prosecuted for lying to congress to the CIA spying on torture investigators in congress without consequences to Patreas getting a slap on the wrist for leaking to his mistress to a heavy-handed campaign against whistleblowers but at the same time... zero Wall Street prosecutions and zero prosecutions for war crimes and other crimes for the propaganda campaign that took us into Iraq and the billions of waste that occurred there etc etc while on the other hand they (I say they and not we) are prosecuting kids who change computer desktops without "authorization", making education overly expensive w/predatory lending rates, tuition and bankruptcy laws, over-prosecuting and criminalizing people like Aaron Swartz... trade agreements being fast tracked and done in secret... mass surveillance, civil forfeitures... the list goes on and on and on.

      Something has gone very very wrong in the last 20-30 years. Oh, and we have global warming to look forward to as well. Woo.

    2. Re:Why Do We Carry On Pretending? by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No need to show papers when you're being tracked 24/7. As long as you behave you'll be able to retain a modicum of freedom and if you don't look you'll never notice the bars.

  5. i shall attempt to explain. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Funny

    As a member of the GCHQ I should take time to explain this to my fellow britons and the international community as a whole. You see, whilst portrayed to be a loveable middle-class eccentric bunch the average pint-pounding football-chanting briton, or as we know them 'bastard' isnt to be trusted with so much as a modicum of personal freedom. We've learned nearly every citizen to be a terrorist on some level (children are actually just very small terrorists.) and have taken great measures to protect actual god fearing pension clutching cloistered elite, whom we've found to be the real true citizenry of our great nation. So, in summation, Everything from VAT to the automated system of bollards and yes, even the chavs we strategically scatter along each and every mode of public transit charged with tactically dispersing vom, is part of this plan. Naturally retroactive immunity from prosecutorial oversight was necessary as in order to obtain critical knowledge of terrorisms. the knowledge that you, yes you, Chester Cleveston on Ellington road, have thrice now failed to finish a pint of Boddingtons because the foamy bit at the bottom puts you off, helps keep normal godfearing patriots of the jack accidentally gifting you a pint despite knowing full well you're a salaried man and can easily afford his own. So, in summation, should you be at this moment to have found yourself with a monocle perched upon your cheek then disregard this 'news.' However if you've just finished your sixth chesterfield and are at this moment urinating on a police car, you'll find solace and comfort in knowing we're here to protect you from Darryl Mansclover, working at the Lydsgate post office, who every morning puts lemon as well as milk in his tea in keeping with his savage tradition of domestic terrorism.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  6. Re:The UK, trying to beat China, NK at their own g by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Funny

    But you understand don't you that they have to take away your rights and privacy in order to keep you safe. I'm sure you feel safe now, don't you?

  7. Anarchy by 7-Vodka · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm beginning to think the anarchists have a point.

    "As long as there are rulers, we can't have rules"

    Because they're always going to make exceptions for themselves and their cronies, and use the rules to stick it to everyone else, while loudly decrying that they speak *for* us.....

    --

    Liberty.

  8. Re:The UK, trying to beat China, NK at their own g by Loki_1929 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Protip: If someone has to give them to you, they aren't rights; they're privileges.

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."