Slashdot Mirror


US Levels Espionage Charges Against 6 Chinese Nationals

Taco Cowboy writes: The U.S. government has indicted five Chinese citizens and arrested a Chinese professor on charges of economic espionage. The government alleges that they took jobs at two small, American chipmakers — Avago Technologies and Skyworks Solutions — in order to steal microelectronics designs. "All of them worked, the indictment contends, to steal trade secrets for a type of chip popularly known as a “filter” that is used for acoustics in mobile telephones, among other purposes. They took the technology back to Tianjin University, created a joint venture company with the university to produce the chips, and soon were selling them to both the Chinese military and to commercial customers."

It's interesting to note that the Reuters article keeps mentioning how this technology — used commonly as an acoustic filter — has "military applications." It's also interesting to look at another recent case involving Shirrey Chen, a hydrologist who was mysteriously arrested on suspicion of espionage, but then abruptly cleared five months later. One can't help but wonder what's driving the U.S.'s new strategy for tackling economic espionage.

100 comments

  1. Change of tactics? by fey000 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they've studied the SEC, and are now realising that a shakedown racket pays far better than justice?

  2. On behalf of planet earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I'd like to charge the U.S. government with economic espionage, unlawful mass surveillance and crimes against humanity.

    1. Re:On behalf of planet earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'd like to charge the U.S. government with economic espionage, unlawful mass surveillance and crimes against humanity.

      In respective order to your charges: Doesn't exist, woefully guilty and probably from most points of view. The topic at hand is industrial espionage. Either point out actual cases of this or STFU. Every country is guilty about some flavor of spying -- this is a particular kind ...

    2. Re:On behalf of planet earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The topic at hand is industrial espionage. Either point out actual cases of this or STFU.

      Perhaps you have not been paying attention to current events. Oh, it's easy to complain when someone else does it to YOU, isn't it?

    3. Re:On behalf of planet earth by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      There is also the General Electric - Enercon windmill case a couple of years back.

    4. Re:On behalf of planet earth by knightghost · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You didn't read your own linked story. The USA snoops on powers but doesn't hand that over to corporations. OTOH, the Chinese snoops #1 priority is to steal everything nailed down so that they can duplicate it for economic gain. Pretty much complete opposites.

    5. Re:On behalf of planet earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA snoops on powers but doesn't hand that over to corporations.

      [Proof needed]. What fucking sense does it make for the NSA to spy on Brazil's deep-ocean oil drilling technologies if not for giving that info to American* companies?

      * Gee, I wonder if Bush's family wouldn't benefit from that info. Noooo, that kind of corruption does not exist, the government is pristine.

    6. Re:On behalf of planet earth by jblues · · Score: 3, Interesting

      [Proof needed]. What fucking sense does it make for the NSA to spy on Brazil's deep-ocean oil drilling technologies if not for giving that info to American* companies?

      * Gee, I wonder if Bush's family wouldn't benefit from that info. Noooo, that kind of corruption does not exist, the government is pristine.

      There was a similar case like this in Australia where the Australian Federal Police were spying in order to gain advantage in a gas resources deal with poor - and recently "liberated" - neighbor East Timor. When it came to light, the Australian lawyer representing East Timor was roughed up and had documents seized.

      These are just the cases we hear about. Presumably the secret service manage to keep their operations secret some of the time.

      --
      If it acquires resources on instantiation like a duck, then its a shared_ptr<Duck>
    7. Re:On behalf of planet earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think the US government only taps individuals and not companies, then you are incredibly naive.

    8. Re:On behalf of planet earth by St.Creed · · Score: 4, Informative

      The USA snoops on powers but doesn't hand that over to corporations.

      [Proof needed]. What fucking sense does it make for the NSA to spy on Brazil's deep-ocean oil drilling technologies if not for giving that info to American* companies?

      Monitoring violations of the Benthic Treaty.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    9. Re:On behalf of planet earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you realize how badly it weakens your argument when you demand evidence/examples and they are readily available?

      http://fas.org/irp/program/process/991101-echelon-mj.htm
      http://money.cnn.com/2015/04/30/news/airbus-germany-nsa-spying/

    10. Re:On behalf of planet earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Australian Secret Service probably deserves their acronym.

      (Or maybe it's Australian Royal Service for Espionage. Whatever.)

