Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Measuring (and Constraining) Mobile Data Use?

An anonymous reader writes: I've carried a smart phone for several years, but for much of that time it's been (and I suspect this is true for anyone for whom money is an object) kept pretty dumb — at least for anything more data-intensive than Twitter and the occasional map checking. I've been using more of the smart features lately (Google Drive and Keep are seductive.) Since the data package can be expensive, though, and even though data is cheaper than it used to be, that means I don't check Facebook often, or upload pictures to friends by email, unless I'm in Wi-Fi zone (like home, or a coffee shop, etc). Even so, it seems I'm using more data than I realized, and I'd like to keep it under the 2GB allotment I'm paying for. I used to think half a gig was generous, but now I'm getting close to that 2GB I've paid for, most months.

This makes me a little paranoid, which leads to my first question: How accurate are carriers' own internal tools for measuring use, and do you recommend any third-party apps for keeping track of data use? Ideally, I'd like a detailed breakdown by app, over time: I don't think I'm at risk for data-stealing malware on my phone (the apps I use are either built-in, or plain-vanilla ones from Google's store, like Instagram, Twitter's official client, etc.), but of course really well-crafted malware would be tough to guard against or to spot. And even if they can be defeated, more and more sites (Facebook, for one) now play video just because I've rolled over a thumbnail.
Read on for second part of the question. Second, what tools or tips can you offer for doling out my data more carefully? Can you name some apps that actually do a good job of minimizing data transfer, or managing apps' data use to at least to look harder for a Wi-Fi connection? I know Opera Mobile uses compression to minimize data transfer, and I'm sure it's possible to turn off many of the annoying sound-bearing ads of the world.

In short, what are some ways to get the most use from my limited data allotment, and be mindful about the ways I *do* spend it? This will be even more important if, as I hope, my next laptop has built-in data service. Web sites are I suspect only going to want to use more of my bandwidth in the future, even if it does get slightly cheaper. Nowadays, browsers have made it a chore even to do things like turn off images, never mind dancing, animated ads. Turning off images used to save my 56k dialup bandwidth, and the concept here is the same. (Google doesn't exactly make turning off images in Chrome friendly enough for my mom.)

(I'm using an Android phone, but I'm sure there are iPhone users who'd like to know the answers to parallel question for Apple gear. I can't be the only one who finds cavalier bandwidth sucking by web pages to be a blood-pressure-raising offense, when I'm paying for each expensive byte. There are lots of places where even wired connections are expensive, but at least with a wired network connection things like Squid can be deployed.)


Have a question for Slashdot's readers? Take a look at other recent questions first to see if someone else has had a similar question. And if not, ask away! The more details and context you include, the more likely your question will be selected.

129 comments

  1. Your phone is an advertising portal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why would you want to turn off ads? If you could do that, there's no point in these companies spending all their time and energy producing the device.

    1. Re:Your phone is an advertising portal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? He right. These things are designed by advertisers, for advertisers. What's the big deal? You needn't get all upset. And you moderators, what is your problem? Since when is telling the truth a bad thing? Ah, yes, money.. Okay never mind... bitch!

  2. Just use a sane carrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Just use a sane carrier like T-Mobile or similar that gives everyone unlimited data and just throttles you after that. I never even think about it.

    1. Re:Just use a sane carrier by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Throttles you after "unlimited?" Luckily, the courts are finally putting the kibosh on terms like these, which appear to have successfully confused consumers.

    2. Re:Just use a sane carrier by rwa2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, that's why they just call it "unlimited data" with 2GB of "high speed data". I don't find it confusing, though I'm a bit confused why other people do.

    3. Re:Just use a sane carrier by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Or get a sane carrier like Sprint that simply gives everyone unlimited data. If enough people switched over to an unlimited data plan, the providers would get the idea that it's what we NEED.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:Just use a sane carrier by msaavedra · · Score: 1

      One big problem with T-mobile's unlimited data plans is that they have hard (and very low) caps on roaming data usage. My wife and I are currently on vacation in an area outside T-mobile's normal coverage (though other carriers have good presence here), and have had our phones' usefulness severely limited due to this. They don't just throttle in this situation, and won't even let us pay them to increase the roaming cap to something reasonable. We're just cut off except when we can get wi-fi.

      --
      "Any fool can make a rule, and any fool will mind it."
      --Henry David Thoreau
    5. Re:Just use a sane carrier by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

      I highly recommend ROK Mobile. I get 6gbs of 4g and unlimited 3g for $50/mo.

    6. Re:Just use a sane carrier by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? TMobile is the best at it- I get free unlimited data in Europe for fucks sake. Unlimited roaming data in over 120 countries. ANd I've used it in Spain and South Korea. Only place I wasn't given free data was Gibraltar.

      http://www.t-mobile.com/option...

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    7. Re:Just use a sane carrier by Shakrai · · Score: 2

      He's talking about domestic roaming, i.e., he's somewhere where T-Mobile doesn't have a network and is using another cellular network, most likely AT&T's. T-Mobile pays whomever he's connected to for every byte of data used and every minute of airtime. Back in the day the carriers would pass this cost along to their customers and didn't care about how much you roamed. That went out of vogue in the early 2000s, with the advent of so-called "nationwide" plans, and they started eating the cost in favor of providing a simpler experience for their customers.

      Most every American cell company limits the amount you can roam, either with an explicit policy like T-Mobile (you only get 100MB and then we shut you off) or a "soft cap" in the Terms of Service. The ones that limit via TOS typically have language saying something like, "If more than 50% of your usage for three consecutive billing cycles is on partner networks we reserve the right to terminate your service." The exception to this rule is Verizon; they've never cared about how much of your usage is domestic roaming. They make far more money from all those regional carriers whose customers roam on the Verizon network than they pay them for the handful of Verizon customers that venture into their service areas.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  3. Android / DroidWall by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Android has a built in data meter (at least in Cyanogenmod/AOSP). Go under mobile data and it will break it down by app.

    Now install DroidWall and disable network access for your apps that don't need it. I walked out of my house once listening to a YouTube "video" lecture (screen off via XPosed plugin) and blew through my entire 300MB data plan on that.

    2GB is crazy-high usage if you're trying to be conservative - I have email and calendar sync and occasional photo uploads on trips and rarely have to buy an extra data card.

    I presume you have to own your phone (be "rooted") to do such useful things. Being slashdot this should be safe to assume.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Android / DroidWall by siddesu · · Score: 1

      Droid Wall is kinda dated now, but works. Android Firewall by Jason Tschohl, Xposed framework and Xprivacy let you have full and fine-grained control over everything, including file and data access to apps.

