WikiLeaks: NSA Eavesdropped On the Last Three French Presidents

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

WikiLeaks: NSA Eavesdropped On the Last Three French Presidents

Posted by Soulskill on Tuesday June 23, 2015 @04:10PM from the enjoy-this-can-of-worms dept.

Earthquake Retrofit writes: The NY Times is reporting that WikiLeaks has released "material which appeared to capture officials in Paris talking candidly about Greece's economy, relations with Germany — and, ironically, American espionage." The information was leaked "a day before the French Parliament is expected to definitively pass a controversial security bill legalizing broad surveillance, particularly of terrorism suspects."

136 comments

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Just doing their job. by EzInKy · 2015-06-23 16:16 · Score: 5, Insightful

The job of the NSA is to spy and if they don't spy on everything spyable they aren't doing their job. Can't even figure out why this would worthy of a ./ headline.

--
Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
1. Re:Just doing their job. by Nyder · 2015-06-23 16:21 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  The job of the NSA is to spy and if they don't spy on everything spyable they aren't doing their job. Can't even figure out why this would worthy of a ./ headline.
  Maybe it is. But I'm pretty sure if the USA found out that the French had our Presidents office/phone bugged, we'd (the USA) would have a shit about it.
  
  --
  Be seeing you...
2. Re:Just doing their job. by Gaygirlie · 2015-06-23 16:25 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  Something being someone's job doesn't make it legal or acceptable.
3. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 16:30 · Score: 0
  
  Well, France has had it's own, independent nuclear deterrent for a long time. That is one of the few reasons why such monitoring would be reasonable for the NSA to do. For other things intelligence gathering from friendly countries there are military observers, news paper reading and traveling diplomatic staff, formal and informal parties and so on. The information is given voluntarily for those who care to listen.
4. Re: Just doing their job. by sergei83 · 2015-06-23 16:39 · Score: 1
  
  Tomorrow's headline - "Cheese prices in America at their highest"
5. Re:Just doing their job. by antiperimetaparalogo · 2015-06-23 16:39 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  The job of the NSA is to spy and if they don't spy on everything spyable they aren't doing their job. Can't even figure out why this would worthy of a ./ headline.
  I don't disagree with you, both about the NSA and "/.", even while i am a Greek (from the summary: "capture officials in Paris talking candidly about Greece's economy"). We Greeks spy on the French, they spy on us, we both spy on USA, USA spy on both of us...
  Few years ago we had a Greek spy captured by our friends the USA while spying them, we Greeks waited for a while until we captured a fine spy gentleman from USA spying us Greeks, and as friends and allies we solved this "little issue" like gentlemen do: we exchanged our spies and continued our fine relation (and spying on each-other)... no wikileaks shit, no drama... you send your diplomats to drink some Ouzo in Athens, we send ours for some bourbon, the thing was solved with mutual understanding that "shit happens"!
  What exactly most Slashdoters expect from NSA, to sing songs about world peace? They are spies, they spy!
  
  --
  Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
6. Re:Just doing their job. by EzInKy · 2015-06-23 16:42 · Score: 1
  
  None of that negates the need of the NSA to spy on whomever they can spy on. Can the French guarantee they are not compromised? Even if they think so, how can they verify this without being spied upon?
  
  --
  Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
7. Re: Just doing their job. by EzInKy · 2015-06-23 16:48 · Score: 1
  
  Exactly. If cheese profiteers didn't do their all to maximize their profit on cheese they would be held to be negilient in doing their duties.
  
  --
  Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
8. Re:Just doing their job. by EzInKy · 2015-06-23 16:51 · Score: 1
  
  When you are willing to sacrifice you freedom and be subjugated to the agreed upon rules of dictator's and plutocrats hit me back! Until then, hope your local politicians continue to protect your own best interests.
  
  --
  Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
9. Re:Just doing their job. by antiperimetaparalogo · 2015-06-23 16:55 · Score: 5, Informative
  
  Just want to mod you down for being a deadbeat Greek.
  I respect that Sir (especially since you do NOT post as an "anonymous coward")! Unfortunately i think that, even if you had mod points, you can't mod me down since you already made a comment on this story... sorry about that.
  
  Your country owes money, your country needs to pay money.
  I agree.
  
  Your poor and destitute can go suck ass as us freemarketer's are concerned.
  Greece is still among the most rich countries of the world (keep in mind that it is our state which is in trouble, no so much the citizens).
  
  --
  Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
10. Re:Just doing their job. by amiga3D · 2015-06-23 17:00 · Score: 2
  
  Yes. But the people to get mad with wouldn't be the French but the people responsible for making sure the office isn't bugged. You can bet the French and everyone else with the capability will try to bug the oval office. I'd be shocked if they weren't. Hell....it may be bugged. That's what spies do.
11. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 17:10 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  What's wrong with being a socialist?
12. Re:Just doing their job. by ShanghaiBill · 2015-06-23 17:20 · Score: 3, Insightful
  
  Something being someone's job doesn't make it legal or acceptable.
  It is legal for the NSA to spy on foreigners. That is the only reason that they exist. Spying between nations is a good thing, because it means everyone knows more about each others intentions and motivations. Exactly a century ago, Europeans were slaughtering each other by the millions, in a world war that they bumbled into by misjudging each other, and because they were unaware of secret alliances that caused the military escalation to spin out of control. Some good spying could have prevented that.
13. Re:Just doing their job. by mysidia · 2015-06-23 17:33 · Score: 0, Flamebait
  
  Maybe... but the French government shouldn't have anything to be concerned about if they have nothing to hide, and if they are trying to hide something, then the NSA is doing a very good thing.
14. Re:Just doing their job. by someone1234 · 2015-06-23 17:40 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  That wouldn't stop the spying, only legalize it.
  
  --
  Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
15. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 17:49 · Score: 0
  
  >> Your country owes money, your country needs to pay money.
  > I agree.
  What is this but pointless drivel? I mean, do you feel the need to assert everything you do or do not believe in?
16. Re:Just doing their job. by Khyber · 2015-06-23 18:01 · Score: 1, Insightful
  
  It's called a discussion. Perhaps you should learn how one is structured in a civil manner.
  