    11. Re:On behalf of planet earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be dumb for real. How were you up-voted to Insightful with a score of 4? What good would the information from economic spying be to the NSA alone? It's divulged to government who will then advise the directors of the big financial institutes on directions for their operations that are beneficial to them, and thus the U.S. and its economy.

    12. Re:On behalf of planet earth by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      If you think only the US government taps individuals and companies, then you are incredibly naive.

      A few minor tweaks holds true as well.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    13. Re: On behalf of planet earth by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Not just for economic gain. In general, China wants offensive weaponry as quickly as possible.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    14. Re: On behalf of planet earth by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Of course, no tech was passed on those. What happened is that NSA overheard airbus and other companies offering illegal kickbacks to win business, so that was reported. Big difference between economic espionage of giving tech to others, vs. reporting to legal authorized of criminal offenses.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    15. Re:On behalf of planet earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't read your own linked story. The USA snoops on powers but doesn't hand that over to corporations. OTOH, the Chinese snoops #1 priority is to steal everything nailed down so that they can duplicate it for economic gain. Pretty much complete opposites.

      The USA snoops on foreign corporations and hands that information over for the benefit of American companies.

    16. Re:On behalf of planet earth by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but if you believe the American intelligence apparatus doesn't engage in industrial espionage, I can only say that you're rather...innocent, to be diplomatic.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  3. Now Germany! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm waiting for the German government to have the balls to level espionage charges against... its own secret service BND and the NSA!

    I'm not holding my breath, though. Corrupt assholes.

    1. Re:Now Germany! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      All german parties except of the CDU/CSU (which are "sister parties"), led by the leftists, who were created from the remaining parts of the totalitarian SED that governed the GDR, and, out of this "tradition", have a very anti-US and pro-russia position (nicely observable in the debate about ukraine), agree that this form of espionage is far too much. There has been some critical politicians before too, but now, after two years of snowden, we finally see something really moving inside political berlin. This is largely thanks to the SPD, the other party of the coalition that forms the government, which has positioned itself against espionage inside the last voting season, and, until now, mostly broken their promises in this regard. Now, thanks to them, and the pressure from the press, there is some activity at least.

      In the current debate, it has turned out that the CDU/CSU has lied about a planned anti-spy treaty in order to get votes in the elections. Its seldom that you have it this crystal clear that a politician is lying.
      Also, it became public that, in inter-state cooperations, where german agencies give US agencies data about terrorist suspects, the US side has requested data not just about criminals, but also about diplomats of befriended governments, including the french, which are the best buddies of the germans, and the austrians, close to germans due to history and shared language. Now the BND found out about it, and it came to the press. Now the german government (the leading CDU/CSU part) seriously first wants to ask the US agencies whether it may share those hostile and reputation-hurting requests (only the names!) with a special section of the german bundestag, which has the task to oversee germanie's secret agencies.

      I'm really ashamed of my government here in this case. Germany isn't a colony. Directly after the war, where there was a high comitee of the allies that oversaw german politics and other parts of the state, this might have been understandable, but not 70 years after it.

    2. Re:Now Germany! by cheesybagel · · Score: 0

      Germany isn't a colony.

      Bwahahaha. Poor deluded person. Germany does not have the capability to defend itself against anything. They delegated their military defense to the USA now they have to pay the price.

    3. Re:Now Germany! by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

      I really hope you are being sarcastic or something, and you don't really think that...

      The German airforce has over 200 front line offensive aircraft in its inventory, 109 of them being the Eurofighter.

      The German army has over 230 Leopard 2 main battle tanks, a tank commonly held as one of the best in the world, and over 150 PzH 2000 self propelled guns, again commonly held as one of the best in the world.

      The German navy has 81 commissioned ships in service, 43 of them front line offensive in nature.

      Germany isn't exactly a nation I would want to currently face in battle, not even with a top tier military such as the US, France, UK et al - those military's would almost certainly win any competition, but they wouldn't come out unscathed....

    4. Re:Now Germany! by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      led by the leftists, who were created from the remaining parts of the totalitarian SED that governed the GDR

      The worst lie is a half truth. The left party was created as a fusion of PDS (itself a successor of SED, true enough) and WASG. Now WASG never had anything to do with DDR, being a party of disillusioned former social democrat party members from West Germany. This way the majority of the left party is just what SPD used to be once upon a time, but with the additional bonus of Gregor Gysi - a brilliant orator.

