Slashdot Mirror


Firefox's Optional Tracking Protection Reduces Load Time For News Sites By 44%

An anonymous reader writes: Former Mozilla software engineer Monica Chew and Computer Science researcher Georgios Kontaxis recently released a paper (PDF) that examines Firefox's optional Tracking Protection feature. The duo found that with Tracking Protection enabled, the Alexa top 200 news sites saw a 67.5 percent reduction in the number of HTTP cookies set. Furthermore, performance benefits included a 44 percent median reduction in page load time and 39 percent reduction in data usage.

5 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Lets all chant together by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Informative

    + NoScript + Ghostery + AdBlock + Block 3rd Party Cookies

    For Chrome: ScriptSafe + Chostery + HTTP SwitchBoard + Disconnect

    The internet is full of shit which needs to be ruthlessly blocked.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  2. For anyone else wondering what the hell this is by guises · · Score: 5, Informative

    I had to look this up. For anyone else wondering: this is one of those hidden FIrefox features which is only available to people who know about it ahead of time, through the about:config interface. If you're one of those people who isn't in the club, the boolean you search for is "privacy.trackingprotection.enabled".

    [Insert rant about FIrefox's god-awful UI and severely lacking menu system.]

  3. Re:How to block Google analytics by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes. I don't believe that you can block ALL Google stuff, but you can indeed block the GA servers. http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho... I'm to lazy to read all through it again, but I'm pretty sure that one blocks Google Analytics. If I'm wrong, you should be able to find one that does with a simple search.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  4. Re:A little late by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Uhhhhh - Pale Moon is not Firefox, and it hasn't been for some time. It is a fork, unlike some other Firefox copycats. I remember FasterFox, which simply took each new version of Firefox, and recompiled it with their own tweaks. That is not the case with Pale Moon. The code has been altered to suit a different vision, and they no longer even try to recompile new FF versions. Pale Moon is a complete break with Firefox.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  5. Re:Lets all chant together by firewrought · · Score: 3, Informative

    And under Firefox, don't forget to tweak your about:config:

    dom.storage.enabled = false # DOM storage is cookies reborn
    plugins.enumerable_names = "" # Useful for fingerprinting
    network.http.sendRefererHeader = 0
    network.http.sendSecureXSiteReferrer = false
    geo.enabled=false
    general.useragent.override = "???" # May not be worth it.

    If you don't need them, WebGL and WebRTC are just big security holes:

    webgl.disabled=true
    media.peerconnection.enabled=false

    Not privacy-related, but...

    network.prefetch-next = false # Don't load pages without asking (esp. at work)
    network.http.pipelining = true # Improve load performance.

    --
    -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction