Slashdot Mirror


Eugene Kaspersky: "Our Business Is Saving the World From Computer Villains"

blottsie writes: While the nature of Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin remains, at the very least, a matter of contention, his company's influence is anything but hazy. On top of their successful antivirus business, Kaspersky Lab researchers have discovered key details about the now-infamous Stuxnet virus, which was deployed by the U.S. and Israel against Iran's nuclear facilities. Kaspersky analysts later uncovered Flame, which the Washington Post found was another American-Israeli cyberweapon against Iran. All of this is on top of building a highly successful antivirus business. In a new interview with the Daily Dot, Kaspersky elaborates on thoughts about his company, his wealth, and the state of modern cybersecurity.

288 comments

  1. This would be a first post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it was not posted from a machine running bloody Kaspersky security tools!

    1. Re:This would be a first post... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I remember when AVP came out, it was both the fastest and best NT antivirus around.

      Then they made a few "updates" and we started calling it "a v poo" (IT nerds are known for their maturity) because it would choke your system like a punk.

      It's sad that they're still not capable of making an antivirus product that doesn't turn your awesomesauce PC into a turd.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re: This would be a first post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, are a fool.
      Safe sex does not mean wearing a condom 24/7/365, it means not having sex with hookers and heroin addicts, and wearing a condom responsibly AS NEEDED- if you had any sense at all for the most part you wouldn't have even needed an antivirus especially back then even though it was the wild west and all... there's just no excuse, your statement betrays the corporate marketeers fingering your brain into motion like a marionette...

      shame on you for not knowing your enemy.
      woe to the man who lets others decide.

    3. Re: This would be a first post... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      if you had any sense at all for the most part you wouldn't have even needed an antivirus especially back then even though it was the wild west and all...

      You're a nutter, you are. AVP was actually catching virii for me, so I know it was valuable. Haven't had a valid detection in years, but I still run antivirus... because now I have multicore and SSD and the penalty is low.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re: This would be a first post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been not running any AV for a decade with zero problems. Malware isn't the problem. Stupid users are the problem.

  2. So 20 years from now... by TWX · · Score: 2

    ...we'll have Kaspersky bloatware slowing down new computers belonging to average people, much like how we have Norton bloatware doing that?

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:So 20 years from now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean it is not slowing you down already?? Are you sure it is installed and enabled?

    2. Re:So 20 years from now... by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      What other 'reformed' virus authors do you allow to install software on your PC?

      Even if Norton was perfect, they still have decades to go before I'd consider trusting them. I'd install software from 'Cryptolocker LLC' first.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:So 20 years from now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation? No?

    4. Re:So 20 years from now... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I was there. Ask any grey beard.

      Norton was the worst virus out there. Impossible to get rid of.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  3. Sate business by sinij · · Score: 2, Informative

    In Russia, there is no such thing as independent large corporation, there are only nominally privately owned, and formally state owned corporations. While Kaspersky does some good work, they should be treated the same way as NIST is in USA, with a primary mission to protect and advance state interest.

    1. Re:Sate business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > most retarded comparison ....

      > you retard

      So he's okay then. Right? I mean, by your statement, he's actually doing pretty well.

    2. Re:Sate business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm wondering why they never expose the KGB spyware that for fucking *sure* is out there, given that half the fucking hackers on the planet are russian.
      Pricks hacked into my kids steam accounts and cost me days of effort to clean their machines up.

    3. Re:Sate business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'cause he himself is a KGB apparatchik.

  4. Antivirus business by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    And do they have a a successful antivirus business?

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    1. Re:Antivirus business by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

      Apparently on top of that successful antivirus business, they have done a lot on top of that successful antivirus business.

    2. Re:Antivirus business by Shoten · · Score: 2

      And do they have a a successful antivirus business?

      They must, because they're a fairly prominent sponsor of the Ferrari Formula 1 team.

      Now, the only question I have about that is whether they know they're sponsoring Ferrari, or if they just know they're sponsoring "the only car that's completely red."

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  5. "Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by Nutria · · Score: 4, Informative

    Kaspersky Lab researchers have discovered key details about the now-infamous Stuxnet virus, which was deployed by the U.S. and Israel against Iran's nuclear facilities. Kaspersky analysts later uncovered Flame, which the Washington Post found was another American-Israeli cyberweapon against Iran.

    Anyone who thinks that Kaspersky isn't in bed (voluntarily or not) with the Kermlin is delusional.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by Vokkyt · · Score: 2

      Kaspersky probably is in bed in some way with the Kremlin, it has nothing to do with the quotes you listed.

      Pretty much everyone figured it was a US/Israeli combo for Stux and Flame, not just Kaspersky.

    2. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Except no one does more than speculate this, even Kespersky. There is still only speculation as there is no actual evidence of who did it.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    3. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was evidence, it wasn't like Kaspersky "pushed a bullshit narrative" about electronic "WMD's" and that precipitated an "actual war" like "America" "did"...

    4. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by Vokkyt · · Score: 1

      Understood, but it's not Kaspersky that wrote the summary nor that section of the article. That's from the Daily Dot, copy and pasted by the submitter and approved by the editor. The dude shootin' his mouth off over "Kaspersky in bed with the Kremlin" is just being an idiot and confusing evidence and statements.

    5. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      http://politics.slashdot.org/c...

      WMD did exist, and were found.

      As far as Kespersky, they have said there was some evidence of a possible EST in the build of stuxnet. However, this could just as easily be someone in Russia's time getting home from work rather than someone in the US going into work. It also doesn't give any kind of conclusive proof of US involvement in Stuxnet/Flame. Without proof, it is just a theory, therefore shouldn't be put forward as fact.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    6. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was evidence, it wasn't like Kaspersky "pushed a bullshit narrative" about electronic "WMD's" and that precipitated an "actual war" like "America" "did"...

      I've only heard about this Kaspersky guy mentioned in tech news and I'm no Windows user and don't keep up to date on Windows security news, but it seems to me it's fair to ask the question whether he has uncovered any viruses deployed by the FSB against somebody the Kremlin doesn't like? Not, that I'd expect nice things to happen to him if hie did. Judging by past experience he would either find him self hacking code on a home made abacus in a secret camp somewhere in Siberia or they wouldn't just dispose of him in a sound insulated room in the basement of the Lubyanka building with a pistol shot to the back of the neck. You can make up your own mind which is the worse fate because I sure as hell can't.

    7. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      There was that retirement party for the Israeli spook general. More or less gave him credit.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by Shoten · · Score: 0

      Kaspersky probably is in bed in some way with the Kremlin, it has nothing to do with the quotes you listed.

      Pretty much everyone figured it was a US/Israeli combo for Stux and Flame, not just Kaspersky.

      What the OP fails to mention is that Kaspersky also focuses on Equaton, Duqu, and every other campaign that's been attributed with any degree of credibility to the US. And that they don't go near any of the things like Sofacy/APT28 that emanate from Russia.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    9. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      "WMD did exist, and were found."

      WTF are you talking about. There were no WMDs found in Iraq. Period. Rumsfeld kept saying he knew where they were but they could not turn them up. There were as no nuclear program. Period. Iraq did not attempt to buy yellow cake uranium. The tubes that Rice claimed would be used to enrich uranium would not have worked. Period. We invaded Iraq because Bush junior wanted to not because the U.S. was under attack by Iraq. Fuck Off you moron.

    10. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The saying goes - "There is no such thing as a former KGB man" - the uni. he went to is _inside_ kgb school - been there.

    11. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Nuclear weapons aren't the only kind of WMD. Iraq had chemical and biologic weapons. We knew they were there as they had used them on the Kurds, and the US sold them to Saddam.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    12. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by countSudoku() · · Score: 1

      Right. Also Women's Maternity Dresses are WMDs too. Right, Mr. Sees Conspiracy Everywhere? I'll not even straighten you out with the real story because your kind does not take to logic or verifiable info. Like the good gentleman said before; fuck off, moron. Go watch more faux noose and leave the technical chatter to people actually in the industry, fucknut. Your bullshit denial of global climate change and how we never landed on the moon, and that dinosaurs are made up cartoons are not welcome here, dicklick

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    13. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Of course, I'm the one who has it wrong right?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W...

      Read the first line.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I...
      specifically
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I...

      But of course my kind doesn't rely on facts and figures, I just make things up. You are funny.

      Oh, and for technical cred, I currently am a systems engineer working specifically on email systems design. I have the technical cred, do you?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    14. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your kind appears to not read past the first sentence either.

      From the first paragraph of your final link.

      Since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, several reported finds of chemical weapons were announced. During the invasion itself, there were half a dozen incidents in which the U.S. military announced that it had found chemical weapons. Most of these cases resulted in field tests showing false-positives.

    15. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by ITRambo · · Score: 2

      Kaspersky is in bed with the Kremlin in the sense that Symantec is in bed with the NSA, IMO. It's a company response to friendly pressure from their national governments to expose information that suits their purposes. If it was deeper than that, international companies like Kaspersky would quickly become local firms as customers shop elsewhere.

    16. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      The thing is... he's right. Iraq did have WMDs of the chemical nature. And yes, the US Government sold them to Iraq. That's all 100% factual.

      Whether they were still functional or whether any of them were actually there to be found 20 years later is a completely different story.

      The real story of the war is why the war was fought over something that we knew that they had for decades. The fact that we didn't actually find much of anything is hilarious, but actually besides the point. We fought a war over something that we'd actually given them.

      Well, that was the reasoning. The real reason we fought the war is because the administration believed we made a mistake leaving Saddam in power, and they wanted to correct that mistake. 9/11 got the ball rolling, and when it didn't seem like anyone was really taking the ALQ threat very seriously, they threw in the WMDs.

      The funny part of all of this is that the US Government wasn't actually trying to pretend there were weapons there that there weren't, the hilarity was that the WMDs were supposed to be the "ringer" because Iraq really did have them. They were expecting Saddam to have maintained them and try to hide them in a semi operational capacity. Instead, he had let them all go to shit and had basically gotten rid of what was left.

    17. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well ... that is because you do not bite the hand of the motherland that feeds you.

    18. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there some Washington idiot bragging about it at the time? Very noisy "speculation".

    19. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The more polite term is Lead Head, you know just another one of those pseudo Christian conservatives suffering from toxic lead poisoning. Not really their fault, just another one of those mind boggling stupid things humanity has managed to do to itself. No need to be cruel, they are a dying minority, currently still noisy but never the less still passing off into an embarrassing history, not just for who they are but how they were made. So no tin foil hat insulation jokes but actual built in cerebral lead insulation keeping those mind closed off from thoughts and ideas. Keep in mind (something they can't do), it is not their fault and as yet the damage can not be repaired. They are tough to deal with but they are what they are and they are still being produced in some locations due to lead pollutants contained in those locations.

      Lets be honest, all the worlds intelligence agencies are criminally corrupt and should never be trusted and it should always be up to police and communications authorities the world over to catch them and prosecute them and never ever work with them to commit criminal acts or to interfere with the proper course of justice. Passive gathering of intelligence is tolerable, active criminal acts or associating with organised crime or corrupting governments or staging coups are all acts of evil and should never be tolerated and the individuals involved should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    20. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      I currently am a systems engineer working specifically on email systems design.

      And this makes you an authority about Weapons of Mass Destruction how? Even if you were doing email systems design for DuPont or the military, you'd have no authority to cite.

      Also, if you were any good as a "systems engineer" they wouldn't have you working on email, that's a lower rung than even web backends. Whoever was responsible for cooking up Saddam's nasties in the 80s wouldn't even hire guys of your caliber as a floor manager, let alone as an engineer.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    21. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by Whiteox · · Score: 0

      Kaspersky probably is in bed in some way with the Kremlin, it has nothing to do with the quotes you listed.

      And those Russian honeypots taste like borsht and vodka.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    22. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      That was in response to this:

      Go watch more faux noose and leave the technical chatter to people actually in the industry, fucknut.

      As this isn't a technical conversation, I took it to mean that I don't belong on Slashdot as I am not technical enough to join the conversation.

      Also, if you were any good as a "systems engineer" they wouldn't have you working on email, that's a lower rung than even web backends.

      So, email, the most vital system to many companies is a low rung system? What do you consider high rung than? Where I work, it is domain, email/storage, etc, but then you must be a programmer who thinks he is hot stuff because he can write code. I design business critical systems, what did you do today?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    23. Re:"Kaspersky's relationship with the Kremlin" by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Hey Mod! That comment was supposed to be Funny +1 and not Troll -1
      Go back to Mod school.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  6. Kaspersky is not special by shihonage · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Their program will slow down your computer with all kinds of security theater "features", but like any other antivirus, it will fail to root out most viruses written in the past 8 years once they've been executed and implanted themselves as a rootkit.

    1. Re:Kaspersky is not special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, the people who wrote and freely give away TDSSKiller are stumped by rootkits.

    2. Re:Kaspersky is not special by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 0

      Their program will slow down your computer with all kinds of security theater "features", but like any other antivirus, it will fail to root out most viruses written in the past 8 years once they've been executed and implanted themselves as a rootkit.

      Ahhhh... Every time a Windows user posts something like this I get fond memories of why I switched to using *nix based OS'es.

    3. Re:Kaspersky is not special by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, duh. When I control your computer, I control what anything running on it can see, including myself.

      But you're invited to write the better mousetrap. I'd be delighted to test it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Kaspersky is not special by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 0

      Their program will slow down your computer with all kinds of security theater "features", but like any other antivirus, it will fail to root out most viruses written in the past 8 years once they've been executed and implanted themselves as a rootkit.

      you make a compelling argument for why most windows users are morons!

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    5. Re:Kaspersky is not special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because ?

      https://www.linux.com/learn/tutorials/284124-myth-busting-is-linux-immune-to-viruses

      or

      http://store.apple.com/us/question/answers/mac/do-i-need-an-antivirus-program-for-my-macbook-pro/Q7HU22X2K27JTAF7J

      As apple gains some traction you will see it more and more targeted (because its users base actually thinks Apple was being truthful years ago).

      Linux is I would say the number one deployed OS out there at this point. It is buried in thousands of devices that will never see a patch. Take for example my router. It has not had a patch in a year (or my SmartTV which has not seen one in 3). In that time there have been how many exploits fixed in say OpenSSL which is a key component of my router (one of the advertised on the box, remote vpn). It is why I moved to a different firmware stack that is updated once and awhile. But how many people bought that router and just left it as is? The cable modem I own? Has not seen a patch in a year.

      To mock windows that it is worse (because it was popular) is to ignore the reality of what is to come. It is going to be ugly and expensive.

      At this point I am of the mind anything can be hacked if someone puts their mind to it.

    6. Re:Kaspersky is not special by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 1

      Because ?

      I don't remember claiming that *nix systems were immune to malware. That is an figment of your imagination that you invented so that you'd have something to get upset over. Unix systems are, however, vastly less targeted than Windows with the exception of Android (if one can still call it a Linux system) which leads the list of targeted mobile OS'es. Like it or not (and you obviously don't) that makes my life easier. Call it security by obscurity but it is a fact I'm going to be insufferably smug about to every Windows user who brings malware up in conversation until your prediction of Linux dethroning Windows as the emperor of malware comes true. I have firewalls, malware scanners and intrusion detectors running on all my Linux and BSD boxes at work partly because I'm mildly paranoid by nature and partly because my colleagues in the Microsoft systems department are afraid my *nix boxes might be an entry point for Windows malware. It's been very quite on that front for years except for the e-mails I get about files infected with Windows malware. The same goes for my personal MacBook. The only thing the security scanner I installed there ever finds is tracking cookies. It has uncovered a piece of genuine 24 carat OS X malware exactly once in six years and it's rated very well in malware detection tests (not the best anymore though, Avira has been outperforming the competition recently).

    7. Re:Kaspersky is not special by techno-vampire · · Score: 2

      I don't remember claiming that *nix systems were immune to malware.

      Agreed. I run a Linux-only household, except for one Windows laptop that my sister uses because some of the programs she needs for school won't run properly under Wine. I don't run ClamAV or anything like that because I'm not in the habit of downloading random Windows programs and sending them to friends. Right now, almost all of the malware writers are targeting Windows for two reasons. First, that's where most of the potential profit is. Second, there are a lot of anti-social script kiddies out there either using cheat-sheets or cookbooks to write malware programs to exploit vulnerabilities that other people discovered; they've no clue how to fine one of their own. And, those who aren't using the cheat-sheets are using programs that create custom malware for them, so that all they have to do is select a security flaw and a payload and the rest is done for them. And guess what: all of those script kiddies are writing malware for Windows because they can't get their hands on what they'd need to write Linux malware, and wouldn't know how to do it on their own anyway.

      And there's another factor here: Linux has much more security designed into it than Windows does, making it a harder target to attack. Yes, I know that there are still people out that who hate SELinux because it was problematic ten or fifteen years ago, but it does make it harder for a malicious program to do its job. And, of course, the fact that most Linux users get their software from their distro instead of downloading files from various third-parties and hoping they're safe helps a lot.

      Sorry to go on so long, but once I got started there was just more and more that I realized needed saying.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    8. Re:Kaspersky is not special by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I bought the Hacking Exposed books.... they were enlightening: Linux isn't really 'safer' than Windows; it just has a different set of vulnerable points (fewer of 'em, but penetrating deeper into the system and more likely to persist across versions). If you want true security, run Netware.

      The patching system may be the real culprit, tho: It's been pointed out that when a Windows version becomes "unsupported" there's an abrupt cessation of newly-found vulnerabilities. Why? Because the bad guys discover the holes mostly (perhaps entirely) by reverse-engineering the official patches ... which with Windows, tend to be monofocused on a single bug, making the hole fairly easy to ID, and thereby paint a handy target on unpatched machines. Conversely linux updates are, to my grok, more likely to address a bunch of stuff at once, making any single hole harder to identify. Likewise, Windows service packs (which address a bunch of stuff at once) have not typically been followed by a rash of newly-found vulnerabilities.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  7. Who watches the watchmen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ?????

    1. Re:Who watches the watchmen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      systemd

  8. Agreed 110% & I'm right there w/ ya Mr. K. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject, & this APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    * :)

    (Not only do custom hosts files give you more security, but unlike OTHER 'security solutions', they also yield more speed, reliability, & even added anonymity (to a lesser extent than the other benefits listed) online - from a fellow "Mr. K." here, "yours truly"...)

    APK

    P.S.=> "My name is Ozymandias: Look upon my works ye mighty, & despair..." because NOBODY does it as well as I do in that program for all the benefits I listed above, in kernelmode, with something you already have vs. "bolting on more" resource-sucking overheads

    ... apk

    1. Re:Agreed 110% & I'm right there w/ ya Mr. K. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      that's surprisingly brief, almost makes me wonder if it's really APK

    2. Re:Agreed 110% & I'm right there w/ ya Mr. K. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in kernelmode

      Except any program is free to send UDP 53 packets out and resolve DNS itself.

    3. Re:Agreed 110% & I'm right there w/ ya Mr. K. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please fuck off, Andrew Peter Kowalsky.

  9. but... but... but... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    but i'm a computer supervillain, you insensitive clod!

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  10. What's /. opinion on AV? by Eloking · · Score: 2

    Just wondering if I'm the only one around here not using any AV for a long time. AFAIK, you can only get your virus on the internet (unless I'm underestimating USB's key viruses). And with gmail (and other huge mail provider) boosted with virus check procedure, Secured browser like Chrome pimped with Adblock and keeping myself far from the "dark side" of the web, I've never had any problem. Add to this the new lite Microsoft Security Essential (intagrated in Win8) to the lot and I'm surprised those company are still in business.

    Or am I naive?

    --
    Elok
    1. Re:What's /. opinion on AV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux.

    2. Re:What's /. opinion on AV? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      Just wondering if I'm the only one around here not using any AV for a long time.

      you aren't but if you are using Windows and no AV then you are a fool.

      AFAIK, you can only get your virus on the internet (unless I'm underestimating USB's key viruses).

      you absolutely are underestimating USB key viruses! stuxnet infected airgapped computers using a USB key.

      Chrome pimped with Adblock and keeping myself far from the "dark side" of the web, I've never had any problem

      while this helps it won't keep you completely safe.

      Add to this the new lite Microsoft Security Essential (intagrated in Win8) to the lot and I'm surprised those company are still in business.

      i'm not surprised at all. windows defender only detects ~75% of malware. at any given time, MS is about a year behind the AV curve.

      there is a good chance you are infected with some malware.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:What's /. opinion on AV? by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      As long as the user you run as is a Standard user without admin privileges you're probably fine.

    4. Re:What's /. opinion on AV? by Eloking · · Score: 1

      So your opinion is that paid AV is a must for any windows OS? And that Kapersky (or norton) is the only way to be completely protected from viruses?

      --
      Elok
    5. Re:What's /. opinion on AV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except there's a plenitude of privilege escalation exploits and any information worth stealing is likely in user-owned files.

    6. Re:What's /. opinion on AV? by Zaelath · · Score: 2

      you aren't but if you are using Windows and no AV then you are a fool.

      you absolutely are underestimating USB key viruses! stuxnet infected airgapped computers using a USB key.

      'm not surprised at all. windows defender only detects ~75% of malware. at any given time, MS is about a year behind the AV curve.

      On the other hand, nothing detected Stuxnet until many years after it was distributed, and it's a horrible example of general public USB virus. It's like suggesting people should build fallout shelters because they have any chance at all against a nation state.

      On top of that, AV does /nothing/ for 0-day.

      How you act and how attractive you are influence your likelihood of attack more than any other factor. If your behaviour is so risky that you need doubleplusgood AV then perhaps you should be doing that kind of thing in a Virtual Machine on a segregated network instead of the same machine you do your banking on, because you WILL get infected.

      Like any other security measure, AV is a layer of protection, and for that reason MS Essentials does an acceptable job for {most|cautious|honest} people. Your grandparents that click on /every/ link and open /every/ attachment emailed to them "in case" may need a paid solution, or better still, an Apple computer since they're still a much smaller target than Windows.

    7. Re:What's /. opinion on AV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're using MSE you're not not using anti virus, you're not using third party anti virus.

    8. Re: What's /. opinion on AV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, for the most part you're good.
      Awareness is key :)

    9. Re:What's /. opinion on AV? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 0

      Kapersky has the best AV software and while great, the only to be completely protected from viruses is to use secure software which completely excludes commercial systems like Windows.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  11. The problem with security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The problem with security is not that security companies are doing worse at making their products. Its that when they did make bad bloated and slow products the end user lost interest. Not to mention we do not have the rampant wide spread out breaks that we used to. Some of this is due to better OS and browser security, also users are finally becoming smarter and the fact the bad guys see more gain in hacking companies the messing with individual PC users. I just finished uninstalling McAfee Live Safe, not because its a lousy product. But because I bought a HP Stream with 2GB RAM and running any kind of security suite will most likely affect performance and use up some RAM. If you look at how these security businesses have basically shrank in consumer markets and along with that so have their profits. Its no wonder they keep saying the sky is falling, the sky is falling. Because they must keep some people paranoid enough to keep buying into their products. The stuff that really affects you, none of these suites ever seem to detect it anyway.

    1. Re:The problem with security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your hypothesis seems to ignore the vast prevalence of cryptolocker like infections that have become the norm lately.

  12. Marketing rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The days where Eugene was leading a technical company are far gone.
    Now they are just the self-absorbed marketing-driven company that puts the Ferrari sponsorship above all their priority....

  13. AdBlock = Inferior vs. hosts + 'Souled-Out' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can "Almost ALL Ads Blocked" do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites/servers (beyond malicious ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (adds reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. bandwidth caps
    11.) Get you past a dnsbl
    12.) Keep you off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up websurfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
    14.) Work on ANY webbound app (like stand-alone email programs) multiplatform.
    15.) Give you easily texteditor controlled data for the above
    16.) Do all that & block ads (better than addons) more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory usage

    * ANSWER ="NO" to each above on AdBlock or its forked variants doing it as well or at all!

    APK

    P.S.=> AdBlock &/or it's forked variants do FAR less than hosts do & FAR less efficiently - hosts by way of comparison do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):

    AdBlock's 4++gb & 100% CPU usage flooring inefficiency -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... + ClarityRay defeats it + it 'souled-out' & is crippled by default paid off to not do its job http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/... & ABP too http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...

    AdBlock & its variants add complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    For the BEST hosts file?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    ... apk

    1. Re:AdBlock = Inferior vs. hosts + 'Souled-Out' by bouldin · · Score: 2

      Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop communique to C&C servers

      Sorry, this is still incorrect. The whole point of a Domain-Generating Algorithm is to evade domain name blocking and takedowns.

      By the time you add known DGA domain names to a blocklist, they are already defunct, and the malware has moved on to new domain names.

    2. Re:AdBlock = Inferior vs. hosts + 'Souled-Out' by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

      Not if the system has been offline for some time.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
  14. Quoting the Beatles for this one... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In this way, Mr. K. will challenge the world..." -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    * :)

    (Nothing does it like the truth, per that lyric, & NOTHING gets you security AND speeds you up + gains you more reliable connectivity the way custom hosts files do...)

