Slashdot Mirror


Cuba Forms a CS Professional Society -- It's No ACM

lpress writes: The formation of the Unión de Informáticos de Cuba (UIC) was announced at a Havana conference and a 7,500 person teleconference (no mean feat in Cuba). My first reaction was "cool — like a Cuban ACM," but there are significant differences between ACM and UIC. For example, one must apply to the Ministry of Communication to be accepted into the UIC and the application form asks about membership in political organizations like the Communist Party or Young Communists League along with technical qualifications. A CS degree is required (sorry Bill Gates). UIC members must be Cuban, while ACM has chapters in 57 nations. ACM has student chapters, but they are less needed in Cuba, which has over 600 youth computer clubs where kids take classes and play games and promising students are tracked and channeled into technical schools.

43 comments

  1. Academy of Country Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    In case anyone is wondering, the poster is talking about the Academy of Country Music. Wikipedia says:

    The Academy of Country Music (ACM) was founded in 1964 in Los Angeles, California as the Country & Western Music Academy. Among those involved in the founding was Eddie Miller and Tommy Wiggins, who joined Mickey Christensen and Chris Christensen. They wanted to promote country music in the western 13 states with the support of artist based on the West Coast. Artist such as Johnny Bond, Glen Campbell, Merle Haggard, Roger Mill, and many more influenced them. The ball finally started rolling in 1965 when a board of directors was formed to govern the Academy.

    1. Re:Academy of Country Music by khallow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thanks for clearing that up. I was trying to figure out what the Associated Colleges of the Midwest had to do with Cuba. The country music connection is an obvious one with Cuba's own folk music. When country bars are playing good, proletarian Cuban music on their digital jukeboxes, it'll be a glorious time to be alive.

    2. Re:Academy of Country Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, not sure if whomever modded this as "insightful" was trying to be funny or didn't bother to read the summary either.

    3. Re:Academy of Country Music by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      I'm facepalming a bit, seeing that these comments are being modded as "informative" and "insightful" instead of "funny". Maybe it's meta-humor, and you can give me a bit ole "whoosh".

      Submitters and editors, how hard is it to remember to always define the first instance of an acronym? No matter how widely known you think it is, there are guaranteed to be people who don't know what it is.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    4. Re:Academy of Country Music by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When country bars are playing good, proletarian Cuban music on their digital jukeboxes, it'll be a glorious time to be alive.

      You really don't realize that American country music has always been the music of the proletariat? Do you know anything at all about the "Father of Country Music"?

      https://youtu.be/Miy4io-rGo0

      Or maybe something a little more recent:

      https://youtu.be/VfiJEfBNRqg

      And yes, good old Kenny Chesney is singing "union made". Yes, country music has always been the music of the proletariat, even with the "New Country" flag-waving "I believe in Amurka" mass-produced crapola that was sold to the yokels after 9/11. It was Tennessee Ernie Ford that stated in no uncertain terms that he "owed his soul to the company store". Country music wasn't only the music of the proletariat, it was the music of the revolutionary, pro-union, anti-corporate proletariat. And if you could take off your elitist goggles for one second, you'd see that the people in those country bars have a lot more in common with the people in Cuba than they have differences.

      And as far as Cuban music over current country music, there's something wrong with you if you'd rather hear Carrie Underwood than this.

      https://youtu.be/bZ2mJehaNbE?t...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Academy of Country Music by khallow · · Score: 1

      You ignore, of course, that country has been coopted by the Nashville machine and is now a tool of the capitalist oppressors.

    6. Re:Academy of Country Music by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      You ignore, of course, that country has been coopted by the Nashville machine and is now a tool of the capitalist oppressors.

      No, I didn't ignore that. It's why I wrote this:

      "Yes, country music has always been the music of the proletariat, even with the "New Country" flag-waving "I believe in Amurka" mass-produced crapola that was sold to the yokels after 9/11."

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Academy of Country Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks - but what is the purpose of Cuba's Country Singer Professional Society?

