Slashdot Mirror


Feds Order Amtrak To Turn On System That Would've Prevented Crash

McGruber writes: Last Tuesday evening, northbound Amtrak Northeast Regional train No. 188 derailed on a curve in Philadelphia, killing eight passengers. The train was traveling in excess of 100 mph, while the curve had a passenger-train speed limit of 50 mph. In response, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is issuing formal emergency orders that will require Amtrak to make sure automatic train control systems work Northbound through Philadelphia at and near the site of the derailment. The FRA is also requiring that Amtrak assess the risk of all curves along the NEC and increase the amount and frequency of speed limit signs along the railroad. FRA's emergency order is newsworthy because Amtrak's existing signal system could have been configured to prevent a train from exceeding speed limits, according to the Wall Street Journal.

13 of 393 comments (clear)

  1. No self driving trains? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm baffled that we just might get self driving cars before self driving trains.

    Do I really have to state the obvious? It's on *rails*.

    1. Re:No self driving trains? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Regulations most likely require that someone is on the train to oversee operation and help in emergencies anyway. So the cost/benefit analysis may still favour the current state with barely any accidents over a complete overhaul which mostly adds maintenance costs. Self driving cars in contrast mainly benefit the car owner who is not paid to spend hours driving.

    2. Re:No self driving trains? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you have any idea what the coefficient of friction of steel on steel is, and how much lower it is if there's a little grease on the rails? How are you going to handle driveways and garages? Switches aren't cheap, and you'd need them every 50 feet in suburbs. Farm equipment? Are you going to lay down rails on roads that currently have so little traffic that it doesn't pay to have them paved, or plowed when it snows? How do you handle parking in cities and at shopping malls?

      With an owner-driven car, drive one place to buy clothes (put them in the car), several more miles to buy books (put them in the car), still more miles to buy a shovel and a hedge trimmer (put them in the car), then yet more to buy groceries (put them in the car and drive home). You going to do that on public transport? (Don't give me any garbage about how everyone should live in cities -- what a drab, sad world that would be.)

      Self-driving cars add cameras (cheap), processors (cheap), and actuators (motors and solenoids, moderate cost). The tough part is the software, but that's a one time expense.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    3. Re:No self driving trains? by AchilleTalon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, instead train operators are installing devices to keep the train engineer awaked and have him push a button at regular interval as a proof since driving a train is a very boring job the day the coal tender was removed. It is kind of automating the engineer to make sure he actually drive the train.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    4. Re:No self driving trains? by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dude, seriously? Nearly every subway, bus and light-rail system in the US already operates under heavy government subsidization, and fares are well below cost.

      Put this way: If fares reflected the actual cost of operation (forget profit), they would IMHO just barely compete with Uber. Chuck in a profit margin for future expansion and improvements, and taxicabs could compete.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    5. Re:No self driving trains? by dryeo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At one time there were rails in most cities and the negative part of capitalism helped get rid of them as GM and friends really wanted to build up its bus monopoly. To quote wiki,

      Most companies involved were convicted in 1949 of conspiracy to monopolize interstate commerce in the sale of buses, fuel, and supplies to NCL subsidiaries, but were acquitted of conspiring to monopolize the transit industry.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Capitalism is a high stakes game and if you can get away with cheating, the rewards are large.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    6. Re:No self driving trains? by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dude, seriously? Nearly every subway, bus and light-rail system in the US already operates under heavy government subsidization, and fares are well below cost.

      Put this way: If fares reflected the actual cost of operation (forget profit), they would IMHO just barely compete with Uber. Chuck in a profit margin for future expansion and improvements, and taxicabs could compete.

      It's only a fair comparison if Uber were paying the full unsubsidized cost of roads. Fuel taxes and registration fees pay only a portion of road costs, and there are hidden subsidies in the oil that fuels most cars,

  2. Re:and dog eats tail by BradleyUffner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They were planted by the Illuminati of course.

  3. Re:and dog eats tail by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We know what caused the crash, we do not know what was responsible for the cause. The PTC, however, would have prevented the speed, therefore, the crash.

    You don't know that. If the train accelerated out of control because the engineer had a medical event then PTC/ATC would have prevented the crash. If it accelerated out of control because the throttle control system and/or brakes failed then PTC/ATC would not have mattered a whit.

    Until we actually know both the how and the why all of these arguments are moot. That's my main point. This is a rush to judgment that's being driven by two factors: The 24 hour cable news cycle (how many different ways can we say, "We don't know anything new yet?") and political interests seeking to advance their cause while the public is paying attention to them.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  4. Re:and dog eats tail by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, your comment is what is misleading.

    No, your correction is misleading. We _don't_ know what would have prevented the accident, the GP was entirely correct in saying that. You are right in saying that he confused ATC with PTC and shouldn't, but the idea that any automatically controlled speed limiting system would have prevented the accident relies upon several factors being ruled out, which have not yet been.

    I entirely agree the GP shouldn't have said PTC, but implying that the headline wasn't misleading as a result is completely inappropriate.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  5. Re:and dog eats tail by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To be fair, Wilmington is chock full of HQs for corps chartered in Delaware (which are many) and is the financial capital of the northeast. There are a lot of riders, I think.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  6. Re:and dog eats tail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not including having to be at the airport early, check in bags, wait to pick them up, and then get a cab into the actual middle of town where the train station already is.

    But good point.

  7. Re:Defund Amtrak NOW. by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why the FUCK are my tax dollars going to support this idiot organization? Why the FUCK are my tax dollars being wasted on a train service that almost no one uses? If some tiny number of dumbasses cannot afford a car or refuse to just because they prefer to eat granola and hug trees, then let them PAY FOR IT THEMSELVES.

    Of course, the incompetent democrat in the white houseopposes all common sense, but at least there is one party working for taxpayers instead of against us.

    Instead of defunding Amtrak, maybe it's time to properly fund Amtrak. You seem worried about your tax dollars, but don't seem to mind the billions of them spent on subsidizing air travel and highways and even waterway traffic. What is really lacking in the US is a cohesive transportation policy.

    But, hey, it's easier to shout "Defund Amtrak" then it is to actually fix the infrastructure and transportation problems in this country.