Slashdot Mirror


Belgian Privacy Watchdog Sues Facebook

An anonymous reader writes: Belgium is taking Facebook to task – and to court – about the company's opaque user-monitoring frameworks. The country's independent Privacy Commission, which is partnered with equivalent institutions in the Netherlands, France, Germany and Spain, failed to obtain information from the social media giant about the extent and nature of its user-analysis network, and has now decided to take action. The commission is particularly interested in the use that Facebook makes of information about users who are not logged in to Facebook, and may not even be members. The ubiquity of Facebook "share" buttons, along with other popular widgets or modules, have extended the company's reach far beyond its own site. The court convenes on the matter this Thursday.

5 of 72 comments (clear)

  1. Yay for Belgium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think people in Europe are not as blinkered and easily duped as the USAians or others. FB is very invasive and not welcome, it is part of the problem and not part of the solution (on privacy and digital rights).

    1. Re:Yay for Belgium by Calydor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      who can't enter in to an agreement with a business

      The commission is particularly interested in the use that Facebook makes of information about users who are not logged in to Facebook, and may not even be members.

      Facebook is essentially saying you don't HAVE to enter into an agreement with them in order for them to keep track of you.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:Yay for Belgium by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yea, we Europeans are really super extra great, not like Yankees... it is just that we like our goverments to treat us like babies who can't enter in to an agreement with a business

      I expect my government to protect me so that I can focus on my life. I thought this was one of the reasons I pay taxes.
      I would hope that keeping me safe from bullshit and invasive practices of corporations is part of that protection.

      Calling that kind of government activity "babysitting" is what an ultra-capitalist american corporate shill would do.

    3. Re:Yay for Belgium by moronoxyd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      if the data controller or a third party has a legitimate interest in doing so, as long as this interest does not affect the interests of the data subject, or infringe on his or her fundamental rights, in particular the right to privacy. This provision establishes the need to strike a reasonable balance between the data controllers' business interests and the privacy of data subjects.

      First of all: this is a directive (it is more than 2 decades old, and it become -some of its provisions- law in my country Greece just a couple of years ago), plus... read the the part in bold.

      Yes, and directives are the basis for national laws, meaning that national laws have to at least reach that level.

      Also, please explain to us how Facebooks interest in collecting data from people that are not Facebook members is more legitimate than the interest of said people not having their data collected by a company they have no contractual relationship with?

    4. Re:Yay for Belgium by Lennie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "we like our goverments to treat us like babies who can't enter in to an agreement with a business"

      Let's be clear:

      This court case is, among other things, about the like- and connect-buttons Facebook uses to track people on other websites on the web even if they have NO agreement with this company.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon