Slashdot Mirror
Cute Or Creepy? Google's Plan For a Sci-Fi Teddy Bear
HughPickens.com writes: Time Magazine reports that Google has designed and patented an "anthropomorphic device" that could take the form of a "doll or toy" and interact both with people as well as tech gadgets echoing the "super toy" teddy bear featured in Stephen Spielberg's 2001 movie AI. This could be one of Google's creepiest patents yet — especially if movies like "Chuckie" still give you nightmares. The patent filing diagrams a stuffed teddy bear and a bunny rabbit outfitted with microphones, speakers, cameras and motors as well as a wireless connection to the internet. If it senses you're looking at it, the fuzzy toy will rotate its head and look back at you. Once it receives and recognizes a voice command prompt, you can then tell it to control media devices in your home (e.g. turn on your music or TV). According to the patent filing: "To express interest, an anthropomorphic device may open its eyes, lift its head, and/or focus its gaze on the user or object of its interest. To express curiosity, an anthropomorphic device may tilt its head, furrow its brow, and/or scratch its head with an arm. To express boredom, an anthropomorphic device may defocus its gaze, direct its gaze in a downward fashion, tap its foot, and/or close its eyes. To express surprise, an anthropomorphic device may make a sudden movement, sit or stand up straight, and/or dilate its pupils."
The patent adds that making the device look "cute" should encourage even the youngest members of a family to interact with it. But Mikhail Avady, from SmartUp, said he thought it belonged in "a horror film", and the campaign group Big Brother Watch has also expressed dismay. "When those devices are aimed specifically at children, then for many this will step over the creepy line," says Avady. "Children should be able to play in private and shouldn't have to fear this sort of passive invasion of their privacy."
The patent adds that making the device look "cute" should encourage even the youngest members of a family to interact with it. But Mikhail Avady, from SmartUp, said he thought it belonged in "a horror film", and the campaign group Big Brother Watch has also expressed dismay. "When those devices are aimed specifically at children, then for many this will step over the creepy line," says Avady. "Children should be able to play in private and shouldn't have to fear this sort of passive invasion of their privacy."
How do you patent an idea that's been done in movies dozens if not hundreds of times? Do they have a working prototype? It's not like they're the first to envision something like this.
The Gigolo Joe and corresponding female model might outsell the children's toys.
Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.
Ernest Hemingway
"To express murderous killing rage, an anthropomorphic device may grimace, lower its eyebrows, and chant 'blood...blood...'"
I'm not sure imitating emotional responses is what we want machines to do. After all, we rely on empathy in others to get along in society. If the outward signs of emotion are false (as they are in psychopaths), we may be unaware of potential danger.
Also, it just seems wrong to program in this behavior if the machine doesn't understand what it's doing.
"Tell me, Sheila, what is love?"
"Love is first widening my eyes a little bit, and quickening my breathing a little, and warming my skin, and touching with my..."
"And so on. Exactly so. Thank you, Sheila."
...who immediately thought of Harry Harrison's "I Always Do What Teddy Says"?
I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.
WHERE does the processing take place?
In the bear? Then it isn't much of a problem.
In a local server under the control of the parents? Then it isn't too much of a problem, though it opens up the possibility of either the server or the bear being hacked into.
In a remote server? Really bad idea. You have no control over who is listening in, or what they might be directing the bear to do/say/command... And it opens the possiblity of the the server, the bear, or the intervening network being hacked into.
You should be very afraid if that happens. It won't be some perve at Google remote controlling it, it will be black market doctors who hacked into it so they can size up your organs for resale. The stroking is just to pacify you while it runs it's scans. If it finishes the job, within a few days you can expect a hot lady with a flat tire along some route you are known to take (due to the teddy bear's data collection for Google ) and shortly after she asks you for help, a van Will drive by with masked thugs and grab you from behind. Next thing you know you will either wake up in a bathtub full of ice or be found in 20 years decomposed along side some remote location that recently became less remote due to urban sprawl.
When mine started telling me to kill my neighbor with the dog that pees on my amaryllis, I thought that was a little bit creepy.
In the end, it turned out Teddy was right, though.
You are welcome on my lawn.
"Anthropomorphic device" covers an awful lot of territory. Humanoid robots are anthropomorphic by definition. The term isn't limited to mechanical bears and such. Of course stuffed robot toys will respond to the user, express surprise and become generally more interactive. That's the natural evolution of Teddy Ruxpin, Furby, dolls that move their eyes, robots that fetch things etc. Toy and robot manufacturers should develop and improve on such products as they see fit. Google does not have a legitimate claim to this idea. There's nothing novel about it. Even if such a patent exists, it shouldn't hold up in court. If there's anything creepy going on here, it's that Google has so much clout. If they can get away with patenting this sort of thing, then they may as well just patent the idea of dolls or robots in general and be done with it.
Seriously starting to think Orwell was optimist...
Not only Orwell. Given what is going on these days, it seems that Murphy was an optimist, H.P. Lovecraft was an optimist, hell it's even looking like Nietzsche was an optimist.
Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
welcome our new teddy bear overlords.
At night, while your children are sleeping, it will whisper ads into their ears.
Ahh, rocket launcher. No wonder. Anyway their download link doesn't work, but you led me to the filename, so https://www.quaddicted.com/fil...
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"