Slashdot Mirror


3D Printed Steel Pedestrian Bridge Will Soon Span an Amsterdam Canal

ErnieKey writes: Amsterdam is famed as the "Venice of the North," with close to 1,300 bridges in use. The next bridge to be built over one of the city's canals will be easily its highest-tech, as it will be constructed via 3D printing technology from MX3D. The steel pedestrian bridge, brought about by a collaboration between MX3D, Heijmans, Joris Laarman Lab, and several sponsors and supporters, will be built using 6-axis industrial robots that will begin construction on either bank and build in toward one another.

18 of 107 comments (clear)

  1. Venice of the north? by mcvos · · Score: 2

    I thought Venice was the Amsterdam of the south. And the small Dutch town of Giethoorn was the Venice of the north.

  2. Terrible example of the use of 3D printing by SlovakWakko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They are actually welding the structure one drop of molten metal at a time. The energy expended must be staggering compared to classical construction technologies, and I'm pretty sure the resulting metal is seriously inferior to standard steel...

    1. Re:Terrible example of the use of 3D printing by ecotax · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You raise an interesting point. The article linked to in an earlier post quotes the robot manufacturer like this:

      MX3D says it can 3D print strong, complex structures of durable material, and that the new technique is more cost-effective and scalable than current 3D printing methods.

      Sounds that comes straight from the marketing department, which suggests that something built using their technology is, at the moment, a more brittle, less durable, and not as cost-effective and scalable as something built using the traditional way. On the other hand, they do claim this new technology is making progress on these fronts.

      --
      "Money is a sign of poverty." - Iain Banks
    2. Re:Terrible example of the use of 3D printing by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      They're demoing the technology on a well understood problem with relatively low requirements.

      3D printing is unlikely to replace bridge building any time soon: humanity has a few thousand years experience in building really good bridges, and the existing technology is very very well optimized.

      It will however be able to create structures that can't easily be fabricated by other means.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:Terrible example of the use of 3D printing by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, the controlled atmosphere is particularly important for the powdered metal printing, like SLS and SLM. High surface area metals are flammable as all hell. You can set fire to wire wool with a lighter to see how well iron can burn, and powders are worse as they can floof up into a nice mist cansing really bad things to happen.

      Looking at the page, the robot tool end looks rather like a MiG head. This wouldn't be too surprising, 3D printing with MiG has been discussed and tried before and it's the easiest of the welding techniques. Very much point and click, which is great for automating.

      http://mx3d.com/wp-content/upl...

      That's from their website. There is a head with a fine wire coming out of it. The concentric thing around that is almost certainly the gas blower. This blows out some inert shield gas, such as a CO2/Ar mix for steel or pure Ar for alu, which provides the inert atmosphere. The atmosphere is just to stop oxidation and scale which prevents good welding: the surface area isn't really enough for fire.

      The problem is that mig welding isn't usually done outside since even a small breeze will happily blow away the inert shield, ruining the weld. I guess they could use a metric fuckton of gas to avoid that problem for light breezes.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re:Terrible example of the use of 3D printing by Dereck1701 · · Score: 2

      "I'm pretty sure the resulting metal is seriously inferior to standard steel..."

      I don't know if it applies to this specific technique or perhaps even to the materials they are using but I've heard it said that at least in standard welding that the weld is actually stronger than the surrounding metal.

  3. Did they have an engineer check the statics? by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    Did they have an actual engineer check the statics, weight durability, corosion and weather/temperature resistance/durability?
    Or did they just have that artist draw different cute pictures of Rivendell-Style bridges and pick the prettiest/easyest to print?

    I'd rather ask before I break my neck and drown crossing one of these. Just saying.

    Aside of that: Neat project. This is where things are headed. I like the outlook of this.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Did they have an engineer check the statics? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, they're going to build it and call it a bridge. /sarcasm

  4. Re:Not a Canal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Linguistically speaking, the whole eskimo-snow thing has been mostly debunked.

    However, for those interested, I cam across this (Dutch) page (google translate). Apparently, there is a branch of science called hydronomy that deals with the etymology of names for bodies of water...

    Canal, channel, and dutch kanaal is from the latin canalis, while "gracht" is from the germanic graven (to dig, in English in grave and groove). Dictionaries are unclear on a real distinction between kanaal and gracht, but in my intuition in general a gracht is in an urban setting (including moats around cities and castles) and has a dual purpose of defense and transportation, while a kanaal is longer and aimed at transportation.