    2. Re:Android / DroidWall by mlts · · Score: 2

      Xposed and XPrivacy have issues in Android 5.x, so it might be a while before the platform stablizes enough for that.

      An alternative is the successor for LBE Privacy guard... provided you can read Chinese, and don't mind trusting the source.

    3. Re:Android / DroidWall by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      I got XPrivacy working one time in 5.0. Had to reinstall the ROM and was never able to recreate whatever alchemical magic got it going. Gave up and went back to KitKat. Even with XPrivacy (God's gift to Android) I still want an outbound firewall / logger so I can ensure nothing is communicating if I don't want it to.

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    4. Re:Android / DroidWall by pla · · Score: 3, Informative

      Android has a built in data meter

      As does the iPhone: Settings -> Cellular -> Cellular Data Usage -> Current Period (that page also breaks it down by app, including both system and installed apps, including tethered usage).

      One "gotcha", you need to manually reset it (at the bottom of the Settings -> Cellular page) when your billing cycle rolls over every month, but not really a big deal, I just set a recurring reminder to do it.

      And yes, I realize the FP specifically mentioned Android, but others (like me) trapped semi-unwillingly in the iGarden may well have the same question.

    5. Re:Android / DroidWall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works fine for me for over a year on my VS980 (Verizon Model LG G2) on Lollipop 5.0.2, and I run Lightning Wall as an Xposed module, among many other useful things. YMMV.

    6. Re:Android / DroidWall by mlts · · Score: 1

      Am in the same boat. I had to roll back to 4.x just because I rather have XPrivacy than the latest gewgaws and UI.

      The acid test of privacy is running Yik Yak. If you like a few posts, delete the app, and reinstall it, without it showing you your old yakarma score, then you did the job right, because that app does a lot of stuff in order to permanently ID a device.

    7. Re:Android / DroidWall by mlts · · Score: 1

      Success might be model and even ROM specific. I did the manual install of the framework on a 5.x ROM with a HTC One M8 with default ROM... and it promptly bootlooped.

    8. Re:Android / DroidWall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android has a built in data meter

      As does the iPhone: Settings -> Cellular -> Cellular Data Usage -> Current Period (that page also breaks it down by app, including both system and installed apps, including tethered usage).

      One "gotcha", you need to manually reset it (at the bottom of the Settings -> Cellular page) when your billing cycle rolls over every month, but not really a big deal, I just set a recurring reminder to do it.

      And yes, I realize the FP specifically mentioned Android, but others (like me) trapped semi-unwillingly in the iGarden may well have the same question.

      You set yourself a reminder to do something on a regular basis because your mobile OS is stupid. Meanwhile, thousands of people are spending that bit of time to make investments in themselves and their lives. Say what you will about it being "not really a big deal", it's just another small thing you waste time on while you die slowly.

    9. Re:Android / DroidWall by pla · · Score: 1

      Drama queen, much?

      Yes, over the next two or three years, tracking my bandwidth usage will waste fifteen minutes of my life.

      No doubt, that loss of precious time means I'll miss the half of an episode of some random sitcom that would have changed my world.

    10. Re:Android / DroidWall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the iPad I use an app called Data Usage. You tell it what your monthly cap is and the date it resets, and it adds a badge to the app icon that tells you the percentage you've used.

      On Android I use 3G Watchdog. Same sort of thing, there's a widget that tells you how much you've used in the month, and you can set it to add a notification icon when it's using cellular data instead of wifi.

      Both are free. They also both analyse your usage and warn you if it reckons you'll blow your cap before the end of the month.

      There are loads of alternatives on both platforms, these are just the ones I use and like.

  4. Watch all apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My best recommendation would be to turn off all apps (disable them) that you do not use. TCTB (The Carriers That Be(TM)) load phones up with worthless tripe applications that continually "phone home" or check for updates or blah blah blah. This has reduced my data usage 25%.

    1. Re:Watch all apps by mlts · · Score: 1

      Titanium Backup is good for disabling apps, even if they live in /system, and are not able to be turned off by normal means. This is a must have app, since it not just can back up, but can use reliable encryption, and back up the encrypted files to a cloud provider.

      Disclaimer: Root is needed.

  5. Open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All your apps that have no actual need for network connectivity should come from F-Droid.

  6. iPhone5S w/VZW by garcia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have an iPhone5S w/VZW and find their tools to be 100% spot on. Between my wife and I, we end up right at our 4GB limit each month and sometimes we're in airplane mode + wifi for a day or more in order to make it under the wire. I feel VZW's own tools are just fine for monitoring my bandwidth, at least at this point in time.

    Many of you will ask why we just don't add more to our plan. Well, that's simple: I don't believe that carriers should be able to charge what they do for the limited amount of bandwidth they provide; data is the new SMS (something I also refused to pay for when I was on AT&T and instead forced the carrier to block all incoming SMS to my phone and I used Google Voice + iMessage to avoid paying for it).

    YMMV.

  7. tips by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    All users and phones are different, but look into your mobile data settings and see what is using the data. I have 3 phones, 2 heavily used, one streaming google play music when commuting as well as heavy web use on weekends and all three phones together rarely hit 2.5GB. Turn off the streaming and it is closer to .5-1GB. I use chrome, waze, facebook, google play music, and google photos the most. I have play store set to only update on wifi, photos to only backup on wifi and FB set to only play cat videos on wifi and it works.

    I would see what apps are the most egregious, make sure you are on wifi at work and home and go from there. You can also look into cyanogen or other roms for your phones that allow you to turn data off at the app level.

    Also, look into ting, since now you can use GSM or CDMA phones on their service. Well worth it.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:tips by ArhcAngel · · Score: 3, Informative

      I second the Ting recommendation. You can set up alerts and based on your preferences the alert can simply tell you when you are reaching a limit or completely disable the feature (data in this case) before you exceed the limit. If you are determined to stay below 2GB then Ting's pricing should also please. I have two lines and rarely pay over $50 a month. And if you use a referral link you get a $25 credit to apply to a phone or service. You pay for your own phone but if you have a Sprint or T-Mobile compatible device already then you should be able to use it on Ting.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    2. Re:tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The post above yours mentioned CDMA, so that's Verizon, also.

    3. Re:tips by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Ting uses Sprint's CDMA network so only Sprint phones will work as Sprint will not authorize a Verizon phone on their network. Ting makes it easy to check if your phone is compatible.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    4. Re:tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I successfully activated a Verizon iPhone 5 on Ting on their CDMA network...

    5. Re:tips by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Verizon's Iphone 5 is a GSM device. Are you sure it isn't connected to the GSM network? If you installed a nano-SIM in it then it's likely you are.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  8. Stay Grandfathered into your unlimited plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once (upon a time) they existed. Don't (and, this is hard) let them switch you to a new plan (no matter how much they try to)!