  --
  Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
17. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 18:09 · Score: 0
  
  USA is a country that conducts warfare over the planet, and has a history of doing terrible things (terror bombing and the mass muder in Hiroshima and Nagasaki 45), and so lauding the NSA/US governmenet is probably only a thing for US citizens, unless EzInKy perhaps was paid or otherwise instructed to write on slashdot.
  In addition to viewing USA as a potential threat of sorts, there is the issue of privacy and democracy. Any kind of 'breaking and entry' type of actions is simply criminal, and the notion of subjecting others to inspection for sake of getting an advantage at the cost of others in say negotiations is dubious at best.
18. Re:Just doing their job. by Capsaicin · 2015-06-23 18:12 · Score: 1
  
  The job of the NSA is to spy and if they don't spy on everything spyable they aren't doing their job. Can't even figure out why this would worthy of a ./ headline.
  The issue here is not so much that the NSA spied on the French president. The issue is that said spying has been revealed. That will always rate a mention.
  I imagine the French, and anyone else, fully expect US (and every other nation's) intelligence services to try to spy on them. However, once the beans have been spilled the French President can hardly respond with a simple 'méh!'
  What is interesting for the rest of us, and the reason it merits a /. headline, is that our prior suspicions are receiving documentary confirmation.
  
  --
  Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
19. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 18:17 · Score: 0
  
  The job of the NSA is to spy and if they don't spy on everything spyable they aren't doing their job. Can't even figure out why this would worthy of a ./ headline.
  Ok, now say that again to the next article about Chinese spying/hacking into American government computers.
20. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 18:20 · Score: 0
  
  do you feel the need to assert everything you do or do not believe in?
  He believes in nothing apart from the fact that his country needs to pay money?
21. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 18:23 · Score: 0
  
  my first thought was... 'only the last three'?
22. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 18:23 · Score: 0
  
  They got caught. That wasn't part of the job, and it's newsworthy.
23. Re:Just doing their job. by phayes · 2015-06-23 18:23 · Score: 1
  
  The job of the NSA is to spy and if they don't spy on everything spyable they aren't doing their job. Can't even figure out why this would worthy of a ./ headline.
  Maybe it is. But I'm pretty sure if the USA found out that the French had our Presidents office/phone bugged, we'd (the USA) would have a shit about it.
  Of course you would, Candide...
  The only difference between the NSA & the DGSE is that the DGSE has essentially no legal limits, as confirmed by a recent French interior minister. When asked if the DGSE performed the same data collection that was so scandalous for the NSA, he replied "Yes, but here it's legal". Result? One line in French Newspapers...
  You can continue to be "shocked, just shocked" that spying is being performed by organizations who's explicit mission is to spy, but we all can see through your Capitaine Renault impressions.
  
  --
  Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
24. Re:Just doing their job. by phayes · 2015-06-23 18:29 · Score: 1
  
  Spying by the DGSE is already authorized by French law and with essentially no limits compared to the NSA. Oversight by an independent judiciary (even a secret one)? Not needed here.
  
  --
  Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
25. Re:Just doing their job. by antiperimetaparalogo · 2015-06-23 18:33 · Score: 1, Insightful
  
  >> Your country owes money, your country needs to pay money. > I agree.
  What is this but pointless drivel? I mean, do you feel the need to assert everything you do or do not believe in?
  As a fellow Slashdoter already replied to you: "It's called a discussion. Perhaps you should learn how one is structured in a civil manner."!
  Some fellow Slashdoter wrote a reply to me (NOT anonymously), where he felt the need to remind me about this issue since i am a Greek (it was a bit off-topic -not much... the summary mentions "Greece's economy"-, but i also go very off-topic very often, so...), and since i try to always reply (especially to fellow Slashdoters, but even to anonymous like you!)... i replied!
  If i write to you "your country [you] owe[s] money, your country [you] need[s] to pay money" ("your country" means "you" as you understand), you will let it unanswered? I take it a little personal, because it is personal! Anyway, i repeat again a part of what the other Slashdoter wrote: "civil manner" !
  
  --
  Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
26. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 19:25 · Score: 0
  
  The job of the NSA is to spy and if they don't spy on everything spyable they aren't doing their job. Can't even figure out why this would worthy of a ./ headline.
  The job of a burglar is the break in and take stuff, if they don't break in and take stuff they aren't doing their job.
  That doesn't mean that we shouldn't shoot them on sight or that anyone who defends that kind of behavior shouldn't get ran out of town.
27. Re:Just doing their job. by EzInKy · 2015-06-23 19:26 · Score: 1
  
  Sure, the job of a Chinese spy is to spy. If a Chinese spy isn't spying then the Chinese spy isn't doing the job the Chinese spy is being paid to do.
  
  --
  Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
28. Re:Just doing their job. by AmiMoJo · 2015-06-23 19:47 · Score: 1
  
  Allies are supposed to refrain from bugging each other's leaders' phones. Part of negotiating in good faith and maintaining friendly, cooperative relationships is not spying on your close allies.
  This will make it harder for the US to negotiate with Europe in the future. Trade deals, data sharing, resolving legal matters like extradition and dealing with multi-national companies etc. If the US is upset over EU privacy laws affecting US companies, well fuck you guys because you don't treat us like friends so why should be give a shit what you think either?
  
  --
  const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
  SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
29. Re:Just doing their job. by EzInKy · 2015-06-23 19:50 · Score: 1
  
  You know what really sucks about this? I truly think Japanese women are about the sexiest women on the planet! I wonder how many millions of them would have died swinging bamboo poles at the millions of multiracial troops that would have been invading their shores had the Empire not surrendered?
  
  --
  Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
30. Re:Just doing their job. by EzInKy · 2015-06-23 19:54 · Score: 1
  
  Allies are supposed to refrain from bugging each other's leaders' phones.
  Where in "Handbook for Allies" does it say this? Friends don't keep secrets from friends, they share information so they can form a united front against those that would use secrets to drive a wedge between them.
  
  --
  Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
31. Re:Just doing their job. by allcoolnameswheretak · 2015-06-23 20:35 · Score: 1
  
  This is the most self-righteous, dumbass comment I've read on Slashdot in a while.
32. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 20:43 · Score: 0
  
  When NSA is spying on US allies, a suspicion arises that America wants info to be able to sell off Paris, Berlin, etc. to Israel. Considering what kind of an ISIS hell-pot american agencies created in the middle east just for the sake of Greater Israel's territorial expansion, European countries are understandably worried.
33. Re:Just doing their job. by allcoolnameswheretak · 2015-06-23 20:45 · Score: 1
  
  Greece is still among the most rich countries of the world (keep in mind that it is our state which is in trouble, no so much the citizens).
  ... because 25% of the Greek population and their cousins is employed by the state, twiddling their thumbs or something, Receiving big, nice paychecks, often 13-15 paychecks a year and many being able to retire in their 50's.
  Obviously, this is not a sustainable model.
  But try to take some of that away, reduce the grants, incomes and pensions to levels that the Greek economy can actually sustain, and all of Greek media starts being indignant about it, blaming Germany and Europe for all this shit.
34. Re:Just doing their job. by Viol8 · 2015-06-23 21:16 · Score: 1
  
  "But try to take some of that away, reduce the grants, incomes and pensions to levels that the Greek economy can actually sustain, and all of Greek media starts being indignant about it, blaming Germany and Europe for all this shit."
  Its much easier to blame someone else than yourself. I'd have a lot more respect for the greeks if they'd admitted they got into the eurozone by fraud and that their entire tax collection and benefits system is an unsustainable mess and needs to be fixed.
  But they haven't and won't. They'll continue blaming everyone else like little children until the day comes when german turns off the money tap and then they're really fucked and no amount of whining will help them.
35. Re:Just doing their job. by dunkelfalke · 2015-06-23 21:40 · Score: 1
  
  No it would not. First world war happened not because of misjudging, but because several rulers were really eager for a war.
  
  --
  "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
36. Re:Just doing their job. by Karganeth · 2015-06-23 21:44 · Score: 1
  
  And the job of ISIS is to kill as many infidels as possible. Dunno why the news keeps going on about it, they're just doing their jobs.
37. Re:Just doing their job. by EzInKy · 2015-06-23 22:01 · Score: 1
  
  Wow, you first have to get over your antisemitic agenda before you can hold an intelligent conversation. Though Berlin under the control of Jews would be poetic justice, it will never happen.
  
  --
  Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
38. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 22:41 · Score: 1
  
  US use force to implement their agenda since the beginning of their existence.
39. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 23:25 · Score: 0
  
  Wow!! Do you even believe your own arguments?
  And seriously; No spying a century ago? Really??
40. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 23:27 · Score: 0
  
  Yeah. Its a good think we got you americans to watch our backs.
  I do hope you use the same arguments whenever the Chinese is caught spying on US interests? You never know when you are comprimised, do you?
41. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 23:32 · Score: 3, Informative
  
  A social democracy need not be established by force. For example the Nordic Model refers to the economic and social models of the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway, Iceland, Greenland, Faroe Islands and Sweden), which involves the combination of a free market economy with a welfare state.
  Another example would be Australia in years past, though its moving away from this in recent years.
42. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 23:33 · Score: 0
  
  The US government did three things wrong here. 1) It spied on a friendly power and risked destroying that friendship by doing so. 2) They publicly got caught which convinced many they are not trustworthy and not competent. 3) They got caught lying countless times about what the NSA was doing which only convinced the world that the US government is either dishonest with outsiders or that it's various agencies are dishonest with each other.
  Also the massive military spending by the US government whist other domestic areas sorely lack investment worries foreign powers a great deal.
43. Re:Just doing their job. by MagickalMyst · 2015-06-23 23:33 · Score: 1
  
  "All France has to do to stop US spying is to agree to follow US law. Easy breezy."
  
  And it might even be possible - if it weren't for the fact that France would likely be forced to rename their "French Fries" to "Freedom Fries". I don't think they'd go for that.
  
  --
  Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
44. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 23:36 · Score: 0
  
  What exactly most Slashdoters expect from NSA, to sing songs about world peace? They are spies, they spy!
  There is also industrial espionage which the nsa does. But "no wikileaks shit, no drama..."
45. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 23:38 · Score: 0
  
  The headline is that the US goverment spends their taxdollars on spying. Spying on a close allied for 70+ years that is.
  Who is performing the dirty deed does not really matter.
46. Re:Just doing their job. by AmiMoJo · 2015-06-23 23:48 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  Times have changed. The EU was set up to prevent another war, and it worked. By being friends who trust each other and can work together. and who treat each other with the respect not to spy on each other's leaders, we have made wars unthinkable.
  The EU averts war through cooperation and trust. The US averts it through violence and economic might. The thing is, the EU is bigger than the US now, and China will be eventually too. The US should be looking to improve its relations with other nations, especially Europe where it has a lot of history.
  
  --
  const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
  SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
47. Re:Just doing their job. by geekmux · 2015-06-24 00:14 · Score: 1
  
  The job of the NSA is to spy and if they don't spy on everything spyable they aren't doing their job. Can't even figure out why this would worthy of a ./ headline.
  Maybe it is. But I'm pretty sure if the USA found out that the French had our Presidents office/phone bugged, we'd (the USA) would have a shit about it.
  We would have a shit about it? Well I hope we wouldn't be totally shocked over it. That would be rather ignorant.
  I'll refer back to the parents comments regarding the NSAs main job. It's kind of the main job of every other agency too.
48. Re:Just doing their job. by alexhs · 2015-06-24 00:19 · Score: 1
  
  France would likely be forced to rename their "French Fries" to "Freedom Fries".
  Ici, nous les appelons simplement "frites", ou parfois "pommes de terre frites". Et certains prétendent même qu'elles seraient d'origine belge.
  
  --
  I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
49. Re:Just doing their job. by MagickalMyst · 2015-06-24 00:27 · Score: 0
  
  "Ici, nous les appelons simplement "frites", ou parfois "pommes de terre frites"."
  
  Où es-tu? France?
  
  Insulté les français sont en changeant le nom de "freedom fries" ?
  
