Slashdot Mirror


Man With the "Golden Arm" Has Saved Lives of 2 Million Babies

schwit1 writes: James Harrison, known as "The Man with the Golden Arm," has donated blood plasma from his right arm nearly every week for the past 60 years. Soon after Harrison became a donor, doctors called him in. His blood, they said, could be the answer to a deadly problem. Harrison was discovered to have an unusual antibody in his blood and in the 1960s he worked with doctors to use the antibodies to develop an injection called Anti-D. It prevents women with rhesus-negative blood from developing RhD antibodies during pregnancy. "In Australia, up until about 1967, there were literally thousands of babies dying each year, doctors didn't know why, and it was awful," explains Jemma Falkenmire, of the Australian Red Cross Blood Service. "Women were having numerous miscarriages and babies were being born with brain damage." It was the result of rhesus disease — a condition where a pregnant woman's blood actually starts attacking her unborn baby's blood cells. In the worst cases it can result in brain damage, or death, for the babies. Australia was one of the first countries to discover a blood donor with this antibody, so it was quite revolutionary at the time. Last year we ran a story about another person with "golden blood" named Thomas.

97 comments

  1. Guest House by kheldan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do they label the containers of his donated blood 'GH 325'?

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  2. Hmmm ... by gstoddart · · Score: 2

    Can they not cultivate these antibodies?

    Because, you know, relying entirely on this one guy seems like bad idea.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re: Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A). Not entirely, no. They can isolate and concentrate it, maybe stimulate production, but full synthesis? I don't see that happening yet.

      B). There are other people with a similar mutation, so he isn't the only possible source. He is just an example of a very reliable one. If it were necessary, they could screen all of Australia and possibly find several, even among his relatives.

    2. Re:Hmmm ... by Sqweegee · · Score: 4, Informative

      They don't have to at all.

      I worked for one of the company that produced WinRho SDF and we collected donations locally and a location in the US. There's probably a few hundred potential donors in the average sized city. There's a half dozen different name brands for the stuff.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...

    3. Re:Hmmm ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Hmmm ... so does Australia have a different amount of people with this?

      Because this makes it sound like he's literally the sole source:

      Every batch of Anti-D that has ever been made in Australia has come from Jamesâ(TM) blood.

      I'm not sure if that means "if we didn't find it in him we'd not even have it", or if literally every batch of this is physically derived from him.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Hmmm ... by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      No, antibodies are usually harvested from people, mice, or goats. The trick is to be able to present an antigen that makes them make anitbodies you want, and then isolate and purify those antibodies.

    5. Re: Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm ... so does Australia have a different amount of people with this?

      Well, yes,of course, every country has a differing genetic composition, and while Australia likely is similar to the UK and Europe, the native populations would be different.

      Even the need for it varies, some countries go through stocks quickly, others might never touch the stuff except in rare instances.

      I'm not sure if that means "if we didn't find it in him we'd not even have it", or if literally every batch of this is physically derived from him.

      I believe the antibody was first identified in Europe, but maybe America, through somebody else. Then it was eventually used for treatment purposes.

      So if this guy never existed? I guess Australia would be looking for another person or importing it from elsewhere.

    6. Re:Hmmm ... by GreyWanderingRogue · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From the article, it sounds like he developed the anitgen from having received more than 3 liters of blood during surgery as a youth. If I'm understanding correctly, his body was given blood incompatible with his own and so it created the antigen to deal with it. Does that mean that the hundred people in a typical city acquired it the same way, and that the number of people developing it will decrease as fewer people are given incompatible blood and those who have in the past die off?

    7. Re:Hmmm ... by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      A little bit later in the article it states "Heâ(TM)s one of no more than 50 people in Australia known to have the antibodies, according the Australian Red Cross blood service."

      My guess is that he's not the only one that could be used, but only one person donating is needed to meet supply demands.

    8. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm one of those. Most anybody with Rh negative blood type could be one.

