Slashdot Mirror


SourceForge and GIMP [Updated]

New submitter tresf writes: In response to a Google+ post from the Gimp project claiming that "[Sourceforge] is now distributing an ads-enabled installer of GIMP," Sourceforge had this response: "In cases where a project is no longer actively being maintained, SourceForge has in some cases established a mirror of releases that are hosted elsewhere. This was done for GIMP-Win.

Submitter's note: Gimp is actively being maintained and the definition of "mirror" is quite misleading here as a modified binary is no longer a verbatim copy. Download statistics for Gimp on Windows show SourceForge as offering over 1,000 downloads per day of the Gimp software.

In an official response to this incident, the official Gimp project team reminds users to use official download methods. Slashdotters may remember the last time news like this surfaced (2013) when the Gimp team decided to move downloads from SourceForge to their own FTP service. "Therefore, we remind you again that GIMP only provides builds for Windows via its official Downloads page." Note: SourceForge and Slashdot share a corporate parent.
Editor's note: I just got back from a busy weekend to see that a bunch of people are freaking out that we're "burying" this story, so here it is. Go hog wild. Sorry it took so long. (And for future reference, user submissions are easily found in the firehose, listed in the order they appear, newest first.)

Update: 06/01 22:37 GMT by T : The SourceForge blog has a welcome update; SourceForge, it says, has effective today "stopped presenting third party offers for unmaintained SourceForge projects. ... At this time, we present third party offers only with a few projects where it is explicitly approved by the project developer, or if the project is already bundling third party offers."

6 of 384 comments (clear)

  1. Took long enough for you to post this Slashdot by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Informative

    I remember seeing a submission on this early last week.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  2. Re:So? by pop+ebp · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is news because Sourceforge used to be trustworthy.
    It used to be a respected site where open-source developers could host their binaries without fear of someone tampering with it.

  3. Re:Not ignoring the story is a good start! by Soulskill · · Score: 5, Informative

    I acknowledge that this was a fuck up. As I said in my note on the story, I'm sorry it took so long for this post to go up.

  4. Re:Seems to Be a Pattern of Behavior by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Informative

    If anyone is bored and looking for a place to lure my 30s year old self. Redo slashdot, allow markdown, bbedit, html, LaTeX.. editing.

    If this is where your interests are, Soylent has forked an re-opened Slash, so people can contribute to it. There's been tremendous cleanup/ and some refactoring, to make Slash a more sane/maintainable project.

    They're very picky on submissions, though, so the variety and community aspects aren't what Slashdot is.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  5. My experiences with SourceForge by jdeisenberg · · Score: 5, Informative
    1) I recommended an open source screencast recorder for Windows to a co-worker. She downloaded it from SourceForge, it loaded adware on her system and made her system pretty much unusable. It cost her quite a bit to have her system restored (she wanted to have it done professionally to make sure it was done right). The next time I recommended some other open source software, her response was "No, I don't want to go to that time and expense again. I don't trust anything Open Source any more." Thanks, SourceForge!

    2) I call bullshit on SourceForge's assertion that their adware only comes with projects that aren't actively maintained. There have been a lot of complaints about FileZilla downloads (see, for example, https://forum.filezilla-projec...), and it is definitely a very active project.

  6. Re:Seems to Be a Pattern of Behavior by pop+ebp · · Score: 5, Informative

    For the record, the FileZilla developers actually opted-in to this, several years ago, in some kind of revenue-sharing program with Sourceforge.

    What is new is that SF now does it with "abandoned" projects without the owners' consent too.