Slashdot Mirror
The Bizarre Process Used For Approving Exemptions To the DMCA
harrymcc writes: The Digital Millennium Copyright Act imposes severe penalties on those who overcome copy-protection technologies. It allows for exemptions for a variety of purposes — but in a weird proviso, those exemptions must be re-approved by the Librarian of Congress every three years. Over at Fast Company, Glenn Fleishman takes a look at this broken system and why it's so bad for our rights as consumers. "The Librarian has opted to require one or more 'champions' or proponents of a carefully defined category, like "Audiovisual works – educational uses – colleges and universities," to file a brief. His office also opens the floor to rebuttals from opponents. Further, the Librarian sunsets every exemption every three years—something not required by the law, and which requires champions to arise again to launch a new defense. The office also doesn't propose its own examples of circumvention that should be permitted, even though the law permits it to do so."
If only the DMCA itself had one.
Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
The US library of Congress ensures that copyright holders have more rights than consumers. I think Benjamin Franklin would be horrified by this unfettered exercise in fascism.