    APK

    P.S.=> ... And, the truth of it is just as I stated it in that link above (since I feel about it as my fellow "Mr. K." does actually, in part on security, HOWEVER - hosts, unlike other security solutions, doesn't SLOW YOU DOWN & instead, speeds you up AND makes your connections more reliable (& hosts even anonymity anonymity, albeit to a lesser extent)) - That all "said & aside"? I challenge the world to do better, + in a simpler fashion (not 'bolting on more overheads' but using what you have natively already instead to do that job)... apk

  15. Quoting the Beatles for this one... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In this way, Mr. K. will challenge the world..." -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    * :)

    (Nothing does it like the truth, per that lyric, & NOTHING gets you security AND speeds you up + gains you more reliable connectivity the way custom hosts files do...)

    APK

    P.S.=> ... And, the truth of it is just as I stated it in that link above (since I feel about it as my fellow "Mr. K." does actually, in part on security, HOWEVER - hosts, unlike other security solutions, doesn't SLOW YOU DOWN & instead, speeds you up AND makes your connections more reliable (& hosts even anonymity anonymity, albeit to a lesser extent)) - That all "said & aside"? I challenge the world to do better, + in a simpler fashion (not 'bolting on more overheads' but using what you have natively already instead to do that job)... apk

  16. reporting comedy by HughJazz · · Score: 1

    It's hilarious when American news sources would accuse Kaspersky of spying for Russian government. Where where they when virtually all major US tech companies were spying on the entire planet on behalf of the NSA? It only took them Snowden handing them indisputable proof for these unprincipled "reporters" to notice.

    Of course the lesson here isn't that America is all bad and Russia is all good. It's that lots of people that preach about ethics to others.... don't actually follow the very principles they claim to stand for.

  17. Re:State business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I grew up in the US in the 80s, and I was basically taught to believe that all Russians are completely untrustworthy.

    (See any "Russian" character played by a Hollywood actor in any US movie or TV show from the 80s and early 90s, with one single exception: Sean Connery in The Hunt for Red October.)

    As a result, I'm far more worried about Kapersky personally trying to steal from me than I am about his ties to KGB/whatever. I know it was 99% propaganda, but I still don't trust anyone with a Russian name or accent.

  18. A very common joke about Kaspersky products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kaspersky products leave malware no chance - they eat computer resources themselves.

    Sad but true.

  19. Target the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then why don't they target the NSA and other US gpvernment agencies?

  20. Hosts can block any domain name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I have a domain name in hosts blocked, it works to stop DGA botnets. Same with subdomains also.

    * Question #1: See subject - Are you saying that's NOT true?

    APK

    P.S.=> You're also assuming they "go dead" everytime... Question #2: Is that what YOU DO WITH YOUR DGA BOTNET, Mr. Expert (who speaks for all botnet masters like himself)? apk

    1. Re:Hosts can block any domain name by bouldin · · Score: 2

      Hosts can block any domain name

      Not true, a hosts file is trivial to bypass. Any piece of software can send TCP/UDP 53 traffic to a DNS server and resolve the name itself.

      Question #2: Is that what YOU DO WITH YOUR DGA BOTNET, Mr. Expert (who speaks for all botnet masters like himself)?

      I don't run botnets, but I do understand what a domain-generating ALGORITHM is. The algorithms are seeded with the current time, so the list of domains is always changing.

      Now, if you reverse engineer the algorithm out of the malware, you could theoretically build a list of all domain names the malware will use in the future, but usually when I hear about reverse engineering a DGA, it's because microsoft and other companies have pre-registered those domain names as part of a botnet takedown. At any rate, you clearly don't understand what you're talking about.

  21. What program does that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Hosts = referenced 1st by default. Same w/ other programs like email that's a non-HTML browser based type. Browsers certainly DO NOT DO THAT either.

    APK

    P.S.=> Can you show me a SPECIFIC example of what you speak of? If you can provide it & I don't THINK YOU CAN, I would Application Firewall block it then (Zone Alarm & even Windows native firewall can do that easily)... apk

  22. Please take your own advice... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Especially if that's the "best you got" vs. this http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    * :)

    APK

    P.S.=> Apparently what I said & the program I designed along with the file you already have in hosts does SUCH A GOOD JOB that it reduces these "trolls" (who are probably malware maker or botnet makers if not advertisers & inferior competitors) to profanity + "FoAmiNg-@-TeH-MoUtH" replies, lol... apk

  23. In the age where we see Putin as the face of Russi by azav · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see positive news like this coming out of Russia.

    Really nice.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  24. Then a DGA botnet node's dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: It blocked itself. They resurrect 'em (fastflux) too so they CAN "live again" & if they use the same name, hosts block those. Per my subject, the DGA killed off that domain already (if it's NOT also 'fastfluxed' that is, some are).

    Hosts files via my program get you the MOST current blocking information vs. those threats AND many others, as soon as they are discovered, but if they're dead, they're dead anyhow so no threat UNLESS "fastflux" tech is used in them in combination with DGA methods also... yes, it happens.

    Doesn't matter though - hosts CAN block ANY domain or subdomain name, & since that is true? Hosts can stop ANY domain/subdomain name based threat... or is that not true??

    E.G.-> Once I set a domain/subdomain as blocked in hosts via 0.0.0.0 baddomainnametoblock.com, is it not forever blocked that way???

    (Periodically, but sparingly due to fastflux usage in botnets, I 'ping' my hosts list via my program to prune off/purge dead entries... ONLY PROBLEM IS, botnet masters CAN SET THEIR HOSTING MACHINE OS TO DENY ECHO REPLIES, so I have to be careful with doing it, due to being able to set an OS' IP stack to NOT reply to pings...)

    APK

    P.S.=> The question is explicit - answer it (as I asked it of bouldin also)... apk

  25. Ozymandias does... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I preempt their protection (& supplement it) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... since I STOP YOU FROM BEING INFECTED IN THE FIRST PLACE by blocking the source of online threats (the most prevalent type now in botnets, maliciously coded sites, & even via email phish) BEFORE YOU CAN GET "SICK" FROM THEM.

    * Not only do hosts do that via my program that gets you the MOST current blocking information from 10 reputable & reliable sites in the security community BUT unlike other security solutions, yes, like antivirus/antispyware, I SPEED YOU UP ONLINE ALSO in 2 ways (saving bandwidth vs. capping too):

    1.) Blocking ads, a major source of malware infestation themselves

    AND

    2.) Hardcoded favorite sites @ the TOP of your custom hosts file (for best speed) where you spend MOST of your time online

    (For me it's LITERALLY 95%++ of my time online per analyzing my browser histories & router logs)

    I.E./E.G.-> Placing them at the TOP of a custom hosts file, which by FAR exceeds remote DNS lookup & return turn-around time by many orders of magnitude, AND, it makes your connections MORE RELIABLE vs. redirect poisoned DNS (big problem since 99.999% of ISP DNS' still aren't patched vs. it) or "downed" DNS (happens a LOT).

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts just work & I make them work as EFFICIENTLY as possible (sorting & deduplicating them, removing comment bloat AND making their blocking address as EFFICIENT AS POSSIBLE via 0.0.0.0 vs. the larger slower to load a larger file & parse it for load internally during a File Open/Read/Close I-O cycle which even an MS VP of their "Windows Client Performance Division" CONCEDED TO ME -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... there on that note) & by using what you have ALREADY natively, vs. bolting on yet MORE OVERHEADS in other security solutions... apk

  26. Answer my questions quit avoiding them... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What software is that? You're avoiding a SIMPLE question! If I block a domain name in hosts IS IT BLOCKED (DGA generated or not)??

    Plus, I protect hosts SO WELL (above & beyond WFP + UAC that Windows provides mind you as well) that they cannot be bushwhacked by malware... how? By creating the hosts from a pristine backup of the original hosts (in case of something SOMEHOW getting past this) AND, by additionally applying read-only attributes to hosts (every 1/2 second on a hi-res timer when my program's resident & when it shuts down also) effectively locking it vs. corruption by malware or otherwise (vs. outright LOCKING the file exclusively which COULD effectively lock out browsers or the IP stack (less chance here) too).

    APK

    P.S.=> It's a simple 2 questions above, YES or NO will do as your answers (don't even *TRY* to "b.s." your way around them with 'hypotheticals' you don't even PROVIDE EXAMPLES OF, ones I can actually see, not mere 'theory')... apk

    1. Re:Answer my questions quit avoiding them... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      What software is that? You're avoiding a SIMPLE question! If I block a domain name in hosts IS IT BLOCKED (DGA generated or not)??

      No.

      The python code below resolves example.com by connecting directly to Google's DNS servers. It does not check the hosts file.

      import dns.resolver

      resolver = dns.resolver.Resolver(configure=False)
      resolver.nameservers = ['8.8.8.8']
      ans = resolver.query('example.com', 'A')

  27. No no senor: Mainstream, not custom... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could write my own code too - mainstream widely used wares... what ones do that?

    * Unbelievable - what a little SNEAK you are!

    (Answer that question... & again - this question too: IF/WHEN I block a domain OR subdomain in hosts, IS IT BLOCKED?)

    APK

    P.S.=> You're a weasel, above ALL else, & one that refuses to answer a SIMPLE question above (& the other one on blocking too)... apk

    1. Re:No no senor: Mainstream, not custom... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      What software is that? You're avoiding a SIMPLE question! If I block a domain name in hosts IS IT BLOCKED (DGA generated or not)??

      No.

      The python code below resolves example.com by connecting directly to Google's DNS servers. It does not check the hosts file.

      (Answer that question... & again - this question too: IF/WHEN I block a domain OR subdomain in hosts, IS IT BLOCKED?)

      The answer is "no," but I just answered that question.

      I could write my own code too - mainstream widely used wares... what ones do that?

      So, you're asking what malware in the wild evades hosts files? None that I know of, but that does not mean your approach is secure. We fix vulnerabilities before they are exploited, not after.

      P.S.=> You're a weasel, above ALL else, & one that refuses to answer a SIMPLE question above (& the other one on blocking too)... apk

      I don't think you understand security. Attackers are sneaky and do whatever they can to evade controls.

  28. Mainstream, not custom... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What widely used software does its own DNS queries? Answer it... you fail, you obviously, can't... lol!

    * Other than DNS servers, I'd like to see that... show me what malware does it, & I'll block it @ the firewall, application type preferable as Windows or Zone Alarm provides, (or hosts) easy as apple pie... & you KNOW it.

    You lose/fail: Why? You can't produce a widely used ware that does that...

    I don't know about computer security??

    LMAO - I was doing security in computing before you were BORN I'd wager & certainly professionally as well I'd also strongly wager...

    APK

    P.S.=> It seems also that you're vainly & effetely attempting to say "every computer under the sun has a virus/malware that does DNS queries itself" & new NEWS/Clue/NewsFlash - they do NOT... apk

    1. Re:Mainstream, not custom... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      I said:

      So, you're asking what malware in the wild evades hosts files? None that I know of, but that does not mean your approach is secure.

      Then you said:

      It seems also that you're vainly & effetely attempting to say "every computer under the sun has a virus/malware that does DNS queries itself"

      What part of that makes sense to you?

  29. Then I have to tell you... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What malware evades hosts since you don't know? IP address using kinds... & you say "I don't know about security?" directed MY way?? WRONG.

    I beat them (as I said last reply) using firewall rules tables, it works @ app level OR IP address level.

    THERE - now YOU LEARNED SOMETHING from "the guy that knows nothing about security" or so YOU said & are wrong on, which that evidences for me.

    APK

    P.S.=> "Here endeth the lesson" AND YOU HAVE BEEN MASSIVELY "SCHOOLED", by a 16 to NOTHING score against your effete & easily disproven B.S. vs. facts I put out in a list YOU CAN'T TOUCH (heck - nobody here a ages has & I am way, Way, WAY ahead on that note per that list of facts in favor of hosts over browser addons & even locally setup DNS)... apk

    1. Re:Then I have to tell you... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Wait, what did I learn? That you can block IPs with a firewall?

      I need to make sure

  30. Let's quote YOU directly shall we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So, you're asking what malware in the wild evades hosts files? None that I know of" by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @02:07PM (#49745175)

    It's YOU quoted saying you don't know what malware evades hosts - I directly told you last reply, stupid... AND how to stop it (via hosts OR if its served by IP address, via firewalls @ IP addy level OR app level - which Windows native firewall even does).

    APK

    P.S.=> Of course, as per your usual? I just "drop my usual bomb" all OVER your wannabe ass (saying I don't know computer security? Dearest DOUCHE wannabe - I write wares for it & guides for it BEFORE YOU WERE BORN + I strongly wager that's right & professionally as well):

    Lastly: Since you can't prove my points wrong @ all, even this single one you cling to, refusing to answer IF I block a domain/subdomain in hosts, am I proof to attacks from it?

    You're MORE THAN WELCOME to *try* to point-by-point disprove my points in favor of hosts here validly (which you can't do & we all KNOW it by now) -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    You lose/fail, vs. "yours truly", as always & it's certain YOU can't code anything I've ever seen (let alone for security which I have in this very app for hosts) so, go away, "wannabe flea", or I will stomp on you even MORE... apk

    1. Re:Let's quote YOU directly shall we? by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Oh, ok. It's hard to understand your verbal diarrhea.

      No, malware that connects directly to an IP isn't designed to evade host files. It's just primitive malware that didn't bother to implement DNS-based resiliency.

      And no, if you block a domain in a hosts file, you are not secure from connections to the domain. 4 lines of Python can bypass the host file.

  31. LOL: Not hard to understand YOURS you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: And, to "shoot you down" w/ it easy, quoted... lmao!

    * Better luck next time, wannabe (my guess? You're nothing but a wannabe MENIAL 'network admin/techie' effetely *trying* to "play coder" w/ your OPEN SORES snipped code above you didn't even write, lol, which is TYPICAL of "your kind"... why don't we see apps written for security out of your kind, bigshot? YOU CAN'T MANAGE IT IS WHY...)

    Ah, yes - trying your "moving the goalposts" logical fallacy w/ your Open SORES copied code again eh? Ok, again:

    * Again, show us a mainstream malware OR WARE that does its own DNS queries... you can't & have ADMITTED IT... you're all "hypothetical bullshit", nothing more.

    Wake up & smell the coffee NEO (noob in other words) - a 1,000 like you have vainly *tried* to take me on on my points here in favor of hosts files over DNS servers AND browser addons http://it.slashdot.org/comment... & NOT A SINGLE ONE's been successful in validly technically disproving those points enumerated there...

    APK

    P.S.=> You can SAY "I don't know security" about ME, but I can PROVE with your own words you don't & your lack of accomplishment in the art & science of computing (let alone that in coding which I can readily prove BOTH on my part vs. your crap) does the rest... apk

    1. Re:LOL: Not hard to understand YOURS you mean by bouldin · · Score: 1

      So, when someone discovers a zero-day vulnerability, it's just "hypothetical bullshit" because nobody has exploited it "mainstream malware?"

  32. Last I say: YOU were asked to show me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't, & had to "eat your erroneous words" here http://it.slashdot.org/comment... so "Rinse, Lather, & Repeat" & QUIT WASTING MY TIME...

    See, unlike YOU, menial?

    I DO write code that DOES work for security!

    (+ added speed, unlike other 'security solutions' actually SLOWING YOU DOWN, & even added reliability via hosts hardcodes which also aid anonymity to a degree vs. dns request logs & doing so with WHAT YOU ALREADY NATIVELY HAVE in more efficient kernelmode, not "bolting on more" that actually slows you down (& doesn't work that well anymore vs. threats out there today too)).

    * Show us, above ALL else, you have done better, YOURSELF... again, you can't... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> Go away already - lol, I've had ENOUGH of dusting your wannabe ass menial - why? Heck, you're MAKING me SAY IT as usual again:

    THIS? This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'" vs. wannabes that say I don't know security, yet I quote them & had to SCHOOL them in it shown above in YOUR WORDS QUOTED!

    (Your kind? Mere user of others' code, & yet you had the AUDACITY to give ME guff & I'm out there doing good things, gratis? LMAO - your generation is pure shit seeing as you "talk a 'game'" but not even a GOOD ONE, & haven't managed SQUAT yourself... prove otherwise (I'll be waiting until the 12th of never/the clock striking 13 etc. for THAT outta "the likes of you", wannabe menial))... apk

    1. Re:Last I say: YOU were asked to show me by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Know why no malware needs to do its own DNS lookups?

      Because nobody uses hosts files for security. I read somewhere that they can be defeated with 4 lines of unprivileged python.

  33. Unbelievable: WRONG again... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask these fellow /.'ers if they use hosts for security, speed, & reliability:

    fustakrakich, Dwedit, UnknownSoldier, gl4ss, sootman, TestedDoughnut, TempestRose, lennier1, ScottCooperDotNet, Bill Dog, drinkypoo, Culture20, Rick17JJ, Ol Olsoc, icebraining, Trax3001BBS, fahrbot-bot, EdIII, bLanark, RocketRabbit, TheRealGrogan, Martin Blank, CAIMLAS. drakaan, Dynedain,Lime Green Bowler, Bob9113, wolrahnaes, raju1kabir, mrbcs, gweihir, frovingslosh, tepples, kimvette, Geeky, humanrev, maestroX, phrostie, ElectricTurtle, mattbee, VShael, AndGodSed, jafiwam, i.r.id10t, NeverVotedBush, falconwolf, BrokenHalo, orclevegam, cyberjock1980, gad_zuki!, furby076, jandrese, halcyon1234, Anonymous Admin, houghi, drooling-dog, dracocat, betterunixthanunix, someones, sqrt(2), cratermoon, bmo, fast turtle, Kris_J, SydShamino, Technician, pjkeyzer, srmalloy, schwit1, mrbcs, KingAlanI, ksemlerK, Scorch_, Mechanic, NealBScott, Anubis IV, crutchy, damn_registrars, couchslug, green1, wakeboarder, Gothmolly, lesincompetent, ls671, DigiShaman, P. Don, Yaa 101, qwertyatwork, dehole, Em Adespoton, CAOgdin, schwit1, MightyYar, RJFerret, idontgno, technosaurus, bemymonkey, wickerprints, noh8rz10, sexconker, sandbagger, NewWorldDan, Karmashock, aNonnyMouseCowered, Dracos, keith_nt4, networkzombie, jafiwam, JohnFen, SigmundFloyd, EETech1, duck_rifted, The MAZZTer, Anonymous Brave Guy, plasm4, holophrastic, Baki, StikyPad, kermidge, & myself...

    * Same ones I crushed that wannabe raymorris with here http://it.slashdot.org/comment... and their DIRECT comments on hosts are shown there, not just their names (as I did here since /. now limits AC post lengths).

    APK

    P.S.=> Additionally: DEMAND for MY program (hosted by MalwareBytes' hpHosts no less) has gone up SO much, they had to move to AMAZON UnDDoS'able servers (for both increase in hosts data demand AND for downloads of APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-1 32/64-bit)

    When YOU can manage to do the same? MAYBE THEN, I'd listen... apk

    1. Re:Unbelievable: WRONG again... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      * Same ones I crushed that wannabe raymorris with here http://it.slashdot.org/comment... and their DIRECT comments on hosts are shown there, not just their names (as I did here since /. now limits AC post lengths).

      Haha, besides the hilarious posts where you pretend to be someone else congratulating yourself, all I see are people who use hosts files to block ads, which is a good use.

      Oh wait, one guy null routes suspicious traffic! You do know that null routing does not involve hosts files, right? Why is that quote in there?

    2. Re:Unbelievable: WRONG again... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bouldin's a hypocrite supports himself by ac and fails http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ? Yes. Talk ironically droll Mr. Pot calling a kettle black. Nobody's going to support a piece of trash like you after this debacle.

  34. WRONG again: Spybot S&D anyone? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & "eat your words" stupid wannabe MENIAL (you are just NOT IN MY LEAGUE, nor do I strongly suspect, will you *ever* BE...) Spybot S&D does for one!

    * :)

    Additionally:

    Want an except from my email where I got NOD32/ESET to remove a FALSE POSITIVE on my ware they had AND Aryeh Goretsky, their LEAD CODER iirc, ADMITTING HOSTS ARE GOOD FOR SECURITY as yet another layer of it?

    Ask & "ye shall receive" dumbass... so you can "eat your words" yet again!

    Piece of advice: Don't EVER "try me" again, or I will crap ALL OVER YOU for your arrogance & stupidity, easily, easier than this time since I can send this link your way next time too!

    APK

    P.S.=> By the way, in case you DIDN'T know it? OpenDNS filters vs. threats online (they would KILL *any* malware served that way too, supplementing hosts, supplementing each other (DNS & HOSTS)) - which is WHY the guides I put out for securing Windows users espouses "layered-security"/"defense-in-depth" & I was PAID for them no less - how about you? Oh, that's right - you can't even show us code you wrote YOURSELF, much less an app for security as I have (yet you say I don't know security? LOL! See above, see this entire exchange everyone)... apkb

    1. Re:WRONG again: Spybot S&D anyone? apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Want an except from my email where I got NOD32/ESET to remove a FALSE POSITIVE on my ware they had AND Aryeh Goretsky, their LEAD CODER iirc, ADMITTING HOSTS ARE GOOD FOR SECURITY as yet another layer of it?

      Yes, I would like to see those e-mails.

      the guides I put out for securing Windows users espouses "layered-security"/"defense-in-depth" & I was PAID for them no less

      What guides? Links, please.

  35. Spybot S&D uses hosts... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0.0.0.0 = same as 'null route' or hosts deny (I didn't say that though he did but it proves you wrong, 118++:1 as the ratio against you from your fellow /.'ers no less... & demand for BOTH hosts custom data from MalwareBytes' hpHosts AND for my program too went up SO MUCH since I released it & "pr'd" it here you have to AGAIN, "EAT YOUR WORDS", lol).

    * Lastly, see subject? Ah, but OF COURSE you do Spybot S&D ANYONE? http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    GOSH: Didn't YOU SAY 'nobody uses hosts for security', stupid? Yes, you did... "eat your words" yet again!

    (You can effetely & vainly *TRY* to "forums post bury" your numerous defeats now, but I will ALWAYS be able to toss this MASSIVE DEFEAT back your way from now on, lol... perfect, thank-you!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Can I ask you a question, slightly off topic? QUESTION: "How does it taste, EATING YOUR WORDS, flavored with 'the bitter taste of SELF-defeat', your foot ramming them down your throat since you stuck it in your mouth?"

    Change your diet: Eating your WORDS != GOOD NUTRITION... lmao! apk

    1. Re:Spybot S&D uses hosts... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      * Lastly, see subject? Ah, but OF COURSE you do Spybot S&D ANYONE? http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

      Show me a link on the Spybot site that says it uses hosts files.

  36. Email excerpt from NOD32/ESET I spoke of... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RE: APK REPLY to Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET on False positive: Why are you calling a program of mine a "bad" file? apkââ

    Aryeh Goretsky
    9/09/14
    To: Alexander Kowalski

    Hello, .... I think blocking via hosts file (or similar blocking at the perimeter) is a good defensive measure, and it is something I do recommend doing as an additional layer of security. Like anything else, it has to be managed, but thatâ(TM)s part of being in IT security.

    Regards,
    Aryeh Goretsky

    ---

    What guides? Search "HOW TO SECURE Windows 2000/XP" on Google or BING... MOST of them, are mine & got me PAID for them (thus, professional, accepting monies for it) even here http://pcpitstop.com/news/winn...

    So, by comparison, again: What have YOU done, Mr. who said "I know nothing about security" directed MY way from your PIE hole? You're a lot of blowhard HOT AIR!

    APK

    P.S.=> Want more? I'll cite Mr. Oliver Day of SECURITYFOCUS a division of Norton/Symantec also IF need be... but I've put you away, especially on you "spouting off" NOBODY USES HOSTS FOR SECURITY, lol... Spybot S&D does, so do I & MalwareBytes' hpHosts admin himself (best antivirus/antispyware/antimalware in the business) hosts my app & HAS VETTED MY CODE, I work DIRECTLY with them no less & SO MUCH DEMAND happened they had to move to AMAZON Un-DDoS'able servers after I released & PR'd my program here on /. no less... again: EAT YOUR WORDS! apk

    1. Re:Email excerpt from NOD32/ESET I spoke of... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      What guides? Search "HOW TO SECURE Windows 2000/XP" on Google or BING... MOST of them, are mine & got me PAID for them (thus, professional, accepting monies for it) even here http://pcpitstop.com/news/winn... [pcpitstop.com]

      Most of those are yours? I see two were written by Mindy. Is that you?

      Want more? I'll cite Mr. Oliver Day of SECURITYFOCUS a division of Norton/Symantec also IF need be...

      Yes, please cite Mr. Oliver Day.

