Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Tries To Guess Relatives With "Twins or Not"
mikejuk writes: Hot on the heels of their popular "How Old Do I Look" website, Microsoft has released a tool called "Twins or Not." Powered by Microsoft’s Project Oxford Face API, the site lets people upload a pair of photos to the web and get back a similarity score. In a blog post Mat Velloso, Senior Software Development Engineer at the Technical Evangelism Development group at Microsoft, talks about how he put the program together in just four hours.
It's probably related to Xbox. Some day, Kinect will scan you and say "Hey, AC, want to play age-appropriate game with your young sister who I see is sitting next to you?" or "Hey, AC, your parents say you can't watch this movie without an older relative present."
Because they're developing facial recognition algorithms, and launching fun websites is a way to get a variety of real-world inputs and increase their test data.
That's all she wrote ...
My prediction: People will do things like compare their own face to Obama or something. Then, post it on social media. Because: laughter.
(Also compare it to famous hollywood people's faces.)
It will be a good headline whenever the the inevitable celebrity love-child finds his or her father through this tool.
Sig: I stole this sig.
"Hey AC, I see you're underage, want to change the parental settings to let you play that mature game you love?"
If microsoft thinks some camera software will prevents kids from getting their "candy", they are wrong.
TWINS OR NOT? Score for Caitlyn Jenner & Jessica Lange = 93%, "almost identical".
Nah, probably match the selfie to the dick-pic.
well they say they dont keep the photos, and they're useless to train any algorithm because you dont input whether you are related or not.
hot old do I look website: http://how-old.net/
twins or not website: http://twinsornot.net/
i didn't try the second one, but I tried the how old and it was pretty neat. MS has some smart people at microsoft research, and the PHBs seem to be doing the right thing and giving these people latitude to do their own thing their own way.
Mat notes how Azure is handling the load after the first few hours:
http://www.matvelloso.com/2015...
Mat,
How is the load, now that you've been Slashdotted?
Is this still within a personal budget?
How about a report on how much this would cost the average Joe if he put it in the cloud and it went viral? Do you have a cost graph to go with the rest of the Azure Web App?
If you are going to chortle about the ease of Azure, perhaps you should be more specific about the pricing. I love the ease, but I fear the the cost.
Ropati
machinator omnis sine licentia
This could lead to an era where your age on your registered account is used for censorship, rather than a parent getting the ability to leave TV-MA banned after a kid turns 18... remember kids, set a password you don't know and lock your TV on "receives everything" before your parent gets to take it out of the box.
Microsoft Press Release converted into Slashdot story has been around here for over two decades....
Even Stranger:
http://imgbox.com/HyjLlrdA
Steve Jobs and Steve Ballmer are "Definitely related" according to this software.
I'm guessing that this has some massive (accidental?) selection bias going on.
They are definitely solving something with this, but I'm guessing it's not nearly as accurate in wider selections.
Hrmm....
-S
By reusing massive amounts of code and an infrastructure already built to do this sort of thing.
The Minecraftification of IT continues.
Turns out this was some guy at Microsoft playing around, only spending 4 hours developing, testing a releasing.
Probably a good investment of 4 hours considering the publicity they'll get.
So anyway, why is it that when I click the Xs on the boxes in the right column, they're back next time I come to the homepage? Since the polls aren't there anymore, there's really nothing I need to have in that column at all.
Yeah, I know, off topic, but where else can I ask?
Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
and they're useless to train any algorithm because you dont input whether you are related or not.
"His name was James Damore."
Because they're developing facial recognition algorithms, and launching fun websites is a way to get a variety of real-world inputs and increase their test data.
the sheeple are so fucking stupid they will say "ooh shiny!" and not realize what they are assisting and how intrusively it can be used against them for profit
I gots positive match for an image of a giant turd and the Microsoft logo . It also matched Bono from U2.
for NSA to link your gmail ID to your face worldwide. I sincerely hope "terrorists" play those games.
