Slashdot Mirror


When Nerds Do BBQ

Rick Zeman writes: On this 4th of July, the day when Americans flock to their grills and smokers, Wired has a fascinating article on a computerized smoker designed by Harvard engineering students. They say, "In prototype form, the smoker looks like a combination of a giant pepper mill, a tandoori oven, and V.I.N.CENT from The Black Hole. It weighs 300 pounds. It has a refueling chute built into the side of it. And it uses a proportional-integral-derivative controller, a Raspberry Pi, and fans to regulate its own temperature, automatically producing an ideal slow-and-low burn."

After cooking >200 lbs of brisket while fine-tuning the design, the students concluded, "Old-school pitmasters are like, 'I cook mine in a garbage can,' and there's a point of pride in that. A lot of the cutting edge is when you take an art form and drag it back onto scientific turf and turn it into an algorithm. I don't think we've diluted the artistic component with this."

149 comments

  1. Nothing to See Here; Move Along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Whomever it is, their begging the question to much

    This.

    Agreed.

    Rediculous

  2. LOX ... pure liquid oxygen by NothingWasAvailable · · Score: 1
    1. Re:LOX ... pure liquid oxygen by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2

      What was that, the first video ever uploaded to the internet?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    2. Re:LOX ... pure liquid oxygen by NothingWasAvailable · · Score: 2

      This was the last (?) of the "fastest way to start the grill" contests held by the Purdue Electrical Engineering honorary, Eta Kappa Nu.

      Fire department made them promise not to do it again.

    3. Re:LOX ... pure liquid oxygen by trout007 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you even work with Liquid Hydrogen you can actually condense Liquid Oxygen out of the air. If it drips onto asphalt it can light it on fire just from the impact.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    4. Re:LOX ... pure liquid oxygen by plopez · · Score: 1

      Bastard! you beat me to it :)

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    5. Re:LOX ... pure liquid oxygen by mmclean · · Score: 1

      Came here on the RSS headline looking for GHG and not leaving disappointed.

    6. Re:LOX ... pure liquid oxygen by NothingWasAvailable · · Score: 1

      Rick Astley was first, this was second.

    7. Re:LOX ... pure liquid oxygen by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we've all heard that tearful story about a worker dropping a wrench on asphalt and dying of explosion because someone spilled oxygen on it earlier. We tried to replicate that back we were students and even if you use pure tar mixed with porous sand, it just does not explode. It does not even burn unless you ignite it with a blowtorch.

      How did we get liquid oxygen? Easy. Just use liquid nitrogen to condense it from air. One large dewar of LN2 nets you about 2 liters of LOX.

    8. Re:LOX ... pure liquid oxygen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looks like the grill melted but the charcoal didn't start.

  3. PID FTW by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I remember watching some BBQ competition TV series (figures, right?) and the winner was an asian dude who built his own PID BBQ fan controllers and used them with cheap grills. It's not impossible for a human to get that kind of consistency, but it's not expensive to let a computer do it any more.

    Now, why aren't all the things PID? People regularly retrofit even digital appliances to be PID because they aren't already, how insane is that?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:PID FTW by trout007 · · Score: 2

      I don't see how a PID controller will help much. You are cooking with very low temperature air (around 200 F). You have this massive ceramic cooker with large heat capacity. It's not a process that is going to run away from you even if you used a simple on/off controller.

      The most important thing for good BBQ is picking a good cut of meat. Do that right and you can throw it in your oven and it will be delicious.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    2. Re:PID FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >why aren't all the things PID
      Probably because PID is only the simplest form of control. It's not actually that good if the thing you are controlling has nonlinear behavior.

    3. Re:PID FTW by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't see how a PID controller will help much.

      It helped him win.

      You are cooking with very low temperature air (around 200 F).

      Yes, temperature control is what PID is used for in this context.

      You have this massive ceramic cooker with large heat capacity.

      No, I'm not talking about TFA, I'm talking about every other BBQ. Anyway you can buy a PID fan controller as a complete unit and stick it up your Weber's arse.

      The most important thing for good BBQ is picking a good cut of meat. Do that right and you can throw it in your oven and it will be delicious.

      That's not even BBQ.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:PID FTW by sycodon · · Score: 1

      There are already commercial grade ovens the precisely control smoke and hea pretty much any BBQ shop that does more than a few hundred pounds a day uses these.

        MIT is reinventing the wheel.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    5. Re:PID FTW by Agripa · · Score: 1

      why aren't all the things PID

      Probably because PID is only the simplest form of control. It's not actually that good if the thing you are controlling has nonlinear behavior.

      PID loops are not the simplest; they require frequency compensation. Hysteretic loops including constant on or off time loops do not and are simpler. A bang-bang type thermostat with a deadband implements a hysteretic loop. Hysteretic loops also have the advantage of not suffering from windup like the integral part of a PID loop although anti-windup can always be added to a PID loop.

      For a BBQ I would use a PID controller though and I agree with poster's sentiment; I would prefer a PID controller for ovens and ranges and such.

    6. Re:PID FTW by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I spent some time, a lot of it, in the South and Midwest. Kansas and Illinois had some of the best BBQs but I have to give the Pulled Pork Award to either Georgia, Alabama, or Florida. I also lived in North Carolina. Somewhere between GA and NC the secret to BBQ has been lost. Somewhere it became something you could do in your oven or, almost worse in some ways, something you did on top of a disposable open-top grill. Also, it is done in a half hour... *sighs* Louisiana does a good BBQ but they seem inclined to put anything edible on the table. I love me a good BBQ.

      Over a summer a few friends and I built two pits plus a shed to house the BBQ equipment and a second Kegerator. It gets pulled out every year on the last weekend of July (our balanced month of Summer's Maniac Middle). We put buried power down to it so the two puts have rotating variable spits. The standard fare is a large smoked turkey, a pig, and a half of a cow. I got a turkey fryer but I have only fried two of them so far, it was not as well liked as I was hoping. I am thinking of smoking a goose and frying another turkey this year. Then again, maybe getting a second (or even a third) smoker is a good idea and I can smoke a turkey and, if the second is large enough, I can smoke two birds and a couple of smaller birds as well. I am thinking a turkey, goose, and a couple of partridge would be nice. I found a recipe for 'honey brined smoked turkey' online and I would like to try it. It reads like it would be very tasty.

      I do not drink anymore but I am not the jackass ex-drunk. I have a keg in the Kegerator on the deck, some in my fridge even, and will be picking up another few kegs for the festivities at the end of the month. I do not make beer or wine any more which is, honestly, no real loss as I have never made anything exceptional. Anyhow, I mentioned that so that I could also mention that we are thinking about making a fold-out "bar" to be manned from inside the shed itself. The shed was built with this future in mind so it was built with quite a bit of extra space.