  --
  Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
50. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 00:52 · Score: 0
  
  Wrong. Rulers of 1914 were less averse to war than they are today, but even back in 1914, they would have wanted a quick war, not one that would turn out to far bloodier and more destructive than any war that preceded it. The main reason Austria and Germany attacked Serbia was that they believed that France and the UK would not enter the war on Serbia's side.
51. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 00:54 · Score: 0
  
  Do you care to point out exactly where in GP's post GP claims that there was no spying a century ago? He made no such claim. Spies were simply not as good at there jobs back then.
52. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 01:01 · Score: 0
  
  That's a pretty poor argument. First of all, spying on allies has a lot to do with economic subterfuge. The NSA has frequently spied on Airbus, a big competitor to Boeing, in order to sabotage deals they are working on. Secondly, these are our allies; there is no legitimate reason to spy on them. We know what they are up to by their public actions.
  If you've paid any attention to the Snowden disclosures at all, you would have seen that spying frequently has little to nothing to do with threats to our national security. We spy on climate change conferences for no good reason; seemingly only to try to sabotage or undermine them. We also do it to human rights organizations. That says a lot (nothing good) about our morality as a nation.
53. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 01:08 · Score: 0
  
  Voulez vous etre sodomise' par une baguette?
54. Re: Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 01:27 · Score: 0
  
  Wrong. People who bet big on baguettes are going to make bank, though.
55. Re:Just doing their job. by N1AK · 2015-06-24 01:29 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  Spying between nations is a good thing, because it means everyone knows more about each others intentions and motivations.
  Bollocks. There's been plenty of spying since pretty much the moment secrets have existed; it hasn't stopped war, and the idea that if that spying had simply been 'better' everything would be different is completely lacking a compelling case.
  
  If we didn't have any spying then we'd have had no one claiming they had found evidence Saddam had WMD to justify the Iraq war; so explain exactly how the billions of dollars spent on spying helped us there.
  
  Even if you could find theoretical examples to try and demonstrate spying stopping wars it'd be worth nothing. The existence of spying will always be accompanied by counter-measures and misinformation which inherently limits the quality of spying.
56. Re:Just doing their job. by Kester1964 · 2015-06-24 01:32 · Score: 1
  
  I would mod you up if I had any mod points. Somebody's irony detector is obviously broken.
57. Re:Just doing their job. by TimeOut42 · 2015-06-24 01:35 · Score: 1
  
  People can't really be so naive that they think other countries, even allies, are not also spying on us. Really?
58. Re:Just doing their job. by N1AK · 2015-06-24 01:39 · Score: 1
  
  That statement is just about directly opposite the established and well informed version of events that is almost universally accepted. The Austro-Hungarians was keen for a military conflict with vastly weaker Balkan opposition, but none of the world powers went into 1914 eager for a major conflict.
59. Re:Just doing their job. by antiperimetaparalogo · 2015-06-24 01:55 · Score: 2
  ... because 25% of the Greek population and their cousins is employed by the state, twiddling their thumbs or something,
  Based on OECD, Employment in general government as a percentage of the labour force (some selective countries):
  
  Greece 8%,
  Germany 11%,
  USA 14%,
  UK 18%,
  France 22%.
  source
  
  Receiving big, nice paychecks, often 13-15 paychecks a year and many being able to retire in their 50's.
  It used to be one extra monthly paycheck per year for everybody, until few years ago (now it is stoped), and the "retire in their 50's" was not so common as believed (and when true it was more like: "retire in their very late 50's").
  
  Obviously, this is not a sustainable model. But try to take some of that away, reduce the grants, incomes and pensions to levels that the Greek economy can actually sustain, and all of Greek media starts being indignant about it, blaming Germany and Europe for all this shit.
  I agree.
  --
  Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
60. Re:Just doing their job. by dave420 · 2015-06-24 02:23 · Score: 1
  
  Israel != Judaism. One can criticise the state of Israel without being antisemitic.
61. Re:Just doing their job. by MagickalMyst · 2015-06-24 02:27 · Score: 1
  
  Non merci. et toi ?
  
  --
  Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
62. Re:Just doing their job. by kilfarsnar · 2015-06-24 02:28 · Score: 1
  
  Just want to mod you down for being a deadbeat Greek. Your country owes money, your country needs to pay money. Your poor and destitute can go suck ass as us freemarketer's are concerned.
  I sincerely hope this is a joke or a poke at free marketers. Because otherwise... really?
  
  --
  "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
63. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 02:39 · Score: 0
  
  It is a socialist country, so that would make sense.
64. Re:Just doing their job. by dunkelfalke · 2015-06-24 02:42 · Score: 0
  
  And how is that directly opposite?
  Rulers generally want a quick and decisive military conflict, but wars usually aren't, especially with both sides of the conflict being similar in equipment and manpower.
  Austria-Hungary really wanted a war with Serbia to lessen the inner conflicts.
  Russia really wanted a war with Austria-Hungary to have more influence in South Slavic countries and to help the czar to save the face after the Russo-Japanese war embarrassment a decade earlier.
  Germany really wanted a war with Russia because they wanted to destabilise Russia for good.
  France really wanted to get Alsace back.
  Britain really wanted to destroy the German industry and smother some local problems like the Irish in the process.
  Seriously, in the beginning, the war was welcomed by most of the participating sides. Only after the horror of it was clearly visible, the war has become unpopular.
  
  --
  "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
65. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 02:42 · Score: 0
  
  If arabs and jew relatives are good why'd they end up in deserts? Good people drove them out.
66. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 02:43 · Score: 0
  
  Conversely, the job of every other country is to not give a damn about the NSAs mandate, and if you act like self-entitled assholes towards your allies ... you might find they don't wish to be your allies.
  America is acting like a bunch of children who think the world should give up our rights for your fucking security.
  And the reality is, we would rather see Americans die than give up our rights for your security. Because our rights are more important to us.
  You guys really need to start understanding how much the world is increasingly pissed off at America's feeling that anything they do is OK, and that the rest of the world should just accept it.
  No, that's not the case. Fuck you. Fuck your country. Fuck your spy agencies.
67. Re:Just doing their job. by tehcyder · 2015-06-24 02:59 · Score: 1
  
  The job of the NSA is to spy and if they don't spy on everything spyable they aren't doing their job. Can't even figure out why this would worthy of a ./ headline.
  YMBNH.
  The NSA has replaced the RPAA/MPAA (and before that Microsoft) as Slashdot Enemy Number One.
  If the NSA announced they had discovered unicorns and a cure for cancer, most people here would assume it was cover for additional surveillance powers.
  
