Slashdot Mirror


Technology Won't Fix America's Neediest Schools -- It Makes Bad Education Worse

theodp writes: In an adapted excerpt from Geek Heresy: Rescuing Social Change from the Cult of Technology, Univ. of Michigan prof Kentaro Toyama begins: "'Technology is a game-changer in the field of education,'" Education Secretary Arne Duncan once said, and there was a time when I would have agreed. Over the last decade, I've built, used, and studied educational technology in countries around the world. As a computer scientist and former Microsoft employee, I wanted nothing more than to see innovation triumph in the classroom. But no matter how good the design, and despite rigorous tests of impact, I have never seen technology systematically overcome the socio-economic divides that exist in education. Children who are behind need high-quality adult guidance more than anything else. Many people believe that technology 'levels the playing field' of learning, but what I've discovered is that it does no such thing."

3 of 150 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Shouldn't this be obvious? by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's pretty racist and stereotypical. Sanjay helps with tech support. Ming helps with math.

  2. Re:Tools not crutches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    PowerPoint in Classroom (con'd)

    • o Bad use: random information dump
    • o Good use: engages students
    • o Presenters need training!
  3. Re:Shouldn't this be obvious? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    So what you're saying is, eventually we'll smash through the brick wall, so we just need to use more technology?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.