  37. "Eat your words" some more... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Change your diet (eating yer words != good nutrition) http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

    * You FULL yet? You ought to be... you've eaten your words here vs. myself REPEATEDLY & that? Is NOT 'good nutrition' considering you're eating the SHIT you vomited my way, weasel...

    You had the NERVE to say I didn't know security?

    YOU CLEARLY DON'T, you blowhard done nothing for security in apps or guides like myself wannabe.

    Everyone & ANYONE into security knows about Spybot S&D using hosts!

    You got what you asked for, PLENTY of evidence supporting me any search engine can show you... you know zilch & this "seals the deal" with documented PROOF of that for me, yet again.

    APK

    P.S.=> I've backed myself up @ EVERY TURN with facts, & certainly ones you can't disprove validly, as is per "your usual" wannabe... apk

    1. Re:"Eat your words" some more... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Show me a link on the Spybot site that says it uses hosts files.

      Change your diet (eating yer words != good nutrition) http://www.bing.com/search?q=%......

      That's not a link to the Spybot site.

  38. Changing my links, loser? Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1st link of many IS a spybot site http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

    * Changing the LINKS I posted now? LOL, you are TRULY stupid & weak... WTF is this you little imbecile? https://forums.spybot.info/sho...

    It's PROOF you can't handle the fact I busted you up, SO BADLY, that you are now "eating your words", you REPREHENSIBLE little pussy weasel, lol...

    APK

    P.S.=> What's the matter? The 'great 'bouldin'' the "ne'er-do-well" is REDUCED to purest BULLSHIT after I smoked him?? LMAO, "Oh, say it AIN'T so" (too bad it is - that's reality when a NO-MIND done nothing like YOU *tries* to 'take me on' only to be SCHOOLED & having to "eat his words", stupid)... apk

  39. This is YOU "eating your words" again, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1st of all, what's this "Mr. Citation"? https://forums.spybot.info/sho...

    Clue/New NEWS/NewsFlash: It's YOU EATING YOUR WORDS you little fuck - talking behind my back here too http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    NOW, I see *everyone* in ALL OF YOUR POSTS is seeing the fact I busted you up totally here, lol... I love it.

    (How do you like them apples, fuckweasel?)

    I love it...

    APK

    P.S.=> http://www.securityfocus.com/c... Take a read FUCKFACE... I see you like citations, I've given you 2 of a TRUCKLOAD that you will NOW *never* EVER hear the end of (so will all reading your bullshit you give everyone)... you brought it on yourself... apk

  40. Re:This is YOU "eating your words" again, lol... a by bouldin · · Score: 1

    I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?

    I do see the text:

    Also, in the HELP entry associated with the Hosts File Tool, a sentence begins with: "Spybot-S&D can add a prepared list of web sites known for bad behaviour . . ."

    Which indicates it blocks websites, not command and control servers for botnets.

    Wait a minute, the spybot site is actually https://www.safer-networking.o..., not spybot.info. So, you didn't post a link to the spybot site.

  41. Weasel, you have failed again... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes it's Oliver Day of SecurityFocus/Symantec http://www.securityfocus.com/c... liar... wow, you really ARE piss-poor @ losing, aren't you, "Mr. Citation"... unbelievable!

    HOW CAN A PIECE OF CRAP LIKE YOU LIVE WITH HIMSELF?

    And?

    What's that image show when you hover over it, in the top right of that forums for Spybot (safer-networking IS spybot too, dumbass) https://forums.spybot.info/sho... ?

    YOU FAIL, whimp... I love it!

    APK

    P.S.=> It's going to be a PLEASURE showing everyone on this forums what a COMPLETE fucking UTTER LITTLE WEASEL & WHIMP you are, Mr. Citation (it's that, or you are blatantly BLIND & ILLITERATE as well as stupid, all @ once). Can't take losing, & the fact you did it to yourself, vs. myself? Absolutely/no questions asked... lol! apk

    1. Re:Weasel, you have failed again... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sorry, I was blinded by all the verbal diarrhea.

      That article is more than six years old. Got something more recent? He still says it's meant for blocking websites.

    2. Re:Weasel, you have failed again... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caught this in your other posts. You failed vs. apk man.

    3. Re:Weasel, you have failed again... apk by bouldin · · Score: 2

      Actually, I found a good reference for malware that does perform DNS directly. See page 9 at OpenDNS - DNS Role in Botnets.

      They reference malware using custom DNS servers, and also malware tunneling messages through the DNS protocol.

      Here's a quote:

      At present time, there are few to no effective countermeasures cited by the security community to detect or prevent DNS-based botnet communications. Some larger, security-aware organizations could use techniques such as "split horizon" DNS. This will force internal hosts to send their DNS requests only through the network DNS server.

      So there you go - a network solution. But the malware they mention completely bypasses OS hosts files.

  42. IF you're infected by such a malware? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Block those DNS in hosts + their C&C servers they can't talk to them (either one).

    You LOSE...

    APK

    P.S.=> You FAIL again, lol... apk

    1. Re:IF you're infected by such a malware? apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Did you look at the PDF? The malware speaks DNS protocols directly, bypassing the syscalls that check hosts files. Thats what you asked for earlier.

  43. For everyone's reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bouldin screwed up on NOD32/ESET's lead dev saying hosts are a GOOD defensive measure, Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton stating the same years before, AND bouldin NOT ADMITTING TO HIS SCREWUP THAT NO WARES IN SECURITY USE HOSTS, but SpyBot S&D does:

    Here http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    and here http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    AND HERE TOO http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    (LMAO - he tried to say "I can't see it", changed my links, & denied seeing Oliver Day @ SecurityFocus (Division of Norton/Symantec) championing hosts, & denied the link that shows Spybot S&D uses hosts files for security too!)

    * :)

    APK

    P.S.=> That malware, that YOU didn't design (see subject) since you are too unskilled to code even malware (easy to do, anyone can be bogus vs. creating wares for security as I do)?

    Clue: Firewalls again (blocks any OUTBOUNDS - even tunneled should work, it's ALL IP, & blocking those DNS there should cut them off too - surprised the security pros don't KNOW that)

    &

    I never SAID (not even once anywhere) hosts "cure all ills"... however, I DID SEE YOU FUCKUP in multiple FAILS on your end fool above, & repeatedly... apkD uses hosts files for security too!)

    1. Re:For everyone's reference by bouldin · · Score: 1

      You said:

      Can "Almost ALL Ads Blocked" do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability: 1.) Protect vs. malicious sites/servers (beyond malicious ads) 2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop communique to C&C servers 3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop communique to C&C servers 4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop communique to C&C servers 5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (adds reliability) 6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns 7.) Protect vs. trackers 8.) Protect vs. spam 9.) Protect vs. phish 10.) Protect vs. bandwidth caps 11.) Get you past a dnsbl 12.) Keep you off dns request logs 13.) Speed up websurfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites 14.) Work on ANY webbound app (like stand-alone email programs) multiplatform. 15.) Give you easily texteditor controlled data for the above 16.) Do all that & block ads (better than addons) more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory usage

      Then you said:

      I never SAID (not even once anywhere) hosts "cure all ills"

      lolwut?

      Remember, this whole thread started because I said software can trivially bypass hosts files, and you flipped your shit.

      Hosts files are NOT effective at blocking command&control of botnets. I actually agree with most of the rest of the list, but hosts files are not the silver bullet you make them out to be.

    2. Re:For everyone's reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What he's done you agree with is more than you ever have or will.

  44. Additionally, as I said before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Application based firewalls stop it (stop the malware itself) - you fail again.

    Even Windows native firewall can do that... so does ZoneAlarm!

    * I never ONCE said hosts "cure it all" but they do more than a lying little scumbag like you (that spent HOURS scouring websites for an obscure passage I can easily overcome as shown above) will ever do.

    APK

    P.S.=> As to your "bs" & outright lies + weasel tactics? Hell, they're all CONSOLIDATED here you reprehensible little prick -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... no wonder you've never accomplished anything of worth in your WASTED life loser... apk

  45. Show me where I say hosts cure all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go for it: BarbaraHudson made that mistake & couldn't do it! You can't either... & I just shut down your stupidity with application based firewalls (Windows one CHECKS APPS, anything, as they *try* to run, asking you IF you allow it when it's not familiar with them... so does ZoneAlarm).

    Whoever you referred to is an IMBECILE of the highest order if they don't know that (& I won't look @ a PDF you point to, no way, can't trust what you put out after all your crap I caught you in here consolidated -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... )

    This thread started with my post on hosts & its features YOU CAN'T PROVE WRONG (especially vs. Adblock) -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    * You still can't... lmao!

    (SCORE APK 16, BOULDIN 0)

    APK

    P.S.=> That 1st link shows what you're made of & how EASILY I can tear you apart... you know nothing done zero little waste of life

    1. Re:Show me where I say hosts cure all? by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Go for it: BarbaraHudson made that mistake & couldn't do it! You can't either...

      Uh, do what?

      Whoever you referred to is an IMBECILE of the highest order if they don't know that (& I won't look @ a PDF you point to, no way, can't trust what you put out after all your crap I caught you in here consolidated -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... )

      The PDF I linked is a whitepaper hosted by OpenDNS. You tried to cite OpenDNS earlier as a supporter of hosts files, but they work at the network level.

  46. Dearest illiterate imbecile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Rinse, Lather, & Repeat" http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    I've apparently smoked your OpenDNS folks too via application based firewalls (which Windows has, & it checks OUTBOUND communications for webbound apps it's not familiar with over IP, so would ZoneAlarm)... so much for 'experts', eh? Not a 1st for me... I've done in the likes of folks from MS (VP of their Windows Client Performance Division, Dr. Mark Russinovich, & others of that ilk... have you? No. Putting YOU away easily?? Cake by comparison!)

    Your problem is YOU have no understanding of this science, your lack of accomplishment in it shows it, along with YOUR CONSOLIDATED BS HERE I CAUGHT YOU IN WEASEL -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    APK

    P.S.=> Still, come on: SHOW US ALL WHERE I HAVE EVER SAID "HOSTS CURE ALL"? Clue: I never have... this started with my challenge to you to validly prove my points in favor of hosts over AdBlock wrong here (and you can't) http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    LMAO!

    "SCORE APK = 16, BOULDIN THE DOUCHE = 0)

    ... apk

    1. Re:Dearest illiterate imbecile by bouldin · · Score: 1

      I've apparently smoked your OpenDNS folks too via application based firewalls [...] Not a 1st for me... I've done in the likes of folks from MS (VP of their Windows Client Performance Division, Dr. Mark Russinovich, & others of that ilk...

      Yeah, I'm sure you schooled a PhD in an argument, and understand security better than OpenDNS.

      facepalm

  47. I schooled YOU easily: Eat your words... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're making ME LAUGH: regarding Russinovich, a former "co-worker" of mine @ SUNBELT in the 90's?

    See "The MEMORY OPTIMIZATION HOAX" where I used an MS tool he apparently wasn't aware of in ClearMem.exe (a memory optimizer) UNHALTING FROZEN or SLOWED EXCHANGE SERVERS, stupid...

    Made them FASTER when lagging, & that tool does EXACTLY what GUI memory optimizers do (by unfreezing them when halted completely due to memory fragmentation)...

    Ask him yourself, I will FLOOR HIM RIGHT HERE AGAIN if need be. Lord knows I've done it to YOU enough here already, lol!

    MS own documentation did it too, lol, oddly & ironically (he works for them now too)

    MS VP of the Windows Client Performance Division, A masters in CS too? He conceded another point to me here on /. no less on HOSTS -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Show me where I said hosts cure all? You keep avoiding that too (gosh, small wonder WHY as I never said it).

    Application based firewalls would QUERY YOU, stupid, & ask you if you want to let *ANY* app thru via IP (TCP or UDP) dumbass... they would stop it by letting YOU stop it (when you don't know what an app is, any idiot should know that - apparently, you're dumber than that even... lol!).

    This all started with me confronting *ANYONE* to prove my points here validly wrong -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Why did Aryeh Goretsky, lead coder of NOD32/ESET AGREE WITH ME HOSTS ARE A VALUABLE LINE OF DEFENSE HERE then too, moron? http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    SCORE APK = 16, BOULDIN THE TROLLING MORON = 0

    You're still more than welcome to keep trying but pulling DIRTY SHIT like changing links I used, saying you couldn't see Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus saying hosts are good, & FUCKING UP saying "nobody uses hosts for security" when SPYBOT S&D does, so do 100's here on /. too -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    APK

    P.S.=> You fail BOY

    ... apk

  48. Ask OpenDNS about this... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I do it on the /etc/hosts level on my dns server. You can find large lists of ad domains that can be added to your hosts file with 127.0.0.1 or 0.0.0.0 to cause them to fail. This covers all machines on your network that use your dns server. The one I use is http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho... [mvps.org] however they have become slow with updating it. You might want to invest some time in looking for one that is updated more frequently." - by qwertyatwork (668720) on Sunday March 17, @10:39AM (#43196749)

    Guess what? Since DNS rides on the IP stack, then that would work on THEIR END TOO (most likely, but ask them)... it all rides on IP, & hosts are queried FIRST, before anything else BY DEFAULT, dumbass...

    APK

    P.S.=> However, I've *ALWAYS* been rather curious about that... you said they work 'server-side' over @ OpenDNS? For once, you're right, for once @ least - however/again:

    That DNS server program?

    Guess what??

    It TOO, RIDES on an OS, that queries DNS first, which queries IP too (like all else does) which uses hosts are PRIMARY RESOLVER by default!

    Please- go for it Bouldin, let's see if I can SMOKE YOUR ASS one more time for the hell of it, lol...

    Lord knows I have TONS of times here already shown here (along with the BULLSHIT you pull http://it.slashdot.org/comment... denying valid technical citations galore, you of ALL /.'ers, "Mr.Citiation" himself RUNS from citations? LOL, please)... apk

    1. Re:Ask OpenDNS about this... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Haha, real DNS servers don't check /etc/hosts.

      Also, looked like that VP told you "Slashdot anonymous posts are most definitely not the proper channels."

  49. Little "GyoGia" hick = Run, Forrest: RUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember the last time you doubted me hick? http://ask.slashdot.org/commen...

    * :)

    (What's the matter, "rebel-BOY"? Lost your bluster all of a sudden when you said "don't try bullshit me" & "you never had any commercial success" you STUPID little rebel motherfucker? EAT YOUR WORDS asshole scumbag! This Yankee KICKED YOUR MOTHERFUCKING ASS then, & has done it again REPEATEDLY HERE you little FUCKING no-mind rebel hick!)

    APK

    P.S.=> I am going to have a FUCKING FIELD-DAY on you, Georgia boy, & it's NEVER, *ever*, going to stop - mark my words on it you dishonorable little SCUMBAG... nicest part is this: YOU started it, & a little WANNABE "security engineer" so you say in yourself? Piece of cake since your reprehensible bullshit you pulled here is your undoing you little fucking douche -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Where do you LIVE in Georgia, asshole? Tell me: I used to live there - I'd LOVE to take a drive and REALLY school your ass, IN PERSON, motherfucker... apk

  50. Holy SHIT: You ARE illiterate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You tried to cite OpenDNS earlier as a supporter of hosts files" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @10:43PM (#49748239)

    See subject: I stated hosts & OpenDNS compliment one another:

    "By the way, in case you DIDN'T know it? OpenDNS filters vs. threats online (they would KILL *any* malware served that way too, supplementing hosts, supplementing each other (DNS & HOSTS)) - which is WHY the guides I put out for securing Windows users espouses "layered-security"/"defense-in-depth" & I was PAID for them no less - how about you? Oh, that's right - you can't even show us code you wrote YOURSELF, much less an app for security as I have (yet you say I don't know security?)... apk" - by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 21, 2015 @06:09PM (#49746961)

    * You ILLITERATE Georgia HICK - that *claims* to be a 'security engineer' (probably another "GyoJa-Tech" grad, losers of the field) & that "he writes security wares for a firm"... well, WHICH ONE, loser?

    No, I am going to tell you what YOU said to me once motherfucker: YOU DON'T HAVE A JOB (me? I don't NEED one, I've been running a successful business of my own now for coming up on a decade - I work for myself, not a wageslave wannabe like you are that does NOT have a job):

    "So you're admitting you don't actually have a job, and nobody likes or respects you?" - by bouldin (828821) on Sunday January 25, 2015 @09:45PM (#48901533)

    Pussy, listen, when YOU can gain the respect of the BEST AntiMalware firm in the WORLD http://www.av-test.org/en/news... as I have with their admin of MalwareBytes' hpHosts site who HOST MY WARE for me here http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes ASSHOLE?

    THEN, you can 'talk' as a peer!

    When NOD32/ESET can be overturned on FP's on my ware as I have done AND had them AGREE I am correct on hosts value in security too in the same stroke -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    APK

    P.S.=> I'm going to have a field day on you... apk

  51. Bring Russinovich (about time he faced me) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.) Microsoft shows memory fragmentation causes Exchange Server 2003 (& prior versions) problems a lot (which memory optimizers stop, & even Dr Russinovich + Arstechnica even admit they can stop memory fragmentation)!

    *******

    Mark Russinovich - "Having contiguous available memory can improve performance in one case: when the Memory Manager, to maximize the behavior of the CPU memory caches, uses a mechanism called page coloring to decide which page from the free or zeroed page list to assign to a process."

    Mark Russinovich - "Developers of RAM optimizers also claim that their products defragment memory. The act of allocating, then freeing a large amount of virtual memory might, as a conceivable side effect, lead to blocks of contiguous available memory"

    *******

    XADM: The Extensible Storage Engine Database Engine Contributes to Virtual Memory Fragmentation Exchange 2000 Server, like many large scale programs, may experience virtual memory (VM) fragmentation. Over time, the server may not perform well, & you may not be able to mount storage groups because of VM fragmentation. http://support.microsoft.com/d...

    XADM: You Experience Excessive Virtual Memory Fragmentation on a Heavily Loaded Exchange Server Your Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server computer may experience virtual memory fragmentation at a much greater frequency than you expect. As a result, you may have to restart the Exchange 2000 computer more frequently than you expect.

    http://support.microsoft.com/d...

    (& 10 more I can supply on request. Earlier, I cite more in the way of examples here showing in how much VM fragmentation (which memory optimizers stop) negatively affects Exchange Server 2003 & previous models of it. I can provide those again upon request should they be required. I have earlier in this thread.)

    ----

    2.) Microsoft producing clearmem.exe (which its description IS "Clear Memory" even in Windows Server 2003 reskits) & is in its default commandline, just another memory optimizer (as this article's author calls them)! DESCRIPTION (verbatim, from Microsoft's resource kit website) = Clearmem.exe: Clear Memory Not a "testing tool":

    *******

    Mike Rowe-Sarft - "Clearmem is *not* a fixing system, it is a tool for developers & testers." - Anonymous User - April 04, 2005

    *******

    (Point #3 right after this one shows otherwise as well as Microsoft's OWN DESCRIPTION of said program above.)

    ----

    3.) Also how memory optimizer apps can unfreeze lagged/frozen memory starved apps, such as how Microsoft's own Clearmem.exe unfroze apps & was cited from MS as being useful here:

    http://support.microsoft.com/d...

    "WORKAROUND You can run Clearmem.exe to recover from this problem. The Clearmem utility flushes the section used as file cache, thus the file object in question is dereferenced by running Clearmem."

    Above all - If these tools of this nature are "useless" as Dr. Mark Russinovich claims? Why then does Microsoft, the inventor of this OS family, include clearmem.exe (a memory optimizer, albeit a bit crude in console/DOS commandline/character mode design & not nearly as feature-laden & automated) in their current resource kits for said OS' & since the NT 3.5x days no less? (&, before anyone tries the "they are unsupported by Microsoft", newsflash - it does not mean they don't work, they do. It's that Microsoft's technical support reps are not required to know them in detail or how to use them etc.)

    * That's ONLY the start of how I schooled him... Ask him about how I said "Hector..." AFTER all that & he RAN (vs. Achilles).

    From http://windowsitpro.com/system...

    ASK!

  52. Let's find out from OpenDNS... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been curious on that as I said. VP from MS gave in to me http://slashdot.org/comments.p... just like "your hero" here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... Dr. Mark Russinovich "PhD" which "lil' ole' me" OUTRIGHT SCHOOLED over a decade++ ago in fact - proof's right there, asshole bigmouth...

    Care to deny it?

    (PLEASE, BRING HIM, he wouldn't even answer my emails after that & won't talk to coders anymore either, only MENIAL NETWORK ADMIN/TECHIES like you who have NO CLUE & insufficient education + accomplishment in CS to begin to see thru his bullshit as I did shutting him up easily @ Windows IT Pro).

    Hey - tell him I know this: He only has a job @ MS due to Alchin & Ballmer being of the same religious faith (& yes, I can SAY that after this easily, where I shut his mouth up SO BADLY, like I have yours on YOUR numerous fuckups that it is not funny...)

    * :)

    (Oh, don't worry - keep posting on /., I'll keep exposing you for it since you've been fucking with me constantly, even TALKING BEHIND MY BACK TOO here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... you little southern rebel COWARDLY little FUCK!)

    You grabbed THE tiger by the tail, and now? I am mauling you for it motherfucker... enjoy!

    APK

    P.S.=> Like I said: I am going to have a FIELD DAY on you, pussy... apk

    1. Re:Let's find out from OpenDNS... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Deny what?

  53. Bouldin says "hosts != good security"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I've seen so far IS "suddenly agreeing with me" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    "I actually agree with most of the rest of the list, but hosts files are not the silver bullet you make them out to be" by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @10:25PM (#49748145)

    1st of all/again: DID I SAY THEY ARE A "SILVER BULLET" & cure all? NEVER...

    Hell no, you're *TRYING* to put words in my mouth I NEVER ONCE STATED ASSHOLE TROLL THAT YOU ARE & NOTHING BUT A MENIAL WANNABE IN SECURITY TOO (prove otherwise, show us you actually work @ a security firm & show me wares you have done for security, ok? PROOF TALKS, Mr. CITATION - Bullshit like YOU, walks motherfucker! You "talk the talk", not even well, but you can't PROVE you "walk the walk"... lol!).

    Yes, same mistake BarbaraHudson Made vs. me... you fail again just like it did!

    All. vs. my points in favor of hosts here that YOU can't validly disprove & you know it (politician weasel that you are) http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    You said "Nobody uses hosts for security" but SpyBot S&D does, so do I asswipe http://slashdot.org/comments.p... + 100's here on /. from a partial list I know of do too, in your peers here douche!

    How about Mr. Oliver Day of SecurityFocus/Norton-Symantec too saying hosts are great for security asswipe http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    NOD32/ESET (whom I overturned their lead coder on no less on a false positive says otherwise) says otherwise -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * They're REAL SECURITY PROS, not a MENIAL SCHMUCK WANNABE LIKE YOU!

    APK

    P.S.=> "EAT YOUR WORDS" you motherfucking BIG MOUTHED little Southern REDNECK dimwit!

    Oh, TRUST ME - The best is YET to come, & I am going SHOW this site just what kind of SHIT YOU ARE, motherfucker... lol, just you wait! apk

  54. "Playing stupid" now, redneck? Ok... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yeah, I'm sure you schooled a PhD in an argument" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @10:59PM (#49748321)

    I'm sure too (so's he, he did a "Run, Forrest: RUN!") http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * Go on, go get your "hero", so @ last, after a decade++, I can show you how I made "techies' 'GOD'" bleed, motherfucker...

    (DO IT, PLEASE!!!!)

    I can't wait...

    APK

    P.S.=> See subject: Of course, a redneck MENIAL wannabe 'security engineer' FAKE-IT-TILL-YOU-MAKE-IT bullshitter like you won't do it... wish you would!

    (You're *ANYTHING* but a real security pro, I've proven it with "CITATIONS" you're SO FOND OF (not now though I wager), & especially vs. REAL ONES that are greatly esteemed -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... SHOT YOU TO PIECES you little dimwit "southern redneck" ignoramus blowhard... apk

    1. Re:"Playing stupid" now, redneck? Ok... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      I don't see any discussion at that link, just more verbal diarrhea. Where is Russinovich?

  55. "Doubletalk" stupid = "best ya got"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find him, bring him, so I can floor him too http://it.slashdot.org/comment... DIRECTLY, again... just like I have yourself here on NUMEROUS GROUNDS BELOW... oh, there is NO doubt of either, see next below, yet again:

    * He ran from me before, so did ALL of Arstechnica there & it was hilarious (ars people, who stalked & attacked me across SEVERAL forums, much like you have, only to have their "resident exchange expert" Jay Little admit defeat, leaving in shame for it, claiming "I AM AN EXPERT ON EXCHANGE"... some expert, see link above... lol!)

    Come on, Mr. "Security Engineer" who went to a "great school"... do it. That's school's NOT HELPING YOU NOW, is it, wannabe?