  --
  To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
68. Re:Just doing their job. by tehcyder · 2015-06-24 03:01 · Score: 1
  
  Voulez vous etre sodomise' par une baguette?
  Translation: my hovercraft is full of eels.
  
  --
  To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
69. Re:Just doing their job. by tehcyder · 2015-06-24 03:04 · Score: 1
  
  Maybe... but the French government shouldn't have anything to be concerned about if they have nothing to hide, and if they are trying to hide something, then the NSA is doing a very good thing.
  Way too subtle for slashdot.
  
  --
  To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
70. Re:Just doing their job. by allcoolnameswheretak · 2015-06-24 03:05 · Score: 1
  
  I'm not sure how the OECD compiles these numbers or what the criteria are, but I've read multiple times in different reputable news sources that about 25% of the Greek labour force is directly or indirectly payrolled by the government.
  I don't think these sources have been "lying" but I also don't think that the OECD has produced these numbers out of thin air, so I suspect the big discrepancy is through a statistical effect of who you decide to count.
71. Re:Just doing their job. by blue9steel · 2015-06-24 03:05 · Score: 1
  
  Only because it would mean a failure by our counter intelligence unit. Their being "outraged" is nothing more than public theater.
72. Re:Just doing their job. by tehcyder · 2015-06-24 03:12 · Score: 1
  
  these are our allies; there is no legitimate reason to spy on them. We know what they are up to by their public actions
  No you don't. Even your enemies know what your public actions are, so they are self evidently not the whole truth.
  Any alliance is secondary to your own country's interests. Of course you spy on your allies, you are just expected to be a bit subtle about it.
  
  --
  To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
73. Re:Just doing their job. by tehcyder · 2015-06-24 03:15 · Score: 1
  
  If we didn't have any spying then we'd have had no one claiming they had found evidence Saddam had WMD to justify the Iraq war; so explain exactly how the billions of dollars spent on spying helped us there.
  The intelligence services are ultimately responsible to the government. If that government chooses to ignore or distort information for political ends, you can't blame the intelligence services.
  
  --
  To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
74. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 03:20 · Score: 0
  
  If the French haven't attempted to, they're negligent.
75. Re:Just doing their job. by tehcyder · 2015-06-24 03:21 · Score: 1
  
  I think the point is that living in a poor European country you're probably still better off than people living in most other countries in the world.
  A quick google shows Greece at around 40th/50th richest in the world depending how you measure wealth, so it's in the top quartile.
  
  --
  To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
76. Re:Just doing their job. by tehcyder · 2015-06-24 03:26 · Score: 1
  
  terror bombing and the mass muder in Hiroshima and Nagasaki 45
  My father was scheduled to be landing on the beaches of Japan to force their surrender in WW2. If not for the atomic bombs that lead to Japan's capitulation he, my siblings, my children, and my grandchildren may very well not be here today. There is no way you can make me feel sorry for the killing of thousands that saved the lives of millions.
  I have never understood the logic behind the argument that the Japanese were prepared to fanatically fight to the last man, woman and child (and would therefore have caused millions of Allied casualties), and yet they suddenly surrendered when the US dropped a couple of impressive bombs.
  Why didn't they just go on fighting anyway? What's the difference between your country being destroyed by invading troops and destroyed by bombing?
  
  --
  To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
77. Re:Just doing their job. by tehcyder · 2015-06-24 03:28 · Score: 1
  
  The job of the NSA is to spy and if they don't spy on everything spyable they aren't doing their job. Can't even figure out why this would worthy of a ./ headline.
  The job of a burglar is the break in and take stuff, if they don't break in and take stuff they aren't doing their job.
  That doesn't mean that we shouldn't shoot them on sight or that anyone who defends that kind of behavior shouldn't get ran out of town.
  Except for the fact that burglary is illegal, and the NSA et al have full legal authority to do what they do, that's a great analogy.
  But you should have made it a car-jacking or something to follow slashdot "shit analogy" guidelines.
  
  --
  To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
78. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 03:35 · Score: 0
  
  Not as good perhaps, but some were downright [in]famous.
  Mata Hari, for example. Didn't need no fancy gadgets, either.
79. Re:Just doing their job. by StikyPad · 2015-06-24 05:33 · Score: 1
  
  That's true for nation states, but not so much for jihadists. Generally speaking, jihadists don't have the budget, expertise, or organization to carry out effective disinformation, and their counterintel is spotty at best. (Hell, our own is spotty, at best.) That's perhaps one of the reasons the IC has such a hardon for the WoT -- it's a case of overwhelming dominance. At least technologically and economically. When we can't tap in technologically (such as when they're avoiding technology altogether), we can often bribe our way in.
  While it's dubious that the IC has stopped any direct plots against the US, at least any of potential note, they're basically waging the entire WoT overseas themselves, from strategy, to targeting, to execution, in both senses of the word, with the DoD playing more of a supporting role.
  
  --
  https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
80. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 06:58 · Score: 0
  
  It's simple, really. The US held forth the ruse that they had multiple warheads, ready to drop anywhere, anytime. Japan's air defense was so riddled with holes that the Allies COULD have bombed Japan anywhere, so all they had to do was drop two nukes to make everyone think they might have a third (or more in store).
  And what the nukes did was kill everyone within a particular radius of the blast. The effects are well-documented, so there's no sense in going into greater detail here.
  The idea was to make the Japanese believe that the US really did have the capacity to nuke Japan to glass and leave. The US had no vested interest (at the time) in occupying Japan.
81. Re:Just doing their job. by RyoShin · 2015-06-24 07:10 · Score: 1
  
  You appear to be conflating socialist with fascist. You can certainly have Fascist socialism, but that is not the only form of socialism.
82. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 07:27 · Score: 0
  
  > A social democracy need not be established by force.
  Yeah, but if the majority votes against it, a large enough minority tends to implement it by force.
83. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 07:42 · Score: 0
  
  > The job of the NSA is to spy
  Never lead with the main shill.
84. Re:Just doing their job. by antiperimetaparalogo · 2015-06-24 11:59 · Score: 1
  
  This (in English) is the latest (March 2015) official data from the "Greek State's Human Resources Record" (everyone who gets paid by the Greek state) - note: there are also historical data going back few years, plus: the data are checked by EU partners and other international organizations (i.e., they are honest!).
  OECD's latest data is from 2013, but i used it for comparison of Greece to other states (e.g., USA, Germany) - compiling such data is problematic but you can get a general idea (and if you use my newest link you can confirm that it is accurate enough)
  If you want more info i can give you.
  
  --
  Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
85. Re:Just doing their job. by ultranova · 2015-06-24 15:08 · Score: 2
  
  Any alliance is secondary to your own country's interests. Of course you spy on your allies, you are just expected to be a bit subtle about it.
  
  Right. So is the information NSA has gained worth more than the cost?
  The problem with realpolitiks is that, with some rare near-legendary examples like Bismarck, people simply aren't smart enough to cut through their cultural conditioning to figure out what the actual results will be. So they simply drag their country from disaster to disaster; or, if they're less lucky, get some initial successes which makes them throw caution to the wind and make the final mistake all the more epic - and proving that even Bismarck wasn't smart enough to see how certain cultural traits of the new German Empire could turn out to be weaknessess in the right conditions.
  No, you don't "of course" spy on your allies, you carefully weight the value of gaining information versus them getting pissed and your reputation taking a hit. But the NSA can't do that, because spying on teveryone at all times is their essence; even if someone there made a cost-benefit analysis about a specific case, the conclusion would be all but dictated by their employer.
  So, what this all is coming down to: ethics matter, whether or not you think they should.
  
  --
  Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.
86. Re:Just doing their job. by ultranova · 2015-06-24 15:17 · Score: 1
  
  Just want to mod you down for being a deadbeat Greek. Your country owes money, your country needs to pay money. Your poor and destitute can go suck ass as us freemarketer's are concerned.
  
  Free market does not imply favoring debtors over debtees. Why would it? If you're dumb enough to make a bad investment, why would it suddenly be anyone's problem but yours just because that investment took the form of a loan?
  
  --
  Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.
87. Re:Just doing their job. by KGIII · 2015-06-24 15:50 · Score: 1
  
  I think the idea is that they would have fought harder had they been invaded - you will fight more when backed into a corner. I have also heard proponents cite estimates (for what those are worth is up to you to decide) that the bombs and subsequent damage were less than what would have happened had the Russians and Americans invaded. Others also claim that the bombs had little to do with the surrender but the imminent invasion by the USSR was the primary motivation. The latter claim is a bit dubious but does hold water well enough.
  
  --
  "So long and thanks for all the fish."
88. Re:Just doing their job. by 7-Vodka · 2015-06-24 16:50 · Score: 1
  
  He wasn't saying you need 'civil war' to bring socialism to a country.
  He was explaining that socialist means always involve using police force to achieve their ends, given that they're not voluntary.
  
  --
  Liberty.
89. Re:Just doing their job. by mysidia · 2015-06-24 17:56 · Score: 1
  
  I think you didn't get it....
  "If you've got nothing to hide, then you have nothing to fear"
  Is the broken argument governments are using to "justify" pervasive surveillance of the people.
  Why should governments be treated differently from people?
  France essentially just took on new Patriot-act style surveillance legislation back in may not too long ago, that allows warrant-free phone taps, e-mail taps, keyloggers, and covertly installed cameras/recorders.
90. Re:Just doing their job. by allcoolnameswheretak · 2015-06-24 23:20 · Score: 1
  
  Oh sorry. If that was meant ironically, I take back what I said.
  My irony detectors are not the best.
91. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-25 03:37 · Score: 1
  
  I love how the US trying to set up free trade agreements with other countries is "economic might" but when the EU does it, it's "cooperation and trust". The US has been doing many of those same things. Hell, if the US and EU didn't have such different views on government, the free trade agreements would probably be even stronger.
  Let's not kid ourselves though; one reason war is unthinkable is NATO, which is primarily a US-driven force at this point. Hell, most of Western Europe doesn't even have the military forces to invade/occupy any real portion of another country's territory at this point, in part because the US has been subsidizing their military forces for decades.
92. Re: Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-25 04:34 · Score: 0
  
  If that's how you treat your allies, is it any wonder that you are becoming viewed as arrogant assholes by the rest of the world.Have you any idea how this seems to people in London, Paris and Berlin. I hope that next time the US wants to use UK or French troops as your infantry, we tell you to sling your hook.
93. Re:Just doing their job. by manu0601 · 2015-06-25 05:40 · Score: 1
  
  [socialists] of force to implement their agenda
  You should not confuse socialists from Russia or China with socialists from France. In 1944, the french communist party, which staffed a lot of France insider resistance, mostly controlled the territory after the Germans were defeated. The french communists had enough power to perform coup, but they did not.try it.
  And anyway, Francois Hollande is not a socialist, despite his claims. His governments' action suggest he is more neoliberalism fan boy
94. Re:Just doing their job. by N1AK · 2015-06-25 08:02 · Score: 1
  
  There's some validity to the point, but given that this topic is about spying on French presidents I think the debate has been, and should remain, focused on the logic of spying between nation states.
95. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-25 08:47 · Score: 0
  
  Hahahaha, all the EU nations spy on each other. If you believe otherwise then you are a extremely gullible .
96. Re:Just doing their job. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-25 11:59 · Score: 0
  
  Times have changed. The EU was set up to prevent another war, and it worked. By being friends who trust each other and can work together. and who treat each other with the respect not to spy on each other's leaders, we have made wars unthinkable.
  Interesting fantasy world you live in.
  They thought war was unthinkable in Yugoslavia, too.
  Everybody spies on everybody else. Spying on the other side's leaders is especially important. Nobody fully trusts one another. Trust is not like pregnancy: it isn't a binary quantity whether you either have it or you don't. The illusion of trust has value in human interactions, but never mistake it for the reality. Time to grow up.
97. Re:Just doing their job. by Uberbah · 2015-06-26 21:38 · Score: 1
  
  Except for the fact that burglary is illegal, and the NSA et al have full legal authority to do what they do
  Except for that whole 4th Amendment thing, and their job being limited to signals intelligence.
Can't you morons figure out how to move the Topic/ by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 16:22 · Score: 0

Can't you morons figure out how to move the Topic/Comment-Count icons off the article titles?
FOI Request ... by PPH · 2015-06-23 16:26 · Score: 5, Funny

... for candid pics of Carla Bruni-Sarkozy.

--
Have gnu, will travel.
1. Re:FOI Request ... by donscarletti · 2015-06-23 16:34 · Score: 1
  
  I remember Sydney Morning Herald (not a semi-pornographic supermarket tabloid) published nude full body shots of her on the second page the day after she married Nicolas. Candid pics are nothing compared to what can be achieved with professional lighting and photography.
  
  --
  When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
2. Re:FOI Request ... by SlovakWakko · 2015-06-23 16:56 · Score: 3, Informative
  
  Google search will achieve effectively the same results and will be much faster.
3. Re:FOI Request ... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 13:54 · Score: 0
  
  Sydney Morning Herald (not a semi-pornographic supermarket tabloid).
  Citation needed!
Too much information by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 17:19 · Score: 0

If 18M breach has tough us anything is that government cannot be trusted to keep all of the data secure:
"Current failures result from decades of meager investment in security systems, but said changes are being made (sic!). Hacker also gained access to the agency's records with a credential used by a federal contractor. Archuleta told the Senate hearing on Tuesday that an "adversary" somehow obtained a user credential used by KeyPoint Government Solutions, a contractor based in Colorado. She didn't say specifically when that occurred or if it was related to the two cyberbreaches being discussed. (Second breach) may have been stolen from a document known as Standard Form 86, which requires applicants to fill out deeply personal information about mental illnesses, drug and alcohol use, past arrests and bankruptcies. They also require the listing of contacts and relatives."
Likely going on both sides by Tablizer · 2015-06-23 18:00 · Score: 4, Funny

If we snooped them, they probably snooped us. Somewhere there may be a recording of the moment the ill-fated invasion of Iraq was decided:
Dick: Now that the Taliban are gone, lets smash Saddam!
Colin: What if something goes wrong? Iraq is far more populated than Afghanistan.
W: Don't worry, Colie, we whacked the Taliban real good.
Colin: Actually, we don't know where the Taliban went. Intel didn't find enough bodies to account for most. They may be hiding in caves and hills.
Dick: You worry too much. They are gone for now; let the next prez worry about them coming back out.
Colin: I don't want to foul my legacy with a war gone wrong.
W: Don't worry, Colie, Dickie is an expert on blaming it on the Dems in the off case shit comes back later. Look, I almost choked on a pretzel the other day; life is short; go for the ball now!
Dick: Amen! My mechanical heart could clack up any day, and you eat a lot of fries yourself, Tubbie.
Colin: Alright, I did have a bad feeling about this, but maybe it's just those damned fries, eh?
Dick, W, & Colin: "Onward Christian Soldiers!..."

--
Table-ized A.I.
Of course ... by garry_g · 2015-06-23 18:04 · Score: 2

... the French will strongly protest against their politicians being spied on, and after that, they will pass the bill for spying on the citizens ...
Similar thing just happened in Germany: CDU/CSU/SPD will be passing data retention laws for phone and internet metadata (up to 10 weeks retention period), while they previously reduced the retention of parliament's Internet access meta data to 7 days following child porn accusations against former parliament member Edathy ... Animal Farm references, anybody?
1. Re:Of course ... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 18:21 · Score: 2, Funny
  
  You want animal farm references on a story about the NSA. Try this link http://www.nationalsheep.org.uk/
2. Re:Of course ... by Joce640k · 2015-06-24 00:28 · Score: 1
  
  They know the USA isn't going to stop.
  
  --
  No sig today...
Fear of the past by Max_W · 2015-06-23 18:24 · Score: 3, Insightful

I read that US is afraid that the Nazism (or National Socialism) will again return to the Western Europe and the Communism (or the USSR) to the Eastern Europe, and that is why it has to watch the European leaders carefully.

On the other hand, if we must follow this absurd logic, we could be afraid that the USA will bring back the Slavery into the world. Were not ancient democratic Greece and democratic Rome based on slavery after all? Were not Slavery rampant in the USA still in 19th century?

In my opinion, it is not possible to enter into the same river twice. And it would be much better to worry about the real problems, - the global pollution, mass unemployment, the life extinction on the planet, etc. But not the ridiculous ghosts of the past.
1. Re:Fear of the past by Earthquake+Retrofit · 2015-06-23 19:33 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  And it would be much better to worry about the real problems, - the global pollution, mass unemployment, the life extinction on the planet, etc. But not the ridiculous ghosts of the past.
  I beg to differ. We must prevent the French from transferring top secret guillotine technology to ISIS.
  
  --
  Fifty years of Yippie! 1968-2018
2. Re:Fear of the past by AHuxley · 2015-06-23 20:07 · Score: 1
  
  How far back do you want to go? France had a very good understanding with Germany in WW2 after its surrender. France worked well with and helped Germany under occupation. The US also had Operation Paperclip and other technical needs that where filled by Germans after WW2.
  The US was also aware of some early French atomic power work and patents from the 1940's that would have made total US control of post war nuclear power interesting. The US was not going to allow France get into the lucrative post war nuclear age with early French nuclear patents.
  The US interest in French codes goes back to the TICOM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... efforts at the end of ww2 to see what France (and free French during ww2) was going to do after ww2. The US and UK found a unit of Italian code experts that had an understanding of French methods in the 1940's and used them (under TICOM) to break French diplomatic traffic after ww2.
  As France was rebuilding this flow of embassy traffic was vital to the US and UK as they got product from French embassies in eastern Europe.
  At some point France finally worked out it was losing all its embassy traffic to the US and UK and finally worked out how to shield some of its crypto hardware (total tempest leaking is not good).
  Into the 1950's the US put massive efforts into French product. By the early 1970's France was working well with the UK (at a JIC level) and US in all military and crypto areas.
  France worked well with the UK over the Falklands, offering all technical details to the UK on systems delivered. The 1987 Libya and Chad boarder war saw the French, CIA and UK work very well together.
  The US fear is that quality French brands and products will sell well at a good price and be in demand around the world. South America, Africa, Asia. All parts of the world the US expects to push new US products and services into.
  So France and its top exporters are under constant surveillance by the US gov until the US can capture all French export markets.
  