      What we are trying to figure out, some sketches have been done, is how to take the "bar" and fold it up for transportation to and from the house. I do not want to leave the alcohol down there as it would be tempting some folks. I generally trust all the people that come here and would know about the bar but I do not trust the people that they may tell about it. There is likely to be a decent investment in booze going on and, frankly, I also do not want to be encouraging anyone who may have control issues. The current, most universal, idea is to make a cover that has 8" deep foam attached to it and is cut to the reverse lines of the shelving. This can then just be put on the front, latched down, and carried back to the house. The expected total number of bottles varies between 25 and 40 count estimates so this would be easily carried by two people. I am, of course, open to suggestions but I am a bit late to the thread to expect much in the way of responses.

      Anyhow, this year is the first year that it is going to be a multi-day event. I have encouraged people to come and stay the weekend. Normally a lot of them tent and the house that was here when I built my house is still completely functional so there is no problem there. I have already set up with a company to provide two additional outside toilets and rented sound equipment. We have done a live band before and then left the equipment up for open mic performances. It was not as good as we had hoped. So if anyone has any ideas, specifically about a collapsible bar or any geeky things (I am putting a wireless AP/repeater in when it arrives), then I am all ears/eyeballs.

      Hell, it is from July 31st to August 2nd and anyone willing to go north and east of Rangeley is more than welcome. It would be kind of awesome to have a /.er or 100 show up. Emails go to uninvolved (at) outlook (dot) com. It is an open invitation though I do not anticipate any /.ers coming. There is plenty of

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    7. Re:PID FTW by KGIII · · Score: 1

      What has MIT got to do with this?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  4. Low-tech for a reason by TWX · · Score: 2

    Part of the reason that some of us take pride in our low-tech solutions is because we can achieve results above and beyond that of others even if we don't have any resources. I'm reminded how when Richard Petty crashed a stock car in the sixties during a big race; the team got the car back into running shape and aligned it with string to compare the geometry and got him back into the race, which he won. No fancy computer alignment or specialized tools, some mechanics hand tools and knowledge got them the solution.

    It's great to use fancy tools or to construct a high-end system, but there's something to be said for being able to make it work without anything more than a brain and a few applied steps.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Low-tech for a reason by plover · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Through lifelong dedication, a craftsman can align a car with a string, or smoke BBQ in a trash can, or whatever it is he or she does. But their activity doesn't scale beyond what they can personally produce. And if they end up smoking 100 pounds of meat per day to run their restaurant, that's it. There's little time left in the day to innovate. Craftsmen don't scale well, unless they industrialize their processes, (and then you risk ending up with a product with all the qualities of Budweiser.).

      The rest of us are dedicated to other things: jobs, families, other hobbies. Does our inexperience mean we can't enjoy products of similar quality as the craftsmen produce? What's wrong with distilling the essence of their wisdom into a PID controller and an Atmel chip? If my BBQ-bot fails, I'm certainly not going to fix it with string - but that's not the point. The point is I could occasionally enjoy a high quality smoked brisket, thanks to a machine that knows more than I do about the process.

      --
      John
    2. Re:Low-tech for a reason by byornski · · Score: 1

      -1 for car reference. It was going so well

    3. Re:Low-tech for a reason by TWX · · Score: 1

      Smoking a brisket the traditional way, while requiring skill, is not something that's so complex that it can't be learned fairly quickly, probably more quickly than implementing a sophisticated control system to attempt to do it otherwise unattended. Besides, to implement one's own system one already needs to have mastered the skill to know what to implement in the first place, or has to learn the skill as one goes.

      I've learned that I should not cook on a large scale. My wife and I can only eat so much and if we cook too much we get sick of whatever leftovers are generated too fast. I don't need to learn industrial or commercial processes for cooking as all I'll generate is waste. In a restaurant setting I'd be worried that too much automation would risk a breakdown that could cripple the menu on a busy night too, so even if automation is used to streamline the process there will still be a need to check on the condition of the product as it's cooked.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re:Low-tech for a reason by plover · · Score: 3

      No, I don't have to learn any of the skills, at all, and I don't want to. I don't want to spend days or hours or even minutes learning the finer points of pit BBQ, and that's the entire point of buying this robot. I don't have to learn when to turn up the heat or turn it down, I don't have to know how much wood to put in or when. I don't have to check on the condition of the product. I simply give my charge card to Williams-Sonoma, haul the BBQbot home and plug it in, add meat and wood, and get delicious brisket out the other end. Every. Single. Time. I wasted zero of my time learning how to barbeque brisket - I just enjoy the results of other people's learnings. If the robot fails, I drag it back to Williams-Sonoma and ask them to service it. It would be no different than any other tool that I own that I don't fix myself.

      I don't understand your preoccupation with fear of breakdowns of systems. I know that some days, despite scheduled maintenance, my truck will breakdown in some way I can't fix and that I'll have to have to deal with a problem. Fear of the inevitable breakdown doesn't mean I sell my truck today and walk to work. It means that I understand the truck can break, and that some days I'll have to call for a tow. Similarly if the BBQbot fails in my restaurant, I tell the servers to 86 the brisket, and we sell grilled chicken until the replacement robot arrives.

      As a business owner, why would I buy a BBQbot instead of hiring a pit master? Because the robot costs me $20,000, and it stays in the kitchen 24x7x365. A pit master has weekends, takes vacations, calls in sick (or doesn't call in at all), and costs me $60,000 every year. I'd be far more worried about hiring a temperamental person that could quit and cripple the menu on a busy night. And if I discovered I was that utterly dependent on the robot, I'd simply buy two of them.

      Every business risks breakdowns of all kinds of complex systems every day: plumbing, fires, melted freezers, employees quitting, roof collapses, electrical problems, labor problems, yet most manage to stay in business even through disasters. Why? Because they know how to adapt to problems, and because taking the risks yields far more reward than doing nothing; instead of sitting there paralyzed by the fear that something might go wrong.

      --
      John
    5. Re:Low-tech for a reason by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Part of the reason that some of us take pride in our low-tech solutions is because we can achieve results above and beyond that of others even if we don't have any resources.

      There's that, of course. But I think a very significant part of doing things by hand, with simple means, is that you enjoy the actual process, being able to apply your skills and achieve something that isn't trivially easy, but requires insight into what you are doing.

      Years ago I worked for an American company, and I got to talk to one of the vice-presidents about fishing. To me fishing is something about trying to land a single fish or maybe two with a bit of cleverness and local knowledge, but to him it consisted in owning a 60 foot vessel on one of the big lakes, equipped with sonar, trawl etc etc. Or take bread making - you can probably make a good bread in one of these automatic breadmakers, but I can't imagine why I would want to skip the most enjoyable part of it.

    6. Re:Low-tech for a reason by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      There are actually already a lot of BBQ products out there much like this one. And the issue is the cost and output capacity. That and there is a good bit of high importance effort that goes into good BBQ outside of the smoker. You want consistency in the cuts of meat, but you'll never get perfection so you have to learn to work with it. The meat needs to be trimmed properly. Seasoning needs to be mixed and applied, whether it's a marinade, dry rub, mop sauce, or table sauce. You've gotta keep the meat as cool as possible without freezing it, before actually starting the smoke. It's kind of funny to me that they are going to all this effort when the actual smoking of the meat is the easiest part of the process. People have been making Ugly Drum Smokers for a long time now on the cheap. And even Charbroil makes water barrel smokers that can turn out amazingly tasty food for $40. I use a Pit Barrel Cooker myself now because it's just too easy and convenient to justify anything more complex.

      It's kind of like that company that made a big money computerized sniper scope system when actually shooting the target is one of the easier parts of sniping. The hard part is everything up to and after that point.

    7. Re:Low-tech for a reason by msimm · · Score: 1

      I agree with your business argument 90% of the time. And that's why we have artisans. A $20,000 BBQbot can cook consistently, but it will never get bored while on-shift and create something new to improve your menu (or your business in general). If you want to exceed the mean you'll still need the kind of SME that calls in sick and takes vacations.

      --
      Quack, quack.
  5. Lost me at the beginning. by trout007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    “Mechanical engineers, it’s not a required class for them,” says bioengineering major Jordan DeGraaf. “There are no mechanical engineers who take this class. They just run away.”

    This class is a ME for Non ME's. Everything in this project/class is what is the core of what ME is. Fluid Flow, Heat Transfer, Sensors, Controls, Materials, etc. I'm guessing the reason there are no ME's in it is because they are taking the real ME classes.

    This is similar to when I was in school for ME but I had to take one EE class for non EE majors. There were no EE's in there not because it was hard but because it was easy.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    1. Re:Lost me at the beginning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely, the class is ME for non MEs and MEs can't take the credit since it is watered down. There were lots of classes fitting that description in both of my engineering degrees. Something along the lines of cross discipline required classes and whatnot.

    2. Re:Lost me at the beginning. by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      This class is a ME for Non ME's. Everything in this project/class is what is the core of what ME is. Fluid Flow, Heat Transfer, Sensors, Controls, Materials, etc. I'm guessing the reason there are no ME's in it is because they are taking the real ME classes.

      Also, no offense to Harvard, but Harvard is NOT generally known for its engineering programs. Just in the past couple of years, Harvard has started to try to make a shift there, but generally Harvard was a place to go for liberal arts, econ, and hard sciences. There's a much better engineering school "down the road" in Cambridge that's much better known for engineering. (And that school -- MIT -- is known to make fun of Harvard all of the time for its lack of engineering skills.)

      I'm not saying these Harvard kids aren't smart -- I'm sure they are. But you're looking at a heat transfer kind of class intended for engineering students who actually wouldn't take a better heat transfer class... at a school that traditionally has downplayed engineering. (Harvard historically disliked "practical" training in college -- that was professional schools, not an undergrad liberal arts degree.)

    3. Re: Lost me at the beginning. by afidel · · Score: 1

      I believe this class was taught as part of the MIT/Harvard cross teaching program.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Lost me at the beginning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and Harvard students make fun of MIT fort their lack of social skills.

  6. Old-School vs Old-School by Shoten · · Score: 1

    So, as far as the old-school pitmasters go, look at it like this:

    Let's say someone wanted to go through engineering school using software that would do all kinds of mathematical equations for them, without them having to learn the underlying math and other discrete skills that the software automates for them. You'd frown upon that, right?

    That's kind of how the old-school pitmasters look at rigs like this. It has a purpose, and it has value...but you won't get any respect for using one.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:Old-School vs Old-School by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's kind of how the old-school pitmasters look at rigs like this. It has a purpose, and it has value...but you won't get any respect for using one.

      I don't want respect, I want brisket that isn't dried out like literally every bit of brisket I've had outside of Texas.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Old-School vs Old-School by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I followed this brisket treatise and had wonderful results.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    3. Re:Old-School vs Old-School by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Until you can buy an iBBQ, come to PDX. We have awesome BBQ. That, or maybe I don't know good barbecue:)

      http://www.smokehouse21.com
      http://podnahspit.com/

  7. Straw man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are plenty of pit masters using PID-controlled hopper-fed pit smokers. They've been on the market for years. The smoker looks great in comparison to neanderthals holding meat over fire on sticks, but it's not groundbreaking technology now. The shape may be nice, but they don't address usable cooking area, sturdiness, and many other factors that make a good smoker.

  8. PIDs and fans? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

    My Rec Tec Grill has that, and it does a great job. I love to mix cherry and mesquite to do my slow-smoked brisket (12-14 hours at 200 deg F).

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:PIDs and fans? by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Can you tell the difference between pellets and real logs of wood? It seems like it would make a difference. Aren't pellets made from grinding up the wood into sawdust, then pressing back together with steam? Lots of sap/resin/aromatics would be lost in that process.

  9. Is that all it is for Independence Day? by mi · · Score: 2

    On this 4th of July, the day when Americans flock to their grills and smokers

    That's it? Seriously? Rather depressing...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Is that all it is for Independence Day? by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      On this 4th of July, the day when Americans flock to their grills and smokers

      That's it? Seriously? Rather depressing...

      "That's it" is baggage you're bringing to this discussion; it's not my baggage. Whether anyone is cognizant of what the fourth stands for or not is independent of the fact that both the ignorant and the enlightened are doing the same thing today: barbecuing. Except, perhaps, those trolling from their mother's basements.

      ~ the poster.

    2. Re:Is that all it is for Independence Day? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      infowars.com

      Where the real 'Murikans hang out on the 4th of July.

      Because we know Alex Jones would never, ever say anything that's not the God's truth.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Is that all it is for Independence Day? by Deadstick · · Score: 3, Funny

      Barbecuing is optional. What counts is drinking beer and playing with explosives.

    4. Re:Is that all it is for Independence Day? by mi · · Score: 1

      Because we know Alex Jones

      • Q: What do Illiberals have other than ad hominem?
      • A: Nothing.

      Please, don't hate.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    5. Re:Is that all it is for Independence Day? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Please, don't hate.

      Oh, look who's being the SJW now. Don't mistake laughing at the ridiculous for hatred.

      Here are some of Alex Jones' "mark my words" predictions:

      Bank runs in February 2009. 9/11-scale terror attacks in 2010. 50% of the U.S. population will be killed in a bio-weapons attack in 2009. 16 year-old soldiers will enforce nationwide martial law by 2012. A major terror attack will occur in the U.S. by the end of summer 2009 (oh, and it’s a false flag). The U.S. will go to war with Russia in 2009. Texas stores are being looted and National Guard troops are moving into Austin right this minute (December 31, 1999). The UN will announce the presence of ET intelligence during 2009 to stage a NWO takeover. The U.S. dollar will be devalued by 50% by 2012.

      And this is just the tip of the iceberg.

      Even David Icke laughs at Alex Jones for being dopey.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Is that all it is for Independence Day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, fuck you, retard.

      Whenever a poster refutes you with superior evidence, you turn tail and run.

      Ad hominem arguments are the only ones you know how to counter.

