Slashdot Mirror


D.C. Police Detonate Man's 'Suspicious' Pressure Cooker

An anonymous reader writes: Yesterday evening in Washington D.C., police officers on routine patrol spotted an unoccupied car parked near the National Mall. They deemed it "suspicious," and took a look inside, where they found a pressure cooker. They also claimed to smell gasoline. The officers called the bomb squad, and at 7:45pm they initiated a controlled detonation of the car's contents. Afterward, a search of the car found no evidence that it contained explosives or any other hazardous materials. The car's owner was located and arrested for driving on a revoked license.

10 of 461 comments (clear)

  1. Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "...an odor of gasoline was detected"

    In a fucking gasoline-powered car. Where do they find these geniuses?

  2. I did not know... by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You need a license to own a parked car? Was he seen "operating" the vehicle?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  3. Re:No pressure by intnsred · · Score: 5, Insightful

    True, and accurately summed up decades ago by Orson Welles when he said, "A policeman's job is only easy in a police state."

  4. Re:did they damage the car? by russotto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They broke the rear window and blew up the pressure cooker outside the car. Reimburse? No, they didn't reimburse him; instead they arrested him for operating a vehicle after license revocation, just to cover up for their incompetence. Obviously if a car belonging to someone has moved, it must be that person who moved it, right?

  5. Re:did they damage the car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Paranoia, it's what terrorists want. It looks like they have thoroughly and completely beaten the government of the USA.

  6. Re:Not pointless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not a crime to have your car parked somewhere if you have a suspended/revoked license

  7. Re:Not pointless... by mysidia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but it would seem that the guy was driving on a suspended or revoked license

    He was not caught by police driving on a suspended driver's license: his car was parked at the time, so there should be no probable cause to arrest.

    Someone else can still drive the vehicle for him.

    Also, the police should have to pay for replacement of his vehicle and replacement of his pressure cooker, before he can be arrested. As I see it, right now: so far: the police have committed the bigger crime, which is wanton destruction of property.

  8. Re:did they damage the car? by jvkjvk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh boy are you misguided.

    You can certainly unintentionally confess to a crime. Never talk to the police except through your lawyer.

  9. Re:Not pointless... by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But it's reality in this era.

    FUCK YOU and FUCK YOUR "THIS ERA" BULLSHIT!

    You know what the reality of "this era" is? The reality is that we as Americans are safer (from all types of crime, including "terrorism") than at any point in history, and that DHS or other "anti-terrorism" jackbooted thugs have had NOT ONE GODDAMN THING to do with it!

    The reality is that some terrorists got lucky ONCE, and shit-for-brains sheeple like you are letting the authoritarian powermongers in our government use that as an excuse to flush our civil rights down the toilet. Knock it off, dipshit!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  10. Re:did they damage the car? by ultranova · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't attribute to malice that which can be blamed on stupidity.

    The problem is, stupidity is sufficient. The police don't need to be actively malicious if their institutional culture - "the brainwashing they've been given" - constantly prompts them to perform unfair and destructive actions.

    Also, you're wrong. "Naturally enough, when they realized they fucked up they looked around for a way to cover their ass and saw the guy had a revoked license." Yes, it's perfectly natural to sacrifice a bystander to save your own skin. It's also not something you can blame on stupidity. It's deliberate, selfish cowardice.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.