      The process is a bit squicky, at least in theory. I get matched up with an Rh + donor with roughly the same antigen profile as mine, I get injected with that donor's blood (it's quarantined for some period of time after donation, to make sure that the donor doesn't show signs of latent diseases like HIV), and my body starts making antibodies to the Rh factor in the donor blood. I donate plasma a couple times a week, the lab siphons off the antibodies I made, and turn it into a drug to give pregnant women. The whole cycle repeats about every 6 weeks or so. I get a decent little check every week for my time and some free cookies and apple juice, and the lab gets to make a product that they charge through the nose for. Win-win!

    9. Re:Hmmm ... by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      The question is, how many people donate blood at all? And would be willing to donate regularly? And *can*? I used to donate 3 to 5 times a year, and haven't for a few years because of medical deferral. If the full donor pool donated even once per year, we wouldn't have any shortages.

    10. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the best source is human blood donations. They probably simply like to stick with this one guy so they have a known, healthy, effective source. If he died or decided he didn't want to do it any more they probably could find another source without too much difficulty but would have to run a boatload of tests on them (AIDS, hepatitis, prion, drug etc) and make sure that the person had a lifestyle that wasn't overly risky (sleeping around, drug use, likes raw meat, etc).

    11. Re:Hmmm ... by xevioso · · Score: 4, Funny

      The most famous donor in Australia has left the Citadel and is out wandering around the Outback, so it may be tough to find him...although some of Immortan Joe's henchman might be after him...

    12. Re: Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      B). There are other people with a similar mutation, so he isn't the only possible source. He is just an example of a very reliable one. If it were necessary, they could screen all of Australia and possibly find several, even among his relatives.

      What makes you think he has a mutation? FTFA: "Doctors still aren’t exactly sure why Harrison has this rare blood type but they think it might be from the transfusions he received when he was 14, after his lung surgery. He’s one of no more than 50 people in Australia known to have the antibodies, according the Australian Red Cross blood service."

      The use of the phrase "blood type" in this instance is wrong, he has developed an antibody probably due to being transfused with Rh(0) D+ blood.

    13. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have someone like you to thank for the life of 2 of my 3 children. My wife is Rh- (she is actually O-,unversal donor) and I am Rh+, so probably 2 of my three children either would not be alive or would be seriously disabled.

    14. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I been doing aphresis donations myself for a few years now, and have donated almost 100 times, usually once a month, unless I am busy, in which case I may skip a couple of months.

      As far as I know, my blood is pretty regular old blood, lol.

    15. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard that he freed a number of Immortan Joe's henchmen from the need to receive transfusions ever again.

      He left them on the surface of the ground, but to quote Josey Wales, "Buzzards gotta eat, same as worms."

  3. So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by sconeu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I owe him for the lives of both my daughters. I'm O+, my late wife was O-, and both girls were O+. My wife got Rhogam and both girls were healthy.

    Mr. Harrison, thank you from the bottom of my heart.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes he was the original donor of the plasma.

    2. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by Firethorn · · Score: 2

      I would have had a younger sister if it wasn't for this. I was the first RH mismatch in my family...

      Sadly, it looks like the treatment didn't reach the USA until at least a decade later.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In 1969 when I was 7, my mother and baby sister both almost died, and as I recall my baby sister needed 6 complete blood transfusions. In my memory, it's like a Mad Men episode. My dad smoked in the car, drove to the hospital (in Indiana), then told me to wait in the car with my 3 year old brother so he could go in and find out if my mother and sister were dead or not. I've always wondered why this problem "went away"

    4. Re: So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It was first approved in the US in 1968, though prior to that tests were being done, as were alternative methods that had some efficacy.

      Don't know what happened in your family's situation, but perhaps something could have been done. Certainly you wouldn't have had to wait till the late seventies. Well, your parents.

    5. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Sir, this was a message from God* for humanity: a human publicly thanking some other human.

      As a PROUD frequent blood donor, i PROUDLY deliver this message: EVERY CAPABLE PERSON SHOULD DONATE BLOOD - some person may privately thank you in his prays... or even publicly in some /. comment that you most probaly you will never read, but it would be in your "record".