  10. Nerds doing BBQs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hilarious. I've seen'em. They get hurt all the time. They get burnt. They cut themselves while trying to eat. They stuff hot stuff in their mouths and then scream. They drink beer by the gallons and then they get violently sick and throw up all over the place. I have seen one flailing about like a spazz and fall upon a lighted barbecue. He turned into a human torch. So funny. Nerds have no business doing Real People stuff.

  11. CNN reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Shit Has Hit the Fan"

  12. Re:Happy 4th of July! by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whoever's in charge of this guy, please lower his dose of Kool-Aid.

    Thank you.

  13. Real Nerds don't BBQ by plopez · · Score: 1

    It interrupts their hacking sessions....

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:Real Nerds don't BBQ by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      You can do both. I've spent today running back and forth between my grill and RStudio.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    2. Re:Real Nerds don't BBQ by plopez · · Score: 1

      What did you do about the sauce?

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  14. Re:BBQ is for cows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I eat Tofurky on the 4th of July you insensitive clod!

  15. Needs to do more by Jayson · · Score: 1

    Alton Brown is King Geek Chef and has a rule about unitaskers, single-purpose devices: don't buy them. Turn this into a unit than can also BBQ lamb and cold smoke fish and cheese, please.

    1. Re:Needs to do more by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      FWIW, Alton does admit to having one unitasker in his kitchen, although he's never needed to use it: a fire extinguisher.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Needs to do more by glitch! · · Score: 1

      That's interesting information, and of course it brings up the question, "Why not make it a multpurpose device?"

      "Hey Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
      "Well, I think so, Brain. If it had separate compartments and a switching valve, you could use it to fight fires, or quickly dispense spices and breading."
      "Exactly, Pinky! With such a device in every kitchen, we could take over the world!"

      --
      A dingo ate my sig...
    3. Re:Needs to do more by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      If memory serves, he did use a fire extinguisher as a rolling pin to crush something (I don't remember what, either nuts or ice.) in a special to celebrate the show's tenth anniversary, but never on the show itself.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    4. Re: Needs to do more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Au contraire, you can use that fire extinguisher to pound out a schitzel or repel boarding pirate ninjas.

    5. Re:Needs to do more by Gryle · · Score: 1

      He used it to rapidly chill fruit and make a smoothy. I was once at one of his live shows and he used the same principle to make ice-cream in something like 30 seconds.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  16. Not exactly cutting edge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a bbq Stoker automatic temp control formy smoker. There are like 5 popular atc (automatic temp control) products and tons of homebrew options. Taking the tech beyond that serves no purpose.

  17. Size Matters when it comes to Grilling ... by xmas2003 · · Score: 1

    For your grilling pleasure, here's an entry for the Biggest BBQ Grill
    ... complete with super-cool looking Griller! ;-)

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
  18. Og by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Smoke plus meat not hard. Og do great!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  19. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  20. How does blighty celebrate USA's independence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How?

    I'll tell you.

    They don't.

    Never have.

    Never will.

  21. engineering for the sake of engineering (ego) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what these engineers created is the world's most inefficient, largest carbon footprint even before its first cook BBQ.

    I mean, all that tech in the BBQ, brain power and setup is a waste of energy.

    Throw it into a cast iron BBQ, set the fuel amount, set the airflow, then cook and relax--will be within temps for what? 8hrs or so? This BBQ is overkill for precision, but a waste of energy.

    It take a lot more energy to be precise. It take little energy to be accurate. Food doesn't need to be precise. Easy lesson in using the right tool for the application...

  22. Run of the Mill by pubwvj · · Score: 2

    This is much like a commercial meat smoker. They have all of these features. They're completely automated. It's how we're makin' bacon in the modern day.

    1. Re:Run of the Mill by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      It's not *like* a commercial meat smoker, it *is* a commercial heat smoker... and they've been around for years. It's also a Big Green Egg with a few accessories, which has also been around for years. Yes, I know they claim it's better - but their claim is based on failing to operate the Egg properly, a hotspot should not exist under the vent and even if it did it should have no effect on an Egg properly rigged for a raised indirect cook.

    2. Re:Run of the Mill by pubwvj · · Score: 1

      Yes, that was rather my point. If you go to a commercial smokehouse company who smokes bacon, hams, hocks, trotters, etc you will find they have a box with similar brains that computer controls all the details and has recipes for different products.

      I've read about them a lot, studied them in situ and am working on building one for our on-farm smokehouse. What they hype in the article is quite familiar and not particularly novel. This is just media hype. PR.

  23. I lost interest when I saw brisket by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    Who builds something like that and then puts a brisket in it?

    If I put that much energy into making a grill... I'd put a better piece of meat into it.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who builds something like that and then puts a brisket in it?

      If I put that much energy into making a grill... I'd put a better piece of meat into it.

      Let me get this straight, you read past "BBQ"... but stopped at brisket?

      City boy.

    2. Re:I lost interest when I saw brisket by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Guilty as charged... Still... brisket?

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    3. Re:I lost interest when I saw brisket by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Guilty as charged... Still... brisket?

      Wow. Just wow. Brisket is one of the most flavorful and delicious cuts of meat. It's cheap because it requires a lot of prep, not because it's not "good." That's pretty typical for meat -- the stuff you can just throw on a grill and cook in 5 minutes: that's expensive. The stuff that's also ridiculously flavorful and beefy but which takes at least 12 hours of careful cooking (usually because it's tough and has lots of connective tissue, not because it doesn't have great flavor)... well, that's cheap, because rich people are lazy, I guess.

      I love a high-quality ribeye. But if you give me a good-quality smoker and sufficient time, I'd choose brisket over any steak any day. If you haven't had slow-smoked brisket that made you cry because it was so awesome, you have no business commenting on this article.

    4. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Properly cooked brisket is awesome. I'm a top ranked competitive BBQ cook, and I can telnet, send http posts, open sockets, and send JSON instructions to my smokers. Not sure what they are doing you can't already do with the commercial gear being used on the BBQ circuit. If they really thing they have something let them try it vs. experienced cooks in a sanction contest,

    5. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I'm probably just spoiled by really nice meat.

      One of my family members owns a small ranch. He raises top quality beef. Most of it is exported to Japan.

      I buy all my serious meat from him. Never frozen. Grass fed... From the slaughterhouse to my plate.

      I've had texas BBQ. Best steak houses etc.

      No offense to those fellow but its massively over rated in my opinion.

      What great BBQ tradition do I hail from? I couldn't say. I'm from Cali and I can often improvise something that is better than that stuff. Obviously with just really good ingredients. But as they say... you use what you have... and I have really good meat. :P

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    6. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm probably just spoiled by really nice meat.

      So...what cut of meat would you use instead of brisket?

    7. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm probably just spoiled by really nice meat.

      That's what my wife said.

    8. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What great BBQ tradition do I hail from? I couldn't say.

      You can't say because you hail from none.