    Also (please), stop using so many parenthesis in your writing (it's like reading LISP).

    1. Re:Stay Grandfathered into your unlimited plan by allquixotic · · Score: 1

      It's a bit off-topic relative to this OP, but I wonder how long it'll be until AT&T and Verizon just decide to unilaterally either (A) move people off of unlimited plans and onto limited/shared plans; or (B) threaten to cancel their service entirely if they refuse to move to a new plan.

      As an unlimited subscriber, this prospect scares me a bit every time I think of it. I know that unless we're able to change the carriers' attitudes about unlimited (which is really an uphill battle for many reasons), the day will come when they pull this. AT&T, generally being the forerunner in screwing customers, will probably do it first, with Verizon following along like a loyal lapdog 6 months later (or thereabouts).

      How long can this continue? I'm really not ready to move into a world without unlimited data, but it's coming whether I want it to or not. :(

    2. Re:Stay Grandfathered into your unlimited plan by bbsguru · · Score: 1
      How long? You can measure it in negative time. AT&T forced me off 'unlimited' without my knowledge When I discovered it had been done, they insisted that since i had not registered a complaint within 90 days it was irrevocable.

      The only thing 'irrevocable' then was my decision to find another carrier. No, it's not unlimited, but at least I'm getting what I agreed to pay for.

  9. goddammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's another idiot who can't keep his phone clean from malware and then complains about his data usage. If i had a dime for each time i meet one of these morons...

  10. Be a man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    tcpdump it all and then sort it out packet by packet.

  11. No root needed by davidleelambert · · Score: 3, Informative

    Android 4.0.4 on a Sprint device has "System Settings" "Wireless & Networks" "Data usage". It lets you set a "warning", a "limit", shows a graph of cumulative usage over the past month, and also breaks down traffic by app.

    --
    note: I have at least one, possibly two other, Slashdot accounts because OpenID creds can't be merged with an older acco
    1. Re:No root needed by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      There are also widgets you can install that will tell you your cumulative network usage for the month. There may not be any need to panic and start fixating on what every little app is doing. Drilling down to that level of detail simply may not be necessary.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  12. Greenify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you're going to get a lot of posts about Droidwall and things like that, so I won't bother. Instead, I thought I'd mention the app Greenify. Its intended use is for improving battery life by keeping apps from running when you aren't actively using them, but apps that aren't running can't use data, so it can also help you out there.

    1. Re:Greenify by mlts · · Score: 2

      Juice Defender is another app along these lines. It is mainly intended for dealing with prolonging battery life by turning off the data and Wi-Fi options, only turning them on at selected intervals to allow mail to be fetched.

  13. You're halfway there already by MachDelta · · Score: 2

    do you recommend any third-party apps for keeping track of data use?

    On Android? No. Data usage is a baked in feature since forever ago, including an app by app breakdown, warning levels and mobile data cutoff limit. Just use that - it should be buried in settings somewhere.

    As far as data limiting tools, the only thing like that I've ever used is DroidWall, which is just a simple GUI for IPTables. It does require root (!) but once installed you can hand out network privileges (Roam, Data, WiFi, all independently) on an app by app basis. This lets you keep data crazy apps from ever touching a cell tower (WiFi only), or apps that have no good reason to be calling the outside world from doing so. Just be warned that a blacklist by default policy means installing a new app isn't just as simple as pushing install - you also have to remember to set it's network rights, or most mobile apps won't work as designed. All that said, I'll admit that DroidWall isn't a perfect solution for what you're looking for (requires root, no way of throttling an app, just yes/no access) but it might still be useful.

  14. Firewall by Solandri · · Score: 1

    I use AFWall+, which is an update of the abandoned DroidWall, which is just a front end for Linux iptables. It lets me pick and choose which apps are allowed to transmit over cellular, wifi (LAN), and/or wifi (Internet). Most of the apps which have no business using data and are probably using it to send back tracking info, I simply prohibit from ever transmitting any data. I have an unlimited data plan so I use this for privacy reasons, not limiting data. But I typically only use about 150-300 MB/mo unless I do something like stream a video over cellular.

    It requires root. I see in the similar apps section of the above link that there are other firewall apps out there which don't require root, though I have not tried them. Also, the latest version of AFWall+ is nearly a year old and has a bug with Lollipop which makes it fail to connect to wifi networks. You have to disable it (use the widget), connect to wifi (use WiFi Manager's widget), then re-enable it. Kinda annoying and digging through xda forums it seems someone already came up with a fix for it, it just hasn't been integrated into the baseline code yet.

  15. Answer coming soon to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bennett will answer this for us all... whether we want him to or not!

    1. Re: Answer coming soon to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I assumed it was him asking when it said "read on for the second part..."

      Maybe he is crowd sourcing his next "article".

  16. A gigabyte is not worth a dollar, much less 10 by allquixotic · · Score: 1

    A gigabyte of data transmitted over the public Internet is not worth a dollar, much less $10. Carriers do not *need* to charge that much, but they choose to because it's profitable and you don't have any other choices.

    Well, you do, kinda. You can "rent" an unlimited data plan from someone who has one grandfathered on Verizon or AT&T, on eBay. It'll be expensive, but if you use data like nobody's business, it's the best way to go. Don't do this if you plan to "sip" data, though, or you'll end up paying MORE than you would with a cheap limited plan.

    Then there's T-Mo as someone else mentioned, but they have the huge downside that you get throttled after a certain amount of data. And the throttling is brutal. You can barely function after you're throttled for the month. It'd be fine -- great, even -- if they reduced it to 25% of full speed. But no, they bump you down to what basically amounts to 2G, if it isn't *actually* 2G. This is not a practical Internet connection for most purposes because everything will timeout trying to use it.

    Then there's Sprint. I think they're still selling unlimited data plans without throttling *in most cases*, but if you're in the top 5% of users AND you're in a congested area (cell tower is saturated), they'll throttle you.

    I'd rather have T-Mo OR Sprint over a "hard cap" data plan with overage fees beyond the cap. But my preference is still for the unlimited data plan I have from Verizon. I don't have any good suggestions for how to manage your data with a 2 GB cap because I would be unable to do that myself. I don't think it's a reasonable cap and it's not acceptable in 2015. The minimum plan should be 10 GB and they should make that as cheap as their current minimum plan.

    The carriers have got to stop gouging the public for access to Internet services. It's killing the economy because so many other businesses besides the carriers depend on customers having unrestricted Internet access to profit from customers demanding their services.

