Stanford Researcher Finds Little To Love In Would-Be Hacker Marketplace
An anonymous reader writes: What if there were an Uber for hackers? Well, there is. It's called Hacker's List, and it made the front page of the New York Times this year. Anyone can post or bid on an 'ethical' hacking project. According to new Stanford research, however, the site is a wreck. 'Most requests are unsophisticated and unlawful, very few deals are actually struck, and most completed projects appear to be criminal.' And it gets worse. 'Many users on Hacker's List are trivially identifiable,' with an email address or Facebook account. The research dataset includes thousands of individuals soliciting federal crimes.
Shady stuff on the intertubes? I'm shocked I tell 'ya.
There's really only one question: is the owner aware that his site is being used for illegal stuff, or has be willfully made sure he isn't aware.
Because TFA sure as hell makes it sound like it's pretty blatantly being used for illegal stuff ... and then it's just a matter to which the owner is consciously facilitating this.
So, which is it ... clueless that your site is being used to break the law? Or intentionally not noticing that your site is being used to break the law?
That does not sound like a site which is in any way policing itself to be a legal operation.
Not even a little.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
Your dog loves you. But that cute girl down the street? She just wants to be friends.
Probably decide which home you should end up in.
is laughing at this
Her dog is in to you. But that cute girl down the street? She won't let you have sex with her dog.