      * Mister "sconeu" (64226) is the messenger - that's how i see it, no need for anyone to get upset.

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    6. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will someone shoot this fucking clown?

    7. Re: So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Not everyone who is able to give blood can give blood. Gay people cannot give blood but some cracked out homeless can. Those are the rules.

      I am sure you understand that there is a good reason why homosexuals are considered not able to donate blood (in most cases): AIDS and other diseases, that epidemiologically make heroin addicts, or heterosexuals with frequent "one night stands", not able also.

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    8. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Will someone shoot this fucking clown?

      Would you donate some blood to help me while i will bleed?

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    9. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would if the red cross and other blood banks didn't resell my blood for 1500 US$/gallon without compensation to me.

    10. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I owe him for the lives of both my daughters. I'm O+, my late wife was O-, and both girls were O+. My wife got Rhogam and both girls were healthy.

      Mr. Harrison, thank you from the bottom of my heart.

      They told my wife and I that the Rhogam was to protect the second child from the antibodies Mom developed from the first pregnancy.

      Like you I'm O+ and she's O-. Our first was O-, so it didn't matter. Our second was O+ and they dosed her up with Rhogam in case we have a third little semen demon.

      So if we have a third I'll thank Mr. Harrison, a bottle of wine, and a busted condom.

    11. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      I am sure that there is not any *for profit* money exchange in this blood donation operation, plus, even if blood banks existed as for profit businesses you should think about *donating* blood.

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    12. Re: So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that all men who have had sex with men, ever in their life, is not the same as people who've had multiple sex partners (or any sex partners) in the last 6 months (or whatever the delay is for cheap and easy HIV testing)? And that it's the former category, not the latter, that's prohibited from donating blood?

    13. Re: So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Do you realize that Epidemiology (i.e., as the "medical statistics" science) concluded that homosexuals (like other groups, e,g., heroin addicts) are a risk? Blood *donation* is not a "gay rights" issue!

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    14. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I do give regularly and it is actually something that I need to do for my own benefit as well as for the benefit of others. I have O- blood but hemochromatosis runs very strongly in my family and while I do not have it have always had a high level of iron in my blood. To help prevent it I give blood as the treatment if I develop it is similar but they can't use the blood so it would otherwise go to waste. So here I am providing the universal donor blood that always has a high but not too high (almost too high) hemoglobin count and not only benefiting myself but also other people.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    15. Re: So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that just because I traveled to the British Isles does not mean I have mad-cow disease, right? Yet cannot donate, because of a smaller than small possibility of contact. Don't be such a loser with your gay SJW attitude.

      How about let's compromise and let everyone donate so they can feel good about themselves and then discard any blood products that came from a high risk group. Problem solved.

    16. Re: So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Don't know what happened in your family's situation, but perhaps something could have been done. Certainly you wouldn't have had to wait till the late seventies. Well, your parents.

      I was born in '76. Mom didn't get the shot when I was born*, my brother matched, then mom spontaneously aborted her third pregnancy due to mismatch. Maybe it was because we were poor and in the midwest, maybe they didn't test, I don't know.

      *The first RH mismatch normally makes it.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    17. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      That's great - you help yourself and you help others. By the way, many people (without your condition) believe that donating blood once in a while is good for the health (i think it is an un-scientific claim, but as a blood donor i don't mind believing it!).

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    18. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For regional blood banks, possibly so but probably not.

      For the American Red Cross, you bet your britches there is. They really need to be audited by the IRS and have their non-profit revoked.

    19. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by marka63 · · Score: 1

      You can charge for stuff and still be a not-for-profit. It all depends on where the proceeds of the sales go to or potentially got to. Paying reasonable salaries is ok. Paying dividends even potentially is not.

