Slashdot Mirror


Making an AR-15 In the Wired San Francisco Office

An anonymous reader writes: Wired's writer Andy Greenberg writes about his experience fabricating an AR-15 lower receiver with the Ghost Gunner CNC mill. (That's the same device that was demoed in a Slashdot video earlier this year.) Greenberg points out that CNC millng isn't new, but reports nonetheless: "Aside from a single brief hardware hiccup, it worked remarkably well. In fact, the Ghost Gunner worked so well that it may signal a new era in the gun control debate, one where the barrier to legally building an untraceable, durable, and deadly semiautomatic rifle has reached an unprecedented low point in cost and skill."

7 of 391 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Lower Receiver? by random+coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually from a regulator perspective it is. That is the serialized part that is considered a "firearm" every other part is just a gun part and not a firearm and thus not regulated under the 1968 Gun Control Act.

  2. Re:Fabricating an assualt rifle in California... by thule · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is not an "assault rifle" if it does not feature "A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon." So depending on the grip that is attached to that lower, it is fine. Also, no flash suppressors, folding or telescoping stock, thumbhole stock, or grenande launchers. It also must not be a .50 BMG. The other option is to "permanently" attach a magazine that holds ten or fewer rounds of ammunition to the lower. If the rifle sticks within these parameters, then it is not an assault rifle.

    There are plenty of guns in California that are based on the AR-15, AR-10, and AK-47 platforms that comply with the law.

  3. Re:Lower Receiver? by PPH · · Score: 4, Informative

    Legally, it is.

    Everything else is spare parts and can be bought/sold/traded without tracking or registration. The lower receiver is defined as the gun and is the part with the serial number.

    The day the Stasi come to collect your registered guns, the only part you have to account for is the lower receiver. Everything else not present can be explained away as sold at a gun show, traded with friends, etc. Or perhaps it's buried out in the woods. So if people can make their own LR and dig up the hidden bits, the confiscators are royally screwed without a major change in firearms regulations.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  4. Re:This whole make your own gun is like the homebr by trout007 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Home brewing was illegal from prohibition until Carter legalized it which is what started the U.S. micro brewing revolution.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  5. Re:This whole make your own gun is like the homebr by random+coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Its a felony to buy a gun with a restraining order; its right there on the form 4473. People who say its incredibly easy to buy a gun usually aren't talking about doing it legally. In California there is a 10day wait even if you're a woman trying to get a gun to protect yourself from the ex you had to get a restraining order against.

  6. Re:Fabricating an assualt rifle in California... by zerosomething · · Score: 4, Informative

    Its not an assault rifle. Those have been banned nationwide since 1986, and controlled/registered nationwide since 1934.

    You mean ownership of fully automatic weapons has been banned since 1986. Assault Rifle is essentially a made up term which can apply to what ever the government nitwits want it to apply to. It does not mean fully automatic weapon.

    DAM lack of edit. I mean ownership of fully automatic weapons BUILT after 1986 has been banned!. Nearly anyone can own a fully automatic weapon built before 1986.

    --
    It all starts at 0
  7. Re:Fabricating an assualt rifle in California... by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually:
    "Assault Weapon" is the term made-up by gun-control spin doctors.
    "Assault Rifle" is a US military term for a fighting rifle in intermediate caliber (not pistol, not long action) capable of full-auto and/or burst fire.

    AR-15 is (as you know) not an Assault Rifle.
    M4 is an Assault Rifle.
    They function differently, but to most folks, they appear exactly the same. This is how gun-control types inject fear, uncertainty and doubt into the debate.

    The GCA banned the manufacture of transferable "machine guns" made after May '86.
    The GCA, therefore reduces the supply-side of the equation for transferable full-autos. Transferable M-16s cost in excess of $10,000, plus the $200 excise tax to transfer them from one owner to the next.
    An individual may legally own a full-auto capable weapon provided that they pass the strict NFA (National Firearms Act) requirements and that the weapon was made before May of '86.

    IANAL etc

    --

    www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

    www.fairtax.org