    NO, lol...I am SCHOOLING YOU easily: Especially with hosts on security (which YOU say is bad, & doesn't work, shall I quote that too again)? Ok, REAL SECURITY PEOPLE show otherwise, & you "ate your words", bitch -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    THIS? Man, I just GOTTA say it as per my usual vs. wannabes like you:

    THIS was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'" & always is vs. bigmouth blowhards like you.

    APK

    P.S.=> Face facts, you aren't even WORTH MY TIME, & are a FRACTION of a man, whimp... & when YOU can gain the respect of the BEST AntiMalware firm in the WORLD http://www.av-test.org/en/news... as I have with their admin of MalwareBytes' hpHosts site who HOST MY WARE for me here http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes ASSHOLE?

    Then you can act like YOU are MY 'peer' but not until then, bigshot (bullshitter is more like it)

    ... apk

    1. Re:"Doubletalk" stupid = "best ya got"? by bouldin · · Score: 1

      So, you want me to track down a Microsoft executive to debate you anonymously in a Slashdot forum? No.

  56. Knew it, same shit as before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't backup your b.s. as usual, quoted here:

    "Yeah, I'm sure you schooled a PhD in an argument" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @10:59PM (#49748321)

    After all YOU said that, sarcastically? I'm MORE THAN WILLING to backup my words with this on that note -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    I did the same, BLOWING YOU AWAY with REAL SECURITY PROS (not wannabes like you) BACKING ME TOO HERE -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    APK

    P.S.=> You aren't though, b.s. artist who always "demands proofs" & citations... lol, & THAT type of CRAP OUTTA YOU, directed MY WAY? No 1st from you: See subject - you did THAT before too asshole & RAN -> http://ask.slashdot.org/commen...

    What a COMPLETELY reprehensible douche you truly are... no shit!

    ... apk

    1. Re:Knew it, same shit as before by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the Windows IT Pro link - it's hilarious! That will make for some great shitter reading later.

      I don't actually see a debate with Russinovich, though. He wrote an article, and you left comments. I don't think he's aware you exist.

      Your apps aren't being used. It's difficult to even find a current download for your garbage while a professional like Dr. Russinovich has a website of his own: http://www.sysinternals.com/

      Oh, you think you schooled the guy who started sysinternals.com? Bahahahhahaa

    2. Re:Knew it, same shit as before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahaha this is pricelessly hilarious Bouldin http://slashdot.org/comments.p... what's the matter? Cat got your tongue over there versus those replies that show you're a fool?

  57. He's aware I exist ("co-workers") by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I don't actually see a debate with Russinovich, though. He wrote an article, and you left comments. I don't think he's aware you exist." - by bouldin (828821) on Friday May 22, 2015 @11:32AM (#49751459)

    As I said before, see subject: In fact I wrote the 1st memory optimizer (in GUI form) & I was OUTSELLING the little loser & he "complained" about it to our managers there, who told him "Fuck off quit crying" so he wrote me & I in turn said pretty much the same as they did... lol, I wrote his colleague Bryce Cogswell asking WHY Russinovich gave me guff, Bryce said "I have no idea, he's not that way usually" & Russinovich *TRIED* to "muscle me" with statements like "I am Dr. Mark Russinovich PhD & I was a star witness in (insert trial here) as a PROFESSIONAL 'forensics' computer guru" etc.- et al... ok!

    We sold wares thru SUNBELT software in the years 1995-2000 iirc, working for them etc.

    "Oh, you think you schooled the guy who started sysinternals.com? Bahahahhahaa" - by bouldin (828821) on Friday May 22, 2015 @11:32AM (#49751459)

    I don't just *THINIK* it, I know it (arstechnica too):

    SEE THE ULTIMATE RESULTS OF HIS STUPIDITIES' RESULTS AGAIN THEN (prove me wrong, or have HIM do it... that lowlife loser can't - proof's in the pudding) http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    APK

    P.S.=> You're even less of a man than that whimp is, proven here http://it.slashdot.org/comment... pussy... don't worry: Like I said - I am exposing you for the SHIT You are wannabe menial, & you came in here bugging me FIRST, as usual? I am systematically going to DESTROY you for it weasel... apk

    1. Re:He's aware I exist ("co-workers") by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Wow, sounds like you're pretty sore at how successful Russinovich is.

    2. Re:He's aware I exist ("co-workers") by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason you stalk apk: Jealous? He does well. You're projecting now. You don't do well against him http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

  58. If you have to work for your money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: = not rich. If your money works for you you are rich.

    I don't have to do what's in the subject (not anymore) I run my own successful business coming up on a decade... who still HAS to work though?

    The "good doctor" who's NOT THAT GOOD, that's who. See here, not successful vs myself http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and despite your b.s.? He CRIED AN AWFUL LOT WHEN MY WARE OUTSOLD ALL OF HIS PUT TOGETHER as I told you last post... lol!

    Successful?

    * LMAO - you, for sure, were NOT SUCCESSFUL HERE blowhard http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    APK

    P.S.=> I just gotta do this to you now: Bwaaaahahahaha @ U, wageslave (so you say, you don't back that up either)... apk

    1. Re:If you have to work for your money? by bouldin · · Score: 1

      What's your business?

  59. It's NONE of your business... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: It's something everyone needs & I can't lose @ it (unlike you LOSING BADLY to me, lol -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... )

    * :)

    (I can "play your games" too, keeping YOU in the dark but computing was just a "stepping-stone" to get to it, put it THAT way!)

    APK

    P.S.=> See subject & that link above + "Rinse, Lather, & Repeat" so it sinks in & you can "drink in & DIGEST it" since you had to "EAT YOUR WORDS" there (lol) flavored w/ the "bitter taste of SELF-defeat" washed down with the spice of your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH ramming your words back down your throat... lol!

    ... apk

    1. Re:It's NONE of your business... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Ha, yeah right. If you did, you would have already bragged about it.

  60. I've spoken of it to others... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to wonder. No small wonder I smoked you though http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    * "... And the world wondered after the beast... saying 'Who is like unto the beast, & who is able to make war with him'?" - Revelations Chapter 13 verse 3 (iirc)

    One thing's SURE on that note: It's been YOUR "APKOLYPSE" (misspelling & pun DEFINITELY intended after the link above, lol!)... AND? I'm actually MORE like "The LORD of Hosts" https://answers.yahoo.com/ques... with rank after rank of protective power I can summon @ a word: Hosts!

    PERTINENT QUOTE/EXCERPT:

    "The image this title brings to mind is of a mighty military commander, one who can at a mere word summon rank upon rank of protective power." via hosts...

    It's certain no "Almost ALL Ads Blocked" or even DNS servers locally installed fans can after this -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    APK

    P.S.=> You have TRULY, massively failed... thank-you for making ME look GREAT & yourself by way of comparison? LMAO - well... "not so great" (see 1st link above)... apk

    1. Re:I've spoken of it to others... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Are you really in your 50s?

    2. Re:I've spoken of it to others... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      I'm actually MORE like "The LORD of Hosts" https://answers.yahoo.com/ques... [yahoo.com] with rank after rank of protective power I can summon @ a word: Hosts!

      I guess you aren't protected from 4 lines of Python, though, huh?

      import dns.resolver

      resolver = dns.resolver.Resolver(configure=False)
      resolver.nameservers = ['8.8.8.8']
      ans = resolver.query('example.com', 'A')

  61. I'll tell you what I am... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: As far as you're concerned (he says it best) -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    * How's that?

    APK

    P.S.=> Oh yea: Better luck next time (I have a feeling there won't be one, since it'd take more than luck to get YOU outta this one you botched http://it.slashdot.org/comment... REALLY badly on YOUR part (more like a miracle's needed))... apk

  62. Application Firewalls again...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They stop it cold (never said hosts "cure all" but do this http://it.slashdot.org/comment... which YOU can *NEVER* ever get the best of - period...). They'd 1st be able to cut it off running @ all, & secondly, tunneled or not, I'd imagine it travels over IP (TCP or UDP) anyway, or by port, & could easily be stalled... so could communique w/ its rogue DNS + C&C's...

    * Heck - Even Windows' native firewall would (does when it doesn't recognize an application & warns you about them - & only a FOOL would let something run they didn't know)... get it? Good.

    * Accept it - you fail... & that, IS truly, that!

    APK

    P.S.=> You wish you were me, since as far as that list in the link above is concerned, the score is APK = 16, Bouldin = 0 ESPECIALLY AFTER YOUR MULTIPLE BLUNDERS HERE-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... , lmao... apk

    1. Re:Application Firewalls again...apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      I guess you aren't protected from 4 lines of Python, though, huh?

      import dns.resolver

      resolver = dns.resolver.Resolver(configure=False)
      resolver.nameservers = ['8.8.8.8']
      ans = resolver.query('example.com', 'A')

      They stop it cold . They'd 1st be able to cut it off running @ all, & secondly, tunneled or not, I'd imagine it travels over IP (TCP or UDP) anyway, or by port, & could easily be stalled... so could communique w/ its rogue DNS + C&C's...

      You seem confused. So are you saying the hosts file would block the DNS request from that Python snippet?

      Heck - Even Windows' native firewall would (does when it doesn't recognize an application & warns you about them - & only a FOOL would let something run they didn't know)... get it? Good.

      Oh, now you're saying the windows firewall would block it. So hosts would not.

  63. Re:Application Firewalls again/AGAIN...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Application firewalls will (never said hosts cure all: Show where I have even once - you can't, I never have (though hosts do MUCH which YOU can't disprove period -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ))

    * Stopped by port, UDP or TCP (full IP stack, thus even a "tunneled" approach would be stalled) & yes - right at even a 'custom app/malware' level as you've extolled even, & if the rogue DNS IP address can be determined (easy enough I'd imagine via netstat & its switches) + those of its C&C servers, it's dead as a doornail for all practical intents & purposes)).

    FULL DEAD-STOP TO IT, "easy as apple pie".

    APK

    P.S.=> You *REALLY* truly need to read - I said ALL that already here http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Yes, & it seems you need to NOT MISS THE SUBJECT LINE IN POSTS! See that one's, it says "Application Firewalls"...

    &

    "Read ALL about it Folks: Security Engineer Bouldin 'blows it' on SECURITY-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... FUMBLES THE BALL & SCORE = APK 16, Bouldin 0... lol!

    ... apk

  64. Re:Application Firewalls again/AGAIN...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bouldin's obsessed w ya apk after you crushed him here http://it.slashdot.org/comment... as his entire post history is centered around you for 2 days now which is more than his usual stalking and harassing you his post history shows over time. Imagine that. His ego's bruised.

  65. Yea, I know: Wanna know why?...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bouldin *wishes* he was me after his self-defeat here http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    * I tell you ALL, 1 thing: It's NOT easy being "The Lord of Hosts" http://it.slashdot.org/comment... & being Bouldin's "APOKOLYPSE"... lol!

    (Just kidding on that: I believe & worship God & have given my commitment to Jesus actually, & my use of it only applies due to hosts files, & I abhor blasphemy/swearing... profanity, not so much though).

    APK

    P.S.=> He's had it coming, since he comes to bug me QUITE a lot in posts of mine regarding hosts files which oddly he agrees with if you read that link (he has an issue with the DGA entry - well, as long as I have the data for the hostsnames those create, I enter them with a blocking address in front of them in hosts? They're done for... they kill themselves shortly later too - but I don't take chances due to "fastflux" tech botnets use to "resurrect" their endpoints/C&C servers etc. - et al, & only "prune" my hosts once a year or so via pings or removal lists my sources produce as needed - as is, my hosts is HUGE & performs like gangbusters on Windows 7 as is w/ 3,738,924++ entries & growing (spammers use those DGA botnets quite a LOT, but the odds of being that stupid on MY part to click on their or their links? NIL here... not that dumb!))... apk

    1. Re:Yea, I know: Wanna know why?...apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      If the windows app firewall is so effective, how are there huge botnets of windows malware?

    2. Re:Yea, I know: Wanna know why?...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BANG!

      KRUNCH!

      SPLATT!!

      You sure showed that aging mental patient Kowalruski! He's crying to his mama, for sure!

  66. Phishing/Javascript misuse/ad misuse etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Think about it, or read security articles - they will show you why. The "bad guys" misuse those items taking advantage of human nature AND the fact Windows is most used.

    Pickpockets don't target "crowds of 1", they go to well-travelled subways, train stations, city streets, & malls where there are crowds to victimize to get the most potential surface area to work on to profit - Best analogy I could come up with, but it'll do to make the point & it's a GOOD part of the reason how/why it's going on.

    Javascript's one of the WORST things there is out there but it's also useful (like a razor you can shave with it OR cut your throat)...Browser DOM's are a problem too (not completely standard yet)...

    The web shouldn't have left CGI-bins/Win-CGI server-side imo. They didn't learn by the lesson of scriptable documents (like Word docs, Excel spreadsheet autoexec macros from MS' OLE compound documents) before scripted webpages imo...

    Do that? The "trash WILL come blowing in" from outside...

    APK

    P.S.=> Once the user activates what's in the subject, THEY let it in unless they're protected by things like hosts or NoScript (or doing what I do using Opera, & setting ALL sites to NOT use script globally, & then, ONLY AS YOU NEED IT, activate it, where it is absolutely necessary for full function of a site (e.g. - ecommerce, banking, test-taking etc.) with "By Site Preferences")...apk

  67. Why's ANDROID (linux) got 'em too?...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AGAIN: See subject - Pickpockets don't target "crowds of 1", they go to well-travelled subways, train stations, city streets, & malls where there are crowds to victimize to get the most potential surface area to work on to profit - Best analogy I could come up with, but it'll do to make the point & it's a GOOD part of the reason how/why it's going on.

    APK

    P.S.=> The MORE an OS platform's used, the more it will be targetted, for the reasons given in my analogy above... apk

  68. Ok: Explain this then...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: ANDROID's a Linux, it's rampantly exploited too due to this http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    * It's "human criminal nature"... They go where the crowds of victims are - on phones, it's largely ANDROID (a form of Linux), on PC's it's 94%++ Windows as most used.

    APK

    P.S.=> "Bang/Krunch/Splat" on you, "right back @ ya" ALBEIT with ease AND FACT... When will you trolls ever learn 1 simple thing: You lack the intelligence & information to "get the better of me" - period! apk

    1. Re:Ok: Explain this then...apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Cool! I hadn't heard of an Android botnet. Is that why the windows firewall doesn't block botnet c&c traffic?

    2. Re:Ok: Explain this then...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows Firewall can block by IP (TCP/UDP), port, vs. *any* threat really w/ hosts combined with it!

      (Of course, my guess is that by now? Heh - You've spent HOURS 'scouring the net', days actually, looking for *ANYTHING* you can stooge, to make that "not true", & unfortunately, between the 2 of them, it pretty much IS true for the most part (unless you find some "edge case"... layered security ontop of it, such as my security guides for Windows are about, can further supplement it to do the rest... )).

      * LOL, it's amazing how you are SO OBSESSED with me now, not doing your USUAL 'million posts a day' anymore, eh?

      NOT!

      APK

      P.S.=> Especially after your MASSIVE BLUNDERS shown here vs. myself -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    3. Re:Ok: Explain this then...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BIFF!!! KAPOW!

      Awwww you got Mr. Kowalruski good! You knocked that walrus out!

      He's so ashamed he can't get his flippers on the keyboard!

    4. Re:Ok: Explain this then...apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Windows Firewall can block by IP (TCP/UDP), port, vs. *any* threat really w/ hosts combined with it!

      Yeah! That's how they blocked the Ramnit botnet! OH wait, once that malware is installed it "will disable a series of Windows security features (Windows Defender, Windows Firewall, User Account Control), Windows Update, and remove the ability to install other antivirus software." Windows firewall FTW!

      You've spent HOURS 'scouring the net', days actually, looking for *ANYTHING* you can stooge, to make that "not true"

      Nope, took a 3-minute Google search to find that. Kinda like the Python code that bypasses your hosts file!

  69. Kaspersky? by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    Mr. K is one of the sauna buddies of Putin...so that makes me wonder which villains he wants to fight and which ones he wants to protect.

  70. You haven't explained away this... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: & you KNOW it -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    * You're ridiculous...

    APK

    P.S.=> It's been a REAL PLEASURE annihilating you "Mr. WANNABE 'security-engineer'"...

    (Self- Allegedly you're one, & yet as usual, no proof whatsoever & judging by your lousy performance vs. myself, The "LORD of HOSTS" -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... you aren't really one... just another internet 'blowhard' I've BLOWN AWAY with facts you can't get the better of http://it.slashdot.org/comment... , easily!)

    ... apk

  71. Patches & security hardening...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple fix for that too, see subject: You can't win & I see thru you easily - as I said:

    I KNEW YOU'D TRY THAT CRAP... looking for "edge cases"!

    (... & how did that get in IN THE FIRST PLACE? You didn't mention that a USER HAS TO GET IT FIRST, stupid... things in my security guide using "layered-security"/"defense-in-depth" cuts off those avenues!)

    LMAO @ U - you FAIL yet again, & it's hilarious watching you "scramble" to effetely & VAINLY *try* to "save face", Mr. nobody done zero nothing...

    (Question: Did YOU fix that problem, or ANY OF THEM, yourself? Hell no... lol, but I have, creating my APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o... which contributes GREATLY to better speed, reliability, anonymity & YES, better security online, in added layered security/defense-in-depth!)

    That last point?

    YOU don't DARE deny it now, NOT AFTER YOUR MASSIVE BLUNDERS HERE -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    APK

    P.S.=> ... And, you know it, I know it - heck, anyone reading here with 1/2 a BRAIN does: I see you, & your "favorite color" MUST be "transparent" since I see right thru you & you're STINGING I got the BEST OF YOU in that last link just above - lol!... apk

    1. Re:Patches & security hardening...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apk that was perfect to shut bouldin down again. You must have ESP. Bouldin's projecting his desperation.

    2. Re:Patches & security hardening...apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Patches & security hardening...apk

      I KNEW YOU'D TRY THAT CRAP... looking for "edge cases"!

      (... & how did that get in IN THE FIRST PLACE? You didn't mention that a USER HAS TO GET IT FIRST, stupid... things in my security guide using "layered-security"/"defense-in-depth" cuts off those avenues!)

      So.. now you're saying you can block botnets if you use hosts + windows firewall + patches + security hardening + don't run executables + don't plug in USB drives? Hosts FTW! U R rock solid security!

    3. Re:Patches & security hardening...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw SNAP! Kowalruski just got told!

      Cow + walrus = Kowalruski! He won't get back up from that one!

  72. Thanks & I know (not ESP)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: I just know wet-behind-the-ears green noobz like bouldin better than they know themselves is all.

    * :)

    (It's just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'", since I've dusted TOO many of "his kind", wannabes, too many times, along with TOP-FLITE figures in the art & science of computing over time as well...)

    I think it's hilarious how he's projected his "modus operandi" here actually...

    I.E./E.G.-> For once, Bouldin's not posting ALL OVER /. TODAY, but instead *trying* & failing @ every turn vs. myself, spending HOURS & DAYS to attempt "saving face" by "getting the better of me", only to FAIL every single time!

    APK

    P.S.=> No, it's not easy being me - but as to the ease of dusting the "bouldins" of the world? LOL, see above - it's always the SAME result like this MULTIPLE FAIL of his here http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ... apk

  73. LMAO: My security guide covers those...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you scan (& clean) USB, it's safe (autorun.inf type stuff is patched for too nowadays) - as far as running executables? Heck, lol:

    In fact?

    YOU PROVIDED THE PEFECT EXAMPLE with your doubtless STOLEN Python code example - UAC + WFP + Windows Firewall cuts those off, detecting them, BEFORE THEY CAN DO DAMAGE, stupid!

    LMAO!

    APK

    P.S.=> Looks like you've "shot your wad", probably outta ammo again, & is THAT the "best you can do"?

    Apparently do!

    I think it's TRULY HILARIOUS how I easily SEE RIGHT THRU YOU & see your "modus operandi" which I can turn aside @ EVERY TURN easily... sometimes via MY OWN CREATIONS in security guides suggestions & PROGRAMS I've created too (none of which YOU have ever done I see, lol, noob)

    Yes, you're transparent (it's not just your FAVORITE COLOR, lol):

    A little rookie GREEN wet-behind-the-ears little NOOB that you are, clearly (since YOU YOURSELF ARE NOT ABLE TO CONTRIBUTE TO SECURITY EFFORTS via anything YOU YOURSELF designed as I have )... lol!

    1. Re:LMAO: My security guide covers those...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truer words were never spoken apk. Bouldin's mad by now with all his fails at every turn against you.

    2. Re:LMAO: My security guide covers those...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed indeed. Saw posts about this in bouldin's other posts and took a read and I am admittedly laughing at Bouldin's clear rookie desperation.

    3. Re:LMAO: My security guide covers those...apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      YOU PROVIDED THE PEFECT EXAMPLE with your doubtless STOLEN Python code example - UAC + WFP + Windows Firewall cuts those off, detecting them, BEFORE THEY CAN DO DAMAGE, stupid!

      Uh, no, the malware disables all that. When a PC has been infected, the malware will disable a series of Windows security features (Windows Defender, Windows Firewall, User Account Control), Windows Update, and remove the ability to install other antivirus software.

  74. Learn to read: You must catch it 1st... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: My security guide & program stop it before you can...

    Since that IS the truly best defense we have: Layered-Security/Defense-in-Depth... & I was @ that way, Way, WAY BEFORE YOU EVER WERE... & I've done things in guides for security, professionally + otherwise, & in software too, you noob - you? You never HAVE, nor do I strongly suspect you EVER will.

    * :)

    (Accept it rookie transparently GREEN noob... you fail - see above!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Your BIGGEST FAIL? LMAO, right here vs. HOSTS files' efficacy from REAL PROS in the art & science of computing security too, no less, backing me & FLATTENING YOU, easily -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    1. Re:Learn to read: You must catch it 1st... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo apk! All I hear is shattering glass of Bouldin's dreams destroyed.

    2. Re:Learn to read: You must catch it 1st... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      So.. now you're saying you can block botnets if you use hosts + windows firewall + patches + security hardening + don't run executables + scan USB drives + your "security guide & program" (whatever that means)?

      Hosts FTW! U R rock solid security!

    3. Re:Learn to read: You must catch it 1st... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw man, apk is barely staying afloat! Like this walrus!

    4. Re:Learn to read: You must catch it 1st... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than being Bouldin the sunken ship after this http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    5. Re:Learn to read: You must catch it 1st... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. Apk had Bouldin before that right here http://it.slashdot.org/comment... by cutting off Bouldin's rather transparent modus operandi as apk put it by cutting off the avenues by which one can be infected in the first place which apk's security guide he mentioned here earlier above on in this debate easily shows anyone how to do using layered security methods.

  75. Whatever's in my security guide... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: It covers all what you note + more for layered security & it WORKS...

    * :)

    Above ALL else though?

    It was a REAL PLEASURE having security pros, recognized ones, BACKING ME on hosts vs. your b.s., here -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Also seeing & NOW KNOWING you've never created *ANYTHING* of worth towards the effort of layered security/defense in depth, whereas by way of comparison, I have LONG ago before YOU EVEN KNEW WHAT IT WAS I strongly suspect.

    (I.E.-> You're a "dime-a-dozen" menial, nothing more... lol!)

    APK

    P.S.=> You fail vs. "the LORD of HOSTS" in myself, no questions asked - accept it! apk

    1. Re:Whatever's in my security guide... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      What security guide?

  76. "Playing dumb" again? Learn to read... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where I posted it (Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET backs me as well on the efficacy of hosts being a good layer of defense), dimwit...

    * NO small wonder you're just a menial rookie green noob - YOU CAN'T EVEN READ!

    (LMAO!)

    Hey everyone: Ever realize you're dealing with not only a noob, but a mentally limited cretin? Bouldin can't even REMEMBER what was written here earlier a DAY ago only... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> Quit wasting my time, & perhaps your own (unless you learned something & you DEFINITELY have - you tried to outwit & outsmart YOUR SUPERIOR on ALL FRONTS in the art & science of computing, in myself, "The LORD of HOSTS"...)

    ... apk

    1. Re:"Playing dumb" again? Learn to read... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Sorry, the link must be buried under verbal diarrhea. Where is it?

  77. Seeing as you can' read... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right here (in your MULTIPLE FAILS list regarding hosts http://it.slashdot.org/comment... )

    * Link's in there to a SINGLE site it's on (where I was paid for it in fact) & HOW TO SEARCH FOR IT via NOD32/ESET (had to write that in BOLD so "BOULDIN" could grasp it & NOT MISS IT, lol... for once!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Search NOD32/ESET there, where 1 of a FEW security pros that backs the fact hosts are an EFFECTIVE & valuable layered security/defense in depth tool vs. your effete efforts & flailing scrabbling @ "saving face" when you've been UTTERLY ANNIHILATED by myself, "the LORD of HOSTS", easily (which you ONLY BROUGHT ON YOURSELF, challenging me & failing)...