    20. Re: So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention having any sex in certain high-risk countries.

    21. Re: So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Type 1 diabetic. Wish I *could* give blood, I keep getting asked to contribute at science fiction conventions. The "nauthy nurses" at Arisia are.... pretty encouraging. Yay, redheads!!!!

                https://www.facebook.com/225761184084/photos/pb.225761184084.-2207520000.1433988568./10150096346729085/?type=1&theater

    22. Re: So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by markass530 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you don't realize what you said isn't true

    23. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      It is a simple way to give back and hopefully if I ever need blood it will be there for me. Having O- blood is great for donating but does limit the options if I happen to need it which is rather unfortunate. Also while I don't have hemochromatosis I don't want to develop it so getting drained periodically is just one thing I do and is less of a pain in the ass than giving up braunschweiger from the meat processor I go to as they really add in the onion and garlic and it was wonderful.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    24. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by stdarg · · Score: 1

      When salaries are as high as they are in medicine and in the administrative ranks of charities then I'm not sure it makes sense to talk about "non-profit" vs "for profit." Who cares whether they pay dividends to shareholders or whether they pay out their excess money as 6-7 figure salaries?

    25. Re: So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you don't realize what you said isn't true

      No i don't - will you help me?

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    26. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Ha! Yes, keep donating blood - if not for any other reason, this braunschweiger worth the trouble!

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    27. Re:So this is the dude behind Rhogam? by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      I understand what you say, and i may agree with you, but at least in Greece (and most of Europe), at least blood donation is done to public healh blood banks.

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
  4. Immortan Joe by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 2

    Don't let him know about this guy.

  5. man with golden arm saves babies by ZippyTheChicken · · Score: 4, Funny

    was so hoping it wasn't about breach births

    1. Re:man with golden arm saves babies by pla · · Score: 1

      I'll admit it - I had the same thought on reading the headline. :)

    2. Re: man with golden arm saves babies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assumed it had something to do with sperm donation. But I guess that would be "man with one abnormally muscular arm makes 2 million babies."

    3. Re:man with golden arm saves babies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I originally skimmed it and didn't parse the "saved lives" part, so I assumed it was a joke about a prolific sperm donor.
      I should read more carefully. :)

  6. That was the polite version by Spy+Handler · · Score: 0

    In actuality the blood plasma was drawn from his gluteus maximus and he was known as the man with the "Golden Ass".

    1. Re:That was the polite version by tdelaney · · Score: 1

      That would be "Golden Arse".

      If blood were taken that way, I think you'd probably get a very different type of person doing it. SLAP, SLAP, SLAP - nope, the vein still hasn't risen up, time to get the paddles ;)

      On a serious note, many thanks to James and the researchers who discovered this. Wasn't an issue for my family (Dad O-, mum O+, and my sister is O+ so OK for her too) but a literal lifesaver for many other families.

  7. I have Bronze blood by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    B- CMV- platelets are apparently good some some kids. Used to donate very often. Probably still should.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:I have Bronze blood by ScienceofSpock · · Score: 1

      I am O Neg (universal donor*) CMV Neg (good for premature babies) and I used to donate regularly, up until some time in the late 90s when the Red Cross stopped accepting donations from individuals who had lived in areas where mad cow disease had occurred, like Europe. I lived in Germany as a dependent for 4 years and as a service member for 3 years.

      From what I understand, the reason is because of Variant Creutzfeldt-Jacob Disease, which they think is a mutated form of Mad Cow disease that has jumped to humans. So because I was in an area where Mad Cow disease has occurred, I can no longer donate blood because it could carry vCJD. Don't they have tests for this?!?

      * Rh is also a factor.

    2. Re:I have Bronze blood by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      The do have tests for it but the tests are expensive and slow. You blood is taken and tested for a range of issues and then treated and put into larger storages. The disease in question survives the treatment process and you need hardly any of it to contract the disease. The net result is that a large amount of blood becomes contaminated.

      It comes down to the fact that while valuable your blood is not as valuable as what the test costs to run.