      I'm from Cali and I can often improvise something that is better than that stuff.

      Jesus, what a self-important little prick you are. Another reason no intelligent reader here takes you seriously

    9. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm probably just spoiled by really nice meat.

      We're talking here about the meat that goes into your piehole, not your cornhole you faggot.

    10. Re:I lost interest when I saw brisket by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I love a high-quality ribeye. But if you give me a good-quality smoker and sufficient time, I'd choose brisket over any steak any day.

      Can't we have both?

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    11. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know. I told her to have some discretion. She just said you enjoy being a cuckold.

    12. Re:I lost interest when I saw brisket by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Those who eat my brisket call it "beef bacon".

      It is considerably more moist and tender than bacon, but I appreciate the comparison.

      Cooked on a Traeger pellet stove, which is essentially this device, including a thermal controller for the pellet feeder. Set a temp, and forget it.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    13. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Tri-tip is well known in California but harder to find outside of California, and makes a great slow cooked alternative to brisket.

      Leaner than a brisket, it is a little trickier, but it gets a good smoke ring and can be done either medium rare or cooked until falling apart. Anything inbetween is a little tough. Also, I can get them in about a 2 to 3 pound cut Price is slightly higher than brisket, but I don't have to buy so much at a time. It is triangular, so I can cook one end more well done and the thick end is more rare. This make it a hit with those who like their meat a specific doneness.

      The first meal we get from it is usually just sliced a little thick and served with potatoes or something.

      Leftovers are added to a mixed green salad with red onions, blue cheese, dried cranberries and raspberry vinaigrette. Yum... I am drooling already.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    14. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      This is definitely a mainstay of cali BBQ.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    15. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      No intelligent reader takes me seriously says an AC?

      Who takes you seriously?

      The unending hypocrisy of ACs to remain so anonymous they don't even use a consistent fake name like mine... and then to judge the histories of people that ACTUALLY log in. You could be posting about your love of goat sex in other threads and there'd be no way to associate that with you. But I'm a bad man because I actually log in? Who the fuck do you think you are? You're some garbage can that is so terrified of being judged he won't even use a fake name.

      Oh... and I have an EXCELLENT karma rating. So... actually on average most people appreciate my posts. Suck it.

      No one takes ACs seriously, shithead. You're all trolls and people that have been so crippled by negative judgements from your peers that you don't even feel comfortable posting under a fake name.

      https://youtu.be/bafxzamsGgY?t...

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    16. Re:I lost interest when I saw brisket by loufoque · · Score: 2

      Damn, that was beef?
      The meat they showed looks like pork.

      Don't you crazy americans don't know what beef is supposed to look like? Protip: if it's not red inside, it's overcooked.

    17. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're all trolls and people that have been so crippled by negative judgements from your peers that you don't even feel comfortable posting under a fake name.

      And yet a large proportion of your posts are in response to ACs. You can call us all the names you want, but your behavior speaks for itself. We LOVE the fact that you keep feeding us. And the food you provide is chock full of nutrients!

    18. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I don't believe in the tactic of "not feeding the trolls"...

      I engage them.

      And really you're just admitting that I'm right, aren't you troll filth? :D

      The problem with the don't feed the trolls concept is that it only works if you can outright censor them. You have to ignore them until someone comes in and bans you.

      but that isn't going to happen in most places so this "don't feed the trolls" idea actually becomes "surrender to the trolls".

      I don't surrender to trolls. I blow through you idiots like a freight train through a paper mache carnival. I have no reason to avoid contact.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    19. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, tri-tip is great. Thing is, tri-tip, is typically grilled, not smoked - and TFA is about a smoker. In any case, saying that tri-tip is a better meat than brisket for smoking is a bit of a stretch - and only an idiot would suggest that brisket is a poor choice for smoking.

    20. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason most people don't feed the trolls is that they don't have the time to engage with idiots. But apparently, engaging with idiots is one of your favorite pastimes. You love us idiots! Too bad you don't recognize our success in dragging you down. In front of everybody. Every day.

    21. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      You got one thing straight... I do like fighting idiots... its so easy!

      Often my forum wars feel like this to me:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      And I'll point out that there's only so much work for me because there aren't enough people helping me keep back the green tide. :D

      Its a sunday morning... and I'm in my underwear slapping fools around between games of "Dirty Bomb" until a store opens where I need to run an errand... then I'm off to a big 4th of july themed party that is on the 5th for no reason.

      That's my day. :P

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    22. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      ... I'm not arguing that about smoking... I'm just not sure why i would do that in the first place.

      Smoking is not something I do... I've gone to places that do it and frequently it is really hard for me to see what all the fuss is about. Maybe that's just me and everyone else is nuts for smoked meat.

      It strikes me a bit like the california oak wine thing. There was this point in the California wine industry where they they thought having an oaky flavor was a plus. So they'd literally put oak wood chips in the wine while it fermented and aged. Needless to say... it made the wine taste gross but a lot of people thought it was more sophisticated or something because it tasted like wood.

      The smoke thing is kind of similar... you've got people picking the right kind of wood they want to have smoke their meat... they want the smoke to really impart a flavor on the meat...

      Why do I want any of these things? Since when do I want to taste burnt wood in my meat? The hell. And I'm pretty sure liquid smoke is the grossest thing ever.

      I'm also not a fan of dry rub. I think they do that in texas because they smoke everything but I prefer a proper marinade ideally.

      I do a lot of asian fusion stuff. I just mess around... people seem to like it and above all I stay interested.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    23. Re:I lost interest when I saw brisket by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      at least 12 hours

      I can only do a smallish (7-9 pound) brisket this way due to space considerations, but I've discovered that 48 hours in apple cider vinegar, flipping every 12, can cut the time-to-perfect-brisket down to 6-8 hours. The ACV also gives the meat just a hint of tang, no sauce needed.

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    24. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I'm not arguing that about smoking... I'm just not sure why i would do that in the first place.

      Uh, because TFS/TFA described a "computerized smoker"? And your response to that was:

      "Who builds something like that and then puts a brisket in it?"

      Do you often forget what you've written in a matter of minutes?

      Smoking is not something I do...

      That's pretty obvious.

      I've gone to places that do it and frequently it is really hard for me to see what all the fuss is about.

      Hardly surprising, since you don't know the difference between grilling and smoking.

      Maybe that's just me and everyone else is nuts for smoked meat.

      Yeah, that's pretty much it. Why is it you're participating in this thread?

      Since when do I want to taste burnt wood in my meat?

      Probably never. That's why you should stay away from any discussions about BBQ.

      I'm also not a fan of dry rub.

      Yet another reason you should avoid commenting.

      I think they do that in texas because they smoke everything but I prefer a proper marinade ideally.

      Uh huh. I'm surprised you could say that with a dick shoved into your mouth. That's the only meat you can speak to with any level of expertise.

      I do a lot of asian fusion stuff. I just mess around... people seem to like it and above all I stay interested.

      Funniest thing I've read on the internet all day.

