Slashdot Mirror


Energy Dept. Wants Big Wind Energy Technology In All 50 US States

coondoggie writes: Bigger wind turbines and towers are just part of what the U.S. needs in order to more effectively use wind energy in all 50 states.That was the thrust of a wind energy call-to-arms report called "Enabling Wind Power nationwide" issued this week by the Department of Energy. They detail new technology that can reach higher into the sky to capture more energy and more powerful turbines to generate more gigawatts. These new turbines are 110-140 meters tall, with blades 60 meters long. The Energy Department forecasts strong, steady growth of wind power across the country, both on land and off shore.

6 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Won't someone think of the birds. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That energy has to come from somewhere and blocking the surface wind reduces the air velocity and increases the amount of heat at ground level.

    Trees also block the wind. So a simple solution is to require anyone erecting a windmill to cut down a tree to compensate.

    A more complicated solution would be to improve math and physics education, so even dimwitted people can figure out that the amount of energy windmills extract from the atmosphere is utterly inconsequential.

  2. Re:Question on EROEI by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    EROI still matters as that basically tells energy investors where they will get the biggest return for their money.

    The trick is that the EROI for fossil fuels is decreasing as all the easy reserves have been tapped. We're mucking around with high tech dynamically positioned rigs for deep water drilling, oil sands, etc... that require more energy and effort to obtain. The EROI for coal has been depressed artificially due to environmental regulations and CO2 rules, but there are still ample reserves. The EROI for wind and solar should be relatively flat, even rising slightly if the technologies improve.

    At some point the fossil fuel EROIs will fall below the EROIs for renewables. It's just a matter of when. Whether you invest in renewables now or later really depends on your perception of the outlook for these energy sources.

    The thing to keep in mind is, low EROIs mean low net power production. An EROI of 1.01 is energetically feasible, but it means you are only getting a net surplus of 0.01 units of energy for your 1 unit of effort. That 0.01 is what you get to power your society with. If you are using a technology with an EROI of 1.01, it means you will need a LOT of that technology to power society. You will actually need nearly 2X a LOT of that technology as you need nearly the same amount of power to simply make the technology.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  3. Re:Won't someone think of the birds. by compro01 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Plus it kills a lot of birds.

    Incorrect.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  4. Re:In other news... by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are you really going to get up at 3AM to do laundry? I doubt it.

    People on Kauai, HI do this all the time - by setting a timer on a washing machine (electricity prices 8x the national average are a good motivator) . You can also pre-heat water during the nighttime or use solar water heaters during the day.

  5. Simply not true by stomv · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since 1978, utilities have been obligated to purchase electricity from qualified facilities (QFs) under a law called PURPA. Net Metering isn't a federal requirement, but PURPA sure as heck is.

  6. Re:Won't someone think of the birds. by Beck_Neard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh don't give me your logic and facts, everyone knows wind turbines have a huge impact on the atmosphere but billions of tons of carbon dioxide doesn't affect the atmosphere at all

    --
    A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.