    3. Re: I have Bronze blood by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      Leukemia of some type. Never bothered to find out exactly.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    4. Re:I have Bronze blood by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      For whatever reason the target recipients did better with their actual blood type. B- being 2% of the population (and half of that being CMV+) put it in high demand in that small audience (which is why I give myself a bronze since my bloods high value has such a narrow focus). Or so they said. All I know is that I donated gallons of the stuff, along with a shit load of platelets, because they said very young children needed it for the above reasons. Sounded good enough for me.

      Like you I then I went to Iraq, donated a bunch there, and was told on my return no more blood drives for 5 years.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    5. Re:I have Bronze blood by ScienceofSpock · · Score: 1

      I heard 5 years as well, but that figure refers to the cumulative amount of time spent abroad, not how long until you can donate again. It may be different for Middle East than it is for Europe. As far as I can tell from the Red Cross website, because I spent more than 5 years in Germany, I can never donate blood again.

      I know this isn't even remotely equivalent, but it rather makes me feel like a felon who can no longer vote, even though I did nothing wrong and was serving my country.

    6. Re:I have Bronze blood by ScienceofSpock · · Score: 1

      So, they can't test my blood to see if I carry vCJD and then clear me to donate if it I don't carry it? I can't imagine that the cost of a test would outweigh potential lives saved.

      Also, if vCJD is such a concern, then why do they bar you from donating if you were there for 5 or more years, but if you were only there for 4 years, you're good to go?

      Not trying to start an argument, just trying to understand the logic here

    7. Re:I have Bronze blood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What matters is the timeframe. If you were there during the 80s (i think, maybe the 90s) when they had the mad cow epidemic in Great Britain then you are disqualified.

      I agree that doing the test once and clearing would be a good alternative for those with higher value blood, but from their viewpoint you might move or get disqualified or decide to stop donating for some other reason before they got the value of the test back out of your donations and then they are out. Also (and I am not sure about this) but vCJD may lie dormant and not show on the tests and one day activate and then screw their supply so the would have to test every batch.

    8. Re:I have Bronze blood by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Just had a look. the vCJD tests are actually a biopsy currently. There is a prototype blood screening option but it is only a prototype at this stage. There was a 2012 study on removed appendixes (32000) that showed a rate of about 1 in 2000 britons carrying the disease so it's not that rare.

      On top of that the prions can remain dormant for up to 50 years without a patient developing symptoms.

      As for value of your blood, there is some speculation that it is worth around about $12 per donation - http://freakonomics.com/2007/0... And according to http://health.costhelper.com/b... biopsy costs range from about $150 to $10k. So even assuming the lowest value you would need 12 donations to break even.

      In the end blood is a bulk product. The main challenges to having enough volume isn't available people to donate but getting them to a centre that can collect in a time frame that works for them. Not sure how the US does it by Australia has buses that travel around collecting blood and volunteers who make appointments.

  8. Right arm by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 0

    It says he's donated from his right arm for the past 60 years. Does it only work from his right arm? Do the antibodies stay in if they take blood from his left?

    1. Re:Right arm by GNious · · Score: 2

      Dude - blood-flow!
      Goes up in the left arm, down in the right one. If you try to draw on the left one, all you'll see is air being sucked into the veins!

    2. Re:Right arm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dude - blood-flow!
      Goes up in the left arm, down in the right one. If you try to draw on the left one, all you'll see is air being sucked into the veins!

      There's enough non-critical people on slashdot that they might not realize that you are joking,. At least I hope you are.... the blood flow isn't strictly clock or counter clockwise in a body, otherwise any amputation (even a toe) or constriction would kill you if there were only 1 "loop".

    3. Re:Right arm by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Ummm . . . . I think not. I've donated plenty of times out of either arm. Didn't make much difference that I could see; but then, my pressure was on the high end of the acceptable range, so maybe it didn't matter.

    4. Re:Right arm by tdelaney · · Score: 1

      My guess is he's left-handed. When they take blood they recommend taking it from your non-primary arm unless there's a specific reason not to.