      And no, Germany is not a colony. Germany is a vassal state.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    5. Re:Now Germany! by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2

      I really hope you are being sarcastic or something, and you don't really think that...

      The German airforce has over 200 front line offensive aircraft in its inventory, 109 of them being the Eurofighter.

      The German army has over 230 Leopard 2 main battle tanks, a tank commonly held as one of the best in the world, and over 150 PzH 2000 self propelled guns, again commonly held as one of the best in the world.

      The German navy has 81 commissioned ships in service, 43 of them front line offensive in nature.

      Germany isn't exactly a nation I would want to currently face in battle, not even with a top tier military such as the US, France, UK et al - those military's would almost certainly win any competition, but they wouldn't come out unscathed....

      Dude, you might want to check this: Germany’s army is so under-equipped that it used broomsticks instead of machine guns (Feb, 19, 2015)

      Or this older article from 2014: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/the-german-military-faces-a-major-challenge-from-disrepair/2014/09/30/e0b7997c-ea40-42be-a68b-e1d45a87b926_story.html

      Hell, just google "Germany military equipment problems". When German soldiers have to use broomsticks to hide the facts they did not have heavy machine guns during a NATO exercise, I have to say your post is full of uninformed baloney. This particular incident, that is the kind of crap I would expect from an underdeveloped nation, not from the fourth largest economy.

    6. Re:Now Germany! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > All german parties except of the CDU/CSU [...] agree that this form of espionage is far too much.

      I'd like to share your optimism, but have seen the "Merkel effect" more than once. When push comes to shove, the cozy and fearful Germans prefer to rely on Momma Merkel fixing things for 'em. Whatever it takes.

      And I don't believe the SPD has half a ball needed to risk their very comfortable position as "junior" in the current coalition over that bit of espionage.

      But hey, if you're right and I'm wrong I'd be ready to open a bottle of champaign in your honour!

      > I'm really ashamed of my government here in this case.

      So am I :-(

    7. Re:Now Germany! by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Greece has more tanks than Germany. That's how few tanks Germany has. Russia has like 10x the amount of tanks.

    8. Re:Now Germany! by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Greece has 353 Leopard 2 MBTs. Russia has 930 T-90s, 4500 T-80s in reserve, 8000 T-72 MBTs in reserve.

      Russia also has 443 Su-27 derived aircraft.

    9. Re:Now Germany! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a German, I'd rather see Germans with broomsticks and a healthy economy...

    10. Re:Now Germany! by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      Greece has 353 Leopard 2 MBTs. Russia has 930 T-90s, 4500 T-80s in reserve, 8000 T-72 MBTs in reserve.

      Russia also has 443 Su-27 derived aircraft.

      Greece actually has an enemy right on its border that it might plausibly go to war with in the not too distant future... Germany not so much.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    11. Re:Now Germany! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a brilliant orator.

      And a man with a MfS past. I'm not trusting these people with anything -- not after they've imprisoned and opressed millions of germans over more than 40 years. At the peak of the banking crisis, the leftists demanded to nationalize all banks. I don't see how the SPD ever could've demanded that, especially not the post-war SPD.

      I know that the Linke wasn't solely formed by SED leftovers, but I didn't want to make the comment too complicated with details.

    12. Re:Now Germany! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, it turns out the ministry of defense is just a large money printing machine for Heckler & Koch, and friends.
      Guttemberg has wanted to change this, and started reforms, but then suprise suprise his doctor title based on copy+paste. What a coincidence it became public right then.
      Let's see what they find out about von der Leyen...

    13. Re:Now Germany! by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      The majority of SED leftovers actually went to east-CDU. And now we have an ex FDJ secretary for propaganda as a chancellor. I'd take Gysi instead anytime.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    14. Re:Now Germany! by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      All german parties except of the CDU/CSU (which are "sister parties"), led by the leftists, who were created from the remaining parts of the totalitarian SED that governed the GDR, and, out of this "tradition", have a very anti-US and pro-russia position

      Are you serious? That is ridiculous. The FDP (liberal party), the SPD (social democrats) and the Green Party are not pro-Russians. None of the parties are pro Russian except the extreme left (Die Linke) and the extreme right (NPD, AfD).

