Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Russian Progress Cargo Ship Docks With Space Station

Posted by samzenpus on from the have-some-supplies dept.

An anonymous reader writes: An unmanned Russian cargo ship has successfully docked with the International Space Station. The successful launch, rendezvous and docking came after two resupply failures. A Progress launched in April spun out of control and a week ago, a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket disintegrated, destroying a supply ship loaded with supplies and equipment. "Crew reports, 'feels like Christmas in July,'" the International Space Station tweeted.

9 of 47 comments (clear)

  1. Looks like we are making Progress by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm glad the ISS crew won't suffocate now.

  2. Thank you Mr. Putin by SpaceXXX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Our nation wants to thank you again for saving ISS and July 4th celebration.
    Every year now, during 4th of July week we will salute strong Russia and will be forever grateful for your generosity.

    1. Re:Thank you Mr. Putin by fnj · · Score: 2

      It's hard to tell if you're being serious, or trying (vainly) to be sarcastic. Forgive me for that.

      At any rate, one of the two segments is Russian; the other US and shared with Europe, Japan, and Canada. So it is basically as much a Russian asset as US. It is in the Russian interest to see to it that the thing doesn't come to grief prematurely. As a human of Earth, I'm not against being thankful and grateful to Russia for coming through in a pinch, and rescuing everyone's ass, but basically they are serving their own interest as much as ours.

  3. Southern hemisphere... by Type44Q · · Score: 2

    Crew reports, 'feels like Christmas in July'

    They must be orbiting over the southern hemisphere...

    1. Re:Southern hemisphere... by Xiaran · · Score: 2

      As a Southern Hemisphere type guy... no... Christmas in winter would be weird.

  4. I seriously would like to know by ClaraBow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    why NASA is relying on private companies to build the next-generation spacecraft. NASA had a dependable spacecraft. Couldn't they have improved the Space Shuttle? There has to be more going here than just money. Seriously, we can afford a war anytime we feel like fighting one, but when it comes to science and space exploration, we suddenly don't have money.

    1. Re:I seriously would like to know by spiritplumber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Shuttle: Take 50 ton ship in orbit to carry 5 tons of payload. Rebuild most of it after every flight. Soyuz stack: Take 8 ton ship in orbit to carry 5 tons of payload. Scrap what's left of it after flight, don't worry about reliability of parts. Turns out most of the cost (and the mass) is the fuel.

      --
      Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
    2. Re:I seriously would like to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was largely the Air Force's doing, not NASA, which wanted a smaller ship, but the Air Force had to have something to carry their bus sized spy satellites into polar orbit or close to it. The thing is despite all that dumbness, we learned a lot about how to and how not to deal with reusable spacecraft from the shuttle program and we've done nothing useful with that knowledge. There should have been a second round of them in development a decade or more ago to replace what we had, and Congress did what they're good at--getting us into another mess by trying to look all budget conscious and stuff while wasting money left, right, and center. So NASA had a choice--fly what they had or develop something else, but they didn't have the money to do both because shortsighted idiots can't see why that's a problem. It doesn't help that your average low information idiot voter out there thinks NASA consumes 15 to 25 cents of every federal dollar when in actuality it's less than half a cent.

      Now we're busy re-inventing Apollo and taking a long time about it because we let THAT knowledge decay, so the next time somebody decides we need a space shuttle we'll be almost starting that from scratch too.

      Yet, as previously stated, if somebody wants to start a war tomorrow that's no problem at all...

    3. Re:I seriously would like to know by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's sad that we can't even get a rocket to reliably deliver cargo to the International Space Station -- It's upsetting and depressing!

      You'd almost think from reading this that the Russians could reliably deliver cargo to ISS...

      Which might suggest that you're aware of the failure of the Dragon at the end of last month and the failure of Cygnus nine months ago, but unaware that in April the Russian resupply mission to ISS failed.

      You also appear to be unaware that this was the second Russian failure to resupply the ISS (the first was in 2011).

      For what it's worth, the EU and Japan haven't failed an ISS resupply mission yet. Of course, between them they've done about 10% of the ISS resupply flights.

      On the other hand, NASA is the only agency that hasn't managed an ISS resupply mission at all. The US resupply missions have all been CRS (SpaceX and Cygnus)....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"