    Analogy: If you can't afford to pay the toll at the toll bridge, how are you going to get to the other side of the river and buy a new car at the dealership there? Well, you won't - the car dealership will go out of business for lack of customers. This is actually happening in the digital economy today.

    1. Re:A gigabyte is not worth a dollar, much less 10 by allquixotic · · Score: 0

      Frame it how ever you want, Libertarian free-market scum. You're so narrow-minded that you couldn't see your hand if you held it right in front of your face. To put it in terms that your tunnel vision paramecium brain can understand, people are rapidly starting to no longer be willing to pay $10 per GB. With the emergence of alterntives to doing so, it's only a matter of time -- a time short in comparison to how long they've been milking $10/GB -- until their market dries up. So they can either drop their prices or go out of business. The choice is theirs.

      Picking one tiny piece of my post and applying your dogma to it while insulting me is not going to win you any arguments.

    2. Re:A gigabyte is not worth a dollar, much less 10 by Shakrai · · Score: 2

      A gigabyte of data transmitted over the public Internet is not worth a dollar, much less $10.

      It costs tens of billions of dollars to bid on licensed spectrum and billions more to actually deploy a modern cellular network. That's not to say that the wireless industry isn't profitable (it certainly is) but you can't equate their cost structure with wireline networks.

      The carriers have got to stop gouging the public for access to Internet services

      Gouging? How old are you? I remember paying $20/mo for dial up internet just 15 years ago. $40/mo if you count the second POTS line. Now I've got the rough equivalent of a T3 in my pocket, for $30/mo, that I can use almost anywhere in the continental United States.

      Then there's T-Mo as someone else mentioned, but they have the huge downside that you get throttled after a certain amount of data

      Your information is out of date, T-Mo does not throttle on their unlimited plan. What they do is use QoS to prioritize customers in the bottom 97% percentile over customers in the top 3% during times of congestion. If you're connected to a non-congested tower you can suck data 24/7/365. Verizon does something similar with their 3G network. It's a whole lot of bellyaching about nothing in my experience; there are congested cell sites here and there but they're the exception rather than the rule.

      Apart from that, the two key differences between T-Mobile and Verizon are:

      1. T-Mo's unlimited plan doesn't include tethering. Verizon's does, free of charge with a rooted device or $30/mo without one. And no, it's not "stealing" to get it for free with root; the Band 13 rules specifically say you can use any application you want and Verizon has never hassled those that tether without paying for the hotspot feature. They even hassled people doing it on the 3G network even though it's a technical violation of the customer agreement and they'd be within their rights to prohibit it.

      2. T-Mo's unlimited plan won't follow you when you're roaming domestically. Verizon doesn't care how much of your data or minute usage occurs on partner networks.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re: A gigabyte is not worth a dollar, much less 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just upgraded from 5Gb to 50Gb per month 4G, and was pleasantly surprised that it wasn't that expensive. 50Gb now cost me 229 kr (25 USD) but I live in Sweden. I visited SF CA this spring and was shocked by the crappy connection speeds over all. SF is like the world capital of Internet. How is this possible I wonder.

    4. Re:A gigabyte is not worth a dollar, much less 10 by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      The issue as I see it are the economics of the network seem to be 180 degrees out of phase with their billing. There is so much spectrum available and so much time slice available on channel in a cell. Its a limited resource. I don't know how the cell towers are connected, you would hope its hub and spoke each tower having its own backhaul to some well connected POP, but maybe not perhaps some of the last mile towers are daisy chained.

      In any case the voice requires consistent latency and fixed bandwidth. Data can be delivered best effort, with further QOS to provide fairness if you like, in terms of if the cell is congested the lower aggregate users get some favorable treatment on the network if you like.

      Yet every carrier pretty much offers affordable unlimited voice, and charges for data. Its voice that forces them to upgrade the network because it has minimum performance requirements. Data can just get slower and slower the more congested things are. There is no reason to have unused airtime in a given cell. The sensible thing to I think would be discourage calls, by going back to metering them and let people have all the data they can eat. Again with the QOS rules in place to make sure normal customers get decent performance and are not choked out by handful of super heavy users.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    5. Re: A gigabyte is not worth a dollar, much less 10 by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      If data gets too slow it becomes useless. In general I like your idea (use QoS to prioritize low usage customers ahead of high usage ones) and have advocated for it before, but I'm not at all certain you'd be able to price data at $30/mo in such a scenario. The exact economics of the wireless industry are not known to any of us outside of upper level management at the carriers, but what we do know is that data is the GROWTH market. Voice isn't dying, but it's less and less important to young people, and there's a limit to how much money you could raise by tariffing it at higher rates. The carriers are looking at tens of billions of dollars of CapEx to keep pace with the growing demand for data; they're not going to find that money by inflating voice rates.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:A gigabyte is not worth a dollar, much less 10 by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Actually you two seem to agree: the price of data is cemented by the paying customers. He isn't going to liberterian extremes, he's pointing out that the tiered-plan carriers are raking in lots of proft. The reason Sprint has unlimited plans is because they are nowhere near as profitable as they'd like to be.

      Customer frustration over data prices is there, afferall AT&T is finally doing data rollover (well... sort of), but right now they are in nowhere near the danger you are predicting.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  17. Airplane Mode by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

    Do you have wifi at home and work? If so, turn the phone off, put it in airplane mode, or shut off cellular data; you are doing something wrong if you think you are a light user and are consuming more than 1GB/month. I do video conferencing, web meetings, VNC, and a few other data-intensive uses, and am around 1GB/month (up from 250MB though a year or two ago).

    With the iPhone you get application-specific cellular data usage, and you can limit applications' access; I assume Android does the same. For my iPhone, about half of my usage is system services and the app store (needed to replace phone while on the road, so I had to download everything over cell).

    1. Re:Airplane Mode by Vermonter · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I rarely hit my 250 MB data cap, and that's only if I decide I want to play Ingress more than usual. And that 250 MB is shared between my wife's phone and mine.

    2. Re:Airplane Mode by GTRacer · · Score: 2

      I'm suffering from a sense of gluttony then. I have TMo's unlimited-unlimited option on my line (the rest are the 2.5GB / mo with throttling) and I routinely hit 30GB per month. 95% of that is Pandora, Twitch and YouTube streaming. I can't use WiFi at work (policies) and sadly, my WiFi at home doesn't reach my bedroom but I don't care - unlimited!

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    3. Re:Airplane Mode by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Set the phone to use Wi-Fi for data. Check you cap later to make sure it worked as expected.

    4. Re:Airplane Mode by Great+Big+Bird · · Score: 1

      On the accuracy point, my iPhone says '30' and my provider's app says '40'. I reset the statistics on the same day the usage period rolled over.