    25. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I saw "when nerds BBQ"... Not when nerds make tedious and generally not very rewarding texas smokers less of a pain in the ass.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    26. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a sunday morning... and I'm in my underwear slapping fools around between games of "Dirty Bomb" until a store opens where I need to run an errand... then I'm off to a big 4th of july themed party that is on the 5th for no reason.

      Considering how much time you spend angrily yelling at people on slashdot, it would seem highly likely the first part of that mirrors every other day for you. Not that you have yet demonstrated any marketable skills for the job market to date, but have you considered looking for employment? It might fill the void in your life more effectively than your current strategy; your parents might appreciate it as well.

    27. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      You don't know how much time I spend. I can make no more than 50 posts in a day and very rarely hit that limit.

      how long do you think it takes me to make a post on this site?

      Average posts per day is something like 25... when I get dog piled by fucktards and feel like slapping them around I could hit 50 in a day but that's rare.

      25 posts... how long does that take you?

      How illiterate are you that 25 posts seems like a full day's work to you?

      And I love that you hypocritical fuckwits think you can judge me when no one can audit your stupid asses. I'm convinced there are far fewer of you than it seems and its just the same couple fucktards posting as AC over and over again.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    28. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      I take it you've never tried Pecan Lodge in Dallas, or Franklin's in Austin?

    29. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just the number of posts (although they are mind-boggling), it's the SPREAD over a 24 hour period.

      It's painfully obvious you have no life outside of slashdot. As sad as that is, your comments here indicate a miserable character as well.

    30. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got something against Texas? Too bad. Smoking meat is way bigger than Texas - and that's pretty fucking big.

      Just stay out of discussions about bbq and we'll all be a lot better for it.

    31. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can make no more than 50 posts in a day and very rarely hit that limit.
       
      thank you for confirming that indeed your earlier remark of being limited to 25 is indeed a lie. granted, your posting history showed that very plainly but now you admit it as well.

      even more so, who the fuck writes 50 posts in a day? even if every post is just a short bit of angry profanity - as most of yours are - it still takes time to vomit them up and hit the requisite buttons. granted, you seem to speed up your process by not really reading what it written to you, but still that is not a trivial amount of time. even people here with excellent karma are generally limited to no more than 1 post every 2 or 3 minutes; that suggests you are spending at least 2-3 hours a day doing nothing but writing angry comments on slashdot.

      seriously, with the kind of skills you demonstrate yourself to have, you could make upwards of 20 dollars or more if you spent that much time at the best job you qualify for.
       
      seriously kid - as the others have said - get help. some day your parents will be dead and you may need to find housing.

    32. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Hence my comment it is an alternative... especially when I am not feeding a crowd but just 3 or 4 people.

      Typical full brisket around here is 6 to 12 lbs. Doing just the flat is just disgusting. The deckle is where the flavor is!

      That is like 6 weeks of red meat dietary budget.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    33. Re:I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who builds something like that and then puts a brisket in it?

      It's a smoker, genius. Smokers are used for exactly this kind of cut of meat. Smokers are used to take inexpensive cuts of meat, cook them slowly, and turn them into incredible dishes.

      So to answer your question directly, any intelligent person who knows BBQ would do that. You don't smoke filet, you smoke brisket.

    34. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know how much time I spend.

      LOL, unless you have someone else posting under you handle, we know *exactly* how much time you spend. They don't call it "posting history" for nuthin!

    35. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seriously, with the kind of skills you demonstrate yourself to have, you could make upwards of 20 dollars or more if you spent that much time at the best job you qualify for.

      Karmaschmuck has already been fired from all the jobs he's qualified for. That's why we're so blessed to have him here all day every day. It's the first best use of his sorry existence. His parents are very proud!

    36. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by SpankiMonki · · Score: 1

      I take it you've never tried Pecan Lodge in Dallas, or Franklin's in Austin?

      If he had, he'd prolly be cured of his foot-in-mouth disease. ;-)

      Pecan Lodge...started in shed 2, landed in deep ellum...poised to take over the world!

    37. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw "when nerds BBQ"... Not when nerds make tedious and generally not very rewarding texas smokers less of a pain in the ass.

      It's OK sugar tits, we Texans have grown accustomed to California's inferiority complex. YEE HAH!!! [gunshots]

    38. Re:I lost interest when I saw brisket by KGIII · · Score: 1

      LOL Someone is going to tell the beef capital of the world about beef? Beef, it is like the one thing Americans can do right on a regular basis. Well, assuming you stay out of chain restaurants. I suspect you have never tried it. People are often afraid of what they do not understand and tend to be critical of it as a defense mechanism. So, I understand. You should try some sometime.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    39. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can make no more than 50 posts in a day and very rarely hit that limit.

      So now your limit is 50 per day, huh? Just a few weeks ago, you were claiming that Slashdot wouldn't let you post more than 25 times in a 24-hour period.

      When several ACs pointed out that your claim was utter bullshit, you then stated that you would "win" the argument by showing us a "screen cap" of the error message from Slashdot saying you were not allowed to post more than 25 times in a 24-hour period. Do you have that screen cap for us yet?

      Don't worry -- we already know the answer. It was obvious you were lying then, and it's even more obvious now.

    40. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do a lot of asian fusion stuff.

      I bet you do.

      I just mess around... people seem to like it and above all I stay interested.

      I'm a fit, shaved young boy with Thai heritage...can you point me to your Craigslist ad? You won't be sorry!

    41. Re:I lost interest when I saw brisket by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If you haven't had slow-smoked brisket that made you cry because it was so awesome, you have no business commenting on this article.

      The only food that's ever made me cry is burnt chillis.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    42. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Ah, SEE... this is what is so funny. There are so many fewer of you idiots than it appears! You were the shit head AC from that discussion weren't you?

      Well... I copied the error the next time I got it:
      ""
        Call It A Night, Cowboy!
      Slashdot only allows a user with your karma to post 50 times per day (more or less, depending on moderation). You've already shared your thoughts with us that many times. Take a breather, and come back and see us in 24 hours or so. If you think this is unfair, please email posting@slashdot.org with your username "Karmashock". Let us know how many comments you think you've posted in the last 24 hours. ""

      I got this one the other day because I was arguing with so many halfwits... The hills were fucking alive with morons.

      Anyway, I KNEW you'd keep stalking me so... when I got the error, I copied it. Bazzoom!

      If you actually logged in... and you actually made a lot of posts... you'd get that message. I was wrong when I said 25 because I didn't remember the number. I love that you think you can claim I'm a liar for that... You're adorable.

      Now you know. Suck it.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    43. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I wasn't lying. I was mistaken. If you literally don't understand the difference then you're too stupid to have an opinion more meaningful than your favorite jello cup.

