Slashdot Mirror


Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Patent Troll

An anonymous reader writes: The Supreme Court ruled today (PDF) that Cisco Systems can't skip out of a patent suit against them from patent troll Commil USA. The case reached the Supreme Court because Cisco argued it had a "good faith belief" that the patent they were infringing was invalid. The justices voted 6-2 that such a belief didn't matter if they were indeed infringing. The Supreme Court's opinion is that a company must know of the patent it's infringing, and that their product infringes upon the patent — which, at least, is more than what Commil was pushing.

The case isn't completely over — a $63.7 million verdict in Commil's favor was overturned by an Appeals Court, and now the Supreme Court has sent it back down for re-evaluation after it clarified the rules of infringement. The Appeals Court could still overturn the judgment for some other reason. The good news is that the Supreme Court dedicated a page in their opinion to telling lower courts how to sanction patent trolls and keep them from clogging the courts with ridiculous claims. "[I]t is still necessary and proper to stress that district courts have the authority and responsibility to ensure frivolous cases are dissuaded."

1 of 87 comments (clear)

  1. View from a patent holder ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Disclaimer: There are several patents under my name and I am getting royalty payments

    Even as a patent holder I find what the SCOTUS did deeply troubling

    Patents supposed to be protecting the inventors, but the patent system is in place right now has been abused by trolls

    Instead of protecting the inventors in many cases - such the the one the SCOTUS just reviewed - the patents are used by the trolls to as some type of racketeering weapon

    By ruling with the trolls the SCOTUS is siding with the racketeers

    It seems the SCOTUS has finally decided to join all the other government agencies, in which, common sense is strictly forbidden