      There is some pro-Russian sentiment among many former citizens of the German Democratic Republic (East Germany), but the vast majority of Germans, especially in West Germany, are very pro USA. Most Germans were actually quite let down by recent revelations that the US does not consider Germany one of its closest allies, at least in terms of intelligence cooperation, as the general perception in Germany has been that it is indeed one of the closest allies.

      The presidency of GW Bush has hurt public perception of the US in Germany a lot, but that is not singular to Germany, this has been the case in almost the entire world.
      Still I would estimate that if forced to choose a side, 80% of Germans would favor partnership with the US over Russia.
      Like Bush before him, Putin seems like he is doing all he can to hurt the Russian reputation accross the globe, but especially in Europe.

    15. Re:Now Germany! by Ottawakismet · · Score: 1

      Germany is a laggard in NATO, that fails to spend what is needed. Germany is still a consumer of security, not a provider of it. NATO troops have had to defend Germany for decades, and US troops are still present in Germany. Germany is the most unreliable country in NATO, look at how cowardly they behaved in Afghanistan. It was appalling! Over the Ukraine, Germany covers its eyes and pretends it cannot see what is going on, and tries to appease Russia The airforce is essentially grounded "Only one of its four submarines is operational. Only 70 out of its 180 GTK Boxer tanks are fit for deployment. Just seven of the German navy’s fleet of 43 helicopters are currently flightworthy." http://www.theguardian.com/wor... Canada has a more reliable military then that, despite spending much less money.

    16. Re:Now Germany! by Ottawakismet · · Score: 1

      What enemy is on Greeces border?? Turkey is a Greek ally, they are pledged to defend each other Russia does not border with Greece, but Kaliningrad is right near to Germany, just a quick hop over the Baltic

    17. Re:Now Germany! by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      What enemy is on Greeces border?? Turkey is a Greek ally, they are pledged to defend each other

      Russia does not border with Greece, but Kaliningrad is right near to Germany, just a quick hop over the Baltic

      Turkey and Greece are both members of NATO but, while being NATO member states have still almost gone to war! The border is still full of land mines.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    18. Re:Now Germany! by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      You are exaggerating, but there is some truth to that, for sure.

      Maybe it's worth mentioning that due to some cataclysmic events you might have heard about in history class, Germany has issues with many things related to patriotism and militarism.

      It's no joke. Expressing patriotism or sympathy for militarism is kind of taboo and still frowned upon in Germany.

    19. Re:Now Germany! by wiggles · · Score: 2

      Until you see Russians who aren't carrying broomsticks.

    20. Re:Now Germany! by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      How about the Netherlands? Who did they invade? Same thing they don't spend on their own defense. Last thing I heard from them was how they sold all their tanks. Used to have 100 Leopard 2. Now 0.

    21. Re:Now Germany! by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Might as well roll the red carpet and let the Russians in.

    22. Re:Now Germany! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry I've prased myself wrongly, that part of the sentence is still about The Linke. The other parties aren't pro-russian, of course.

    23. Re:Now Germany! by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Eckhard, die Russen sind da!

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    24. Re:Now Germany! by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      The Durch are to busy partying. I mean, who would want to drive around in a cramped and smelly tank when you have one of the highest living standards in the world and Amsterdam?

    25. Re:Now Germany! by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Pray Vlad doesn't roll his tanks over Europe then.

    26. Re:Now Germany! by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      As a German, I'd rather see Germans with broomsticks and a healthy economy...

      Because those two are so mutually exclusive. You people are dumb. If you do not want to be an armed country, that's great, just be open about it as opposed to pretending to have an army with broomsticks in lieu of heavy machine guns.

  4. Student VISAs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slash the number of China's student VISAs, watch the problems with China disappear.

    1. Re:Student VISAs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing that I'm a US citizen who's a frequent visitor to China, I'd prefer that this sort of tit-for-tat not be encouraged, thanks.

    2. Re:Student VISAs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will have to buy your tiger penis extract online like everyone else.

  5. SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by lesincompetent · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yes but what about when it's the US that pulls this kind of espionage? Oh right, they're the good guys.