It may be a fun site but they are also show casing their new Oxford API which does tie in to their business model.
Haha, it's the kids who censor the computer for the parents.
Launching fun sites is one thing
Launching sites that do not conform to the core business is a waste of money, waste of time, waste of efforts
Dude, you just couldn't be more wrong!!
Microsoft has always been a vital sidekick for the BIG BROTHER and they will do everything to please the BIG BROTHER, including but not limited to incorporate NSA backdoors as un-announced feature of their software
Now that BIG BROTHER needs to have more heads up on human cloning, this new "twins or not" site from Microsoft, no matter how much fun it seems to be, will offer BIG BROTHER the chance to identify, tag and potentially track all cases of human cloning activities around the world
BIG BROTHER ftw!!
has long since passed. A belated farewell and a hi-de-ho.
Just give me the bong already!
Or shoot me!
Am I a horse or a dude, or maybe, just maybe, a chick. Na, no way I'm a chick.
I tried, and it only accepts faces. Don't ask.
If the code is not tested, it is not finished.
TWINS
Let software weight in on the whole mess...
Once when a friend of mine happened to get his hair cut at my regular place the barber thought it was me and called my friend by my name.
We had a good laugh about it. But then later that year when our 11th grade class photograph was published in the school magazine our class teacher had captioned both of us with my name.
Found a pic of the guy now (wow, a reason for Facebook), uploaded it to the Twins Or Not? site with a recent pic of myself, and it said:
Twin score: 27%, we can see some resemblance.
Was kinda hoping it would be higher, we've probably diverged somewhat over the past 20 years.
As with anything else where some company, whether a start-up or an archaic behemoth like Misrosoft, (makers of miserable software, hence the name,) wants you to upload photographs of your face...
IT'S. A. TRAP. They want a picture of your face, and the associated data that goes with that which are probably obliquely referenced in the Terms of Service, like how they are free to use the photo for "testing" or some other such bullshit purpose, which is really TESTING how large of a database of people's faces they can acquire so they can sell to their REAL customers enhanced ability to recognize your face to push advertising on you...
and that's a BEST CASE SCENARIO. It could be something far more nefarious and underhanded. After-all... it's Misrosoft. Ripping people off and making them miserable is what they're best at.
Don't give away your personal information to Misrosoft (or anyone) for NOTHING, people!
Common, guy. The NSA already HAS that. This is for Chinese companies and others to advertise to you and/or rip you off in other ways.
A simple test: is it from Microsoft?
Then it's intended to rip you off. Use ANYTHING ELSE.
I tried two identical couples and it doesn't work. These should give, at least, 105%.
http://imgur.com/J7dy6Ng
http://imgur.com/lxtZI7T
As a rule, incorporate those two in your test set. If you don't pass that, keep your image recognition algorithm to yourself.
The headline should read that a developer downloaded an SDK, tweaked a demo in the SDK, and uploaded it to the web. Then wrote an TFA about out.
Goodbye Slashdot. You've changed.
I wonder about the electric costs associated with such a similarity comparison. You calculate the costs associated with running the comparison itself, plus the electric costs associated with the training data, and the costs associated with each queries associated piece of everything else involved. The costs must be astronomical. I wonder if anyone has ever done such a study.
Would it be able to distinguish if someone uploaded two photos of twins but they weren't related... They are still technically twins in their own right but would Microsoft's service be able to detect that...?
Also a neat way to get pictures of faces for amm.... other things...
I'm sure people are reading the terms of use that gives Microsoft and their partners/advertisers the rights to use your image in any way they like.
It would be more interesting if it matched a database of photos to find doppelgangers... although there may be identity theft liabilities.
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
Yep, somebody has to be root at the firewall... I would love it if ISPs would configure a firewall at their side of the connection.... something along the lines of don't even send me anything nodes I don't ever want to see again. Would nip the DDOS problems out.