    5. Re:Airplane Mode by Shakrai · · Score: 2

      Pandora mobile is only 64kbit/s with the default setting or about 80kbit/s with "high quality." That's ~30MB per hour. Your high usage numbers are entirely driven by video. :)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:Airplane Mode by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Provided records what is sent, phone records what is received. That is why I dumped ATT; they indicated I used 1GB in a month while the device indicated 120MB, consequently charging me for substantial overages. They actually have an incentive to provide bad coverage.

  18. Limit apps' ability to use cellular data! by wikthemighty · · Score: 1

    Every once in a while I go through my settings and turn off each app's use of cellular data, except for a few obvious ones (like Google Maps) There's a ton of apps that phone home/check for updates/adds/notifications/etc.and that all ads up...

    --
    "There are people who do not love their fellow human being, and I _hate_ people like that!" - Tom Lehrer
  19. good luck by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    You're in a bad situation where you carrier is billing you, and you have to pay. You don't get to question the data.
    That said... use the Android data limits, have it warn you at a certain level, and turn off data when you reach your limit.
    Uninstall Facebook, their app is disgusting in the way it consumes data. Auto-playing videos, messaging app on all the time in the background, refreshing itself with no option to disable it. It was by far and above the worst offending app, even with most options disabled, that I've ever had installed on my phone.

    A lot of apps have options like "Only download big files over wifi" turn as many of those on as possible. Most google apps have features like that, like Picasa can be set to only backup while in wifi. Do everything you can over wifi.

    One thing I'd like android to do more of is give more options for wifi usage. It seems to treat all open wifi the same, which is certainly not the case now that a lot of wifi requires login. I don't want my phone just using my work wifi willy nilly for example.

    As far as Apple goes... if you've got an iPhone, you clearly don't value money anyway, so your question is moot in those cases. :-P

    1. Re:good luck by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      FB Messenger is not a particularly offensive app with regards to data consumption. I used 56MB with it during my last billing cycle and the total was only that "high" because of photo sharing. If you just use it for text messaging the data usage is insignificant.

      Their actual app is another matter, as you point out, and I would highly recommend ditching it in favor of using m.facebook.com through your mobile browser of choice. It's also better from a privacy standpoint because you can control whether or not you share your location with them via the web browser and they don't get access to the file structure, camera, dialer, or anything else for that matter. That site will work as a messenger replacement too, with the caveat that you won't get push notifications. I would be happy to ditch FB Messenger altogether but I've got a lot of friends aboard that use it exclusively; they live in countries where SMS is billed per message and there's no unlimited option as there is here in the States.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  20. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you roll over a thumbnail on a smart phone?

  21. Avast Firewall by thoriumbr · · Score: 1

    I use Avast firewall. On it, I can select what kind of internet access all my programs can have: Wifi only, data plan + Wifi, or none.

    For me, is good enough.

  22. On the EDGE of legality, you say? by tepples · · Score: 1

    I don't see on what grounds a court could strike down an "Unlimited with the first x GB at blazing fast speed" claim for a carrier that falls back to dial-up speeds after the subscriber exceeds his quota. It's still unlimited, even if on EDGE.

    1. Re:On the EDGE of legality, you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see on what grounds a court could strike down an "Unlimited with the first x GB at blazing fast speed" claim for a carrier that falls back to dial-up speeds after the subscriber exceeds his quota. It's still unlimited, even if on EDGE.

      I don't know what other carriers fall back to, but since we are talking about tmobile, and tmobile falls back to 3G after the first tier limit...either you have no idea what dial-up speed is really like, or dial-up must have gotten a LOT faster than I ever realized it did.

    2. Re:On the EDGE of legality, you say? by psm321 · · Score: 2

      Umm no, T-Mobile falls back to 2G speeds, around 64-128 kbps. While not literally dial-up speeds, it's pretty much the same neighborhood.

    3. Re: On the EDGE of legality, you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember when I would have killed for 64-128 kbps... I was king of Usenet when I got my 14.4 kbps modem

    4. Re:On the EDGE of legality, you say? by Pikoro · · Score: 1

      Those are ISDN speeds.

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    5. Re:On the EDGE of legality, you say? by bn-7bc · · Score: 0

      Just a small question, is dialup just used to reffere to analog modems, because ISDN (that is the domestik BRI not the buisnes PRI vareant) provides 64 or 128 kbps (if you bundelded the two farachannels ande used multilink ppp) but you still had to dial the nearesr pop, so if you inklude ISDN as dialup you could actualy get 128 kbps ( thst was before ppp and tcp/ip overhead) . Or was isdn for non buisness use primerely a scandinsvian thing as broadband ( cable/dsl) was telativily late here?

    6. Re:On the EDGE of legality, you say? by psm321 · · Score: 1

      Sure, but GP was saying that they fall back to 3G speeds, which are a LOT faster

    7. Re:On the EDGE of legality, you say? by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 2

      Two-line ISDN setups were offered here in the US as well, and later DSL would pump even more data over the same lines, but when Americans say "dial-up," they're generally referring to 14-56k connections.

    8. Re:On the EDGE of legality, you say? by bn-7bc · · Score: 0

      Ok thank jou for klearing that up

  23. Look at the carrier's apps by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    imo, some carriers (AT&T, are you listening?) use marginal techniques to make you buy more data. I'd make sure a carrier's apps are not sucking up my data allotment.

  24. WSJ App by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The only data hog I got on my iPhone is the Wall Street Journal app. If I'm not careful to use the wifi connection on the express bus, I'll get an email warning towards from Sprint near the end of the billing cycle that I'm approaching the 1GB cap. Otherwise, my typical data usage is under 300MB per month.

  25. Games by tepples · · Score: 1

    All your apps that have no actual need for network connectivity should come from F-Droid.

    Which leaves what for single-player games? Free software has tended to lag at producing compelling video games that aren't flat-out clones. Or would you consider the online leaderboard an "actual need for network connectivity"?

    1. Re:Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never tried a game with an "online leaderboard"; the idea frankly pisses me off.
      On my Android devices I play mostly emulators, chess, text adventures, and ScummVM.

  26. Android - My Data Manager by Sowelu · · Score: 2

    Started using "My Data Manager" recently on android. It shows data by app per time period. There's a lot of other stuff out there, probably plenty better and plenty worse, and probably most of it free like this one. Still...it seems pretty invaluable. I just use it to see which apps are using way more data than they ought to on my unlimited plan, but it also lets you set alarms, and it differentiates between wifi/phone data use.

  27. Data-hogging JS malware by tepples · · Score: 2

    Most mobile web browsers make it difficult to keep a device "clean from malware" that is written in JavaScript and served through advertising networks. Without wiping a device to root it, for example, there's no way to install a third-party firewall.