    Yes - seeing as an easily flattened mere rookie green wet behind the ears NOOB like yourself is LOATHE TO ADMIT IT projecting MASSIVE DESPERATION vs. your many FAILS here vs. people better than YOU in myself & Mr. Goretsky in computer security (and certainly programming as well) having to SCHOOL you in it (thought you went to a GOOD school, apparently not - it's NOT HELPING YOU NOW)... "Here endeth the lesson", fool... apk

    1. Re:Seeing as you can' read... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      There aren't any links to security guides in that post - just links to more slashdot comments. Are you embarrassed of your shitty "security guide?"

  78. WoW: You really CAN'T read... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I said it's found in the NOD32/ESET link here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... stupid. It was in your MASSIVE FAILS list below in my p.s. as stated (1 of the proofs of your UTTER annihilation @ my hands).

    * See subject: Get "hooked on phonics" or remedial reading lessons - you TRULY need them!

    APK

    P.S.=> You can call it 'shitty' but the principles in it enumerated in part here took care of YOU easily & YOU have NOTHING LIKE IT TO YOUR CREDIT much less an effective for added speed, reliability, anonymity & SECURITY tool as I have created here -> http://start64.com/index.php?o... + it also took care of your "transparent 'modus operandi'" I saw RIGHT thru & shot you down easily on @ every single turn here (via layered security methods stopping malware before you can get it), but then again, LMAO: YOU "TOOK CARE OF YOURSELF" (flattening yourself FOR me, lol) BEST, right here in the next link, easily finishing yourself off MULTIPLE times -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... - CLASSIC & perfect on my part... too easy!

    ... apk

    1. Re:WoW: You really CAN'T read... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      The guide from over 7 years ago for win2000?

      Link is broken. Why did they take it down?

    2. Re:WoW: You really CAN'T read... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bahahhahahaha

      APK Host Engine is written in.... Pascal? That language is for high schoolers!

    3. Re:WoW: You really CAN'T read... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bouldin you can't code then. Read on Delphi XE8 from http://www.embarcadero.com/products/delphi from Borland-Embarcadero a nigh totally complete multi platform solution. You really are getting desperate with anonymous coward very ignorant replies to try to back yourself and you're only showing us your lack of depth in computing with dumb comments like that.

  79. WoW: You're a liar or stupid... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bouldin you admitted you saw it here already http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    AGAIN since you're obviously mentally challenged:

    It's on multiple sites as stated searching "How to Secure Windows 2000/XP" as you yourself already know liar from your post there in that link above, lol!

    Are you mentally addled unable to recall your own posts now too, or just playing stupid as I suspected? You've NOW PROVEN IT TO ME you are!

    * Man - Take your pick you fail badly now attempting to nitpick at any turn in vain.

    (You look like a stumbling fool)

    APK

    P.S.=> You're ridiculously easy to pick apart & claim to be a security engineer? No, don't think so - you're not very intelligent & can't even REMEMBER YOUR OWN POSTS for Pete's sake, lol... it's that or you can't keep track of your UTTER LIES too...

    Did my DISMANTLING YOU with NOTED SECURITY PROS on HOSTS FILES SECURITY EFFICACY really do you THAT MUCH MENTAL DAMAGE HERE or what -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?

    Apparently so... LMAO!

    ... apk

    1. Re:WoW: You're a liar or stupid... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      So you don't actually have a security guide?

    2. Re:WoW: You're a liar or stupid... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man leave old AP Kowalrus alone! He can't help being an amateur!

  80. it's amateur hour by bouldin · · Score: 1

    Yeah, he's a total amateur! He thinks you can block botnet traffic with hosts files! I even showed him some Python that bypasses hosts, but he got really confused.

    1. Re:it's amateur hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice job! You KO'd that walrus!

  81. 1st you have to catch it... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My layered security guide stops that & you saw it http://it.slashdot.org/comment... so you can stop being a liar already to try to "save face" which is impossible after all of what's below, lol!

    Hosts don't stop botnets? Ok - they block access to their C&C servers easily also like Zeus -> https://zeustracker.abuse.ch/m... easily by host-domain-subdomain names fool...

    * :)

    REAL SECURITY PROS & ESTEEMED SECURITY WARES PUT YOU IN YOUR PLACE ALREADY ON THAT NOTE LOSER -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    APK

    P.S.=> See subject again? "Rinse, Lather, & Repeat" the rest of this post so you can "drink it in & digest it" while you EAT YOUR WORDS flavored with the "bitter taste of SELF-defeat", spiced with your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH ramming those erroneous words of yours back down your throat, lol... apk

    1. Re:1st you have to catch it... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      My layered security guide stops that & you saw it http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

      I saw the PCpitstop page earlier, but all the guide links were dead then, too.

      It's on multiple sites as stated searching "How to Secure Windows 2000/XP" as you yourself already know liar from your post there in that link above, lol!

      Then it shouldn't be hard for you to find a link to your own paper.

      Hosts don't stop botnets? Ok - they block access to their C&C servers easily also like Zeus -> https://zeustracker.abuse.ch/m... [abuse.ch] easily by host-domain-subdomain names fool...

      Oh really? Hosts files cannot stop DGA botnets. Read the following from Gameover Zeus begins using DGA:

      The Domain Generation Algorithm is a method for a criminal to regain access to his botnet. Based on the current date, random-looking domain names are calculated and the malware reaches out via the Internet to see if that domain exists.

      bmo0ve7lxujkiid9sycsfxb.biz
      borwxz16ctey4fmc99y1t8nw9s.biz
      bttkygongoew1himlrd1889yui.net
      bzi7vw1f0iw5r1qy1pax1sgl3z0.biz
      [...]

      There is a new set of domains every day. For some DGAs, the domains are only up an hour. By the time you find them on a blog somewhere, they are not being used anymore.

      (Yes, we all KNOW IT'S YOU *trying* to "support yourself" via truly unidentifiable anonymous coward 'supporters' Bouldin, lol, & THAT IS HILARIOUS + piss poor 'tactics', moron... totally transparent.)

      Yeah genius, I was making fun of you for doing exactly the same thing. It is hilarious!

  82. Don't you remember this idiot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: YOU SAID you saw them here http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ) & the same one's on MANY places online... lol!

    REAL SECURITY PROS & ESTEEMED SECURITY WARES PUT YOU IN YOUR PLACE ALREADY ON THAT NOTE LOSER TOO -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Apparently, you can't take it when you SCREW UP LARGE, can you? Nope... lmao!

    APK

    P.S.=> See subject again? "Rinse, Lather, & Repeat" the rest of this post so you can "drink it in & digest it" while you EAT YOUR WORDS flavored with the "bitter taste of SELF-defeat", spiced with your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH ramming those erroneous words of yours back down your throat, lol... apk

  83. If you get paid you're not amateur... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: January 2008 Alexander New York = me http://pcpitstop.com/news/winn... right there, fool... lol!

    My layered security guide stops that & you saw it already admitting it here http://it.slashdot.org/comment... and it's posted at MANY PLACES online for the benefit of others.

    You can't win!

    Plus - I can't catch a botnet due to that guide's measures, & even IF I could, hosts + firewalls would stall communications back to C&C servers idiot.

    (Yes, we all KNOW IT'S YOU *trying* to "support yourself" via truly unidentifiable anonymous coward 'supporters' Bouldin, lol, & THAT IS HILARIOUS + piss poor 'tactics', moron... totally transparent.)

    Why?

    * NOBODY'S GOING TO SUPPORT YOU AFTER THIS where I used specific examples from SECURITY PROS from NOD32/ESET & esteemed security wares using hosts + stating they're great layered security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    APK

    P.S.=> Perhaps ABOVE ALL ELSE? I never *once* have said "hosts do it all" (nothing does by itself, hence why I wrote the security guides for Windows I was PAID for & I've worked in the field as a pro @ that level for decades ontop of coding as well professionally).

    So - care to show me where I have said "hosts cure everything"??

    You can't - I've asked you to do THAT here, many times, & you can't produce it... you are SO full of shit and such a SELF-DEFEATING loser, it's unbelievable, lol... apk

  84. LMAO: "EAT YOUR WORDS"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More proof of it is on PCPitstop yet again http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in... as "APK" this time (not Alexander from New York).

    I've written them to correct the link, they move links around occasionally when they create NEW forums sections, & I can't help that... but soon even THAT won't be a problem.

    Besides - YOU ALREADY ADMITTED TO SEEING MY GUIDES FOR WINDOWS LAYERED SECURITY HERE ALREADY http://it.slashdot.org/comment... you little piece of shit... lol!

    (Plenty of those show up @ Google or BING easily, no denying that... you FAIL!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Lastly: I never ONCE said "hosts cure all" - care to show me WHERE I DID, even once? I never have... lol! You can't...

    So "trying to put words in my mouth" I never said is piss-poor tactics, MENIAL... you don't create anything of worth in security, even in guides, let alone software as I have.

    As far as HOSTS are concerned though?

    REAL security PROS backed me, along with their testimonials to hosts efficacy from NOD32/ESET, SpyBot S&D using hosts as security (when YOU SAID NOBODY DOES, wrong) & more, here http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    You lying little jackass MERE MENIAL in the field of computing (which you can't prove YOUR PROFESSIONAL STATUS IN pal)... apk

  85. Eat your words MENIAL... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I saw the PCpitstop page earlier, but all the guide links were dead then, too." - by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @07:34AM (#49762849)

    Many aren't dead & you admit seeing 'em http://it.slashdot.org/comment... so what's your point?

    They changed the link while creating new forums sections apparently... I wrote them on it by the way, should be re-linked/fixed soon (not that it matters - I've proved they PAID ME for it).

    CIS Tool is heavy in those guides & it's an esteemed security tool I MYSELF CONTRIBUTED FIXED TO no less - want to see email excerpts of that too?

    I have that like I had the ones from ESET/NOD32 saying hosts are great for layered security here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    YOU by way of comparison? ZERO I can see that way, much less software as I have that is great for added security (and speed, reliability, & even anonymity too).

    "Then it shouldn't be hard for you to find a link to your own paper." - by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @07:34AM (#49762849)

    It wasn't for you already admittedly here either http://it.slashdot.org/comment... so what's your point? You don't have what I do, as usual, even in a security guide, much less one YOU WERE PAID FOR AS I WAS, nor security tools you've written (or fixed as I have in CIS Tool).

    "Oh really? Hosts files cannot stop DGA botnets" - by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @07:34AM (#49762849)

    Sure they can: Put in the host-domain names they use into hosts blocked and they stop those cold... simple. You saying that this:

    0.0.0.0 dgabotnetcanc.com

    Isn't blocked by hosts?

    I never said hosts stop EVERYTHING though - you have said I have said that pretty much - where did I say it? Show me... I never have.

    APK

    P.S.=> Funniest parts when you said "nobody uses hosts for security" but this proves otherwise http://slashdot.org/comments.p..."I saw the PCpitstop page earlier, but all the guide links were dead then, too."

    1. Re:Eat your words MENIAL... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apk what does MENIAL mean?

    2. Re:Eat your words MENIAL... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Newsflash: if you got paid $100 once, as a prize, you are not a professional.

      You still don't understand malware or botnets. The domain changes more often than you would get updates, so your list is always out of date.

      As I showed you with the Python code, it's trivial to bypass hosts files.

      As I showed you with a previous link, malware (e.g. Ramnit) can disable the firewall and change DNS settings, anyway.

  86. LMAO: "MENIAL" = Bouldin... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See topmost definition "not requiring much skill and lacking prestige" http://www.bing.com/search?q=m... and it's the truth about him.

    He doesn't even have a security guide of his own (much less one he was PAID for as I was shown here http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in... (Search APK there near top) & its based on CIS Tool, a HIGHLY ESTEEMED tool for layered security (along with tons of other measures that STOP YOU FROM GETTING INFESTED IN THE FIRST PLACE) that I even contributed fixes to... Bouldin never has (or will I suspect) done anything of any of that, & says he is a "security engineer"? No, don't think so.

    He doesn't even have softwares for security he's built like I have http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    A ware that uses hosts to give you more security (& unlike other security tools it even gives you more SPEED vs. slowing you down like others do in say, antivirus, which isn't that effective anymore sadly) + speed, reliability, & even added anonymity from 1 simple file that does TONS for you of good benefit.

    Bouldin says "nobody uses hosts for security"

    http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    BS -> SpyBot Search & Destroy does...

    Bouldin *tried* to DENY Spybot uses it, saying it's not their forums (bullshit) here in his posts' termination http://it.slashdot.org/comment... and it IS their forums... & nevertheless proves my point (anyone can try that program, many use it, and see anyhow).

    Even NOD32/ESET's lead coder (whom I overturned on a false positive on my program no less) said this that hosts are a valuable layer of security -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Mr. Oliver Day of SecurityFocus/Norton-Symantec said the SAME too http://it.slashdot.org/comment... WHICH BOULDING TRIED TO DENY HERE http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    APK

    P.S.=> Bouldin't NOT ONLY A MENIAL but also a lying little "ne'er-do-well" stooge and troll, nothing more (& certainly NO SECURITY ENGINEER)... apk

  87. kowalrus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey APK, is this your mom?

    1. Re:kowalrus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No this is you running Bouldin (yes it's you resorting to childish crap as is the case with defeated trolls whom apk slaughters on Slashdot) after this when I wrote it http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7442373&cid=49763215

  88. When you get PAID, you're a pro... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "you are not a professional." - by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @08:10AM (#49762951)

    See subject: A proof there I have been (I spent a 21 yr. career coding for security on databases idiot, also, as well as networks galore like the 1996 Atlanta Olympics (while YOU were in diapers still I wager )).

    Clue: You won't even SAY WHERE YOU WORK yet YOU CLAIM you are a "security engineer"??? LMAO - No, don't think so.

    "You still don't understand malware or botnets" - by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @08:10AM (#49762951)

    I don't? My ware UPDATES DAILY dimwit (every 12 hours automatically) & more if you do it manually often as you like (every hour if you want, defeating even DGA's stupid) & blocking them, ala:

    0.0.0.0 dgabotnetc&c.com

    YOU SAYING THAT WON'T BLOCK A DGA ENDPOINT or C&C? Wrong... hosts block *ANY* host-domain/subdomain name! ANSWER THAT SIMPLE QUESTION!

    "As I showed you with a previous link." - by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @08:10AM (#49762951)

    Patches & Layered security, per my guide, do. You can't corrupt bypass my hosts file by the way.

    Again: DID I SAY HOSTS STOP EVERYTHING? Never. Show me WHERE I HAVE ok? I never have once. Nothing by itself does.

    Layered security does!

    I've proven I have TONS OF GUIDES FOR THAT even PAID FOR ONES I WROTE that actually work (with testimonials too)

    Do you? NO!

    I have security pros galore backing me on the efficacy of hosts - SpyBOT S&D uses it - YOU SAID "Nobody uses hosts for security" - wrong http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    You tried denying it was spybot's forums that said they do http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    NOD32/ESET's lead even says hosts are valuable security http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    SO DOES Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Which YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY scumbag http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    APK

    P.S.=> You shot yourself down in flames weasel "ne'er-do-well" MENIAL... apk

    1. Re:When you get PAID, you're a pro... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      See subject: A proof there I have been

      Uh, what? Parse error

      Clue: You won't even SAY WHERE YOU WORK yet YOU CLAIM you are a "security engineer"??? LMAO - No, don't think so.

      Ha, I don't want you harassing me at work, idiot.

      I don't? My ware UPDATES DAILY dimwit (every 12 hours automatically) & more if you do it manually often as you like (every hour if you want, defeating even DGA's stupid) & blocking them, ala:

      You can run your update as often as you like, but malware reverse engineers are not providing you an up-to-the-minute list of all DGA domains. Even if they did, you wouldn't get the domains until the malware had already connected up for its C&C of the hour. Hosts files are a bad strategy for modern botnets because techniques like DGA were designed to defeat static blocklists.

      That's why real antimalware vendors like Damballa don't rely on a static DNS blocklist, much less a hosts file on the OS.

      YOU SAYING THAT WON'T BLOCK A DGA ENDPOINT or C&C? Wrong... hosts block *ANY* host-domain/subdomain name! ANSWER THAT SIMPLE QUESTION!

      I already answered this question - NO. You didn't believe me and called it "hypothetical bullshit," so I provided 4 lines of Python that trivially bypass hosts files.

      You can't corrupt bypass my hosts file by the way.

      Another parse error, but yes, malware can trivially disable your hosts file or the windows firewall.

      Again: DID I SAY HOSTS STOP EVERYTHING? Never. Show me WHERE I HAVE ok? I never have once. Nothing by itself does.

      You keep claiming hosts files stop botnet communication, which is clearly not true.

      I've proven I have TONS OF GUIDES FOR THAT even PAID FOR ONES I WROTE that actually work (with testimonials too)

      No, you provided one dead link that may have hosted 1 guide 7 years ago. And that was a site for AMATEURS to submit their text files, and win a $100 prize if their amateurish text files were accepted.

    2. Re:When you get PAID, you're a pro... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, what? Parse error by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @09:15AM (#49763123)

      Bouldin omits apk's 21 yr career in security != dumb selective quoting. Apk's been there and done that at levels I now suspect you can't touch. Are you even over 21? You'd have to be at least that and more to be a pro with 21 yrs to your credit in security as apk has. Are you really a security pro? Prove it. That's all I want to see now. How old are you? I doubt you've been a security pro at all much less one that has a 21 yr career as apk has on levels in coding and networking.

    3. Re:When you get PAID, you're a pro... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Bouldin omits apk's 21 yr career in security != dumb selective quoting. Apk's been there and done that at levels I now suspect you can't touch. Are you even over 21? You'd have to be at least that and more to be a pro with 21 yrs to your credit in security as apk has. Are you really a security pro? Prove it. That's all I want to see now. How old are you? I doubt you've been a security pro at all much less one that has a 21 yr career as apk has on levels in coding and networking.

      First off, we know this is you, Kowalrus.

      Second, no, you do not have a 21 year career in security. You have a 15 year career of being a total asshole in internet forums.

      You really have not proven that you've ever had a job, although it does seem likely you worked at Sunbelt but were fired because everybody hates working with you.

  89. Projecting what YOU'd do? Yes... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I don't want you harassing me at work, idiot." - by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @09:15AM (#49763123)

    See subject: You harass me on /. repeatedly (proofs of your inadequacy vs. myself & IN SECURITY):

    Security pros galore backing me on the efficacy of hosts - SpyBOT S&D uses it!

    YOU SAID "Nobody uses hosts for security" - wrong http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    You denied it's spybot's forums that said they do http://it.slashdot.org/comment... anyone can use it and see.

    NOD32/ESET's lead says hosts = valuable security http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY that scumbag http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    & WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS AS A WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    ?

    I block DGA endpoints in hosts served by host-domain/subdomain + MY LAYERED SECURITY METHODS STOP YOU FROM GETTING INFESTED IN THE FIRST PLACE! & My security guide uses the BEST THING WE HAVE GOING, layered security/defense in depth.

    Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No.

    Do you write a ware that other security pros second me on?? No.

    A ware that not only secures you but ALSO SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus which is not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, whereas mine is, stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get into you, & IF in you, stopping their communications BACK to C&C servers too!)

    "yes, malware can trivially disable your hosts file or the windows firewall." by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @09:15AM (#49763123)

    Not if you secure yourself vs. their methods of getting in which my guide does (cuts off all avenues) first.

    APK

    P.S.=> Plus: My program updates as OFTEN AS YOU LIKE vs. host-domain served threats (firewalls do IP ones) & my program UPDATES FROM A BACKUP PRISTINE COPY OF HOSTS stupid, no way to "infect" that... apk

    1. Re:Projecting what YOU'd do? Yes... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      You still have not responded to this:

      You can run your update as often as you like, but malware reverse engineers are not providing you an up-to-the-minute list of all DGA domains. Even if they did, you wouldn't get the domains until the malware had already connected up for its C&C of the hour. Hosts files are a bad strategy for modern botnets because techniques like DGA were designed to defeat static blocklists.

      Perhaps because you are an amateur, and don't understand malware, security, botnets, or anything beyond Pascal on Windows 2000?

      "yes, malware can trivially disable your hosts file or the windows firewall." by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @09:15AM (#49763123)

      Not if you secure yourself vs. their methods of getting in which my guide does (cuts off all avenues) first.

      So.. hosts file means strong security as long as you never get an infection in the first place? Surely you realize how stupid that sounds.

  90. Prove you're a pro in security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amateurs need help. Not pros. Apk proved pros back him. Do you? No. I see you doing a lot of garbage here instead http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and you should be ashamed of yourself Bouldin.

  91. Time for YOU to respond... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Perhaps because you are an amateur, and don't understand malware, security, botnets, or anything beyond Pascal on Windows 2000?" - by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @09:55AM (#49763249)

    WRONG http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Why'd you "strangely omit" in reply my professional security background?

    Oh, I know why...

    The questions below in my p.s. will get THAT out of you!

    I.E. - I have a 21 yr. long career in security for database work as a pro + a guide for layered security for people that need it: Amateurs mostly need it, not pros.

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    I understand when you BLOCK SOURCES OF INFESTATION via those practices you're very safe.

    See that guide, it does that!

    It uses hosts & layered security (best thing we have + security pros GALORE back me on that) & my program works FINE on more modern versions of Windows (2000/XP/Server 2003/7/Vista, possibly beyond, but nobody uses 8-10, by choice (poor sales)).

    "So.. hosts file means strong security as long as you never get an infection in the first place?" - by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @09:55AM (#49763249)

    Misquoting me AGAIN? LEARN TO READ! What's in my LAYERED SECURITY GUIDE DOES blocks infestation vectors!

    It shows how to cut off the sources of infestation & firewalls + hosts (which security pros GALORE backed me on vs. your bs, fool) do the rest even stopping infected systems from "talking back" to their C&C controllers (think Iron Man in Avengers 1 killing the central command in the black hole).

    You're showing how much of a LOSER you are yet again (& my last post show tons of that from you already http://slashdot.org/comments.p... via security pros FLATTENING your bs!)

    APK

    P.S.=> QUESTIONS: How old are you? Where DO you work as an ALLEGED security pro?? What wares or guides for security have you done to YOUR NAME/CREDIT?? Watch "Forrest RUN!" everyone... lol!apk

    1. Re:Time for YOU to respond... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      You still have not responded to this:

      You can run your update as often as you like, but malware reverse engineers are not providing you an up-to-the-minute list of all DGA domains. Even if they did, you wouldn't get the domains until the malware had already connected up for its C&C of the hour. Hosts files are a bad strategy for modern botnets because techniques like DGA were designed to defeat static blocklists.

      And you keep insisting you have a multi-decade security background, but all you have to show for it is a file manager written in Pascal:

      I.E. - I have a 21 yr. long career in security for database work as a pro + a guide for layered security for people that need it: Amateurs mostly need it, not pros.

      And you keep citing your guide, which is from the "tips n tricks" section of a newsletter, but the guide is not up anymore. Apparently they didn't think it was worth much.

      http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in... [pcpitstop.com]

      See that guide, it does that!

      Misquoting me AGAIN? LEARN TO READ! What's in my LAYERED SECURITY GUIDE DOES blocks infestation vectors! It shows how to cut off the sources of infestation & firewalls + hosts (which security pros GALORE backed me on vs. your bs, fool) do the rest even stopping infected systems from "talking back" to their C&C controllers (think Iron Man in Avengers 1 killing the central command in the black hole).

      I have yet to see a security guide, just a dead link.

  92. Wasn't me but I read it too... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ask YOU the same questions here: Answer them http://slashdot.org/comments.p... the person posting them asked fair questions. I can back myself, & have repeatedly with proofs from respected security pros http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and all you have now is more b.s., lol!

    By the way: As a professional software engineer since 1994 here, DB security IS part of the job. To be that job title, you also HAVE to be a network admin with FULL rights to do it. Security IS a HUGE part of it, dumbass (talking out your ass again as usual).

    Sunbelt didn't "fire" me. I left them after I found they had ripped off a fellow programmer in fact. IIRC, so did Mr. Russinovich whom we discussed above (& I smoked HIM too, you never could, lol).

    I then left Atlanta in 2000 after working with Sunbelt for 4-5 yrs. iirc, where network solutions iirc (their retailers of my wares outlets of theirs) are located.

    I made my monies, doing well enough to NOT have to work anymore in fact (it's great, early retirement)

    &

    I later even had EEC Systems/SuperSpeed.com, a certified MS partner, BUY up my code and PAY ME FOR IT (winning a finalist position @ MS TechEd 2000-2002 in its HARDEST CATEGORY, SQL Server Performance Enhancement... have YOU DONE THE SAME? No... lol!)

    APK

    P.S.=> You are NOT in my league. Nor will you ever be. Answer these questions in my ps here to prove otherwise -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Since you asked ME for citations galore, I provided them galore (backing me on the efficacy of hosts no less from respected pros in security -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... which YOU don't have to your name/credit, OR to dispute them, lol... )

  93. Why'd you avoid my questions? LOL!... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You still have not responded to this" - by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @10:30AM (#49763359)

    No, I have repeatedly: My layered security guide addresses it which you can easily read since you ADMIT seeing various sources to it here http://it.slashdot.org/comment... since WHEN YOU BLOCK AVENUES MALWARES USE TO GET INTO YOU, THEY CAN'T INFECT YOU: Pure truth.