  --
  Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
3. Re:Fear of the past by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 06:27 · Score: 0
  
  A painless execution device created by a medical doctor would be all too sciency for ISIS. But since the EU has already established trade relationships with the ISIS, as widely reported here in the /., they could get their hands on some patented Viking execution methods, and not paying the appropriated licensing fee for them! The horror.
No controversy here by nicolaiplum · 2015-06-23 20:05 · Score: 2

The NSA is supposed to spy on officials.
It is not supposed to spy wholesale on ordinary citizens, especially those in the USA.
It should not be controversial that they spied on French officials.

--
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled"
1. Re:No controversy here by Zedrick · 2015-06-23 20:35 · Score: 2
  
  > The NSA is supposed to spy on officials.
  
  I don't get that argument. STASI was supposed to spy on East German citizens. Does that make it right? If it's the NSA's job to spy on allies, why not change their damn job description or shut them down?
2. Re:No controversy here by Viol8 · 2015-06-23 21:23 · Score: 1
  
  "If it's the NSA's job to spy on allies, why not change their damn job description or shut them down?"
  Your naivety is touching. Countries have spied on their supposed allies since spying was invented - the french have almost certainly spied on the USA too. Its part of realpolitik. If you think this is new and unprecedented then its time you bought a ticket for the clue train.
3. Re:No controversy here by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 23:41 · Score: 0
  
  I don't think it's any part of the NSA's remit to get caught spying and publicly shamed for it. It makes them look like idiots and by extension makes the government they claim to serve look like idiots.
4. Re:No controversy here by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 00:47 · Score: 1
  
  Ok so I suppose that next time Chinese spy will get caught US media will just say "It is the purpose of China to spy on us, so business as usual", and don't go through the usual China is the bad guy, see, see, see!
5. Re:No controversy here by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 01:04 · Score: 0
  
  Slavery has been around for over a millenia. Appealing to tradition is a poor argument and a logical fallacy. Same with the bandwagon fallacy.
6. Re:No controversy here by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 13:25 · Score: 0
  
  Not really. The NSA's own mission statement says:
  
  The Signals Intelligence mission collects, processes, and disseminates intelligence information from foreign signals for intelligence and counterintelligence purposes and to support military operations. This Agency also enables Network Warfare operations to defeat terrorists and their organizations at home and abroad, consistent with U.S. laws and the protection of privacy and civil liberties.
  
  Note, "from foreign signals". It takes a, frankly, intellectually dishonest reading of that clause to interpret that as extending to "words spoken in a private office". Most people would understand "signals" as being things that are transmitted from one location to another.
  In other words, once the French president picks up the phone, writes a note, or briefs a messenger, anything he says is fair game. Until then, however, he has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
7. Re:No controversy here by manu0601 · 2015-06-25 05:32 · Score: 1
  
  The NSA is supposed to spy on officials.
  NSA is also supposed to not get caught. And french officials are supposed to be outraged even if France does that same kind of spying. At least they did not did it AND get caught.
8. Re:No controversy here by Uberbah · 2015-06-26 21:22 · Score: 1
  
  Your naivety is touching.
  Your tired apologia for Big Brother is nauseating.
  
  Countries have spied on their supposed allies since spying was invented
  England was tapping the entirety of French communications in 1900?
  
  If you think this is new and unprecedented then its time you bought a ticket for the clue train.
  If you think the Vatican having guards makes them equal to the U.S. military because they both have guns, sure.
Intel failed? by Viol8 · 2015-06-23 21:18 · Score: 1

They should have use AMD computers then!
US spying on French military? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 21:34 · Score: 0

I wonder, have and does the US conduct espionage into the various facets of the French military? Would probably be bad if US had espionage into the working of French nuclear weapons systems. US would go probably nuts if anyone did that to them, or so was implied by NSA's Brian Snow on 'cryptographers panel' some years ago iirc
Mr Rains, paging my Claude Rains... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-23 22:22 · Score: 0

We're shocked, shocked to find out there has been spying going on in here.
Super Important by JimSadler · 2015-06-23 22:42 · Score: 4, Informative

Wiki Leaks is so important in correcting social and political issues that it may well be something the history books must feature as a very prominent turning point in history. The more that people around the world are able to see and understand the better our laws and social policies will become. In a way it is simply nothing more than social and political government in the sunshine and we all should demand the kind of access that wiki has created for us. Every utterance of public officials should be public 24/7/365. Corruption could cease to exist.
Standard by Alomex · 2015-06-24 00:27 · Score: 2

In 1989 there were some rather delicate debt renegotiation talks in Washington between the Mexican government, USA and the IMF.
Every night, the Mexican chief negotiator would fly back to Mexico to debrief the president, since no other means of communication were assumed to be NSA proof.
Money well spent. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 01:11 · Score: 0

I guess NSA is being efficient. Probably it was cheaper to spy the French than remote caves where terrorists hide.
What I wrote's nonsense dave420? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 02:26 · Score: 0

"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you here:

"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points of fact in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more, with less, vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + other overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(Which is more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---

"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
I bother you? Use them!
OBVIOUSLY, you don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motivations" (see next):
---
* QUESTION:
DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer that!
No, instead as per your usual, you'll avoid every question, or lie!
(You must be involved with 1 of those above, especially since you can't EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, OR YOU'D USE THEM, merely evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork!)
APK
P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM - evasions galore from him will ensue, guaranteed... apk
Exactly by Anonymous Coward · 2015-06-24 04:11 · Score: 0

I would expect it to be news if they did't spy on them, not the other way around.