    1. Re: Data-hogging JS malware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IPhone seems to do ok

  28. Re: Android 5 takes care of this by rwa2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a stock Nexus 5 with Lollipop (Android 5.something) and they put in a pretty excellent data meter under Settings | Data Usage

    It shows a cumulative graph of data usage over time, and a linear projection up to the end of the month for your billing plan, along with a customizable warning threshold. Under that it lists a histogram of how many MB is used by each app. Click on those, and you can configure background data for each app to restrict them to only update on wifi (or not at all).

    This is pretty much a solved problem if you can convince your phone manufacturer to update you to Android 5 (or just flash a CyanogenMOD build yourself like I used to do on every phone I had before my Nexus 5)

  29. Voicemail Drain by Hakala · · Score: 1

    I found that getting my voicemail from my phone sucked up cellular data unnecessarily. Try getting voicmail with cellular data turned off. It will call the voicemail number instead of playing the recording over cellular channels. Alternatively, you can ignore voicemail.

    1. Re:Voicemail Drain by ledow · · Score: 0

      You still have voicemail? That's cute.

      The rest of the world moved on from the 90's.

  30. McWi-Fi by tepples · · Score: 1

    needed to replace phone while on the road, so I had to download everything over cell

    Was there not a restaurant on the way where you could grab a bite while your package manager could also grab a byte?

  31. You're focused on the wrong things by pthisis · · Score: 1

    You need to work big to small here, and your focus seems almost backward.

    The things you mention as concerns are relatively data-light: Avoiding checking facebook through the app, or turning off image loading in the browser aren't really going to save you much unless you're hitting very image-heavy pages often*. You can spend a ton of time working to minimize these and in the end you won't save much--as a hint, if you were doing it on a 56k modem (even if it was "bandwidth-heavy" then), then it's probably not a significant bandwidth user in this day and age.

    Meanwhile the things you're dismissive of are exactly the sort of things that can suck bandwidth: Google Drive can be using arbitrarily huge amounts of data depending on how you use it. Instagram is the definition of "very image-heavy", unless you're pretty selective about its use.

    *Blocking videos in the browser can be a big win, but IME autoplay videos are extremely rare on mobile

    --
    rage, rage against the dying of the light
  32. By scrolling past it, or by getting a laptop by tepples · · Score: 1

    How do you roll over a thumbnail on a smart phone?

    In context, I think it's referring to video that some apps start as soon as the user scrolls past it. Also tethering, and "This will be even more important if, as I hope, my next laptop has built-in data service."

  33. Just turn it off most of the time by neminem · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apps can never background update if you have your 3g radio off except when you're using it. As an extra bonus, it also saves you tons of battery (I turn off wifi and gps when I'm not using them, too, even though they don't cost any money to leave on). If I turn my 3g on and immediately notice it start flashing like something is using data, that's a big red flag, then I investigate what's doing it.

    I'm a huge fan of Ting - when it was just me using it by myself (now we've merged several accounts, so bookkeeping would be more complicated), my phone bill was usually an amazingly low ~16 bucks after taxes and fees. I got that because I rarely went above the lowest data bracket of only 100 MB. I used data as much as I needed to - I was just mindful of it. Occasionally I'd go above 100 MB and have to pay an extra ~10 bucks that month for the 500 MB bucket, which I was alright with. I can't even imagine needing 2 GB, though. (Now me and my wife have a combined 500 MB bucket for a couple dollars more each, which is even nicer. We *never* go above that.)

  34. What *is* every little app doing? by dtmos · · Score: 2

    There may not be any need to panic and start fixating on what every little app is doing.

    But then again, there might. How is one to know? That's the biggest problem I have with the mobile telecom computing model. I have no idea what the apps do, and no way, other than make it my life's work, to find out.

    I hate having to trust the OS provider that everything is properly sandboxed, that none of the apps in their stores are malware, etc. What's going on, inside this box?

    1. Re:What *is* every little app doing? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      if you don't trust the OS provide then you'll be much happier with iphone than android. iphone tracks data usage by app. most of my data intensive stuff is pandora, web, maps, email.

    2. Re:What *is* every little app doing? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      But then again, there might. How is one to know? That's the biggest problem I have with the mobile telecom computing model. I have no idea what the apps do, and no way, other than make it my life's work, to find out.

      If you have Android and root steal a wakelock and run tcpdump for a day.

    3. Re:What *is* every little app doing? by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Huh? If you don't trust the OS provider, Apple is the worst choice- you can't put on a custom ROM, you can't use non Apple stores, you can't use non Apple approved software, you can't use non Apple approved browser. If you don't trust the OS provider a custom ROM of Android is the only option.

      Also Android tracks usage by app, and has forever. My biggest user is Maps, then facebook, then messenger. It even lists out things like Google Play Services.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    4. Re:What *is* every little app doing? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      I do NOT understand the jailbreak community. "I don't trust Apple, so I'm going to download a jailbreak from an unknown chinese hacker group that is based on zero day flaws, because then I'll feel safe."

    5. Re:What *is* every little app doing? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Android 4.4 and Android 5.0 both have the ability to track data usage by application (in the Settings menu). Maybe even an earlier revision...

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    6. Re:What *is* every little app doing? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      the issue apparently isn't the ability to track data use, it's the reliability of these numbers. I think because iOS has greater control over the phone its numbers are going to be more reliable. arkham knight ftw!

    7. Re: What *is* every little app doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not every Android is root capable. I would love to root mine but have been unsuccessful thus far. ( samsung galaxy s5 via at&t )

      Towel Root won't even touch it. If you have tips on rooting it, I'm all ears

    8. Re:What *is* every little app doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jailbreak is rarely about "trust". It is "I want to do whatever I like with this thing I own". Apple doesn't let you take your chances with apps they themselves don't trust or simply dislike - but jailbreakers have no problems with that.

      Android is a bit better, in that third-party untrusted apps is only a setting away. But if you want to mess with the kernel and other ROM stuff, you still need a jailbreak. If I want to take my risks - let me. Worst case is that I brick the phone and buy a new one - the phone makers ought to like that . . .

  35. Your carrier by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

    Your carrier charges you based on what they know you used so the carrier tool is your best bet.

    1. Re:Your carrier by Shakrai · · Score: 2

      Your carrier's billing system will never agree with what's collected on your phone. They'll typically see more sent on the downstream (tower -> phone) than your device because of retransmissions of packets your phone never received. Likewise, they'll see less on the upstream (phone -> tower) for the same reason. They can't bill you for a failed packet on the upstream but your phone will still count it.

