Slashdot Mirror


Airplane Coatings Help Recoup Fuel Efficiency Lost To Bug Splatter

MTorrice writes: When bugs hit the wings of oncoming airplanes, they create a problem. Their blood, called hemolymph, sticks to an airplane's wings, disrupting the smooth airflow over them and reducing the aircraft's fuel efficiency. To fight the problem, NASA is working on developing a coating that could help aircraft repel bug remains during flight. After experimenting with almost 200 different formulations, researchers recently flight-tested a few promising candidates. Results showed that they could reduce the amount of stuck bug guts on the wings by up to 40%. With further optimization, NASA says such coatings could allow planes to use 5% less fuel.

8 of 117 comments (clear)

  1. Pneumatic bug launcher for the win! by ravenscar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First of all - where do I pick up one of these guns:
    "To test these materials in the lab, researchers developed a pneumatic launcher to fire living bugs at a sample coating. They first used crickets as ammunition, but a physicist colleague urged them to switch to fruit flies, which would be more representative of what planes hit during takeoff and landing."

    Second - I hope they develop a clear coating as I would like it on my motorcycle visor.

    1. Re:Pneumatic bug launcher for the win! by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Lemon Pledge. No seriously. The high dollar aircraft windshield treatment for bugs and water called Plexus is nothing more than Pledge wax with no scent.

      Lemon pledge is used heavily by high mileage motorcyclists for years.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Pneumatic bug launcher for the win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      We use Lemon Pledge to clean our Cessna at the flight club.

      But... the first rule of flight club is YOU DON'T TALK ABOUT FLIGHT CLUB !

  2. Re:I'm skeptical of the 5% claim by Falconhell · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not weight, it's maintaining laminar flow. It only takes very small objects to turbulate the boundary layer, increasing drag considerably.

  3. Re:And ticket prices? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    American corporations will instead do the following.

    Get a government grant for the coatings, claim the actual full purchase price at full retail as the cost and pass that cost to ticket buyers.

    Use the 5% fuel savings as a ,"we are saving the planet.... see? SEE?" advertising campaign.

    Also add the costs of the advertising to the ticket prices.

    Profits go up an additional 75%, claim they need more government subsidies.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  4. Help me with the puzzle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Under every summary, there's a small puzzle of colored blocks. Looks like it says "bird fucking", but I don't get it.

  5. Re:Deicing? by occasional_dabbler · · Score: 3, Informative
    It will make no difference at all. It's a very different issue.

    The most sensitive part of a modern aircraft wing is just aft of the leading edge where the flow makes the transition from subsonic to transonic. Having even 'frosting' in this area can destroy all lift from a wing so they are liberally sprayed with gelatinous treatments that are specially formulated to melt any ice that forms from rain or snow while the aircraft is static, yet become sufficiently diluted during the take off to be washed of the wing for flight.

    Once airborne, the problem becomes one of thermal balance and heat is supplied to the wing leading edges using engine bleed air.

    The bugs don't affect icing and so far, no coating has been found that cna get rid of ice under all conditions mandated by the FAA.

    --
    "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs," I said. "we have a protractor"
  6. So if ... by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... bug parts detract from aircrafts' ability to fly, then how do bugs fly at all.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.