      ""Call It A Night, Cowboy!
      Slashdot only allows a user with your karma to post 50 times per day (more or less, depending on moderation). You've already shared your thoughts with us that many times. Take a breather, and come back and see us in 24 hours or so. If you think this is unfair, please email posting@slashdot.org with your username "Karmashock". Let us know how many comments you think you've posted in the last 24 hours. ""

      Here is the message. I get this maybe once a month.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    44. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Show me your posting history please.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    45. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      still not a screen capture. still not supporting your earlier argument, either. are you striving for the title of least honorable person on slashdot? you have a good run going at it so far...

    46. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      smoking IS BBQ, idiot. look up the definition. everything else is just setting fire to meat. if you aren't smoking your meat, you are not BBQ'ing - you're just lying about your activities to make yourself feel better.

    47. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now your limit is 50 per day, huh? Just a few weeks ago, you were claiming that Slashdot wouldn't let you post more than 25 times in a 24-hour period.

      Wow! That exchange in your last link was un be fucking lievable. This Karmashock dude has some serious mental issues. How someone can go that long with his hands clasped to his ears shouting "NA NA NA" is...it's just inexplicable. I'm going to go with a diagnosis of a incredibly acute case of BPD.

    48. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're proud of the fact that you frequently run up against a 50 post per day limit. You're proud of the fact that a large proportion of your posts are replies to trolls. Have I got that right?

      What a fucking waste of a life.

    49. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great new sig! I wonder how long your new little goal will last? I'm betting you won't make it through the end of the day.

    50. Re: I lost interest when I saw brisket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when I got the error, I copied it. Bazzoom!

      Now you know. Suck it.

      It's a bit sad that you are gloating about this as if it is some sort of win for you. All it does is demonstrate three things:

      1. 1. You were wrong, and all of your yelling and screaming about how everyone else was stupid and you were going to "win" now looks even more ridiculous.
      2. 2. Even if you weren't outright lying before, at the very least, you were just making shit up and passing it off as truth without making any effort to verify it. Either way, it doesn't look good for you.
      3. 3. You care a hell of a lot about the opinions of ACs. The fact that you were saving the "error message" for a chance to use it makes that very obvious.

      And, as someone else already pointed out, nice sig! How many times have you responded to ACs since adopting it? At least 8 or so times on this thread alone. Now *that's* amusing. Also, see point 3 above.

  24. this isn't new at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a WSM (weber smokey mountain) and I can buy several different solutions that use PID controllers to hold it at an exact set point. Its actually pretty trivial to design / build by a single individual.. You certainly don't need a team of people to accomplish this..

    1. Re: this isn't new at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I built the open-source Heatermeter for my WSM and its been great! Holds temp at 225+/- 0.5 for hours. Built around a Pi.

      https://github.com/CapnBry/HeaterMeter

  25. Depends on your goals by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Let's say someone wanted to go through engineering school using software that would do all kinds of mathematical equations for them, without them having to learn the underlying math and other discrete skills that the software automates for them. You'd frown upon that, right?

    If they want to work as an engineer, sure. But if they just are a tinkerer or someone trying to get some stuff done, I don't really care unless safety is involved. I am an engineer and I run a company that makes wire harnesses. A LOT of the products we make were not designed by people with a background in electrical engineering. And that doesn't matter and I don't look down my nose at them for it. As long as what they do works it doesn't matter. If someone can play music beautifully I don't care if they can't read sheet music.

    That's kind of how the old-school pitmasters look at rigs like this. It has a purpose, and it has value...but you won't get any respect for using one.

    Whether that matters or not depends on how much you care about the opinion of "old-school pitmasters". Personally I don't really care much. I have no ambition to do what they do or do it the way that they do it. I don't compete in BBQ competitions and I don't have anyone to satisfy but myself and my family and friends. I don't own a restaurant either. So if someone wants to use a device to get good results without spending half their life learning esoteric BBQ techniques, who am I to care how they do it?

  26. What do a nigga need? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    White wimmin, f'ied chikumz, watuhmelo, bakibol, n' cocaine: Das ALL a nigga needs! Y'all kin substiTOOT bbq fo' da chikumz!

  27. "When nerds smoke meat." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BBQ != Smoked
    Smoked != BBQ

    A smoked meat can be barbecued but they are not interchangeable terms.

  28. The no unitaskers "rule" isn't a rule by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Alton Brown is King Geek Chef and has a rule about unitaskers, single-purpose devices: don't buy them.

    While I'm as big a fan of Alton as anyone around here, I'll decide for myself what tools to buy thanks. There is nothing wrong with buying a unitasking device provided it meets a couple of conditions. 1) You actually will use it a meaningful amount and 2) It saves time or results in a better product. There is a lot to be said for having the right tool for the job. Sometimes specialty tools exist for very good reasons.

  29. Big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was built years ago. It's called the Ugly Drum Smoker. Guys have been putting PID controllers and fans on them for years.

    This is nothing new...........

    1. Re:Big Deal by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Thinking the same thing. It is just a cross between a Traeger pellet smoker and a Big Green Egg.

      Considering they used the Big Green Egg as a "competitor" it would have been easier.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  30. Re: Happy 4th of July! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Please fuck off.

    -- a US veteran

  31. Ignorant stereotyping by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

    The MIT nerds are just ignorantly stereotyping BBQ chefs. You'd figure that they of all people would be sensitive about looking down on others, but I guess not. BBQ chefs aren't morons who use old oil barrels for pits (they're not food grade and will make your food taste like shit). If they do reuse an old barrel, it's one that has held food like olives, and it is reused because it's cheaper and better than buying a brand new one. Seriously, duh.

    Just check all this out. Science, science, science. It's all over BBQ these days. All the wisdom of the elders has been tested, trialed, and the old myths like "salt gets into meat by osmosis" and "pink chicken is not safe" have been busted and thoroughly debunked. Just check out the following SCIENCE:

    The Thermodynamics of Cooking
    What You Need to Know About Wood, Smoke, and Combustion.
    The Maillard Reaction And Caramelization
    The Science of Wet Brines
    Basic Meat Science
    Why We Don't Need Grill Marks, and Why You Should Flip Often

    And there are about a kajillion more articles like this on this one site. There are many, many more sites all across the internet. All of them are full of science. MIT isn't breaking new ground here, as much as they'd like to think so. Up to and including computer-controlled cookers that turn out perfect meat every time.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  32. Re: Happy 4th of July! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please fuck off.

    -- a US veteran

    Of course you are. And I am Santa Claus.

  33. Re: Happy 4th of July! by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    Please fuck off.

    -- a US veteran

    Of course you are. And I am Santa Claus.

    You sound more sinister than that. You're Death, right? I'd know that scythe anywhere.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  34. Pretty sure... by eWarz · · Score: 1

    As someone who has a bazillion different grills and smokers. I'm pretty sure these 'students' don't know their (pork) butt, from a hole in the ground. Science doesn't make great flavor, expertise does (otherwise we'd have robots cooking gourmet meals by now...those things can't even run the local mcdonalds, forget cooking quality brisket. Also love the nerds on slashdot claiming to know about quality bbq. How many people here know without looking what animal or what part of said animal the brisket comes from?) P.S. I've been a computer nerd since I was old enough to read or write. My day job is a software engineer. My hobby is creating awesome food.