    1. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That's the point of making noise about these arrests. Distract people from what the US is doing, maybe drum up some support for it because after all everyone else is doing it... Make China look like the big bad, to justify offensive hacking.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the US government does very little to no industrial espionage. First because the government and industry are separate in the US unlike in China. Second because China is doing almost no industrial innovation so there is not much to steal. The US does do a lot of military espionage but then so does every other country on earth. Those two things need to be treated as separate issues along with what you probably really want to complain about & that is the level of individual monitoring governments do against its citizens.

    3. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1
      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    4. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's especially hypocritical considering the US is literally built on economic espionage. Or do schools no longer teach the start of the Industrial Revolution in the US, which was based on technology stolen from the British? The US desperately doesn't want China to do to the US what the US did to Britain.

    5. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Actually the US government does very little to no industrial espionage

      You should do stand-up

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    6. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by GroeFaZ · · Score: 1

      It could be argued that the NSA-BND cooperation was a case of outsourcing the espionage activities, so the US really did not do any espionage here, just like the US outsource their manufacturing. The fact that they made the BND spy on their own country's companies is just a little ironic icing on that shit cake.

      --
      The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
    7. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are NO good/bad guys when talking nation-states. Just people competing for stop dick. This idea that there is some kind of global morality at that level is absurdly ignorant.

    8. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so what industrial espionage did they do?

    9. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but what about when it's the US that pulls this kind of espionage? Oh right, they're the good guys.

      You're goddamn right we're the good guys. If you love China so much then put your money where your mouth is and go move and live there.

  6. Using the same logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Using the same logic Wernher von Braun should have been arrested, charged and sentences for espionage when he learn rocket making secrets, financed by one type of government, and soon was contributing to the manufacturing of rocket devices in USA.

    You know, rocket devices have huge economic potential, as well as potential military applications.

    You can bet that Germany can present enough evidence and collect serious royalties for USA, including late fees, for all the benefits and gains attributable to von Braun's inventions.

    1. Re:Using the same logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using the same logic Wernher von Braun should have been arrested, charged and sentences for espionage when he learn rocket making secrets, financed by one type of government, and soon was contributing to the manufacturing of rocket devices in USA.

      You know, rocket devices have huge economic potential, as well as potential military applications.

      You can bet that Germany can present enough evidence and collect serious royalties for USA, including late fees, for all the benefits and gains attributable to von Braun's inventions.

      Unless the international term limit on patents is twenty years. Which it is. For both countries.

      At least that's how it works today when you're a member of WIPO. Prior to its creation in 1967 it was the wild west of cotton gin stealing and silk worm selling on the international market.

    2. Re:Using the same logic by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure Von Braun never visited nazi germany again after leaving it(would have been pretty hard to do).

      anyways, it's probably some feedback filter. and military applications? yeah, they use walkie talkies.

      totally ground breaking tech only available from the few small companies? veery fucking unlikely. doubt they even had decent patent protection.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Using the same logic by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it wouldn't be a trade secret if it was on a patent.

      it's quite likely that in this case there wasn't that much of secrets anyways, that weren't "common industry knowledge" that they just happened to learn in these two companies.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re: Using the same logic by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Oddly, the Germans learned how to do liquid rockets from Goddard, an american. And most of that was stolen.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  7. "Theft" of trade secrets? Huh? by bradley13 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Back when I learned about this stuff, companies basically had two options to protect their technology: patents and trade secrets.

    - If you file for a patent, the theory is that you tell the whole world how it works, but get the exclusive right to produce it yourself, or license it to others. Yes, the patent system has problems, but that's theory. This is supposed to help technology advance, because you can build on other people's work.

    - If you go with a trade secret (think: the secret recipe for Coca Cola), that means that you don't want to publish the information, so you receive no protection from the government. Protecting the secret is up to you; if someone steals it, that's your problem. This lack of protection is deliberate, providing motivation for filing patents and publishing information.

    What I didn't know is that in 1996, the government passed the Economic Espionage Act. This essentially grants government protection to trade secrets, not only by criminalizing their theft (but that is likely a criminal act anyway), but also by criminalizing the use of the trade secrets by another company.

    Of course, the act also explicitly exempts the government; the government can spy on you as much as it wants.

    The act also funds the Boys and Girls Clubs of America. You've gotta admire the US Congress - they never miss an opportunity to include pork.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re:"Theft" of trade secrets? Huh? by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is that going in and stealing them is bad (and theft), but you are not protected from people reverse-engineering your trade secret.

    2. Re:"Theft" of trade secrets? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this supposed to be a counterbalance H1Bs?

