Slashdot Mirror


Untethered Miniature Origami Robot That Self-Folds, Walks, Swims, and Degrades

jan_jes writes: MIT researchers demonstrated an untethered miniature origami robot that self-folds, walks, swims, and degrades at ICRA 2015 in Seattle. A miniature robotic device that can fold-up on the spot, accomplish tasks, and disappear by degradation into the environment promises a range of medical applications but has so far been a challenge in engineering. This work presents a sheet that can self-fold into a functional 3D robot,actuate immediately for untethered walking and swimming, and subsequently dissolve in liquid. Further, the robot is capable of conducting basic tasks and behaviors, including swimming, delivering/carrying blocks, climbing a slope, and digging. The developed models include an acetone-degradable version, which allows the entire robot's body to vanish in a liquid. Thus this experimentally demonstrate the complete life cycle of this robot: self-folding,actuation, and degrading.

27 comments

  1. "complete life cycle" by fche · · Score: 2

    The mechanics are lovely, but it's funny to define "complete life cycle" their way, as though death/destruction were an interesting or difficult achievement of life (or machine operation).

    1. Re:"complete life cycle" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the reproduction part of the life cycle? Nothing is going to be complete until Nanobots take over the world.

    2. Re: "complete life cycle" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're making a spy robot then destruction is an important part of the life cycle.

    3. Re: "complete life cycle" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad you chimed in, Mr Phelps.

    4. Re:"complete life cycle" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Single use devices should decompose automatically, if they all did our landfill problem would be a lot less severe.

      In Medical uses the death/destruction phase is indeed an interesting and difficult achievement, just as important as the actual task the robot will do.

      It brings to mind Asimov's short story _Too_Bad_ in which a miniaturized cancer fighting robot self destructs creatively to avoid risking damage to the patient through its extraction.

      Also _Tom_Swift_and _his_Giant_Robot_ in which a robot designed to service an atomic lab (written in the day when such things were "atomic" rather than "nuclear") becomes radioactive itself and can never leave the containment area around the atomic pile. That story conveniently never discussed the questions of service or disposal.

      In RL, in Fukushima, we recently discovered that robots and radiation don't always successfully mix, and because the dead robot can't self-dispose there is another ungainly robot shaped chunk of radioactive waste which will have to be cleaned up.

      The acetone dissolving version in TFA doesn't seem quite as useful to me, since the solvent itself is a hazard to dispose, and I would expect if the robot were contaminated because of the task it performed then biohazrd type incineration would be the method of choice.

  2. Not quite a robot by trout007 · · Score: 2

    This isn't a robot as there is no internal power source, controls, or actuators. It is a very clever mechanism that responds to outside temperature and magnetic fields.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    1. Re:Not quite a robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way back when I was a kid in the 1960s, we had this toy football table. You'd put the little 1-inch high pieces representing the players on top. Each piece had a magnet on the bottom. Then you'd hold another magnet in your hand, underneath the table, and you'd be able to move the pieces on the top of the table. You'd move the players around, pushing the football with them. This "robot" is pretty much just the same idea.

  3. slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only 2 posts in and Already slashdotted.

    1. Re:Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very unlikely since only those of us who are OCD or uninformed still actually glance at /.

      "slashdotted" is old slang...kind of like "groovy" or the "bee's knees".

  4. Slashdotted by kubajz · · Score: 1

    Site in the first link is down... slashdotted?

  5. Spoiler by Guy+From+V · · Score: 1

    Gaff's origami unicorn means Deckard's a skinjob or maybe not.

  6. swims and then degrades by rossdee · · Score: 1

    so how long does it last if you don't put it in or near water?

    1. Re:swims and then degrades by matfud · · Score: 1

      There are three versions according to the presented paper.

      "The developed origami robot. (a) (From left to right)
      water-degradable model whose outer layer dissolves in water;
      conductive model (aluminum coated polyester); acetone-degradable
      model whose entire body (except magnet) dissolves in acetone. "

  7. Link to a PDF on a Japanese host? For shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, there doesn't seem to be any other source but the host was killed in seconds. Time for a /. article cache? (similar to Fark's image hosting/re-caching)

    Somebody re-host this thing.