      In the real world the difference isn't statistically significant; Verizon usually agrees with my phone to within 1%. It's just something to be mindful of when you're getting close to your cap or if you're roaming and paying those rates.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Your carrier by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Which is why I said your carrier. The carrier servers contain the billable amount.

  36. use a cheapo phone and get a high capacity tablet by known_coward_69 · · Score: 0

    keep your phone for years or get something on the level of a phone from 2 years ago and use it for email, texting, etc. get a tablet with at least 96GB of storage and use that for media on the go. or put a sd card into your phone for music. don't rely on the cloud. if you use spotify or something similar the premium accounts let you download music to your phone and play it from there

  37. Sigh. by ledow · · Score: 2

    My Android phone has a data measuring tool built-in and also warns and stops when you hit the limit. It's not rocket-science, it's already there in the settings on any vaguely recent phone (fuck knows about Apple, because I don't care about them).

    If you don't have a vaguely recent phone then install something like Onavo, which does exactly that.

    Also, if you're doing 2Gb on a mobile, stop using the mobile for data, connect to Wifi, or up your package. How hard is this? Pissing about shrinking images hasn't done much since the days of Opera Mobile and WAP.

    This is Slashdot and you HAVEN'T worked this shit out?

    1. Re:Sigh. by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2

      Perhaps not, but there's no reason to be a jerk about it. Some people prefer to ask about the alternatives rather than hunt through the zillions of possibilities on app stores and reading through the dozens of utterly useless online reviews from sketchy sites that have names like "manage-your-mobile-data.net", etc.

      The submitter trusts the /. community to give better than average advice on this sort of thing. Humour them or don't respond, but maybe don't be so disparaging. Asking is more often the right thing to do than blundering around without much direction.

    2. Re:Sigh. by McFly777 · · Score: 1

      Pissing about shrinking images hasn't done much since the days of Opera Mobile and WAP.

      I might agree with the rest of your post. Particularly as what the #^@% is he expending 2G on? I use my phone all the time, and the only time I came close to my 2G cap was the month where I watched every episode (to that date, 5th or 6th season) of Mad Men on it. And that took me most of the month to do so.

      I however disagree with your attitude about using appropriate dimensioned images. It is so ridiculous that, with broadband service, it takes longer to load some of the web pages, with little more real content, than it did when I was using dial-up service 20 years ago. Back then I remember reading web design guidelines to resample your images to keep load time to 5 seconds per page (at 56kbps). Now, you can reasonably update the bandwidth*, but you should probably still keep to the 5 second rule. This will require a small amount of resampling/optimization, but probably not so much that anyone will notice, unless they really want to examine the pore structure of your cat's nose in the photo.

      * work to a bottom-tier cable modem speed, or something similar.

      Admittedly, whining on Slashdot isn't likely to change anything. So there, I agree with you again.

      --

      McFly777
      - - -
      "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
  38. Interactive fiction control on touch screen by tepples · · Score: 1

    On my Android devices I play mostly emulators

    Where should one (lawfully) obtain ROM images for these emulators now that Retrode is out of production?

    text adventures

    How does text input work on those? Is there any attempt to work around the limits of the on-screen keyboard that ships with Android OS?

    1. Re:Interactive fiction control on touch screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where should one (lawfully) obtain ROM images for these emulators now that Retrode is out of production?

      I wouldn't know. I've had my ROMs for 15 years or more.

      text adventures

      How does text input work on those? Is there any attempt to work around the limits of the on-screen keyboard that ships with Android OS?

      A lot of different things have been tried, some more successful than others. You should try the different interpreters to see what you like: JFrotz, Twisty, Son of Hunky Punk, and Text Fiction are all good. My phone has a hardware keyboard, so that's pretty nice.

    2. Re:Interactive fiction control on touch screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On my Android devices I play mostly emulators

      Where should one (lawfully) obtain ROM images for these emulators now that Retrode is out of production?

      If copyright holders want to make money, they could set up a place where we could pay for such ROMs. Then again, many has legal ROM content extracted from an old device still sitting in a closet somewhere. Transferring bits you OWN onto current hardware is legal many places. Just as ripping CDs are legal - when you actually pay for the CD before ripping & storing it in the .ogg collection.

      My C64 ROMs are legal - I transferred them myself. The pirated game is not - but the statute of limitation ran out so no problem there.

    3. Re:Interactive fiction control on touch screen by tepples · · Score: 1

      If copyright holders want to make money, they could set up a place where we could pay for such ROMs.

      They do. It's called Nintendo eShop.

      Where should one (lawfully) obtain ROM images for these emulators now that Retrode is out of production?

      many has legal ROM content extracted from an old device still sitting in a closet somewhere.

      That's what I was asking for: recommendations of such a device.

      Besides, even if you do have ROMs, action games originally made for a physical D-pad and buttons don't work well on a flat sheet of glass in my experience. I tried a few platformers in Nesoid, and they were an exercise in frustration as I kept either pressing the wrong button or "whiffing" (pressing outside all buttons).

  39. Ads by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    If you browse the web, make sure you have adblock activated. Firefox supports this.

    Also in android there's a built-in feature to allow you to see which app that consumes most bandwidth.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  40. iOS 9 content blockers by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

    For iOS users that somehow haven't heard, it'll be possible to write content blockers for Safari in iOS 9, and someone has already implemented one as a test that significantly reduces the amount of data that mobile sites use. (Using iMore as a test, he got page load times down from 11s to 2s, and reduced the amount of data transfer from something as high as 14MB in some cases down to 4MB.)

    That seems like something that those of us that are concerned about data limits should immediately get on.

    1. Re:iOS 9 content blockers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was going to post something about this. Link: http://murphyapps.co/blog/2015...

      I would assume that something similar already exists for Android since it seems to be way ahead of iOS in these types of things, but I don't know about this specifically. I'd look for something like it.

  41. Unlimited data? by HiThereImBob · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure why you are fretting about data use when there are plenty of unlimited plans available (You didn't say where you live, so I'm guessing US based on slashdot user base). Telecommunications companies have been making an effort to push us all into tiered / limited data plans mostly to boost their bottom lines. T-Mobile offers 2 lines with unlimited data for $100 a month - so why accept limited data from a-holes like ATT or Verizon? Show them what you think of their policies by giving your money to their competitors instead.

    1. Re:Unlimited data? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Hehehe, 2GB plans. I'm amazed people put up with such rubbish, but maybe they don't have a choice ni their part of the US. I bet I use way more than that viewing Youtube videos alone. Lucky I have an all-you-can-eat data plan with Three in the UK.