    Quoting the GREAT Jack Nicholson: "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

    "And you keep insisting you have a multi-decade security background, but all you have to show for it is a file manager written in Pascal:" - by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @10:30AM (#49763359)

    Uhm, I never wrote a FileManager 1st of all, lol, & secondly? Again:

    By the way: As a professional software engineer since 1994 here, DB security IS part of the job. To be that job title, you also HAVE to be a network admin with FULL rights to do it. Security IS a HUGE part of it, dumbass (talking out your ass again as usual). I've also taken jobs as a techie before that killing viruses by the MANY 1,000's for clients (using ProcessExplorer & a Windows Install CD recovery console alone even, not needing anything more, even rootkits), & as a network admin/engineer too before graduating to MIS/IS/IT level coding.

    E.G. - 1st you secure the DB engine rights & app level security in it, then in code using stored procs + bound variables (avoids SQLInjections) in CODE LEVEL as SOME examples thereof, & since websites are DB driven, IIS too (or OTHER webservers) + the OS itself etc. (I've done it 100's of times buddy, for corporations to do their JOBS safely over decades... I wonder - have you? Answer my questions)

    APK

    P.S.=> See subject: Answer MY questions now (my turn) & you keep RUNNING from them in my ps there - why? LOL, I KNOW WHY as does anyone else reading here http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    1. Re:Why'd you avoid my questions? LOL!... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      You still have not responded to this:

      You can run your update as often as you like, but malware reverse engineers are not providing you an up-to-the-minute list of all DGA domains. Even if they did, you wouldn't get the domains until the malware had already connected up for its C&C of the hour. Hosts files are a bad strategy for modern botnets because techniques like DGA were designed to defeat static blocklists.

      No, I have repeatedly: My layered security guide addresses it which you can easily read since you ADMIT seeing various sources to it here http://it.slashdot.org/comment... since WHEN YOU BLOCK AVENUES MALWARES USE TO GET INTO YOU, THEY CAN'T INFECT YOU: Pure truth.

      So, then, you are admitting the hosts file is not effective at blocking botnet c&c channels. Take that out of your list of extravagant claims of the benefits of hosts files.

      Uhm, I never wrote a FileManager 1st of all, lol, & secondly? Again:

      Yeah, you wrote a file manager in Pascal.

      By the way: As a professional software engineer since 1994 here, DB security IS part of the job. To be that job title, you also HAVE to be a network admin with FULL rights to do it. Security IS a HUGE part of it, dumbass (talking out your ass again as usual). I've also taken jobs as a techie before that killing viruses by the MANY 1,000's for clients (using ProcessExplorer & a Windows Install CD recovery console alone even, not needing anything more, even rootkits), & as a network admin/engineer too before graduating to MIS/IS/IT level coding.

      Sounds like you've washed out of every job you've had. It's funny, because if I google your name, all I find is you pissing off people in Internet forums over the past 9 years. Repeatedly.

      P.S.=> You are NOT in my league. Nor will you ever be. Answer these questions in my ps here to prove otherwise -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... [slashdot.org]

      Hahhaa.. no, I'm not going to give my personal details to some mental patient on the Internet. Let's just say I moved past Pascal when I was in high school.

      I made my monies, doing well enough to NOT have to work anymore in fact (it's great, early retirement)

      Uh no, you are not independently wealthy. You are unemployable. If you apply for a job, the employer will google you and see you are a total whack job who needs medication.

  94. LMAO: "Silence is GOLDEN"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: From "Mr. Bouldin" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * See subject again - "... And silence reigned in heaven for about the space of 1/2 an hour..." - LUKE Chapter 21 verses 1-6

    (It's actually been LONGER, going on an hour++ now per the timestamps on the posts)

    Yessiree Bob - Seems the "cat got his tongue" outta "BIG MOUTH BOULDIN" vs. myself "The LORD of HOSTS", eh?

    Yes, no questions asked...

    (...& Bouldin CERTAINLY WON'T ANSWER ANY OF MY QUESTIONS IN THE LINK ABOVE, now will he? Nope... see subject again!)

    Too bad his BIG MOUTH & no backing doesn't "measure up" doing a "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!"

    (vs. myself with TONS of it from respected security pros from Norton/Symantec AND ESET/NOD32 backing me & respected WIDELY USED APPS like SpyBot S&D -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )

    He brought it on himself: I merely let BOULDIN colosally FLATTEN himself, eating his words... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> As I should just like "The LORD of Hosts" https://answers.yahoo.com/ques... with rank after rank of protective power I can summon @ a word: Hosts + LAYERED SECURITY via my guides!

    PERTINENT QUOTE/EXCERPT:

    "The image this title brings to mind is of a mighty military commander, one who can at a mere word summon rank upon rank of protective power" via hosts/custom hosts files + layered security guides use...

    For the BEST hosts file?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    Yet ANOTHER respected SECURITY SOURCE backing me right there, hosting my code (vetted it too) on the efficacy of custom hosts files for security & unlike OTHER security tools? It also adds speed @ multiple levels vs. taking it away... apk

  95. Trying to put words in my mouth.. apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Avoiding my questions too loser? Yes (see ps here) -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    That says it ALL about you, full of hot air (nothing contributed to in security YOURSELF, not a DAMN thing, lol, whereas I have an application that security pros even back me on from Symantec/Norton, ESET/NOD32, SpyBot S&D -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... & even MalwareBytes -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )
    Can't you read? Obviously not, next (I addressed it with a specific example):

    ---

    "So, then, you are admitting the hosts file is not effective at blocking botnet c&c channels." - by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @01:09PM (#49763859)

    How many times is a dumbshit like YOU going to *try* pull that on me, menial? Are there hostnames here that are still online?? Yes, ZEUS botnet (as a SINGLE example) https://zeustracker.abuse.ch/m...

    You lose as usual... lol!

    Any OTHER kind, such as the edge case RARE types you noted (out of 'desperation') MY SECURITY GUIDE catches via Layered Security/Defense in Depth practices -> http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    You LOSE YET AGAIN, as per your usual (see above & ALL thru this exchange).

    LMAO - do YOU even have a job (I asked that of you, you avoid it "damballa boy", that's right idiot - I see thru YOU like an X-Ray right into your soul, easily...)

    ME?

    Like I already said, unlike YOU wageslave, I don't NEED ONE ANYMORE - my money literally works for me!

    ---

    "Sounds like you've washed out of every job you've had." - by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @01:09PM (#49763859)

    Do you have even HAVE a job? Prove it.

    Wouldn't matter, since if YOU are 'state of the art' in "security engineers" (allegedly)? You suck...

    I've torn you totally apart, & you resort to misquoting me, playing games constantly when I burn you, etc.!

    You're weak.

    ---

    "It's funny, because if I google your name, all I find is you pissing off people in Internet forums over the past 9 years. Repeatedly.." - by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @01:09PM (#49763859)

    I don't "hide" behind BULLSHIT names like "Bouldin" douche.

    When I FRY weasels like YOU on a forums as I have here? Sure, they get pissed & have to 'kick me'...

    However - If I want, I can be RIGHT back in, but facts I use speak for me so I don't bother (just like they have vs. your weak ass every single turn here, lol).

    It's obvious you're DESPERATE now, trying to "character assasinate me" but you can't BEAT MY FACTS I use, can you? Nope!

    LOL, mgt. style political BS isn't standing up to me...

    ---

    "Let's just say I moved past Pascal when I was in high school." - by bouldin (828821) on Sunday May 24, 2015 @01:09PM (#49763859)

    Yea? Show us a program you've written TONS of people use... what can you show us that proves you even code?? Nothing.

    I can do that easily thru my Hosts Engine ALONE, right off the bat (& many other wares over time commercially sold in other languages by MS partners stupid which I've already noted & you RAN from before this even).

    I know 12++ computer languages fluently in fact.

    For my Hosts Engine, I chose Object Pascal since it's beaten even MSVC++ in strings work which my app does HEAVILY - dumb thing for you to say:

    Check Borland/Embarcadero Delphi XE8 & say that again, you limited worm... lol!

    What 'filemanager' is this?

    To me, Explorer.exe is a FILEMA

    1. Re:Trying to put words in my mouth.. apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      So, then, you are admitting the hosts file is not effective at blocking botnet c&c channels. Take that out of your list of extravagant claims of the benefits of hosts files.

      How many times is a dumbshit like YOU going to *try* pull that on me, menial? Are there hostnames here that are still online?? Yes, ZEUS botnet (as a SINGLE example) https://zeustracker.abuse.ch/m...

      If your approach only blocks 5-10% of domain names, then it is NOT effective for security. This might fly in your shareware consumer world, but that is not enterprise-grade.

      Any OTHER kind, such as the edge case RARE types you noted (out of 'desperation') MY SECURITY GUIDE catches via Layered Security/Defense in Depth practices -> http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

      You DO NOT HAVE A SECURITY GUIDE. I actually looked for it, and the closest I could find was where you posted it, but everybody thought you were an idiot and banned you. Not what I would call "success."

      "Sounds like you've washed out of every job you've had."

      Wouldn't matter, since if YOU are 'state of the art' in "security engineers" (allegedly)? You suck...

      Yeah, you have totally washed out of every job you had, and now you've been an author of (shitty) shareware. Found this gem:

      IpTables, iirc, = the LINUX modern evolution of the older IPChains system, right?? I am more of a Win32 guy the past few years though, so I must ask.

      So you don't even understand UNIX. You are quite the security professional.

      When I FRY weasels like YOU on a forums as I have here? Sure, they get pissed & have to 'kick me'...

      You have been banned from almost every forum you've ever joined. Like when you were banned in 2000 from arstechnica, and rejoined as a different name to defend yourself. Or when you were banned after trying to spam your shitty security guide in 2007.

      The best thing I could find anyone say about you, from a friend, was:

      Vortac said:

      The only thing I don't like about him (although I've gotten over it), is he thinks everyone is an idiot. He just hasn't had any real experience, deadlines to meet, or being a team player within an organization.

      And the worst thing is, you're a really shitty programmer!

      For my Hosts Engine, I chose Object Pascal since it's beaten even MSVC++ in strings work which my app does HEAVILY - dumb thing for you to say:

      Funny, because you got called out for very poorly performing code (that just sorted some strings and took 11 minutes) here. And here are the kinds of things people said about your code a few years ago:

      Man with no head wrote:

      Of course spamming forums with publicity ads is kind of lame; don't take it personally, but you brought it upon yourself.

      Now as regarding the actual package, I find the UI kind of weird and you don't seem to be following Windows UI guidelines (That's a no-no in Tog speak).

      The feature set is kind of questionable; I fail to see the real value of your product really.

      And to finish my rant, I got these errors on startup on my Win2k SRV SP1 system.

      BTW

  96. Bouldin's "GREATEST HITS" top 10, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

    FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    SpyBot S&D does, dimwit (you FAIL #1)!

    You LATER denied it's spybot's forums that said they do http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Anyone can use it and see they do, & MANY use that program stupid (you FAIL #2).

    ---

    NOD32/ESET's lead says hosts = valuable security http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I also "overturned a NOTED expert" on a "false positive" on my APK Hosts File Engine RIGHT there too & he gave in! (YOU FAIL #3))

    (Had to - MalwareBytes' employees VETTED my code & even host it for me -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    ---

    Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://www.securityfocus.com/c... (you FAIL #4)

    YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY that scumbag & it's there in PLAIN Black & White with his NAME on it (you FAIL #5)

    "I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @08:43PM (#49747763)

    FROM-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    YOU FAIL #6

    ---

    & WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS AS A WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    YOU FAIL #7

    Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide extolls? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too, lol... you FAIL #8!

    ---

    Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No. YOU FAIL #9!

    ---

    Do you write a ware that other security pros have even seconded me on?? No. You FAIL #10!

    A ware that not only secures you but ALSO SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus which is not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, whereas mine is, stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get into you, & IF in you, stopping their communications BACK to C&C servers too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO @ U Bouldin, you failed (lots)... apk

    1. Re:Bouldin's "GREATEST HITS" top 10, lol... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Now you see why I've referred to you as a parade of delusion. You're a total fuckup imagining ways that someone you know nothing about has failed.

      Your amateurish security guide sucked, you don't know anything about security, and you're a windows luser. You write shitty freeware in Pascal, and you have no job. You've been caught in lie after lie, and frankly, everybody you have ever known hates you.

    2. Re:Bouldin's "GREATEST HITS" top 10, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit crying Bouldin. Apk utterly nuked you here 10x http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and your stupid mistakes burnt you. He blew away every single so called argument using layered security methods or hosts files and now you try to use illogical ad hominem attacks on him? The very people you tried to use against him are ones he burned so badly that Jeremy Reimer a known troll posted edited photos of apk. That is something a child would do and apk fried his pal Jay Little on Exchange Server (Dr. Mark Russinovich too). Illogic doesn't wash on slashdot. Facts and citations do. You failed. Badly on all accounts noted.

    3. Re:Bouldin's "GREATEST HITS" top 10, lol... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Do you seriously think anybody believes this isn't you? Or are you really that fucked up in the head that you have multiple personalities?

  97. Arstechnica? BWahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask them about what I showed you here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... & Jeremy Reimer + Jay Little & YES Dr. Pizza GOITER MAN Peter Bright failed on... they banned me, I didn't come back (despite their bs lies) or use other names - didn't HAVE to after that (Jay Little Reimer's henchman GOT HIS ASS KICKED on Exchange being unfrozen sped up by Memory Optimizers stupid... after claiming literally "I AM AN EXPERT ON EXCHANGE" & they ALL RAN, lol...)

    I'm a shitty programmer? At least I have something to show that MalwareBytes' folks even HOST for me & praise @ the TOP of their page here (going to say "I don't see it" like your greatest hits PROVE you pull again -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... Hmmm? Try it!)

    Plus = DO BETTER you done ZERO 'ne'er-do-well' BULLSHIT artist little SOUTHERN hick "damballa boy" wageslave weasel!

    Your code has NO BUGS - of course it has NO LINES either, so it does ZERO (just like you loser, lol).

    Try "character assasinate" me ALL YOU LIKE, but using fools I have FLOORED before isn't smart... I prove that above easily... you fail, "ne'er-do-well" no job lying fuckup that you are shown below!

    APK

    P.S.=> I refer you ALL to "Bouldin the 'security engineer'" (allegedly but its bullshit after I smoked him repeatedly here) AND HIS GREATEST HITS -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Every post of yours (which oddly I notice you're not posting all over /. anymore - why's that loser? I am COMING for you to expose those 'hits' (fails) of yours in your posts from now on loser, bank on it).... apk

  98. Your "greatest hits" QUOTING you != delusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

    FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    SpyBot S&D does, dimwit

    (you FAIL #1)!

    You LATER denied it's spybot's forums that said they do http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Anyone can use it and see they do, & MANY use that program stupid!

    (you FAIL #2)!

    ---

    NOD32/ESET's lead says hosts = valuable security http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I also "overturned a NOTED expert" on a "false positive" on my APK Hosts File Engine RIGHT there too & he gave in!

    (YOU FAIL #3)!

    (Had to - MalwareBytes' employees VETTED my code & even host it for me -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    ---

    Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    (you FAIL #4)!

    YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY that scumbag & it's there in PLAIN Black & White with his NAME on it!

    "I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @08:43PM (#49747763)

    FROM-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    (you FAIL #5)!

    ---

    WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS AS A WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    (YOU FAIL #7)!

    Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide extolls? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too, lol...

    (You FAIL #8)!

    Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No.

    (YOU FAIL #9)!

    ---

    Do you write a ware that other security pros have even seconded me on?? No.

    (You FAIL #10)!

    A ware that not only secures you but ALSO SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus which is not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, whereas mine is, stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get into you, & IF in you, stopping their communications BACK to C&C servers too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> EVERY POST YOU MAKE on /. will have this right after it... apk

    1. Re:Your "greatest hits" QUOTING you != delusion by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Ha, you can keep reposting that list, but none of those are failures on my part, and half of it doesn't even involve me in any way.

      You, on the other hand are a total failure and liar. You claimed you quit Sunbelt, but actually you were fired. You claim to be independently wealthy, but you have a $100,000 house that your mom gave you.

      You've been banned from dozens of sites (in other words, dozens of failures), and each time try ridiculous arguments that everyone on the site shuts down (so let's just call that several hundred failures).

      And now, you are a complete failure because you write super shitty software that is slow. You don't understand computing or security.

      Go back to school. Go to a real school this time.

    2. Re:Your "greatest hits" QUOTING you != delusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He made money from Sunbelt from what I read for a long time. Did you? Not that I can see. Can you prove your illogical allegations with valid proof Bouldin? Banning doesn't make someone right. From what I read apk completely scorched all of arstechnica in fact. After your huge fails against apk here (hahaha top 10 golden hits) http://slashdot.org/comments.p... where he proved you wrong at every turn and you tried to lie your way out but your own words caught you in the act quoted? I have rarely seen such a loser in my time such as you, online. I told you before, valid facts like your mistakes quoted in that link above as fact work here. Not mere character assasination attempts and illogical off topic ad hominem attacks from an 'alleged security engineer' who can't prove it and lost terribly on 10 points at least shown above in your own words mistakes quoted.

    3. Re:Your "greatest hits" QUOTING you != delusion by bouldin · · Score: 1

      You don't understand security or computing, Kowalrus.

  99. Reduced to illogical ad hominem attacks again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone believes you said this quoted:

    "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

    FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    SpyBot S&D does dimwit

    (you FAIL #1)!

    You LATER deny it's spybot's forums http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Anyone can use it + see they do & MANY use that program stupid!

    (you FAIL #2)!

    ---

    NOD32/ESET's says hosts = valuable security http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I also "overturned a SECURITY expert" on a "false positive" on my Hosts program RIGHT there & he gave in!

    (YOU FAIL #3)!

    (Had to - MalwareBytes' employees VETTED my code & even host + HIGHLY RECOMMEND it for me near top of -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    ---

    Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    (you FAIL #4)!

    YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY it & it's there in PLAIN Black & White with his NAME on it!

    "I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @08:43PM (#49747763)

    FROM-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    (you FAIL #5)!

    ---

    WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS - WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    (YOU FAIL #7)!

    Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide extolls? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too!

    (You FAIL #8)!

    Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No.

    (YOU FAIL #9)!

    ---

    Do you write a ware that noted security pros even seconded me on?? No.

    (You FAIL #10)!

    A ware that not only secures you but ALSO SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus which is not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, mine is, stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get into you, & IF in you, stopping their communications BACK to C&C servers too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO: "Bouldin's GOLDEN top 10 'greatest hits'" (fails vs. me)... apk

    1. Re:Reduced to illogical ad hominem attacks again? by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Everyone believes you said this quoted:

      "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

      Haha, yeah, nobody in enterprise does use hosts files for security. That's some consumer-grade shareware shit.

      Spybot doesn't even seem to think it's a good feature, because you haven't been able to link anywhere other than that forum where they even admit having the feature.

      Anyone can use it + see they do & MANY use that program stupid!

      You can keep your consumer-grade shareware/freeware. Enterprise uses solutions like Damballa.

      YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY it & it's there in PLAIN Black & White with his NAME on it!

      Didn't see it - it was buried under your verbal diarrhea. As many others have noted, your English is terrible.

      WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS - WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

      Congrats, you got $100 seven years ago. You're a real pro!

      Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide extolls? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too!

      You didn't even understand the cases I presented. And they aren't edge cases, they are malware with millions of infections. But that was lost on you, because you don't understand anything.

    2. Re:Reduced to illogical ad hominem attacks again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prove you're really a security engineer. We might listen. You prove apk beat you with your own mistakes http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as no good real security engineer (allegedly from your mouth only in your case only) would mess up that badly and then be reduced to off topic illogical ad hominem attacks minus any substance to them for character assasination unless he was furious at his own mistakes as you clearly are Bouldin, and showing us you're desperation is horribly clear to see you reduced to such lows. You lose. Anyone can see it. Accept it.

  100. Wrong on all counts in your bs, AND? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your "GOLDEN HITS' (fails) quoted:

    "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

    FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    SpyBot S&D does dimwit

    (you FAIL #1)!

    You LATER deny it's spybot's forums http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Anyone can use it + see they do & MANY use that program stupid!

    (you FAIL #2)!

    ---

    NOD32/ESET's says hosts = valuable security http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I also "overturned a SECURITY expert" on a "false positive" on my Hosts program RIGHT there & he gave in!

    (YOU FAIL #3)!

    (Had to - MalwareBytes' employees VETTED my code & even host + HIGHLY RECOMMEND it for me near top of -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    ---

    Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    (you FAIL #4)!

    YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY it & it's there in PLAIN Black & White with his NAME on it!

    "I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @08:43PM (#49747763)

    FROM-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    (you FAIL #5)!

    ---

    WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS - WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    (YOU FAIL #7)!

    Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide extolls? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too!

    (You FAIL #8)!

    Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No.

    (YOU FAIL #9)!

    ---

    Do you write a ware that noted security pros even seconded me on?? No.

    (You FAIL #10)!

    A ware that not only secures you but ALSO SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus which is not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, mine is, stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get into you, & IF in you, stopping their communications BACK to C&C servers too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO: "Bouldin's GOLDEN top 10 'greatest hits'" (fails vs. me)... apk

  101. ESET/NOD32 anyone? Enterprises use it... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOD32/ESET's says hosts = valuable security http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I also "overturned a SECURITY expert" on a "false positive" on my Hosts program RIGHT there & he gave in!

    (YOU FAIL #3)!

    (Had to - MalwareBytes' employees VETTED my code & even host + HIGHLY RECOMMEND it for me near top of -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    ---

    "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

    FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    SpyBot S&D does dimwit

    (you FAIL #1)!

    You LATER deny it's spybot's forums http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Anyone can use it + see they do & MANY use that program stupid!

    (you FAIL #2)!

    ---

    Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    (you FAIL #4)!

    YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY it & it's there in PLAIN Black & White with his NAME on it!

    "I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @08:43PM (#49747763)

    FROM-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    (you FAIL #5)!

    ---

    WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS - WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    (YOU FAIL #7)!

    Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide extolls? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too!

    (You FAIL #8)!

    Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No.

    (YOU FAIL #9)!

    ---

    Do you write a ware that noted security pros even seconded me on?? No.

    (You FAIL #10)!

    A ware that not only secures you but ALSO SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus which is not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, mine is, stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get into you, & IF in you, stopping their communications BACK to C&C servers too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO: "Bouldin's GOLDEN top 10 'greatest hits'" (fails vs. me)... apk

    1. Re:ESET/NOD32 anyone? Enterprises use it... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Hey nice copy-paste. So why did you lie about being independently wealthy? Why didn't you just say your mom gave you your house?

    2. Re:ESET/NOD32 anyone? Enterprises use it... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Hey, what do you know? Even malwarebytes thinks your program is just a file manager:

      APK Hosts File Engine - Small program for managing the HOSTS file

      So your one claim to fame IS a file manager written in Pascal. For which nobody pays you.

  102. YOUR WORDS (lol, fails) show otherwise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

    FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    SpyBot S&D does dimwit

    (you FAIL #1)!

    You LATER deny it's spybot's forums http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Anyone can use it + see they do & MANY use that program stupid!

    (you FAIL #2)!

    ---

    NOD32/ESET's says hosts = valuable security http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I also "overturned a SECURITY expert" on a "false positive" on my Hosts program RIGHT there & he gave in!

    (YOU FAIL #3)!

    (Had to - MalwareBytes' employees VETTED my code & even host + HIGHLY RECOMMEND it for me near top of -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    ---

    Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    (you FAIL #4)!

    YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY it & it's there in PLAIN Black & White with his NAME on it!

    "I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @08:43PM (#49747763)

    FROM-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    (you FAIL #5)!

    ---

    WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS - WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    (YOU FAIL #7)!

    Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide extolls? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too!

    (You FAIL #8)!

    Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No.

    (YOU FAIL #9)!

    ---

    Do you write a ware that noted security pros even seconded me on?? No.

    (You FAIL #10)!

    A ware that not only secures you but ALSO SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus which is not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, mine is, stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get into you, & IF in you, stopping their communications BACK to C&C servers too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO: "Bouldin's GOLDEN top 10 'greatest hits'" (fails vs. me)... apk

  103. Doesn't stand up well vs your 'greatest hits' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've really lost it reduced to illogical off topic ad hominem attacks & hahaha (greatest hits of Bouldin Golden top 10) http://slashdot.org/comments.p... there's no denying it. Your 'enterprise class' garbage? How would you know that? You're not enterprise class by any means and you don't have a job you're willing to prove either despite trying that on apk in desperation. I have rarely seen such a loser except for Jeremy Reimer of arstechnica doing the same to apk after apk dominated all of arstechnica at Windows IT Pro (Dr. Russinovich of MS PhD too) http://slashdot.org/comments.p... which the clearly not even menial unemployed you can never do. You can't even take on apk minus having a childish fit reaction. Look at your post and yourself. You're disgusting.