  8. Reproduction by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    All that is left is for the little critter to learn to reproduce itself. That might be easier than one might think if it only involves assembling components but if is defined as also creating all the components it is much more difficult. Human fetuses do not create their won components by comparison. After that we need to build in a "Darwin Effect". In other words the little robot should find better and better designs for itself which computers and net connections could provide. At some point we must define it as a life form and perhaps reach a point where whether it is sentient or not can be debated. The issues will be similar to what Mr.Data faces in the Star Trek series. My best guess is that less than 20 years will be needed to advance to this point if the social disruption caused by raid changes in technology does not kill us all.

    1. Re:Reproduction by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Human fetuses do not create their won components by comparison.

      Fetal Hunger Games?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re:Reproduction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagined them to be more like manifestation of Thought Vectors. Mind you, I did this imagining while reverse engineering my soul from Earth Wind and Fire into this Virtual Reality, I synthesized these robotic diagrams, into a series showing intersections of two angular vectors, culminating in the walking graphics that overlay the final credits in the movie, Ex-Machina (2015). Thus in a flash, I articulated the hidden variables of my long sought-after take on how Conformal Field Theory can describe artificial consciousness.

      If anyone out there thinks I can patch into their software, firstly, In order to arrange for me to send you a link, is it possible for us to Skype first? Before committing yourself into helping me get your source code installed with an IDE and hopefully vise versa, because our fields may collide, I want to ensure that there are no licensing problems or conflicts of interest. Technically, I can read most programming languages. With only a little practical Linux experience, but with 20 years of prerequisite study, I have all-in-all over 40 years of daily Commercial/Scientific experience in Assembler, FORTRAN and mainly in any form of Basic. I compiled more times than I’ve had food over the last 16 years developing my thought-processing studio in VB6. It’s called The Ingrid Thought Processor and reintroduced in 2004, it takes a month of learning and work, just to install my big background entertainment studio. In 2007 the build for my off-line cloudless network was 7.3.09. As of today, v.12.1.85 is available for download.

      I got the Source code aligned beforehand during today. It was then as I read through the file names in date order spanning 20 years of development that topic trees immediately formed in my mind showing the structure of a dramatic novel. It would be produced by Ingrid with a direct interface to the Dramatica Pro script writing software.

      Ingrid already visualizes thoughts into origami-like little paper robots.

  9. Pretty sure the neodymium magnet donesn't disolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, the 'robot' moves because it's got a neodymium magnet inside but somehow we're supposed to believe that it

    >disappear by degradation into the environment

    Pull the other one, it's got bells on it.

  10. Not Quite by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    From the summary

    The developed models include an acetone-degradable version, which allows the entire robot's body to vanish in a liquid.

    From the paper;

    acetone-degradable model whose entire body (except magnet) dissolves in acetone.

    1. Re:Not Quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just heat it up and it'll stop being a magnet. Problem solved!

      Oh, wait...

  11. why degradable? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    Re-use is better than recycling. Recycling is better than disposal or destruction.

    1. Re:why degradable? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Because these types of things may go where you can't easily get them back. Or rather, where it would be cost prohibitive to get them back at least. In the medical field, the ideal would be for the robot to simply dissolve harmlessly after a period of time. Sending a micro-robot into a body would be easy. Getting it back out seems like it would be harder.

      Anyhow, recycling is most beneficial when done on a mass scale (i.e. an entire population's consumption of raw materials).

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  12. video by feddas · · Score: 3, Informative
  13. Sounds like people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thus this experimentally demonstrate the complete life cycle of this robot: self-folding,actuation, and degrading.

    For people, the equivalent life cycle is self-realization, self-actualization and self-degradation.

  14. Hope they don't ever become sentient... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Roy: I want more life.
    Tyrell: You were made as well as we could make you.
    Roy: But not to last.
    Tyrell: The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long, and you have folded so very very crisply, Roy.

  15. How's it build the neodynium magnet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, this thing moves because it's got a nice big neodymium magnet inside it and some one else is twiddling the external EM field to make it dance.

  16. Walk, dig, carry and place blocks, self-destruct by kipling · · Score: 1

    = Lemmings

    --
    -- open source? sounds like the real book --