    2. Re:Unlimited data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For my plan, I'm paying $25 for 4GB of data LTE data and unlimited "reduced speeds" . Real unlimited plans simply aren't worth paying another $65; that's ridiculous

    3. Re:Unlimited data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Cricket has unlimted talk/text, 2.5GB of fast data, and unlimited 2G speeds after that for $35/month if you autopay. Works for me, but I rarely even hit 1GB of data in a month since I'm mostly on Wifi. But at least there would be no overage charges if you did use more, and you'd still be able to check email and stuff. Probably even do Pandora, maybe videos wouldn't work well.

  42. Enable "Data Saver" in Chrome by essbase_nerd · · Score: 1

    Chrome has a "Data Saver" feature in settngs; enable that.

    I think it compresses and/or down-scales images on a proxy before sending them to your device.

    My Data Saver reports that it has saved me 32% in the last 30 days sample.

  43. doling out data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.netspark.firewall

    "With Mobiwol No Root Firewall you can - ...
    * Easily Allow/Block App Connectivity
    * Block background app activity
    * Be Alerted When New Apps Access the Internet
    Secure your phone or tablet, with reliable Android firewall protection - No ROOT access required!"

  44. Internet Speed Metere Lite by Mistakill · · Score: 1

    I use https://play.google.com/store/... (Internet Speed Meter Lite), it runs up the top left of your notification bar, and tracks your wifi data/mobile data usage (separately), and also displays your current speed

  45. Built into Windows Phone by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Windows Phone tells you exactly how much data each "app" or part of the OS uses. Easily limitable, too. Sucks for Android/ios users.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  46. Simple & Complex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Multi-part answer:

    - carriers often misrepresent data numbers. The method most use when on the "native" network are accurate, but issues creep in when devices roam on to other carrier networks , either domestically due to coverage limits and carrier-carrier roaming agreements, or international roaming. How much an issue this is depends on which country you are in. Generally phones sleep & wake, reconnecting to the network. Often the roaming agreements cross charge for connections, as well as data. To make your bill "easier" to read, they simply present the connection fees as data usage of an equivalent cost.

    This is partially why you see stories of people traveling overseas, not using their phones much, but leaving them on and still racking up large roaming fees.

    So if you roam , your data usage numbers from the carrier are likely going to be dodgy, and over estimate how much you used.

    For iOS, in Settings -> Cellular, you can see it tracks it on the device, down to the App or individual service , and you can toggle cellular data usage on or off for individual Apps whenever you like. eg if you wanted to disable you streaming radio service (whatever your favorite one is) or podcast player from using cellular , you can do so really easily . You can also reset counters if you want to test over a particular period of time. Managed devices give MDM some control of this stuff as well, eg when MDM has installed an App, it can prevent it from using cellular data by policy.

    On Android , it varies widely be what version , device, carrier you have. In general later 4.4.x and 5.x devices start to get similar UI to the iPhone, and in some cases better. Cyanogen has good UI for this. On earlier builds of Android you might need to install a firewall and use that .
    The further complexity is does the carrier treat the data usage of its Apps that re built in to the OS as part of your data plan not. Some do , some don't.

    Further complicating the data is how does the carrier bill ? Upload & download ? Download only ? It can get tricky.

    These days, I'd consider 2 GB/month a light usage plan for someone who is away from wifi most of their day. eg an OTA OS update could blow that limit easily, or even if you were in a country with decent LTE , and a capable phone - if you can download at 20-40 MBit per second, 2 GB can be burnt through quite quickly without perhaps realising. If you are capped by your carrier at say 1.5 Mbit, it's less likely to sneak up on you

  47. Carrier's tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use the carriers tool. It may be gouging me (mobile carriers are notorious for "padding" the amount of data you pay for), but without thousands of dollars for court, that is the one that my bill is based on.

  48. Check Carrier Settings by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    I use Verizon Wireless with an iPhone. This gives me two levels of data overage. My philosophy is - I'm paying for 2GB, nothing wrong with using it.

    Check with your carrier - I'm sure they all have similar features. Here's what VZW & iOS offers...

    First: VZW offers to send me text messages when I get to ~80% and 90% of my monthly usage. Enable that.
    Second: iPhone now has "widgets" and VZW created a data usage one. So I can now see a % progress bar in the notification screen.
    Third: I've configured my phone and certain apps to only download data on Wifi. App patches, podcast downloads etc. If I want something Now! on cell-data I'll manually pull it.

    And finally - VZW stops me if I reach my allotted data plan. I haven't yet maxed it out because I spend most of my time on WiFi. I let photo uploads occur anytime.

    There's no harm on my plan for reaching 100% usage...other than data stops.

  49. Add a cellular data toggle widget by Wokan · · Score: 1

    On Android 4.4 I could toggle my cell data on and off with a swipe and a press. Android 5.1 has broken that simplicity, so now it's a swipe, a press, a careful swipe and another press (thanks, Google, for making that harder). I can toggle background data access on and off from the same widget bar. I just turn it on when I need it and off when I don't. The rest of the time I use wi-fi. I set my podcast app to only update and download on wi-fi, so I have plenty to listen to on my commutes without consuming my cell plan at all.

  50. The feature I want to see by tepples · · Score: 1

    Has Safari for iOS added a way to block HTML5 video ads from even starting? If so, in what version?

  51. phone cost USD $3 per month. by eionmac · · Score: 1

    1. I remain on old fashioned phones with only talk and SMS on a PAYG (Pay As You Go) scheme. 2. I use computer based data only via WiFi or Ethernet work, home or Public Wifi. My costs are about GBP £2 per month (say USD3 per month) fro phones (two of them on separate networks so roaming and dead spots are minimiseed) 3. I see no reason for a data phone or visual 'apps' outside my base (home,work or pub) 4. Maybe because I am a canny Scot I do not like transfering my cash to others. 5 Organise your life to suit your cash available.

    --
    Regards Eion MacDonald
    1. Re:phone cost USD $3 per month. by eionmac · · Score: 1

      Edit. No voice mail allowed.

      --
      Regards Eion MacDonald
  52. Blackberry 10 Has This built in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have this feature in my Blackberry Q10 that sends me an alert when I get to 70% of my allotted data for the month. I can set the amount I'm allotted and the phone keeps track of ALL data usage from all apps - even tethering. It's quite nice really.

    Sorry, if you don't use Blackberry. Maybe you should.

  53. Ghostery Browser for Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I don't feel like logging in...

    Ghostery has a nice little browser for Android with the Ghostery plugin baked in. I installed it on an S4 to help limit unintended data usage and am very happy with the performance.

  54. Android usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Android, I use Onovo and My Verizon Mobile. Onovo gives me a widget. MVM gives me an exact number and a date/time when the reading was taken. It also allows you to set an alarm for when you get close to going over. The two numbers are always very similar, though I suppose they could both be wrong.