    8. Re:Academy of Country Music by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Sorry but even after reading the f*ing article, ACM is still a non-obvious acronym for those who weren't aware of it. It's unclear why ordinary Cubans should give 2 shits about conformity.

      After a decade of reading Slashdot, I'd never heard of ACM.

    9. Re:Academy of Country Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This man gave his life fighting the likes of the ACM, you insensitive clod!

    10. Re:Academy of Country Music by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      Seriously? A site for geeks can't expect people to know the professional association for computer scientists? Would you also want IEEE expanded?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:Academy of Country Music by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Sorry im not from America. None of my colleagues have ever mentioned the organisation thus it carries no prestige or noteworthiness in my country.

    12. Re:Academy of Country Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you couldn't figure out it was related to computer science after you read the title, I think you have bigger issues.

    13. Re:Academy of Country Music by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      I'm also not in America. The BCS is our local equivalent, but the ACM has a large international membership and either runs, or co-runs with the IEEE, almost all of the top-tier computer science conferences around the world. It also publishes most of the top-tier journals in computer science. What country are you from where no one has ever heard for the ACM? I'd have guessed Australia from your username, but that can't be it as the ACM has a fairly significant presence there.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  2. Open Access by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are their journals open access? That seems like the communist way to do it, and it would be better than the ACM.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Open Access by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Are their journals open access? That seems like the communist way to do it

      Communism has never been about "open access" or serving the people. It has always been about preserving the privileges of the elite, and enhancing class distinctions. In communist China, your hereditary class is printed on you national ID card, and you can be denied access to housing, healthcare, public schools and even food, based on your class. 98% of the 30 million people that starved to death during the Great Leap Forward had the "wrong" mark on their ID cards. The 7 million Ukrainians murdered during the Holodomor were mostly killed because of their class. Open source software emerged from capitalist societies, not communist countries. The top-down nature of communist societies actually makes corporatism easier, and equates non-conformity with treason.

    2. Re:Open Access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Communism has never been about "open access" or serving the people. It has always been about preserving the privileges of the elite, and enhancing class distinctions.

      So, communism it's like capitalism then?

    3. Re:Open Access by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      ...The top-down nature of communist societies actually makes corporatism easier, and equates non-conformity with treason

      With the large and increasing income equality and the purchasing of Congress by corporate interests here in the United States, it would seem to follow in your logic that the United States is moving towards Communism.

    4. Re:Open Access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open source lies towards the anarchic end of the anarchy/authoritarism spectrum, placing it diametrically against both communism (left-authoritarian) and fascism (right-authoritarian).

      "True communism" is like a rarefaction shock - it's fun to theoretically discuss, as long as you remember it's not connected with any physically realizable behavior and you'd be a fool to waste your time trying to make one because it's never, ever going to happen.

    5. Re:Open Access by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      *All systems are open. Some systems are more open than others*

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    6. Re:Open Access by peppepz · · Score: 1

      It has always been about preserving the privileges of the elite, and enhancing class distinctions.

      I don’t know how it works in China, but in my country that’s the job of freemasonry.

    7. Re:Open Access by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I don’t know how it works in China, but in my country that’s the job of freemasonry.

      The Freemasons are not "elite". Anyone can join, even Homer Simpson.

    8. Re:Open Access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communism has never been about "open access" or serving the people. It has always been about preserving the privileges of the elite, and enhancing class distinctions.

      So, communism it's like capitalism then?

      Pretty much. It's just rebranded to deceive the poor and underprivileged into thinking the government actually gives a s*** about them.

    9. Re:Open Access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's always been about that. Your problem is that you are confusing governments that claim to be "Communist" with actual communism. There has never actually been a communist government. I'd love to see a real one some day.

