Navy's New Laser Weapon: Hype Or Reality?
Lasrick writes: MIT's Subrata Ghoshroy deconstructs the Navy's recent claim of successful testing with the Laser Weapon System. It seems the test videos released to the press in December were nothing more than a dog-and-pony show with scaled-down expectations so as to appear successful: "When they couldn't get a laser lightweight enough to fit on a ship while still being powerful enough to burn through the metal skin of an incoming nuclear missile, they simply changed their goal to something akin to puncturing the side of an Iranian rubber dinghy." Ghoshroy is an entertaining writer and an old hand in the laser research industry. He gives a explanation here of the history of laser weapons, and how the search for combat-ready tech continues: 'At the end of the day, good beam quality and good SWAP—size, weight and power—still determine the success or failure of a given laser weapon, and we're just not anywhere near meeting all those requirements simultaneously.'
Professor Hathaway was apparently foiled again
The power to destroy an Iranian rubber dinghy is insignificant next to the power of the Force.
So you are going to cover every surface of every target with a mirror? Let me know how that goes for you.
Well at least that way there won't be any trouble tracking it.
Cover everything with mirrors?
Liberace called, he wants his mirror encrusted missile cruiser back.
Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra