Slashdot Mirror


Stanford Researchers Make Photonic Components Faster, With Algorithmic Design

retroworks writes: Integrated photonic devices are poised to play a key role in a wide variety of applications, ranging from optical interconnects and sensors to quantum computing. However, only a small library of semi-analytically designed devices is currently known. In an article in Nature Photonics, researchers demonstrate the use of an inverse design method that explores the full design space of fabricable devices and allows them to design devices with previously unattainable functionality, higher performance and robustness, and smaller footprints than conventional devices. The designed a silicon wavelength demultiplexer splits 1,300nm and 1,550nm light from an input waveguide into two output waveguides, and the team has fabricated and characterized several devices. The devices display low insertion loss (2dB), low crosstalk (100nm). The device footprint is 2.8×2.8m2, making this the smallest dielectric wavelength splitter.

6 of 26 comments (clear)

  1. Editorial incompetence strikes again! by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 4, Informative

    The device footprint is 2.8x2.8m2

    The actual measurement, from TFA, is 2.8x2.8 square micrometers.

    Apparently timothy is too busy burying unflattering stories about his employer to bother reading what he's posting to the front page.

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    1. Re:Editorial incompetence strikes again! by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 2

      The device footprint is 2.8x2.8m2

      The actual measurement, from TFA, is 2.8x2.8 square micrometers.

      Yes, it is square MICRO-meters - (1 micro-meter = 1/1000000 of a meter; ~0.00004 of an inch, for our friends in USA who... but, don't get me started... just adopt the damn metric, you... you...!)

      Apparently timothy is too busy burying unflattering stories about his employer to bother reading what he's posting to the front page.

      Is it true "timothy"? Well, shame on you - not so much for failing to understand the metric system (or is it just because this site is not able yet to display unicode? The micrometer use the Greek "m" before the Latin "m"...), but because you bury a story with NEWS FOR NERDS, THINGS THAT MATTERS...

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    2. Re:Editorial incompetence strikes again! by Mr+Z · · Score: 2

      The Greek mu was probably there when it was copy/pasted. Slashdot silently eats characters outside the English alphabet though.

  2. Re:apr1 by olsmeister · · Score: 2

    Things like this are used a lot in telecommunications, they allow multiple wavelengths of light to travel over a single fiber, cutting down on the amount of glass needed and increasing the bandwidth.

  3. comment error by beanfeast · · Score: 3, Informative

    The summary seems to have been screwed up by some sort of comment glitch. It should read:

    "low crosstalk (<11dB) and wide bandwidths (>100nm)"

    --
    The preceding line was intentionally left blank.
  4. Nanophotonic WG by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 2

    The waveguide has a very small cross-section. Wonder how they coupled fiber to the ports. End-fire coupling directly to a fiber would be horrendously inefficient, since minimizing coupling loss requires both a good spatial overlap of the mode profiles and a good match of the effective refractive indices in the two waveguides.