Slashdot Mirror


Combating Climate Risks With 3D Printing

Lasrick writes: While security risks that emanate from climate change will not always require military responses, the technological innovations that 3D printing makes possible can significantly improve the tools available for both militaries and civilian institutions when responding to, preparing for, and mitigating those risks. These benefits come in five main forms, and this article details what they are and how each may work: Rapid response and prototyping; Democratization of preparedness and response; De-globalizing hazards; Increasing accessibility; Enhancing energy efficiency. The authors clearly believe that 3D printing will be a key tool in mitigating effects from natural disasters: "If the United States, including the Department of Defense, truly believes that climate change presents 'immediate risks to national security,' then developing all the tools necessary to combat those risks should be a high priority. 3D printing, given its potential utility in helping us adapt to and mitigate climate risks, and doing so cost-effectively, is one tool that deserves close attention."

13 of 85 comments (clear)

  1. 3D printing fanboi much? by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 4, Funny

    3D printing! It slices, it dices, it cures erectile dysfunction (even yours!), it fucking prints money! It. will. save. the. world.

    Whoa Sparky...slow down. Breathe.

    3D printing may be useful, great, but kill the hyperbole. It is a technology, and all technologies have a niche. Be a 3D printing fanbois all you want, but you cannot jam 3D printing into places where it is not wanted or is not useful. The users will know the difference and 3D printing will settle into its niche naturally.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:3D printing fanboi much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can we get a network of 3D printed things?

      sorry, let me re-word that for the New Slashdot

      You Won't Believe this Network of 3D Printed Things!

      things you might also like:
      -Top 10 Linux Celebs
      -The problem between keyboard and chair might be closer than you think
      -Why E3 Matters This Year

    2. Re:3D printing fanboi much? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      A three-dimensional Beowulf cluster of these things!

  2. Buzzword bingo by goodmanj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Peak Oil may be a ways off, but we've definitely hit Peak Buzzword.

  3. Yes, 3D Printers are amazing! by BadPirate · · Score: 2

    On an unrelated note, is anyone interested in buying a barely used and a slightly dusty 3D printer?

    --
    - Holy crap, I've got MOD points! Who thought that was a good idea.
  4. Confusing Article by BlueStrat · · Score: 2, Funny

    TFA is unclear.

    Are the 3D-printing fanbois trying to ride on the Warmist's :"perceived-legitimacy" coattails, or is it the Wamists who are attempting to ride 3D-printing's "perceived-legitimacy" coattails?

    Seems to be a lose-lose either way.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    1. Re:Confusing Article by riverat1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      TFA is unclear.

      Are the 3D-printing fanbois trying to ride on the Warmist's :"perceived-legitimacy" coattails, or is it the Wamists who are attempting to ride 3D-printing's "perceived-legitimacy" coattails?

      Seems to be a lose-lose either way.

      Strat

      You know, the nice thing about being a "Warmist" is that we can just sit back and point out the things that are happening while people on the other side have to work hard to find the slightest little thing that might appear to support their position. I am very concerned about the future for human civilization but I have no concern at all that "Warmist" position will be found to have been wrong in the big picture.

    2. Re:Confusing Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have no concern at all that "Warmist" position will be found to have been wrong in the big picture.

      And if it that ever happens again then NOAA et al. will simply "correct" the numbers again, so yeah, that's a pretty good bet.

      Now all you have to do is make China stop filling the atmosphere with carbon.

    3. Re:Confusing Article by khallow · · Score: 2

      Do you think if we didn't collect those observations the problem wouldn't exist?

      Yes. AGW would still exist, but the current high level of hysteria? Probably not. I don't think AGW is the biggest climate problem today, but rather the hysteria about it which is spurring us to make poor short term choices. In a century or two, we may have a real AGW problem. In which case, I'll be quite happy to change my opinion.

      Carbon emissions are everybody's problem, China is only one part of that

      A part which is growing at about 50% of all increase in CO2 levels. They can single-handedly neuter any attempt at AGW mitigation.

  5. Re:3D printing by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not sure what they are fishing for. The authors are with the Center for Climate and Security (http://climateandsecurity.org/staff/), but don't have any obvious reasons to be 3D printing shills (which is possibly why the article reads like crap). The Center for Climate and Security has a lot of generals and admirals on its board of trustees. I'm wondering if this isn't some wild backdoor appropriations move. I'm actually interested to see if any of them are holding a lot of stock in 3D printing development firms. There is money at the bottom of this somewhere.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  6. Somebody writes grants by Rich0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Clearly somebody owns a 3D printing company and is looking to get grants from the EPA and DARPA, etc.

  7. Re:3D printing by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article also seems to think 3D printers can make anything out of thin air. You save transportation costs because you don't need to ship anything, and you avoid supply chain disruptions because you don't have to ship anything.

    From the article:

    The effects of natural disasters extend far beyond individual companies. In 2012, a severe drought temporarily halted the transport of goods down the Mississippi River, affecting the entire region. This is the type of problem likely to become more common in a changing climate. The ability to print goods where they are needed would clearly decrease vulnerability to droughts and other disruptive weather events.

    From the linked Bloomberg Article on the drought:

    which could be shut to cargo from companies including Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. next month.

    -Agricultural. We can print food now?

    “If you’re shipping raw materials to a steel mill in Chicago, you’re trying to figure out if you can go to Cincinnati or Louisville, Kentucky, unload it out of the barge and rail it up to the steel mill.”

    -Thank god 3D printers can print steel out of nothing

    Barges on the Mississippi handle about 60 percent of the nation’s grain exports entering the Gulf of Mexico through New Orleans, as well as 22 percent of its petroleum and 20 percent of its coal.

    Good thing we can print fossil fuels now too.

  8. Re:3D printing by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 2

    Very good point. 3D printing basically lets you remotely manufacture a part if the raw manufacturing materials are present on site . And it does jack shit to fuel your equipment.

    One of the most dangerous jobs in the U.S. military in the Iraq war was to be a driver in a convoy - the folks that had to haul fuel, water, and supplies through unfriendly country. I worry that some asshat in the Pentagon is going to read this article (written by asshats) and think that 3D printing magically makes supply lines invisible ("in the cloud, derp!"). The only result will be that the folks hauling fuel, water, supplies, and multicolored 3D printer filament spools will die in the next war.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!