  104. A top employee of malwarebytes hosts it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject and recommends it highly "I'd suggest using HostsMan or APK Hosts File Engine as these will do it all for you"and he hosts it but I don't see any recommendations from the likes of Malwarebytes for you do I, Bouldin? Nope. In fact nobody sees anything out of you but childish illogical ad hominem attacks http://slashdot.org/comments.p... that show your fail, even better than your massive (hahahaha, can't help but laugh now at this) "Top 10 'Golden Bouldin GREATEST HITS'" fails against apk here (especially your latest enterprise class fail, ESET/NOD32 and Symantec are exactly that and it again proves you know nothing on security saying that here) http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

  105. Get it right, lol: Explorer.exe/winfile.exe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those = filemanagers (see subject & your fails list, lol):

    "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

    FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    SpyBot S&D does dimwit

    (you FAIL #1)!

    You LATER deny it's spybot's forums http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Anyone can use it + see they do & MANY use that program stupid!

    (you FAIL #2)!

    ---

    NOD32/ESET's says hosts = valuable security http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I also "overturned a SECURITY expert" on a "false positive" on my Hosts program RIGHT there & he gave in!

    (YOU FAIL #3)!

    (Had to - MalwareBytes' employees VETTED my code & even host + HIGHLY RECOMMEND it for me near top of -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    ---

    Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    (you FAIL #4)!

    YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY it & it's there in PLAIN Black & White with his NAME on it!

    "I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @08:43PM (#49747763)

    FROM-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    (you FAIL #5)!

    ---

    WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS - WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    (YOU FAIL #7)!

    Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide extolls? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too!

    (You FAIL #8)!

    Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No.

    (YOU FAIL #9)!

    ---

    Do you write a ware that noted security pros even seconded me on?? No.

    (You FAIL #10)!

    A ware that not only secures you but ALSO SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus which is not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, mine is, stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get into you, & IF in you, stopping their communications BACK to C&C servers too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO: "Bouldin's GOLDEN top 10 'greatest hits'"... apk

    1. Re:Get it right, lol: Explorer.exe/winfile.exe by bouldin · · Score: 1

      APK In a Nutshell (A Life of Failure)
      1. Got a mediocre degree in IT. No computer science degree.
      2. Fired from Sunbelt in 2000. Never found full-time employment again, much less as a software engineer.
      3. Mom gave him a house. He lied about it, and claimed to be independently wealthy.
      4. 2000 - Banned from Arstechnica. Rejoined under another name (lied) to argue for himself. Everyone there hated him.
      5. 2003 - Tried to argue with Russinovich in forums of Russinovich's blog. Other forum posters schooled him. Nevertheless, claims he beat Russinovich in argument that Russinovich did not realized happened.
      6. 2007 - Banned from Antionline. Everyone there hated him. Pasted his "security guide," which everyone agreed was not good.
      7. 2008 - Actually got paid $100 for his security guide, and 7 years later claims he's a "security professional."
      8. 2008 - Admitted he doesn't understand UNIX: "I am more of a Win32 guy the past few years though, so I must ask [what iptables is]."
      9. 2008 - Made legal threats against Thor Schrock, but turned out to be lying. Embarrassed publicly by Schrock.
      10. 2010 - Wrote a crappy file manager in Pascal that performs terribly. Nobody would pay for it.
      11. Managed to get malwarebytes to host his file manager because it's free. Lied and denied it's just a file manager, but Malwarebytes calls it what it is: a file manager.
      12. 2011 - BarbaraHudson caught him in a lie - that he had plenty of +5 modded posts on slashdot. They were all at -1.
      13. 2011 - Attempted to re-add garbage to Wikipedia 20 times on the hosts file. Had it removed each time.
      14. 2012 - Embarrassed on slashdot for his text file manager's extremely poor performance. Pastes Python but fails to indent, showing he does not understand the basics of Python.
      15. 2014 - Zontar schooled him, doxed him, caught him in several other lies.
      16. 2014-2015 - Bouldin repeatedly explained why hosts files are not suitable security against botnets, but he didn't understand the technical aspects. Seems very confused about basic networking and how malware works. Refers to malware with millions of infections as "edge cases." Doesn't understand basic Python, and believes the hosts file cannot be bypassed even after proof otherwise.
      17. Still has not done anything since his long-since-deleted security guide from 2007 or his file manager from 2010.

  106. Bought it from my Dad... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: 'enterprise class'? Symantec & ESET = that per your fails:

    NOD32/ESET's says hosts = good security http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I also "overturned a SECURITY expert" on a "false positive" on my Hosts program RIGHT there & he gave in!

    (YOU FAIL #1)!

    (Had to - MalwareBytes' employee VETTED my code & even host + HIGHLY RECOMMEND it for me @ top of -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    (you FAIL #2)!

    ---

    Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    (you FAIL #3)!

    YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY it: It's there in PLAIN Black & White w/ his NAME on it!

    "I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @08:43PM (#49747763)

    FROM-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    (you FAIL #4)!

    ---

    "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

    FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    SpyBot S&D does dimwit

    (you FAIL #5)!

    You LATER deny it's spybot's forums http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Anyone can use it + see & MANY use that program stupid!

    (you FAIL #6)!

    ---

    WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS - WINNER 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    (YOU FAIL #7)!

    Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too!

    (You FAIL #8)!

    Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No.

    (YOU FAIL #9)!

    ---

    Do you write a ware that noted security pros second me on?? No.

    (You FAIL #10)!

    A ware that not only secures you but ALSO SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus which is not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, mine is, stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get in you, & IF in you, stopping their communique BACK to C&C servers too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO: "Bouldin's GOLDEN top 10 'greatest hits'" (fails vs. me)... apk

  107. Putting away your Ad Hominem attacks... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    90/120 cr into BS CS (AAS done) & MIS BS. Not fired from Sunbelt. Russinovich & I used 'em as outlets. Both of us found they ripped off a gent who made a defragger for NT-based OS (all of us sold thru ServerExtras on Powers Ferry rd. Atlanta via Sunbelt). We made money for years. Enough to buy a house from Dad (not ma) which I did work on years before + SOLID house & live comfortably not having to work running my business. I escaped IT hole but worked it + doing side programs I received monies for (e.g. EEC Systems/SuperSpeed.com buying out my code & ideas for ramdisk use only NOW taking hold in big enterprise in fact that was a finalist @ MS TechEd 2000-2002 2 yrs in a row). I worked as a programmer-analyst/software engineer professionally ontop of that 1994-2008 in fact (& before it as a network admin/techie yes in security related role). I worked in Atlanta during 1996 Olympics for BellSouth (now CINGULAR iirc) cellular for a SECURE 'impossible task' on NT-3.52 laptops via ASCEND gateways via dialin modems so they could avoid the BIG traffic of the Olympics. Banned from ars? That's best they had vs.-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... easily. Resorted to posting edited photos of me (Reimer) like you here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... like a frustrated child's illogical off topic ad hominem effete vain useless tantrum style that's not valid. My layered security guides burnt you here on "edge cases" & you have nothing. UNIX & VMS here. Was paid for my security guide + for decades as a software-engineer/network admin securing DB engines, apps on them, OS + network periphery etc. It's part of the job you've never done! Barb Hudson *tried* same as you saying "hosts are not a cure all as apk says" & like to you I asked "Where've I ever said that once?" Never have. Prove otherwise. Wikipedia doesn't post detail is all. Zontar's loonily sent me a postcard & recently threatened me here in fact (he'd come to my house w/ a bat). Forgot to POST AC Bouldin? # @16 = busted & your TOP 10 "GOLDEN BOULDIN" Fails vs. me = your words quoted here http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    1. Re:Putting away your Ad Hominem attacks... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Enough to buy a house from Dad (not ma)

      Funny, the tax assessor said she sold it to you in 2010 for $1. So I guess you were actually just living at mom's house until 2010, when she gave it to you.

      UNIX & VMS here.

      Just cause you said it doesn't make it true. Your internet history shows otherwise - a windows luser.

  108. Bouldin's "Golden" top 10 'greatest hit' vs. apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

    FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    SpyBot S&D does dimwit

    (you FAIL #1)!

    You LATER deny it's spybot's forums http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Anyone can use it + see they do & MANY use that program stupid!

    (you FAIL #2)!

    ---

    NOD32/ESET's says hosts = valuable security http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I also "overturned a SECURITY expert" on a "false positive" on my Hosts program RIGHT there & he gave in!

    (YOU FAIL #3)!

    (Had to - MalwareBytes' employees VETTED my code & even host + HIGHLY RECOMMEND it for me near top of -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    ---

    Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    (you FAIL #4)!

    YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY it & it's there in PLAIN Black & White with his NAME on it!

    "I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @08:43PM (#49747763)

    FROM-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    (you FAIL #5)!

    ---

    WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS - WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    (YOU FAIL #7)!

    Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide extolls? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too!

    (You FAIL #8)!

    Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No.

    (YOU FAIL #9)!

    ---

    Do you write a ware noted security pros even seconded me on?? No.

    (You FAIL #10)!

    A ware that secures you + SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus (not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, mine is) stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get you & IF in you, stopping their communications BACK to C&C servers too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Your off topic childish illogical ad hominem attacks here too = nil -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... since that's the "best you got" vs me... apk

  109. You don't own a home evidently, renter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever bought real estate? It's possible to do that for tax purposes from relative & 1 time gift stuff etc.- et al. IS that what was PAID though? You must wonder (houses worth 100k + land around it worth more too I paid for but helped Dad). Taxes, taxes, taxes & capital GAINS are key.

    I knew you were stupid, but not so stupid to RENT, which evidently you do still, lol!

    (Especially in Atlanta, it's too expensive, I lived there... but that's you - stupid, & YOUR "GOLDEN BOULDIN" top 10 greatest hits prove it here, lol, vs. myself -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )

    Bouldin, above ALL else? I disproved every line of bs you stated here-> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... "renter" wageslave that you still obviously are (then again, you can't prove you even have a job, OR A DEGREE (I do, 2 of them, AS in CS + BS in MIS where I was also a lettering NCAA athlete 1st string no less for a many time national or divisional champ... how about you, creampuff? No?? Didn't think so!)

    Uhm, call LeMoyne's CS dept, & computer center. It was VAX 1180 during my time @ LeMoyne 1984-1987.

    As usual?

    "EAT YOUR WORDS" which you're used to (see below, lol)... change your diet: Eating your words != good nutrition.

    Go ahead, shoot your wad again & blow it as usual! You're burning out your "last resort" illogical ad hominem attacks, which are worthless.

    See subject: All you have now is arstechnica lies I long ago disproved in the post parent to yours... all done now? Yes. You are, & then we'll go back to our "regularly scheduled program", YOUR "top 10 'GOLDEN' Bouldin 'greatest hits" fails vs. me...

    APK

    P.S.=> If the 'best you got' is that stupidity? No small wonder I flushed you down the toilet so easily 10x ++ (more actually but these are my favorites since you are quoted fucking up so badly, lol) -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ... apk

    1. Re:You don't own a home evidently, renter by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Ever bought real estate? It's possible to do that for tax purposes from relative & 1 time gift stuff etc.- et al. IS that what was PAID though? You must wonder (houses worth 100k + land around it worth more too I paid for but helped Dad). Taxes, taxes, taxes & capital GAINS are key.

      You really are condescending. That's (part of) why nobody likes you.

      The $1 sales price means the house was a gift. If you actually handed over more money than that (doubtful), then you committed fraud.

      I knew you were stupid, but not so stupid to RENT, which evidently you do still, lol!

      Ha, yeah, nice try.

      (I do, 2 of them, AS in CS + BS in MIS

      Assocates in CS is meaningless. You don't get into real CS classes until Junior year. This means you have a BS in MIS (a circa 80's degree, at that).

      ... where I was also a lettering NCAA athlete 1st string no less for a many time national or divisional champ... how about you, creampuff? No?? Didn't think so!)

      Congrats. But then you started smoking, and now you sit around playing Diablo all day.

      All you have now is arstechnica lies I long ago disproved in the post parent to yours... all done now?

      Disproved? I read the posts. People criticized your shitty software, and you flew off the handle and got banned for it. You made a lot of enemies there. By the way, I noticed someone started a petition to have you killed in 2006. According to the archive.org page, it got at least 29 signatures. So, congrats on that, too!

      Uhm, call LeMoyne's CS dept, & computer center. It was VAX 1180 during my time @ LeMoyne 1984-1987.

      Even if you had gotten a CS degree (you didn't), that was a way shitty school that actually disbanded the CS department from 1994 - 2008.

    2. Re:You don't own a home evidently, renter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clutching at straws, illogical off topic ad hominem attacks too? Bouldin what's this http://slashdot.org/comments.p... hahahahahahaha they're your Top 10 "Golden Bouldin" truly 'greatest hits' fails vs apk and you can't deny your own words and screwups since you asked for each one here in this exchange which I read the entirety of it now and see you have to now EAT YOUR WORDS as was put to you by apk and its true. You are the biggest dimwit I've ever seen and you're committing fraud saying you're a professional security engineer after those debacles of yours in that link above. You're pitiful. What school did you go to for CS (which after the above mess you made for yourself must have been really shitty)? Did you really? I don't see it after that link above. Do you have a job in computer security? Prove it. You're a joke and the only fraud around here.

    3. Re:You don't own a home evidently, renter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arstechnica got their asses handed to them by apk http://slashdot.org/comments.p... after stalking him here, just like you did coming in here and messing with your betters in apk right here in your "Top 10 Bouldin GOLDEN 'greatest hits'" fails vs apk you asked for directly and ask and ye shall receive it looks like Moldin Bouldin since whatever school you went to didn't stand up to apk too well here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and there is no way a security engineer pro you claim to be is true. No good professional security engineer would mess up that much or fail when so many security pros of truly enterprise class from Symantec/Norton (securityfocus) and ESET/NOD32 prove him wrong as is the case with you being outright pwned by apk in that second link. Your further posting pictures of apk as a walrus here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... completely off topic like ac posters did (obviously you) before you, with you forgetting to submit ac that time shows apk is making you slowly crumble and that your facade lies of being a 'security engineering pro' is bullshit from you. You're reprehensible and shitty at it.

    4. Re:You don't own a home evidently, renter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bouldin if you're a security pro college grad as claimed how'd apk burn you http://slashdot.org/comments.p... there at least 10 times? If his AS in CS and BS in MIS mean nothing then either you are lying about your background which you never seem to offer actual proof of (I can say I am President Obama too you know) then wherever it is you work is a shit shop and you earned a devry so called degree. He cooked your goose pretty easily. You ended up tossing names and posting walrus pictures of him and you're the creampuff and he was an ncaa jock for a top school in his sport who just creamed you totally. That's really weak of you Bouldin. You can't even talk a good game and apk's done a lot more that I can see and you can't show a damn thing.

  110. Bouldin's "'Golden' top 10 'greatest hits'" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

    FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    SpyBot S&D does dimwit

    (you FAIL #1)!

    You LATER deny it's spybot's forums http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Anyone can use it + see they do & MANY use that program stupid!

    (you FAIL #2)!

    ---

    NOD32/ESET's says hosts = valuable security http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I also "overturned a SECURITY expert" on a "false positive" on my Hosts program RIGHT there & he gave in!

    (YOU FAIL #3)!

    (Had to - MalwareBytes' employees VETTED my code & even host + HIGHLY RECOMMEND it for me near top of -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    ---

    Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    (you FAIL #4)!

    YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY it & it's there in PLAIN Black & White with his NAME on it!

    "I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @08:43PM (#49747763)

    FROM-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    (you FAIL #5)!

    ---

    WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS - WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    (YOU FAIL #7)!

    Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide extolls? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too!

    (You FAIL #8)!

    Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No.

    (YOU FAIL #9)!

    ---

    Do you write a ware that noted security pros even seconded me on?? No.

    (You FAIL #10)!

    A ware that not only secures you but ALSO SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus which is not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, mine is, stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get into you, & IF in you, stopping their communications BACK to C&C servers too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO: "Bouldin's GOLDEN top 10 'greatest hits'" (fails vs. me)... apk

  111. Bouldin's "GOLDEN top 10 'greatest hits'", lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

    FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    SpyBot S&D does dimwit

    (you FAIL #1)!

    You LATER deny it's spybot's forums http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Anyone can use it + see they do & MANY use that program stupid!

    (you FAIL #2)!

    ---

    NOD32/ESET's says hosts = valuable security http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I also "overturned a SECURITY expert" on a "false positive" on my Hosts program RIGHT there & he gave in!

    (YOU FAIL #3)!

    (Had to - MalwareBytes' employees VETTED my code & even host + HIGHLY RECOMMEND it for me near top of -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    ---

    Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    (you FAIL #4)!

    YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY it & it's there in PLAIN Black & White with his NAME on it!

    "I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @08:43PM (#49747763)

    FROM-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    (you FAIL #5)!

    ---

    WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS - WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    (YOU FAIL #7)!

    Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide extolls? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too!

    (You FAIL #8)!

    Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No.

    (YOU FAIL #9)!

    ---

    Do you write a ware that noted security pros even seconded me on?? No.

    (You FAIL #10)!

    A ware that not only secures you but ALSO SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus which is not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, mine is, stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get into you, & IF in you, stopping their communications BACK to C&C servers too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO: "Bouldin's GOLDEN top 10 'greatest hits'" (fails vs. me)... apk

  112. Kowalrus in a Nutshell by bouldin · · Score: 1

    Illogical? Only if you don't understand logic. Since you never took logic classes, you probably don't.

    Here, I updated your timeline:

    Alex Kowalrus In a Nutshell (A Life of Failure)
    0. Birthday was January 31st (see below).
    1. 198x - Got a mediocre degree in IT from LeMoyne University. No computer science degree. LeMoyne actually disbanded their CS department from 1994 - 2008.
    2. Fired from Sunbelt in 2000. Never found full-time employment again, much less as a software engineer. Moved back in with mom in Syracuse.
    3. 2000 - Banned from Arstechnica. Rejoined under another name (lied) to argue for himself.
    4. 2003 - Tried to argue with Dr. Russinovich (of sysinternals.com) in comments below Russinovich's blog. Other forum posters schooled him. Nevertheless, he still claims he beat Russinovich in an argument that Russinovich did not realized happened.
    5. 2006 - Someone opened petition on petitiononline.com to have APK put to death. It got (at least) 29 signatures.
    6. 2007 - Banned from Antionline.com. Everyone there hated him. Copy/pasted his "security guide," which everyone agreed was not good.
    7. 2008 - Actually got paid $100 for his security guide as a newsletter prize, and thus claims, to this day, that he's a "security professional."
    8. 2008 - Admitted he doesn't understand UNIX: "I am more of a Win32 guy the past few years though, so I must ask [what iptables is]."
    9. 2008 - Made legal threats against Thor Schrock, but turned out to be bluffing. Embarrassed publicly by Schrock.
    10. 2010 - Mom gave him the house (worth $100,000, counting land). He currently lies about that, claiming to be independently wealthy.
    11. 2010 - Wrote a crappy file manager in Pascal that performs terribly. Nobody would pay for it.
    12. Managed to get malwarebytes to host his file manager because it's free. Lied and denied it's just a file manager, but Malwarebytes calls it what it is: a "Small program for managing the hosts file"
    13. 2011 - BarbaraHudson caught him in a lie - that he had plenty of +5 modded posts on slashdot. They were all at -1.
    14. 2011 - Attempted to re-add garbage to Wikipedia 20 times on the Windows hosts file. Had it removed each time. Complained in the editorial pages, but was shot down.
    15. 2012 - Embarrassed on slashdot for his text file manager's extremely poor performance (11 minutes to sort 1.8 million strings). Currently claims he "chose" Python because C++ does not perform as well. Pasted Python but failed to indent lines, showing he did not understand the basics of Python.

    1. Re:Kowalrus in a Nutshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was reading and must point out apk dominated russinovich n' arstechnica http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and he's done things you cannot seem to achieve in technical accomplishments and actual degrees and jobs with facts on them in many levels in security in computing that you can't seem to produce proof of either Bouldin. You're losing it and losing this very badly. You need to grow up since your illogical attacks on him aren't doing well against your numerous screwups here prove you're not a college grad in security nor a security pro you claim to be http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and usually I see you post all over this forum. Yet for 2 or 3 days now you have fixated on apk and I suspect because he's schooling you badly. You give people a lot of grief calling them names and being condescending. No denying that either. I read just a fraction of your post history showing it to me. You project your own weakness as you fail in attacking apk completely illogically and off the topic you started. You can't prove his points on hosts technically wrong either. Score APK 16 and Bouldin 0 as I saw in one of apk's posts, for sure. You continually failed against apk's actual points of fact quoting you no less. Grow up little boy.

  113. continued by bouldin · · Score: 1

    16. 2014 - Zontar schooled him, doxed him, caught him in several other lies.
    17. 2014-2015 - Bouldin repeatedly explained why OS hosts files are not suitable security against botnets, but Kowalrus didn't understand the technical aspects. Currently seems very confused about basic networking and how malware works. Doesn't understand basic Python, and believes the hosts file cannot be bypassed even after seeing Python code that does the bypassing. When provided proof that malware with millions of infections (Ramnit, Gameover Zeus) can bypass the hosts file (and other OS protection mechanisms), he called the malware "edge cases."
    18. Still has not done anything since his long-since-deleted security guide from 2007 or his text file manager from 2010. Declares victory over everyone on every forum he has ever visited. Currently has no friends.

    Other events on Jan 31st:
    * Guy Fawkes was executed.
    * Germany used poison gas at a large scale for the first time in history of warfare.
    * The Soviet Union exiled Leon Trotsky.
    * Harry Truman announced a program to develop the hydrogen bomb.
    * Viet Cong launched the Tet Offensive.

    1. Re:continued by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bouldin you forgot to submit ac to 'support yourself' again. Check line 2 stupid. Your other parts you have to, as apk said, catch them first. His paid for security guide shows how to stop any avenue to infestations and it works. You can't even show you contributed to this science of computing at all. Apk can and does. You have failed so many times now it's not even comical anymore. Attacking apk rather than his points here is further signal of your self-defeat against your betters in apk is what I see. So does anyone else. You're obviously too stupid to be a security pro let alone a college grad after this shellacking apk gave you here 10 times or more http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and after I read through all this it turns out you asked for the quotes from Symantec/Norton/Securityfocus and ESET-NOD32 so ask and ye shall receive as was said to you here by others so far. Apk received your ass on a golden platter and is cooking it like a goose burning you in the process. Your childish off topic reactions show that much is true from your illogical off topic ad hominem attacks on him which mean nothing against him pounding you into the ground with verifiable visible facts. You're attempting to attack the man rather than his points. That is not valid logical debate. It means You lose man. Grow up. Your alleged school and alleged job are looking more like total lies from you at this point. Believe me.

    2. Re:continued by bouldin · · Score: 1

      #owned

  114. Bouldin's "GOLDEN" top 10 'greatest hits' fails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

    FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    SpyBot S&D does dimwit

    (you FAIL #1)!

    You LATER deny it's spybot's forums http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Anyone can use it + see they do & MANY use that program stupid!

    (you FAIL #2)!

    ---

    NOD32/ESET's says hosts = valuable security http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I also "overturned a SECURITY expert" on a "false positive" on my Hosts program RIGHT there & he gave in!

    (YOU FAIL #3)!

    (Had to - MalwareBytes' employees VETTED my code & even host + HIGHLY RECOMMEND it for me near top of -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    ---

    Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    (you FAIL #4)!

    YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY it & it's there in PLAIN Black & White with his NAME on it!

    "I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @08:43PM (#49747763)

    FROM-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    (you FAIL #5)!

    ---

    WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS - WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    (YOU FAIL #7)!

    Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide extolls? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too!

    (You FAIL #8)!

    Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No.

    (YOU FAIL #9)!

    ---

    Do you write a ware that noted security pros even seconded me on?? No.

    (You FAIL #10)!

    A ware that not only secures you but ALSO SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus which is not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, mine is, stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get into you, & IF in you, stopping their communications BACK to C&C servers too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Can't take on facts above? Ok facts vs. your bs http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ... apk

  115. Bouldin 10x++ pwned by ME? Yes... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

    FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    SpyBot S&D does dimwit

    (you FAIL #1)!

    You LATER deny it's spybot's forums http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Anyone can use it + see they do & MANY use that program stupid!

    (you FAIL #2)!

    ---

    NOD32/ESET's says hosts = valuable security http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I also "overturned a SECURITY expert" on a "false positive" on my Hosts program RIGHT there & he gave in!

    (YOU FAIL #3)!