  35. The best BBQ I ever went to by xevioso · · Score: 1

    was one in Berkely at an industrial kiln for scientific equipment. They made chemistry beakers and the like, all to precise standards, using multiple kilns.

    Somebody got the bright idea many years ago to roast pigs and slabs of beef in these things. What would normally take hours to cook was done in one or two hours, and I have never had a better pig. It was delicious.

    I just hope I didn't get asbestos poisoning.

    1. Re:The best BBQ I ever went to by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      What you had was roasted as you said, not BBQ'd. BBQ is low temperature cooking using combustion for the extra flavor and color. The reason you want a low temperature over a long time is so that most or all of the connective tissue has time to melt without the meat being over cooked and so dried out. With good enough prep you can get nearly the same result with roasting by tightly wrapping the meat so it doesn't dry out but then you really end up with steamed meat, and you miss out on the smoke flavoring.

      All that said pig and ox roasts still make for delicious eating. It just isn't the same thing as BBQ. Although I suppose it should be noted that in different parts of the country BBQ has come to mean a lot of different things to different people. Some insist that it has to be beef, or pork and not the other. Some places it has to have a vinegar sauce, some insist that sauce makes it not BBQ. In some regions the entire hog has to be smoked as a whole, you can't cut it up or use only prime parts like ribs. And in some parts of the country any time you cook food on a grill, and I shudder to say this, they call it a BBQ.

  36. xeon chicken roast by drolli · · Score: 1

    where else?

  37. Re: Happy 4th of July! by cellocgw · · Score: 2

    Of course you are. And I am Santa Claus.

    You sound more sinister than that. You're Death, right? I'd know that scythe anywhere.

    Turn in your Pratchett Nerd Card. Death only speaks in ALL CAPS.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  38. There's a few problems here. by quietwalker · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just to name a few:

    1. The water pan is there to keep the brisket moist, which not only helps keep the meat from drying out, which also aids in smoke penetration (which is where the flavor comes from). It's not there to catch drippings. In the case of an egg smoker, it's also there to reduce the impact of different burns.
    2. Offset smokers seem to be preferred by most "pitmasters"; direct heat really means you're grilling, not smoking, and that means you're mostly cooking over coals, rather than producing consistent smoke with an open-flame fire for the duration of the burn, and that means you're not getting enough flavor.
    3. The "fuel" - given rather short shrift here - is one of the more important parts of bbq, and very hard to automate. Green wood, seasoned, large chunks or small, each has an impact on the immediate heat, the curve that the heat follows as it burns, and of course, the flavor via the smoke.
    4. 220 lbs of brisket is decent, but good brisket places do 2000 lbs a day. If you're looking for something of quality instead of, well, acceptable, you're going to need to spend more time experimenting to figure out how to make a good brisket.
    5. In order to have a chance to regulate the temperature well - and not keep cycling through blasts of heat and cooling - they'll need multiple temp probes, and an awareness of the outside temp and humidity as well, since ceramic insulation or no, the external environment will play a huge factor.
    6. If the flat - the lean part of the brisket - is falling apart when you pick it up, the brisket has been overcooked. It means the point is going to have the consistency of pudding - or it's been destroyed entirely and is completely dry. It's harder to avoid this in a direct-heat smoker rather than an offset.

    It should probably look like this. I remember seeing that shot in Franklin's book, Franklin Barbecue: A Meat Smoking Manifesto ... which yes, sounds pretentious, but since he's lauded as the best BBQer in texas several times over, and that book is #1 in BBQ & Grilling books on Amazon, maybe he's allowed to be a bit pretentious. Go get that book if you're at all interested. Apparently fact checked by Harold McGee.

    There's more things I could pick apart too. I know, I'm sounding like a BBQ snob, but the fact is that I'm not very good at cooking it, and I haven't had a lot of experience. However, like any geek, I did my research. I read around. I checked things up on the internet. I talked to cooks. I volunteered at some cookoffs. I think I have just barely enough experience to recognize when someone else is doing it poorly. Anyone who's done this at all isn't going to be very worried about this invention, since, well, the parts that you can automate are the parts that are least likely to affect whether your brisket is going to taste good. You may as well have just stuck it in an oven with a few blocks of aromatic wood in a water pan underneath at 275 for an hour and a half per lb.

    1. Re:There's a few problems here. by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      Some people geek out about cars, some computers, some sports, some beer. In the Carolinas, barbecue is on the list. BBQ is a religion around here, sounds like its similar all the way down there.

    2. Re:There's a few problems here. by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      5. In order to have a chance to regulate the temperature well - and not keep cycling through blasts of heat and cooling - they'll need multiple temp probes, and an awareness of the outside temp and humidity as well, since ceramic insulation or no, the external environment will play a huge factor.

      If your PID controller is cycling like that something is seriously wrong. Even a poorly tuned controller should eventually stabilize, unless the gains are way out from where they should be. The controller should be easily capable of overcoming fluctuations in ambient temperature, even in New England.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    3. Re:There's a few problems here. by quietwalker · · Score: 1

      The problem is that with normal smoking, you're using split wood. It has a non-uniform size, and has been seasoned to different levels. Some may be greener than others, even in a batch of mostly seasoned wood. So some will burn hot and fast, and others slow and smoky (and some of those will be too smoky, and not fully combust, leading to bad tasting byproducts). A big piece of green wood won't burn the same as a small piece of dry wood, but by carefully adding the right wood at the right time - for the right external temp and humidity - and then further managing the airflow by various mechanisms such as extending the chimney or using fancy airflow redirectors in the bbq itself, a cook can actually manage the consistent heat with the right amount of aromatic smoke to enhance the flavor of the meat.

      There's a lot of variables that go into play here, and there really is a whole science to it.

      That being said, you could get uniform fuel for uniform heat. That usually means pellets. Of course, that in turn means that you're probably not going to be getting flavorful smoke, and that in turn, is the whole point of smoking in bbq.

      You may as well just use an oven at that point though. It's easier to manage a consistent heat, and you don't have to worry about smoke. The quality of such a cook would very likely not suffer from injecting some 'liquid smoke' at that point, and it's so much easier.

  39. Want one by Mister+Null · · Score: 1

    My only question is: "When will this product become available to us the masses?"

  40. Re:BBQ is for cows. by KGIII · · Score: 1

    In insensitive clod Russia, Fourth of July Tofurkey eats you?

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  41. Not quite run of the mill by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    What they hype in the article is quite familiar and not particularly novel.

    While the backyard pitmaster could assemble a similiar system from component parts (a ceramic grill like the Egg along with some aftermarket accessories), an integrated turnkey system is moderately novel.

  42. Re: Happy 4th of July! by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

    That's because that's the satirical Discworld version of Death. The real-world figure employs different typographical conventions. Particularly when he's disguised as Santa Claus.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'