    5. Re:Right arm by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Geez, I was just joking. I just thought it was weird for them to emphasize what arm they used in the summary. Why would they recommend taking it from your non-primary arm? I haven't donated blood but have had blood tests and have had IV fluids given to me and it didn't matter what arm was used.

  9. Brits in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Sadly for a lot of British folk in Canada, because of Mad Cow disease and the unknown incubation period, we're ineligible to give blood. Who knows how many Golden Arms are out there? I used to give blood regularly but that ended when I came to Canada. Not sure how many other countries have those kinds of restrictions.

    1. Re:Brits in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of Europe has the same issue because of Mad Cow, and anyone else living there during 75-83 is also restricted here in the states =/

      Disappointing since I have O- blood, and considered it my civic duty to donate regularly. I was seriously crushed when they told me.

  10. a person with "golden blood" named Thomas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well don't leave us hanging - what's James's blood's name?

    1. Re:a person with "golden blood" named Thomas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be careful or you'll start floating up to the ceiling...

  11. Donation frequency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised he's allowed to donate weekly. In my area (Gulf Coast Regional Blood Center), you can only donate plasma once every 28 days.

    1. Re:Donation frequency by Bengie · · Score: 1

      You can donate plasma 2x a week, but not blood. Plasma is mostly water and electrolytes.

  12. Kid with the Golden Arm by jomcty · · Score: 1

    Was he the Kid with the Golden Arm when he was younger?

  13. Re:Net savings by gurps_npc · · Score: 2
    No it does not.

    The basic problem is that the kids' blood is different from the mothers. As such, the mother's body attack's the kid's blood.

    The problem re-occures when the mother gives birth to a female child that has blood similar to her own. But in that case the daughter does NOT need the blood.

    So actually every kid the golden arm saves will never have to worry about this problem again.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  14. SURE they can. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Informative

    They can isolate and concentrate it, maybe stimulate production, but full synthesis? I don't see that happening yet.

    Huh?

    Human monoclonal antibodies have been grown by culturing gene-engineered mouse cells since at least 1988. They're already in use treating a number of diseases and more are in the approval pipeline.

    From Wikipedia:

    Building on the work of many others, in 1975, Georges KÃhler and César Milstein succeeded in making fusions of myeloma cell lines with B cells to produce hybridomas that made antibodies to known antigens and that were immortalized.[2] They shared the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1984 for the discovery.[2]

    In 1988, Greg Winter and his team pioneered the techniques to humanize monoclonal antibodies,[3] removing the reactions that many monoclonal antibodies caused in some patients.

    Monoclonal antibodies have been generated and approved to treat cancer, cardiovascular disease, inflammatory diseases, macular degeneration, transplant rejection, multiple sclerosis, and viral infection (see monoclonal antibody therapy).

    In August 2006 the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America reported that U.S. companies had 160 different monoclonal antibodies in clinical trials or awaiting approval by the Food and Drug Administration.

    This disease process looks like suitable candidate for this approach, as well.

    A few antibody PRODUCING cells, harvested from the same donor(s) as the antibodies, would be an ideal starting point: The antibodies have already been proven to cure the disease, so only a production mechanism is needed. Once a suitable cell line has been constructed, tested, and its product approved, the donor can retire, secure in the knowledge that his genetic material will continue to save mothers' and babies' lives, even long after his death.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  15. C'mon, this is 2015... by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    Your're telling me this antibody stuff can't be produced artificially?

  16. Duped by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    He donated, and they profited.

  17. That's... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    That's a legitimate super-power right there. And it's not very often that a fictional superhero saves 2 million anything. Just sayin'.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  18. It's "Rh-negative", not "Rhesus negative" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although it's (sort of) named after rhesus monkeys, the protein is "Rh factor", not "Rhesus factor". Those mothers aren't rhesus-negative, they're Rh-negative.

    Well, they are rhesus-negative, but that's because of their livestock inventory, not their blood type.

  19. Yes, donate blood if you can by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

    One small poke in the arm for you, some bleeding, and maybe someone gets to live.

