Slashdot Mirror


Genetic Rescue Efforts Could Help Coral Shrug Off Warmer Oceans

The Washington Post reports that research published last week in the journal Science indicates that coral reefs may be less vulnerable to ocean temperature changes than has been widely believed, especially given human intervention. A slice: Some corals already have the genes needed to adapt to higher ocean temperatures, and researchers expect those genes will naturally migrate and mix with corals under stress over time ... And that process could potentially be sped up artificially. ... Giving coral evolution a boost isn't an entirely new concept. Some scientists have already suggested genetically modifying corals through artificial breeding, or doing the same for the tiny microbes that live inside corals and are essential to reef growth.

1 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Re: Coral dies all the time by Karmashock · · Score: 3, Informative

    And yet it happened:
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/ja...

    Also this notion that peer review catches all frauds is laughable:
    http://www.nature.com/news/pub...

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

    http://articles.mercola.com/si...

    http://arstechnica.com/science...

    http://www.the-scientist.com/?...

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04...

    As to your point about reading the abstracts. That's not enough. You need to actually have the study itself vetted. And peer review does not do that.

    These studies are getting busted all the time for making things up or using really sloppy methodology that could be "interpreted" to mean anything... often transparently the author had a conclusion they wanted before even starting the study.

    That isn't real science. That's what creationists do. You have to do your study with an open mind and accept whatever the study might say. No forming your theory before the data comes in and no shaping the data to fit your theory. It is FINE to have a hypothesis before you start the study. But it can't go beyond that until you've actually got the data in... and then you base the theory on the data... you do not shape the data to equal your hypothesis.

    And that is frequently what is going on.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.