Slashdot Mirror


Tweets To Appear In Google Search Results

mpicpp writes with news that Google will now begin showing tweets alongside search results. Mobile users searching via the Android/iOS apps or through the browser will start seeing the tweets immediately, while the desktop version is "coming shortly." The tweets will only be available for the searches in English to start, but Twitter says they'll be adding more languages soon.

17 of 91 comments (clear)

  1. OK, but seriously... by richy+freeway · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How do I turn this off?

    1. Re:OK, but seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Use Bing.

      I think Microsoft finally found a way to beat Google at search, and all it took was Google doing something mindnumbingly stupid like think anyone would care to search tweets.

    2. Re:OK, but seriously... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Informative

      How do I turn this off?

      instructions are here.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:OK, but seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Google used to show tweets in search results. About three or four years ago. Twitter shut them down. I'm guessing Twitter's star is fading and they want the increased exposure again.

  2. I dont get why... by shione · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Companies like Google do this to legitimize another company's business. I've been using the internet for quite some time now and I've seen loads of companies/websites come and go. But with all this integration of facebook/twitter/youtube/linkedin shit into apps and other websites, it makes me wonder what happens when those sites go out of fashion (out of fad). Or is the internet mature enough now that websites/comanies have stopped coming and going.

    Heck, even Slashdot participates in this with those 4 symbols near the article summary.

    1. Re:I dont get why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They're trying to integrate themselves so far that they can't go out of fashion.

    2. Re:I dont get why... by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      Just look at what happened when MySpace got out of fashion.
      Some other site(s) takes over and the world just keeps on spinning like nothing happened, because nothing did.

      Any developer worth his salt has neatly modularized the social media code, fully expecting their own code to outlast atleast some of the currently popular social media sites.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:I dont get why... by worf_mo · · Score: 2

      They should have done this five years ago - the old nimble Google of 2001 would have quickly indexed Twitter and Facebook, and every other silo of information. It's only Big Corporate Google that can't acknowledge another source of information for some sort of ego-bruising related reason. "Index all the world's information ... except if it's hosted by a company run by that guy down the street who drives that ridiculous 918 Spyder".

      Twitter messages used to appear in Google's real-time search, but after Twitter chose not to renew their agreement in 2011, Google started to follow Twitter's rel=nofollow instructions.
      So it's more like the guy down the street who drives that Spyder told Google to go take a hike and they complied.

      source 1, source 2

  3. Great news by MrKaos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    something to shorten peoples short attention spans even more.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  4. Qwant by lorinc · · Score: 2

    I think Qwant ( https://www.qwant.com/ ) does it already for ages.

  5. Twitter is junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Emotive and smug one liners at best. No serious discussion on any topic is possible. The closest you get is oft out of context quotes under stoic photos of someone staring off into space. Twitter has its place, but not for anyone searching for actual information. You fail, Google.

    1. Re:Twitter is junk by jabberw0k · · Score: 3, Funny

      As a 20-year veteran of Perl programming, I am authorized to say: Twitter looks like line noise.

  6. Again? by darkain · · Score: 4, Informative

    Am I the only one that seems to remember that GOOGLE ALREADY HAD THIS FEATURE years ago. Back in the earlier days of Buzz, your Buzz account could be connected to a Twitter account. Google would pull friend's tweets on a particular topic, and show them intermixed with search results. This was just another one of the brazzilion tweeks Google has added/removed/fuckedwith/whoknowswhatelse over the years, and I'm quite honestly surprised to see it make a comeback.

  7. On the one hand ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

    ... yeah, bleah. On the other hand, whole "news" stories are written about various clowns' reactions on Twitter.

  8. Re:Oh hell no... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the context of the rest of the conversation I can almost always figure out what a stupid Slashdot comment meant.

    OTOH, tweets are virtually impossible for me to parse, because everyone's using lots of pronouns to stay under 140 characters, and "twitter threads" really don't show me "ok this guy was responding to this tweet, which was a response to that tweet, which was a response to something that chick said, so the 'she' in this last tweet is probably that chick..."

    For example, every time I go to Fivethirtyeight.com there's a list of tweets the Fivethirtyeight authors are making. I can generally figure out what half of them mean. Today it's up to 3/4 or so, because Enten just sent out a barrage of 6 on the same topic and one of them said "this is the topic I am talking about," rather then the twitter-user's traditional reliance on everyone knowing precisely what they're talking about right now, and therefore not including any context becsides a timestamp and the twitter handles of the people they're interacting with.

    This will probably be incredibly useful for a small set of users (ie: twitter addicts who get the lingo; marketers figuring out everything said about their boss, etc.) and be completely useless for damn near anyone else.

  9. Please don't! by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    Please no! When I want to search newsgroup contents, I'll tell them so, ditto for tweets.

    The search results are already pretty much useless right now, because they show me what they 'think' I might mean instead of what I actually typed in the field.

    I have to enclose every fucking word between quotes, otherwise they get ignored an they show me Kardashian or Rihanna crap.

  10. Aren't we a little fast on the hate switch? by Eloking · · Score: 3, Informative

    I get that most people here doesn't give a damn about the blue bird, but everyone is reacting like we're going to have our search filled with tweet.

    I've looked up in my history for all the latest google search I did in the last week and I hardly see how most (any) of them would give me tweet result ("Matlab plotyy axis scale"?).

    On the other hand, let's say that I'm a 13 years old girls who's googling the latest gossip about Taylor Swift, I get that, in some cases, tweet could become an insightful result.

    I say let's give it a chance and see how it goes. Furthermore, Google Search have always been "customizable" and I'm sure us folk would have no problem deactivating tweets from a search (-youtube anyone?).

    --
    Elok