    10. Re:Open Access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can a government be communist and not be totalitarian and repressive? It is not possible. For it to work there must be absolute control to force everyone to be equal. People are not equal. Everyone does not agree all the time. Communism is a horrible idea and you have to have a very shallow mind to think that it is good or possible. OR you want to be a totalitarian dictator. Then you can use communism to turn the poor against everyone else and put you in charge. "we will take money from the evil rich people and give it to you". Even then you cant do without capitalism. Capitalism is like air and water and must exist for humans to thrive. A government based on capitalism is going to have opposing views allowed and built into its core. It is also going to have winners and losers.

      Communists are like religious fundamentalists. What they really want to do is to impose their values on the population and eliminate people who disagree with them. It boggles my mind when I talk to people that are all about civil liberties but are also socialists/communists. It just shows how massively ignorant people can be. More government control ALWAYS means less civil liberties.

    11. Re:Open Access by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      So, communism it's like capitalism then?

      Unlike communism, capitalism wasn't constructed. The fundamental principle behind capitalism is free markets, and free markets mean prices are governed by the forces of supply and demand. Any time where supply and demand doesn't figure into that, then it's not a free market (such as monopolies, for example) and thus is not capitalism.

      Copyrights, by their nature, are not free market as far as that particular work is concerned. This, IMO, is why open source does so well: It eliminates the monopoly status given to proprietary software, so others are free to fork and compete.

    12. Re:Open Access by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Actually yes, there have been. The USSR did genuinely start as communist, so did Vietnam. The USSR even tried to get rid of its legal system (as stipulated by Marx.) Just everything broke down within a few short years.

      Another example of communism being implemented is the Icarians. They literally had a complete infrastructure, town, and all, handed to them at no cost. Yet they later fell apart anyways. Why? Because work eventually slowed down as the people lost motivation to work at all (they were literally working for free.) After that happened, new rules started being added (like no talking during work) to try to bring up productivity. But people just got sick of it and left.

    13. Re:Open Access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't only attributed 7 millions deaths to Communism / Stalinism.
      Don't forget the tens of millions of Russian citizens who died (were killed) under Stalin.

      A truly bleak period in history which, unfortunately, raises only the slightest awareness in Western media.
      If only there was a Ukrainian / Russian equivalent to Spielberg to make movies about those events.

    14. Re:Open Access by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Unlike communism, capitalism wasn't constructed.

      Bullshit.

      The fundamental principle behind capitalism is free markets, and free markets mean prices are governed by the forces of supply and demand.

      These are constructed things.

      At the end of the day, Capitalism comes from the observation "people own stuff", that is it. People owning stuff exists independent of "free markets", "supply and demand", and anything else. The rest of it is a belief system.

      Any time where supply and demand doesn't figure into that, then it's not a free market (such as monopolies, for example) and thus is not capitalism.

      Again, bullshit.

      You can't take definitions which came after the fact and pretend that they inherently describe a system as is did (or should) exist in nature. Because "Capitalism" is not a naturally occurring thing, nor are the special little footnotes which are supposed to make it perfect, infallible, and ideologically pure.

      Capitalism isn't an innate fact of the universe. It is an ideology, just like communism. It's not a natural law.

      That people have spent decades doign hand-wringing to try to define in the specific what "Capitalism is" doesn't mean it's any thing more than an ideology.

      And, exactly like Communism, there are huge holes in the ideology of Capitalism, and if you take either to its extreme it will completely fall apart.

      And, exactly like Communism, Capitalism is treated like a blind ideology as if it is some inherent aspect of the universe, and that disagreeing with the premises or conclusions is somehow heresy.

      Sorry, but in their extreme forms, both of these ideologies are unsupportable, unworkable, rely on assumptions which don't align with reality, and which have no more meaning as any other human idea which isn't founded in objective fact.

      It's how people think things should work, if their assumptions are 100% true, and their predictions are 100% accurate.

      And that's simply not possible, and demonstrates why they're both flawed views.

      You know what is a natural fact? "If I am big enough, I will eat you or take your stuff". In "civilization" we put a different spin on things, and pretend it's all noble and the like.

      The reality is, both Communism and Capitalism describe who should do the eating and under what circumstances.

