Slashdot Mirror


Universe's Dark Ages May Not Be Invisible After All

StartsWithABang writes: The Universe had two periods where light was abundant, separated by the cosmic dark ages. The first came at the moment of the hot Big Bang, as the Universe was flooded with (among the matter, antimatter and everything else imaginable) a sea of high-energy photons, including a large amount of visible light. As the Universe expanded and cooled, eventually the cosmic microwave background was emitted, leaving behind the barely visible, cooling photons. It took between 50 and 100 million years for the first stars to turn on, so in between these two epochs of the Universe being flooded with light, we had the dark ages. Yet the dark ages may not be totally invisible, as the forbidden spin-flip-transition of hydrogen may illuminate this time period after all.

10 of 55 comments (clear)

  1. Starts with a Bang by vikingpower · · Score: 4, Insightful

    is not scientific news, nor does the link point to any academic results. "Ask Ethan" is simply a popular-scientific discussion of results already known. So no News for Nerds, and hardly any Stuff that Matters, IMHO.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:Starts with a Bang by itzly · · Score: 2

      hardly any Stuff that Matters

      But we get Matter that Stuffs.

  2. Gold Medal attempt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The forbidden Hydrogen spin-flip-transition was first banned at the Olympic Games of 13,299,999,996 BC due to a string of injuries. It will be interesting to see if they can pull it off, although the judges may not be impressed by such an illegal maneuver, which will almost certainly result in an automatic disqualification. Still, they are choosing to make a statement of validity of the maneuver, even at the expense of a possible gold medal. Riveting. Simply riveting.

  3. what? by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    Can someone explain "high-energy photons." The way I understand physics if you add energy to something it moves faster. Photons travel at one speed. The only other option is for them to appear to add mass to themselves when energy is applied. Photons don't have mass apparently. So what are the properties of a high energy photon and how is the energy not expressed as speed?

    1. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know that whole mass-equivalence equation Einstein is famous for? E=mc^2?

      That's a simplification.The expanded version is called the Energy-momentum relation:

      E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2

      p is momentum. When momentum is 0, you can simplify to:

      E = mc^2

      If you have a massless particle, such as a photon, m = 0. That make the whole equation simplify to:

      E = pc

      Thus, high energy photons have high momentum.

    2. Re:what? by Drumhellar · · Score: 4, Informative

      The energy is expressed as wavelength - higher energy photons have shorter wavelengths.

      And, if it helps, shorter wavelengths = higher frequency, if you choose to describe it that way (Since, the frequency in Hz of light, including radio, is the distance light travels in a second divided by the wavelength).

    3. Re:what? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Higher energy photons are distinct from lower energy photons in having a shorter wavelength. They both travel at (about) the same speed. Presumably in a true vacum they would travel at exactly the same speed.

      Thus blue light is more energetic than red light, and has a shorter wave length. You measure the energy of the photons by absorbing a certain number and measuring the change in velocity or temperature of the thing that absorbed them. (Usually this is done by some sort of photocell arrangement were the absorbtion translates into electron volts, and that's what you actually measure. I believe that this has been done down to the single photon level, but I'm not sure.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:what? by cfalcon · · Score: 3

      Blue light is higher energy than red light.

      X-Rays are higher energy than any visible light.

      Radio waves are lower energy than any visible light.

      Gamma rays are higher energy than X-Rays (and all other photons, because past a point, we call everything a gamma ray)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...

      If you had enough energy to make one 350nm photon (a wavelength that just might be visible, maybe, as it is UV), you could instead make two 700nm photons with the same energy (which also might just barely be visible, as it is at the edge of infrared). More reasonably, if you had enough energy to make 3 blue photons, you could instead make 4 red ones with that same amount of energy.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V...
      http://www.chemteam.info/Elect...

  4. Re:Is science this speculative actually science? by Drumhellar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No. We looked at the sun. Helium is something we can see, though, not with our eyes.

    You see, beyond the basic blackbody radiation (Which is purely due to matter radiating heat), each atom glows at specific wavelengths - this happens when an electron moves to a lower energy state (Think: smaller orbit), and emits a photon at the energy level that corresponds to the difference. Every atom has its own set of wavelengths that it emits - this is called the emission spectrum, and if you stretch out the spectrum of a point of light, you can see bright spots that correspond to this emission spectrum.

    Additionally, each atom has a set of wavelengths that it highly efficient at absorbing. These appear as darker spots when you spread out the spectrum of a star. These are called absorption spectrum, and they are unique to each element.
    Analyzing the emission and absorption spectrum of the Sun showed that it was largely made up of a gas that hadn't been discovered, because there were strong emission and absorption lines that corresponded to an element we hadn't yet discovered. This gas was named "Helium", after the Greek word "Helios", meaning the sun.

    A number of years later, knowing that there was strong evidence of its existence, chemists managed to isolate Helium in the lab, and ran tests on it to measure the properties of Helium's spectrum, and it matched to what we saw in the Sun.

    This is how we know the Sun is made of Helium.

  5. Re:Is science this speculative actually science? by Drumhellar · · Score: 2

    Whoops. Didn't mean to imply that it was, but I clearly did. Yeah. The sun is about 71% hydrogen, 27% helium, 1% oxygen, and a smattering of a few other elements.