    3. Re:"Theft" of trade secrets? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if a third party steals it and dumps it on the internet, does that mean it's then essentially protected for eternity rather than being limited to the length of a patent, since at that point there's literally no way to prove you came up with it on your own?

  8. absurd to even try to stop this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For every one they catch, there are 1000 they don't.

    It's widely considered that industrial theft is so rampant that any US technology biotech company of any size is having its trade secrets walked out the door headed for China.

    But then, the US does it to other countries to, so turnabout is fair play, hmm? You don't get to have it both ways.

  9. Never assume that ALL your Chinese workers are in by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    Companies really like Chinese engineers. Many are highly degreed, many of those are highly educated, they work hard and they're cheap. Only a few are going to steal IP. If a dedicated Chinese engineer has family back in China there's no way to know what kind of pressure the Chinese govt is going to apply, and, IMHO, it's all about the Chinese govt. Ya pays yer money, ya takes yer chances. I would like to encourage Apple to hire lots of H1Bs from SE Asia.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  10. military applications by morgauxo · · Score: 1

    '...article keeps mentioning how this technology â" used commonly as an acoustic filter â" has "military applications."'

    Sure. Soldiers communicate. So do civilians. A soldier has to shit too. I guess if they were stealing the recipee for Charmin that would also be military secrets.

    1. Re:military applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you read 'acoustic' assume they mean 'submarine'. Don't be obtuse.

    2. Re:military applications by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      According to TFS, It looks like it's primary usage is in telephones. You should stop being obtuse and realize that saying something has military applications is just some bullshit to add on to make it scarier.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:military applications by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I guess if they were stealing the recipee for Charmin that would also be military secrets.

      No that is civilian tech only. For the military version they need to talk to 3M.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    4. Re:military applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to TFS, It looks like it's primary usage is in telephones. You should stop being obtuse and realize that saying something has military applications is just some bullshit to add on to make it scarier.

      That is one possibility, or perhaps there is an important use for the technology within military hardware that they would rather not specifically identify since it might give ideas to other countries who don't realize it (yet). It is a common fault that people will take a lack of evidence as proof something doesn't exist (called an Argument from Ignorance), but when dealing with secret government programs this becomes a breading ground of all sorts of ignorant, wild, and grandiose claims since after all, if you can't disprove it it must be true, right?

    5. Re: military applications by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Non-stick toilet paper??

    6. Re:military applications by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      Again, if everything that could have some important use to the military is kept from the public then the rest of us do what? Go back to living in caves? Oh, wait.. those might be good bomb shelters...

  11. Re: Never assume that ALL your Chinese workers are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only a few steal IP at a time because that's all they need at any time. If you boot the ones who are stealing now, the PLA will just move on to the next name on their lost.

  12. only 6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the early 80's my uni had a bakers dozen (13) of Chinese visiting researchers. only 12 of them turned out to be spies. one went on to create knock-offs of a million dollar, world leading, research technology. another still works in the US! 6 is a drop in the bucket - a serious embarassment that capturing this tiny fraction of spies is not a measure of success - it is an admission of failure

    1. Re:only 6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese researchers are the worst. Always cracking their machines' admin accounts to remove anti-malware software because they think it spies on them. Paranoids.

  13. Once more into the breech, dear friends. by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have no problem with going after people who steal trade secrets, anything more than I have a problem with going after people who steal nuclear secrets. The only thing is that the FBI has a long history of racist paranoia about Chinese scientists, from Quan Xuesen in the early 50s to Wen Ho Lee in the 90s.

    Rhwew may well of a legitimate case against these guys and if they do I hope they nail the bastards. But I'm not jumping to any conclusions based on FBI say-so.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Once more into the breech, dear friends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That or they've seen a long-term pattern. Only the fools deny that this is exactly what's happening.

    2. Re:Once more into the breech, dear friends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That or they've seen a long-term pattern. Only the fools deny that this is exactly what's happening.

      I agree that there is a clear and long-term pattern of the Chinese stealing any information they can to help their country's military and industry, but trying to argue by labeling anyone who hold a different opinion than yours as a fool is, well, foolish.