      But stop pretending that either isn't a constructed thing, or that either is an innate fact of the universe. The fucking Ferengi rules of Acquisition have as much actual meaning and basis in "fact" as all the treatises on Capitalism or Communism.

      And like any religion/belief system, they're both woefully incomplete and oversimplify the world around them.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  3. TTL Gates by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the popular assumption that Cubans all have ancient old cars that they keep running with homebrew fixes.

    Should we all be sending them our old TTL gates, to help them in keeping their computers up and running?

  4. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first reaction was "cool — like a Cuban ACM,

    What would be cool about that?

  5. Overqualified by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 0, Troll

    For example, one must apply to the Ministry of Communication to be accepted into the UIC and the application form asks about membership in political organizations like the Communist Party or Young Communists League along with technical qualifications

    From the article: "... Stallman submitted his application without citing any formal association with the Communist Party, but instead described his pioneering work with the FSF and authorship of the GPL. Unexpectedly, however, his application was declined. When asked to comment on Stallman's rejection, a UIC official responded, 'What kind of organization does he think this is? We're Communists, not a bunch of (expletive deleted) radical ideologues!'"

  6. in other news... by Type44Q · · Score: 1
    Someone takes in Cuba attaches electric motors and batteries to a wheeled testbed...

    Highly-reasoned conlusion? It's no Tesla.

    1. Re: in other news... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Well, wasn't that nice, grammar-mangling little typo to thoroughly fuck-up my joke...

    2. Re: in other news... by Type44Q · · Score: 0

      Samsung can take the onscreen keyboard that they jammed up the ass of this shitty S5, and jam it up their own asses (and may Verizon get gagged with Andre the Giant's now-presumably-long-decomposed cock for locking the bootloader of this piece of shit)...

    3. Re: in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you could just click the "Preview" button and proofread your post before clicking "Submit".

    4. Re: in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although, you seem to be able to use it effectively when you're motivated by previous embarrassing failures and check your work!

  7. OK it may be no ACM, by jpellino · · Score: 4, Funny

    but I bet the coffee and sandwiches are better.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  8. Cuba is not the USA by manu0601 · · Score: 2

    Different country, different culture: Cuba is not the USA.

    To grasp an idea on how Cuba can be suspicious about foreign influence, you have to imagine being embargoed for decades, with hundreds of assassination plots against your political leaders, and dozens of successful military coups in neighbor countries.

  9. Tendentious summary by pjt33 · · Score: 5, Informative

    For example, one must apply to the Ministry of Communication to be accepted into the UIC

    Shock horror! You don't become a member just by putting MUIC on your business cards! I bet that you don't get admitted to the ACM without applying either.

    A CS degree is required (sorry Bill Gates).

    If the submitter (presumably the author of the blog from the second link) had actually read the two-week-old comments in the first linked page then they would see that this isn't true. A CS degree is sufficient, but not necessary: the statutes clearly say that membership is open to professionals in other areas "with experience in support activities for the IT sector". So basically that's about the same as e.g. the venerable British Computer Society.

    UIC members must be Cuban, while ACM has chapters in 57 nations

    I don't see any nationality requirements in the statutes. It just seems to be a standard national professional body. And it hasn't even formally come into existence yet, so how would it have tentacles spread across the globe?

    The only thing which seems to be both accurate and potentially upsetting to some people is the political side: that the application form asks about membership of political organisations, and one of its objectives relates to defending the Revolution. But that's completely unsurprising to anyone who knows anything at all about Cuban society, and it's a bit rich that someone from a country which propagandises primary school children by making them recite a Pledge of Allegiance every day (have you seen George Takei talk on the Daily Show about having to do this in an internment camp for Japanese Americans?) should complain about it.

    (If I've just fed a troll, then I apologise to the Internet at large).

  10. toasters by vongillern · · Score: 1

    not bad for a country that made it legal to own a toaster (or computer) a mere 7 years ago _