    (Had to - MalwareBytes' employees VETTED my code & even host + HIGHLY RECOMMEND it for me near top of -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    ---

    Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    (you FAIL #4)!

    YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY it & it's there in PLAIN Black & White with his NAME on it!

    "I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @08:43PM (#49747763)

    FROM-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    (you FAIL #5)!

    ---

    WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS - WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    (YOU FAIL #7)!

    Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide extolls? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too!

    (You FAIL #8)!

    Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No.

    (YOU FAIL #9)!

    ---

    Do you write a ware that noted security pros even seconded me on?? No.

    (You FAIL #10)!

    A ware that not only secures you but ALSO SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus which is not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, mine is, stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get into you, & IF in you, stopping their communications BACK to C&C servers too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> You asked for all of that above, & Score APK 16, Bouldin 0 vs. http://slashdot.org/comments.p...... apk

    1. Re:Bouldin 10x++ pwned by ME? Yes... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Let me guess. You have some goofy visual basic script to get around Slashdot's lameness filter. You must be proud.

    2. Re:Bouldin 10x++ pwned by ME? Yes... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

      FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

      SpyBot S&D does dimwit

      (you FAIL #1)!

      You LATER deny it's spybot's forums - Anyone can use it + see they do & MANY use that program stupid!

      (you FAIL #2)!

      ---

      NOD32/ESET's says hosts = good security http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I also "overturned a SECURITY expert" on a "false positive" on my Hosts program RIGHT there & he gave in!

      (YOU FAIL #3)!

      (Had to - MalwareBytes' employees VETTED my code & even host + HIGHLY RECOMMEND it for me @ top of -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

      ---

      Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

      (you FAIL #4)!

      YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY it & it's there in Black & White w/ his NAME on it!

      "I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @08:43PM (#49747763)

      FROM-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

      (you FAIL #5)!

      ---

      WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS - WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

      http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

      (YOU FAIL #7)!

      Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide extolls? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too!

      (You FAIL #8)!

      Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No.

      (YOU FAIL #9)!

      ---

      Do you write a ware that noted security pros even seconded me on?? No.

      (You FAIL #10)!

      A ware that not only secures you but ALSO SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus which is not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, mine is, stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get into you, & IF in you, stopping their communications BACK to C&C servers too!)

      APK

      P.S.=> No guess I pwned you 10x++ times, see above! You provided the ammo & asked for it even: Score APK 16, Bouldin 0 vs. http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ... apk

    3. Re:Bouldin 10x++ pwned by ME? Yes... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U claim 2B a college grad security pro? How come apk smoked you 10x http://slashdot.org/comments.p... then? I don't believe you're anything you claimed after that.

    4. Re:Bouldin 10x++ pwned by ME? Yes... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Alex Kowalrus In a Nutshell (A Life of Failure)
      0. Birthday was January 31st (see below).
      1. 198x - Got a mediocre degree in IT from LeMoyne, but not a computer science degree. LeMoyne U actually disbanded their CS dept from 1994 - 2008.
      2. Fired from Sunbelt in 2000. Never found full-time employment again, much less as a software engineer. Moved back in with mom in Syracuse.
      3. 2000 - Banned from Arstechnica.com, but rejoined under another alias (a lie) to argue for himself. Everyone in the forums hated him.
      4. 2003 - Attempted to argue with Dr. Russinovich (of sysinternals.com) in the comments below Russinovich's blog. Other commenters schooled him, but he still claims he beat Russinovich in an argument that Russinovich did not realized happened.
      5. 2006 - Someone opened a petition on petitiononline.com to have APK put to death. The petition got (at least) 29 signatures.
      6. 2007 - Banned from Antionline.com because everyone there hated him. Posted his "security guide," which everyone agreed was not good.
      7. 2008 - Actually got paid $100 for his security guide as a newsletter prize, and thus claims, to this day, that he's a "security professional."
      8. 2008 - Admitted he doesn't understand UNIX, saying, "I am more of a Win32 guy the past few years though, so I must ask [what iptables is]."
      9. 2008 - Made legal threats against Thor Schrock, but turned out to be bluffing. Embarrassed publicly by Schrock.
      10. 2010 - His mom gave him the house (worth $100,000). He currently lies about that and claims to be independently wealthy.
      11. 2010 - Wrote a buggy file manager in Pascal that performs terribly. Could not find anyone to pay for it.
      12. Managed to get malwarebytes to host his freeware file manager. Currrently lies, denying it's just a file manager, but the Malwarebytes site labels it a "Small program for managing the HOSTS file"
      13. 2011 - BarbaraHudson caught him in a lie - that he had plenty of +5 modded posts on slashdot. They were all at -1.
      14. 2011 - Attempted to re-add garbage about the Windows hosts file to Wikipedia 20 times, but it was removed each time. Tried complaining in the editorial pages, but was shot down.
      15. 2012 - Called out on slashdot for his text file manager's extremely poor performance (11 minutes to sort 1.8 million strings). Ironically claims he "chose" Pascal because it performs better than C++. Pasted Python but failed to indent lines, indicating he did not understand even the basics of Python.

    5. Re:Bouldin 10x++ pwned by ME? Yes... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      16. 2014 - Zontar schooled him, doxed him, and caught him in many other lies. People chimed in on Slashdot to call him out on his crazy lies and say they hated him.
      17. 2014-2015 - Bouldin repeatedly explained why OS hosts files do not provide security against botnets, but Kowalrus couldn't understand the technical aspects. Currently seems surprisingly confused about basic networking and how malware works. Cannot read basic Python, and believes the hosts file cannot be bypassed even after seeing Python code that does the bypassing. When given examples of malware with millions of infections (e.g. Ramnit, Gameover Zeus) that can bypass the hosts file (and other OS protection mechanisms), he dismissed the malware as "edge cases."
      18. Still has not done anything since his long-since-deleted security guide from 2007 or his text file manager from 2010. Declares victory over everyone on every forum he has ever visited. Currently has no friends.

      Other events on Jan 31st:
      * Guy Fawkes was hanged, drawn, and quartered.
      * Germany used poison gas at a large scale for the first time in history of warfare.
      * The Soviet Union exiled Leon Trotsky.
      * Harry Truman announced a program to develop the hydrogen bomb.
      * Viet Cong launched the Tet Offensive.

    6. Re:Bouldin 10x++ pwned by ME? Yes... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than faking you're a jew when you're not and grandma paying your way fool when you indebted yourself so far you'll never get out.

    7. Re:Bouldin 10x++ pwned by ME? Yes... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Peter Kowalrus wrote:

      Better than faking you're a jew when you're not and grandma paying your way fool when you indebted yourself so far you'll never get out.

      lolwut

  116. Correcting Bouldin's BS part #1 of 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. WRONG - BS MIS & AS CS (past its 60cr hr & into 90/120 BS CS)

    2. WRONG - JUST USED THE PLACE AS AN OUTLET, like Russinovich, but we BOTH LEFT after making money there for years, after hearing from a fellow dev who created an NT defragger he was being ripped off

    3. WRONG - BEAT THE HELL OUT OF THEM (Russinovich too), details here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... + JEREMY REIMER WAS SO CRUSHED HE REACTED LIKE A CHILD POSTING EDITED PHOTOS OF ME (just like you here after I tore you apart using hosts files + my layered security guide http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )

    4. WRONG - BEAT THE HELL OUT OF HIM @ WINDOWS IT PRO WITH DOCUMENTED FACTS FROM OF ALL PLACES MICROSOFT, REPEATEDLY EMAILED HIM & NO ANSWER. TECHNICAL DETAILS HERE-> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    5. WRONG - THAT WAS JAY LITTLE (arstechnica fool in #3 I dusted above) & I HAD THAT REMOVED DUE TO DEATH THREATS

    6. WRONG - MY GUIDE'S GREAT & GOT ME PAID FOR IT NO LESS, DETAILS HERE FROM YOU NEXT

    7. 2008 - Actually got paid $100 for his security guide

    CORRECT - BUT, I worked for years as a programmer-analyst, software-engineer, & network admin securing networks, OS, & DB engines + programs written to run on them all of 'enterprise-class'

    8. WRONG - I used UNIX & VMS + IBM OS like OS-400 before MOST here were born both academically & professionally (often programming cross-platform to them during my professional coding career)

    9. WRONG - I embarassed Thor SCHMUCK easily by pointing out a false positive he did on an old ware of mine (I recently did the same regarding my APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit vs. ArcaVir, EmSiSoft, NOD32/ESET, Comodo, McAfee, Qihoo360, & Sophos getting them to rescind it (or is in process thereof currently)

    APK

    P.S.=> You fail as usual Bouldin - part # 2 next post... apk

  117. Correcting Bouldin's BS part #2 of 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    11. WRONG - I WROTE APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit ( Score APK=16, Bouldin =0 via points listed you can't validly technically disprove here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )

    12. WRONG - MalwareBytes' TOP employee hosts + HIGHLY RECOMMENDS IT @ MalwareBytes' hpHosts over all others like it here http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    13. WRONG - Bouldin + Barb/Tom erroneously said "hosts are not a cure all like apk says" & I asked both to show WHERE I SAID THAT EVEN ONCE - they both could not, as I never have.

    15. WRONG - I can sort, deduplicate, & normalize 4++ million record entries in it, via a GUI program (with its associated overheads vs. character mode scripts the script kiddies here use & I had to correct their massive mistakes on here no less http://yro.slashdot.org/commen... , a few times now) another something Bouldin can NEVER ever manage as well!

    16. WRONG - Zontar got his ass handed to him on hosts here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... & Zontar's been mentally affected ever since creating TrollingForHosts Files sockpuppet accounts to *try* to harass me w/ proven here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... like the loony loser he is -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... from his own words (depression victim)

    17. WRONG - Bouldin (forgot to post AC there to harass me as usual as you all can see) was destroyed Score APK = 16, Bouldin = 0 (lol) vs. my technical points on hosts files he cannot validly disprove by using BOTH my guides on layered security's principles vs. 'edge cases' hosts might have trouble stopping (I never said they cure all as I showed above but that they do more than ANY single browser add on solution by far with less) + custom hosts files points I made he can't disprove here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    18. WRONG - Bouldin has never achieved *anything* of note in the art & science of computing & can't produce proof of his alleged college degree nor as an alleged 'security engineer'

    APK

  118. Not I & Bouldin's Golden Top 10 hits... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

    FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    SpyBot S&D does dimwit

    (you FAIL #1)!

    You LATER deny it's spybot's forums http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Anyone can use it + see they do & MANY use that program stupid!

    (you FAIL #2)!

    ---

    NOD32/ESET's says hosts = valuable security http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I also "overturned a SECURITY expert" on a "false positive" on my Hosts program RIGHT there & he gave in!

    (YOU FAIL #3)!

    (Had to - MalwareBytes' employees VETTED my code & even host + HIGHLY RECOMMEND it for me near top of -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    ---

    Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    (you FAIL #4)!

    YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY it & it's there in PLAIN Black & White with his NAME on it!

    "I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @08:43PM (#49747763)

    FROM-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    (you FAIL #5)!

    ---

    WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS - WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    (YOU FAIL #7)!

    Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide extolls? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too!

    (You FAIL #8)!

    Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No.

    (YOU FAIL #9)!

    ---

    Do you write a ware that noted security pros even seconded me on?? No.

    (You FAIL #10)!

    A ware that not only secures you but ALSO SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus which is not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, mine is, stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get into you, & IF in you, stopping their communications BACK to C&C servers too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO: "Bouldin's GOLDEN top 10 'greatest hits'" (fails vs. me)... apk

    1. Re:Not I & Bouldin's Golden Top 10 hits... apk by bouldin · · Score: 1

      "Better than faking you're a jew when you're not and grandma paying your way fool when you indebted yourself so far you'll never get out." - Anonymous Peter Kowalrus

  119. Again, NOT I, but here's your greatest hits! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Because nobody uses hosts files for security" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @05:53PM (#49746865)

    FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    SpyBot S&D does dimwit

    (you FAIL #1)!

    You LATER deny it's spybot's forums http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Anyone can use it + see they do & MANY use that program stupid!

    (you FAIL #2)!

    ---

    NOD32/ESET's says hosts = valuable security http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I also "overturned a SECURITY expert" on a "false positive" on my Hosts program RIGHT there & he gave in!

    (YOU FAIL #3)!

    (Had to - MalwareBytes' employees VETTED my code & even host + HIGHLY RECOMMEND it for me near top of -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    ---

    Mr. Oliver Day of Symantec/Norton/SecurityFocus does too http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    (you FAIL #4)!

    YOU ALSO TRIED TO DENY it & it's there in PLAIN Black & White with his NAME on it!

    "I don't see Oliver Day of SecurityFocus on there. Weren't you going to cite him?" - by bouldin (828821) on Thursday May 21, 2015 @08:43PM (#49747763)

    FROM-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    (you FAIL #5)!

    ---

    WHOSE INITIALS ARE ON THIS - WINNER IN 2008 (added proof of paid for good layered security article):

    http://forums.pcpitstop.com/in...

    (YOU FAIL #7)!

    Via the layered security/defense in depth methods my security guide extolls? I've COMPLETELY shut down your "desperation" RARE edge cases you tried too!

    (You FAIL #8)!

    Do YOU have *ANYTHING* like it to YOUR name/credit? No.

    (YOU FAIL #9)!

    ---

    Do you write a ware that noted security pros even seconded me on?? No.

    (You FAIL #10)!

    A ware that not only secures you but ALSO SPEEDS YOU UP (e.g. unlike antivirus which is not as effective anymore vs. online modern threats, mine is, stopping sources of infestation BEFORE they can get into you, & IF in you, stopping their communications BACK to C&C servers too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO: "Bouldin's GOLDEN top 10 'greatest hits'" (fails vs. me)... apk

  120. In hex, because I know you don't understand that by bouldin · · Score: 1

    Alex Kowalrus In a Nutshell (A Life of Failure)
    0x00. Birthday was January 31st (see below).
    0x01. 198x - Got a mediocre degree in IT from LeMoyne University. No computer science degree. LeMoyne actually disbanded their CS department from 1994 - 2008.
    0x02. Fired from Sunbelt in 2000. Never found full-time employment again, much less as a software engineer. Moved back in with mom in Syracuse.
    0x03. 2000 - Banned from Arstechnica. Rejoined under another name (lied) to argue for himself. Everyone there hated him.
    0x04. 2003 - Attempted to argue with Dr. Russinovich (of sysinternals.com) in the comments below Russinovich's blog. Other commenters schooled him, but he still claims he beat Russinovich in an argument that Russinovich did not realized happened.
    0x05. 2006 - Someone opened petition on petitiononline.com to have APK put to death. It got (at least) 29 signatures.
    0x06. 2007 - Banned from Antionline.com because everyone there hated him. Posted his "security guide," which everyone agreed was not good.
    0x07. 2008 - Actually got paid $100 for his security guide as a newsletter prize, and thus claims, to this day, that he's a "security professional."
    0x08. 2008 - Admitted he doesn't understand UNIX, saying, "I am more of a Win32 guy the past few years though, so I must ask [what iptables is]."
    0x09. 2008 - Made legal threats against Thor Schrock. Backed down, and was publicly embarrassed by Schrock.
    0x0A. 2010 - His mom gave him the house (worth $100,000). He currently lies about that and claims to be independently wealthy.
    0x0B. 2010 - Wrote a buggy file manager in Pascal that performs terribly. Could not find anyone to pay for it.
    0x0C. Managed to get malwarebytes to host his file manager because it's free. Lied and denied it's just a file manager, but Malwarebytes calls it what it is: a "Small program for managing the HOSTS file"
    0x0D. 2011 - BarbaraHudson caught him in a lie - that he had plenty of +5 modded posts on slashdot. They were all at -1.
    0x0E. 2011 - Attempted to re-add garbage to Wikipedia 20 times on the Windows hosts file. Had it removed each time. Complained in the editorial pages, but was shot down.

  121. Correcting Bouldin's BS part #1 of 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. WRONG - BS MIS & AS CS (past its 60cr hr & into 90/120 BS CS)

    2. WRONG - JUST USED THE PLACE AS AN OUTLET, like Russinovich, but we BOTH LEFT after making money there for years, after hearing from a fellow dev who created an NT defragger he was being ripped off

    3. WRONG - BEAT THE HELL OUT OF THEM (Russinovich too), details here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... + JEREMY REIMER WAS SO CRUSHED HE REACTED LIKE A CHILD POSTING EDITED PHOTOS OF ME (just like you here after I tore you apart using hosts files + my layered security guide http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )

    4. WRONG - BEAT THE HELL OUT OF HIM @ WINDOWS IT PRO WITH DOCUMENTED FACTS FROM OF ALL PLACES MICROSOFT, REPEATEDLY EMAILED HIM & NO ANSWER. TECHNICAL DETAILS HERE-> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    5. WRONG - THAT WAS JAY LITTLE (arstechnica fool in #3 I dusted above) & I HAD THAT REMOVED DUE TO DEATH THREATS

    6. WRONG - MY GUIDE'S GREAT & GOT ME PAID FOR IT NO LESS, DETAILS HERE FROM YOU NEXT

    7. 2008 - Actually got paid $100 for his security guide

    CORRECT - BUT, I worked for years as a programmer-analyst, software-engineer, & network admin securing networks, OS, & DB engines + programs written to run on them all of 'enterprise-class'

    8. WRONG - I used UNIX & VMS + IBM OS like OS-400 before MOST here were born both academically & professionally (often programming cross-platform to them during my professional coding career)

    9. WRONG - I embarassed Thor SCHMUCK easily by pointing out a false positive he did on an old ware of mine (I recently did the same regarding my APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit vs. ArcaVir, EmSiSoft, NOD32/ESET, Comodo, McAfee, Qihoo360, & Sophos getting them to rescind it (or is in process thereof currently)

    10. WRONG - I bought the place from my Dad (solid house, I know - I did the work on it for years)

    APK

    P.S.=> You fail as usual Bouldin... apk

  122. Correcting Bouldin's BS part #2 of 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Con't. from part #1 of 2)

    11. WRONG - I WROTE APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit ( Score APK=16, Bouldin =0 via points listed you can't validly technically disprove here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )

    12. WRONG - MalwareBytes' TOP employee hosts + HIGHLY RECOMMENDS IT @ MalwareBytes' hpHosts over all others like it here http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    13. WRONG - Bouldin + Barb/Tom erroneously said "hosts are not a cure all like apk says" & I asked both to show WHERE I SAID THAT EVEN ONCE - they both could not, as I never have.

    15. WRONG - I can sort/dedup/normalize 4++ million record entries in it in 30 minutes via a GUI program (with its associated overheads vs. character mode scripts the script kiddies here use & I had to correct their massive mistakes on here no less http://yro.slashdot.org/commen... a few times now) another something Bouldin can NEVER ever manage as well!

    16. WRONG - Zontar got his ass handed to him on hosts here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... & Zontar's been mentally affected ever since creating TrollingForHosts Files sockpuppets to harass me w/ proven here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... like the loon he is -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... from his own words!

    17. WRONG - Bouldin (forgot to post AC there to harass me as usual as you all can see) was destroyed Score APK = 16, Bouldin = 0 (lol) vs. my technical points on hosts files he cannot validly disprove by using BOTH my guides on layered security's principles vs. 'edge cases' hosts might have trouble stopping (I never said they cure all as I showed above but that they do more than ANY single browser add on solution by far with less) + custom hosts files points I made he can't disprove here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    18. WRONG - Bouldin has never achieved *anything* of note in the art & science of computing & can't produce proof of his alleged college degree nor as an alleged 'security engineer'

    APK

  123. Re:In hex, because I know you don't understand tha by bouldin · · Score: 1

    0x0F. 2012 - Called out on slashdot for his text file manager's extremely poor performance (11 minutes to sort 1.8 million strings). Ironically claims he "chose" Pascal because it performs better than C++. Pasted Python but failed to indent lines, indicating he did not understand even the basics of Python. 0x10. 2014 - Zontar schooled him, doxed him, caught him in several other lies. People chimed in on Slashdot to say they hated him. 0x11. 2014-2015 - Bouldin repeatedly explained why OS hosts files are not suitable security against botnets, but Kowalrus didn't understand the technical aspects. Currently seems very confused about basic networking and how malware works. Doesn't understand basic Python, and believes the hosts file cannot be bypassed even after seeing Python code that does the bypassing. When provided proof that malware with millions of infections (Ramnit, Gameover Zeus) can bypass the hosts file (and other OS protection mechanisms), he called the malware "edge cases." 0x12. Still has not accomplished anything since his long-since-deleted "security guide" from 2007 or his text file manager from 2010. Nevertheless, he declares victory over everyone, on every forum he has ever visited. Has no friends. Other events on Jan 31st: * Guy Fawkes was hanged, drawn, and quartered. * Germany used poison gas at a large scale for the first time in history of warfare. * The Soviet Union exiled Leon Trotsky. * Harry Truman announced a program to develop the hydrogen bomb. * Viet Cong launched the Tet Offensive.

  124. APK - a life of failure by bouldin · · Score: 1

    0x0F. 2012 - Called out on slashdot for his text file manager's extremely poor performance (11 minutes to sort 1.8 million strings). Ironically claims he "chose" Pascal because it performs better than C++. Pasted Python but failed to indent lines, indicating he did not understand even the basics of Python.
    0x10. 2014 - Zontar schooled him, doxed him, caught him in several other lies. People chimed in on Slashdot to say they hated him.
    0x11. 2014-2015 - Bouldin repeatedly explained why OS hosts files are not suitable security against botnets, but Kowalrus didn't understand the technical aspects. Currently seems very confused about basic networking and how malware works. Doesn't understand basic Python, and believes the hosts file cannot be bypassed even after seeing Python code that does the bypassing. When provided proof that malware with millions of infections (Ramnit, Gameover Zeus) can bypass the hosts file (and other OS protection mechanisms), he called the malware "edge cases."
    0x12. Still has not accomplished anything since his long-since-deleted "security guide" from 2007 or his text file manager from 2010. Nevertheless, he declares victory over everyone, on every forum he has ever visited. Has no friends.

    Other events on Jan 31st:
    * Guy Fawkes was hanged, drawn, and quartered.
    * Germany used poison gas at a large scale for the first time in history of warfare.
    * The Soviet Union exiled Leon Trotsky.
    * Harry Truman announced a program to develop the hydrogen bomb.
    * Viet Cong launched the Tet Offensive.

  125. Bouldin the bs artist: Step inside... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Write a better one (does 4++ million records in ~ 30min) yourself then in GUI form with COMPLETE built-in whitelist filter vs. false positives (like blocking antivirus/antispyware companies which protect you falsely, search engines, etc.) + the ability to remove the TONS of bloat from 10 different custom hosts files data producers... go for it!

    * You can't - you're a LOT of talk & 'butthurt' I showed all here you're no security engineer, OR college grad in that discipline/major... lol, FAR from it after your mess you made for yourself here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... & there's NO DISPUTING IT - they're your words quoted PROVING your fails!

    APK

    P.S.=> Of course, you *tried* before, now didn't you? Yes, you did -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen... (a few times now above that horrible primitive inferior ttymode/charmode that nobody would ever use MESS one you did, lol, FULL of errors in the data afterwards) & FAILED as per your usual... lmao! apk

    1. Re:Bouldin the bs artist: Step inside... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Write a better one (does 4++ million records in ~ 30min) yourself then in GUI form with COMPLETE built-in whitelist filter vs. false positives (like blocking antivirus/antispyware companies which protect you falsely, search engines, etc.) + the ability to remove the TONS of bloat from 10 different custom hosts files data producers... go for it!

      Are you kidding? I gotta break this apart

      4++ million records in ~ 30min

      I don't think I could find a sort method that slow if I tried to on purpose. Even using C# in LINQPad (hardly the fastest):


      var strings = new List<string>(4000000);

      for (int i = 0; i < 4000000; i++)
              strings.Add(System.IO.Path.GetRandomFileName());

      Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
      sw.Start();
      strings.Sort();
      sw.Stop();
      sw.ElapsedMilliseconds.Dump(); // 10000 ms

      On my system it takes about 10 seconds every single time. Generating the random strings takes almost as long. 30 minutes!? Ha Ha Ha!

      in GUI form

      Oh, wow, let me break out the Visual Basic. This could take all night.

      built-in whitelist filter vs. false positives

      Since HOSTS can't whitelist domains, I assume you mean removing some domains from the craptastic lists you download? Easy Mode.

      the ability to remove the TONS of bloat from 10 different custom hosts files data producers

      I can't decide what's funnier -- that you go on and on about "security" and yet blindly trust random third parties who serve up such crappy HOSTS files that you need to "remove bloat" -- OR that you think doing a unique sort on a list of strings is difficult.

      This thread has been a great read and it's always fun to see APK get poked and prodded. My favorite bit is his complete inability to understand dynamic domains, or wildcard DNS. I've lost count of the number of people that have tried to explain these concepts, all for naught.

      Posting as AC so I don't get stalked again by APK -- been there, done that and he's finally leaving me alone.