    3. Re:Once more into the breech, dear friends. by SmaryJerry · · Score: 1

      If you have even done any business at all in China, you know this story is 100% true and probably under-exaggerated if anything. China has a completely different cultural perception about copying/stealing ideas and general bribery and collusion of organizations. Try to do any business where you purchase something in China without being offered a bribe. Seriously try it. It's not racist, if anything it would be nationalist. Everyone is out to make an extra buck and has no problem doing so. Companies, government officials, banks, judges, no one in China is going by the books because they all play the bribe game. I can't tell you how many people have had their ideas stolen by building their products in China. You have to have extremely strict control of your organizations with constant monitoring to build protects in China. That is why typically only the cheapest things are made there and why Apple moved their production to Brazil. The problem with building there is you end up like Jamie Lanister and even though you pay someone a bunch of money to protect your secret they still go and try to sell it to make more.

  14. Not 1st time: one year ago (to the day) by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Wall Street Journal:

    U.S. Charges Five in Chinese Army With Hacking
    http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304422704579571604060696532

  15. Better get more visa workers to replace them by walterbyrd · · Score: 0

    Not as if there is any risk in hiring foreign nations. Absolutely no chance that our trade secrets are going to go to countries that do not respect our laws, and may be hostile to our interests, and already have a near monopoly on our manufacturing.

    1. Re:Better get more visa workers to replace them by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

      Then they will just move on to plan B and pay a 'local' to steal it.
      What, you thought America didn't have criminals or greedy people?

  16. Byproduct of a patent-and-monopoly mindset? by swb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if this is a byproduct of the general corporate tendency to look at "innovation" as a way to get a patent which is then used to enforce a monopoly and collect rents. Collecting rents is a disincentive towards more innovation, product improvements and other business efficiencies. Why compete when you can just charge rents?

    If there wasn't a patent-and-monopoly mindset, perhaps there would be greater effort put into innovation as a means to more rapidly improve products (as well as a focus on other business efficiencies). If somebody "stole" your IP in this model, it would matter less because your pace of innovation may render the stolen IP retrograde by the time it was turned into useful products, and your sales would be driven by the strength of your products not because you had a legalized monopoly.

  17. USA handles industrial espionage THE AMERICAN WAY by GroeFaZ · · Score: 2
    --
    The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
  18. Avago and Skyworks are massive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    "two small, American chipmakers — Avago Technologies and Skyworks Solutions"

    Avago has a market cap over 30 billion, and Skyworks is almost a 20 billion dollar company. They're not exactly garage start-ups, and everyone in the RF world recognizes them as being quite big players.

    1. Re:Avago and Skyworks are massive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But compared to other Republican-ruled organizations, they're small fish that the Republicans hate because they hate everyone that isn't old, white, and powerful. That is the way of their kind. They are refusing to protect these Americans because they considering them not worth protecting. The concept of Equal Protection to a Republican is pure nonsense. They don't consider it to exist. They hate us all.

  19. already tit-for-tat by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Chinese requires a visa at aminimum of $130. This was in reaponse to the visa increase by the US after 9-11.

  20. Re:USA handles industrial espionage THE AMERICAN W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A thief believes everybody steals." -- E. W. Howe

  21. Re:Never assume that ALL your Chinese workers are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would Apple want to "takes yer chances"? Pretty sure Apple is doing quite well, and doesn't need to take risks with Chinese theft. They deal with that enough already.

  22. wait... what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are American chip makers? With physical factories in the US? I actually don't believe it.

    1. Re:wait... what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, yes? Skyworks and Avago both have multiple facilities in the US. If you want to go bigger... then how about Intel?

  23. taco, it is driven by spies. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    As one that has dealt with one Chinese spy , and potentially, another one, it is obvious that China is hard at work stealing as much tech as they can. Sadly, our clearance methods were compromised by privatizing them. We should give it back to FBI, along with ICE. There are far far too many chinese spies in the west.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  24. More useful than the dumb War on Terror by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    The impact of actions like this is many many many times greater than any impact from the stupid waste on spying on Americans for the War on Terror.

    The only spying that has worked has been that actually done in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and other real threats.

    So, about time.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  25. Re: Never assume that ALL your Chinese workers are by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    Apple and, to be fair, Google & others, want cheaper workers. That's ok. They want to keep costs down. Shareholders agree. They want to artifically control the labor market. That's less ok. They should realize the short-term costs (fines) and longer-term costs (loss of IP). http://www.inc.com/associated-...

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.