    Of course, both kanalen and grachten are also extremely important for drainage, where they are joined by the "wetering" (water-ing), which is a dug canal with drainage as its original purpose. In general, it would be dug parallel to a river to help drain the land next to the rivier, and would drain to a lower point, often a "spui" (spew) which would drain into sea at low tide using a sluice. A well know example is the boerenwetering (farmers watering) in Amsterdam, which used to run from around Ouderkerk to the Spui square in central Amsterdam. The water near the Rijksmuseum (Hobbemakade / Ruysdaalkade) still bears the name, and if you look at the map you see how along a straight line from the Spui to Ouderkerk there are still a lot of remains of the old Wetering.

    TMI, I know :)

  5. Re:Q&A by BlueStrat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Weird to hear about this on SlashDot first

    Amsterdam officials had intended to keep this tech under wraps until this test project was successfully completed, as they were hoping to convince US leaders to use it to build themselves a bridge to sanity.

    Sadly...[sigh]

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  6. Re:Not a Canal by Njovich · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm Dutch. Gracht is just a type of canal ('kanaal'). There is no a linguistic or translation problem, it's perfectly valid to call it canal.

  7. Re:Anyone ever swim in those canals? by ecotax · · Score: 3, Informative

    And live to tell?

    Yes, it's not exactly clean water, but now that all houses and house boats are supposed to be connected to the sewer system for a few decades, it's definitely less filthy than it used to be.

    How many window-sitter prostitutes wind up in those a month?

    Zero-point-something. Not nearly as many as drunk tourists.

    Can you smoke cannabis on the streets of Amsterdam? Hashish?

    Sure, it's not necessarily a healthy idea, but it's allowed (and done a lot).

    Is there an age limit to smoke dope?

    Drink spirits? Wine? Beer?

    Sure, 18 years for alcohol/sigarettes, I assume for dope too, not sure.

    --
    "Money is a sign of poverty." - Iain Banks
  8. Re:Not a Canal by X10 · · Score: 2, Informative

    A gracht IS a canal. A city-canal to be more precise.

    Nope. There are seven distinct things that in English are all "canal". In Dutch, they are distinct, different things. No Dutch person would call a gracht a canal. Nor a singel, vliet, wetering, sloot, vaart. It's as if English wouldn't have separate words for truck, car, bike, motorcycle, van, bus but rather would call each of them "vehicle".

    --
    no, I don't have a sig
  9. Save us from marketing department by dywolf · · Score: 2

    Dear God, save us from the marketing department.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  10. Re:Not a Canal by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 2

    Like I said above, moats are also called grachten, and moats do not typically have houses on both sides, so that can't be a necessary condition for something to be called a gracht.

    As a native Dutch speaker, I associate the term 'kanaal' with man-made waterways that are typically much wider than grachten, so a gracht is not a kanaal and a kanaal is not a gracht, even though they're both man-made and therefore differ from rivieren, beekjes, and (some) sloten.

    The technical term for what the English would call a moat - if it's not used for a transport, and it doesn't have houses on both sides, is a singel. As a dozen Dutch and you'll get a dozen answers. Most will tell you that if it runs through the city is a gracht. Ask a dozen Dutch kanaal historians and you'll only get one answer. I got my definitions from them, and a quick look at Wikipedia shows the same definitions. Any Dutch drainage ditch or river that's been "improved" is a kanaal - but most Dutch will give it a more definitive name. Just like the English don't point to any body of water and say "that's a body of water" - they'll say "river, or lake, or creek". I point to what I was told was a gracht and get told it's a singel - I say "everyone calls it a gracht" and I'm told "they're idiots - there's a castle on one side and a park on the other, and no tow path or moorings - that section is a singel". (sigh)

  11. Re:Not a Canal by kyubre · · Score: 5, Funny

    Being of Dutch descent and having chosen to live in The Netherlands for a number of years to reconnect with my (soggy) roots, it pleases me to no end that a Slashdot headline featuring 3D printing AND bridge construction, so quickly devolves into the nuances of Dutch linguistic syntax.

    --
    Nothing evolves faster than the word of god in the minds of men who think themselves divinely inspired.
  12. Amsterdam is famed as the "Venice of the North" by cardpuncher · · Score: 2
    Not just Amsterdam. The list apparently includes Manchester (UK).

    However, as it has been pointed out before, for reasons that are not immediately clear, Venice is not commonly known as "the Manchester of the South"...

  13. Re:Not a Canal by X10 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm Dutch. I live in Amsterdam. It's not perfectly valid to call a gracht a kanaal. The issue here is not what the Dutch call our canals and grachten and sloten, the issue is that the fact that English has one word for a collection of things that the Dutch have individual words for affects more than just language. It affects the way people think about them.

    Again, read Babel 17 and you'll see.

    --
    no, I don't have a sig