    Sad to say, donating blood is probably the most good I do my fellow human beings, of all my activities.

    I was kind of pissed when I found out that my trip to Sinaloa, Mexico disqualified me from donating for a year. (Out of fear of malaria.)

    --PM

    1. Re:Yes, donate blood if you can by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Keep doing that good (donating blood), keep yourself modest (feeling that it's not good enough), and let karma (the real one, not Slashdot's!) do its thing!

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
  20. Robert A., Heinlein would approve by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    And probably put the man in a book.

    Niven, Pournelle? You've put a few friends in wonderful stories. If you collaborate again, this man deserves it.

  21. How can one do apheresis donation for 60 years?? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a platelet donator myself I have nothing but respect for Mr. James Harrison

    Unlike Mr. James Harrison I simply can't foresee I can do 600 bouts of aphresis donation

    During the 'peak years' I donated almost once every 2 weeks, as I was always 'on call' by the blood bank as my platelet count is high (more than 350, sometimes approaching 400)

    Many blood banks prefer to give the patients, - especially those severely weakened patients who had gone through regiments of chemotherapy to fight their blood/bone marrow cancers, - platelets from single donor rather than platelets collected from multiple donors

    Thus far I have done platelet donation for more than 200 times, but due to the accumulation of scar tissues many of the blood veins in both of my arms have either collapsed, or shrunk

    I still give blood, but whole blood, as my veins can no longer take the punishment from the aphresis process

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  22. What happens when he dies? by generic_screenname · · Score: 1

    The article says he is irreplacable, and that about 17% of Australian women are at risk for the condition his blood helps to correct. Is there a backup plan for how to handle that many at-risk pregnancies when Mr. Harrison can no longer donate?

  23. Re:How can one do apheresis donation for 60 years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Unlike Mr. James Harrison I simply can't foresee I can do 600 bouts of aphresis donation

    Depends on how much he is getting paid. Given the rare antibody, he is probably banking big dollars.

  24. Re:How can one do apheresis donation for 60 years? by rpstrong · · Score: 2

    What part of 'donation' do you not understand?

  25. Re:How can one do apheresis donation for 60 years? by RyoShin · · Score: 1

    This might be a stupid question, but is the scar tissue the result of so many donations, or injuries unrelated to the donations?

  26. Re: How can one do apheresis donation for 60 years by billdale · · Score: 1

    I am a longtime regular (biweekly) platelet donor as well-- over 32 gallons of platelets to Children's Hospital Los Angeles, dozens of gallons before that to Red Cross-- but unlike you, my platelet count has never been over about 230, and more typically about 180 or so. I'm 67 now... have been using the same needle site for many years... I hope I never have the problem you have had, since I take great satisfaction in my donations, and would be quite happy to continue for another few hundred years. In actual fact, I am confident researchers will eventually make our donations no longer necessary due to some form of synthetic or other substitute, such as genetically engineered platelets (and, plasma, red cells, white cells, etc.) provided by bacteria, plants or other life forms created especially for the purpose. (I see others on Slashdot can create paragraphs, but when I write anything with paragraphs it appears as a single block of text-- WHY???)

  27. Re: How can one do apheresis donation for 60 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Australia donors don't get paid. They give you a cup of tea and a snack. My hat is off to this bloke. I get sick when I give blood but I try to do it anyway. Many life events stop you being able to donate and my boring life has ensured I can do so. I just get anaemic like crazy afterwards. I've only donated about ten times in twenty years. Shame.

  28. Re: How can one do apheresis donation for 60 years by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

    I see others on Slashdot can create paragraphs, but when I write anything with paragraphs it appears as a single block of text-- WHY???

    Because Slashdot is fucked. You need to markup your text with html tags such as this

  29. Re:How can one do apheresis donation for 60 years? by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

    When I was in hospital they put a tube in my arm with a plug in it. This way I could be hooked up for numerous IV/injection in the same hole. I would imagine this guy might have something similar.